Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 150 No. 3940 (2020)

Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia and reduction of distal radius fractures in an emergency department

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20288
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20288
Published
23.09.2020

Summary

OBJECTIVES

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures. Ultrasound is gaining importance in the treatment of and as a tool to diagnose distal radius fractures, guide regional anaesthesia and support reductions. Our aim was to demonstrate safety, feasibility and outcome in patients with a distal radius fractures undergoing ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) with ultrasound-guided reduction (UGR), as compared with procedural sedation for the reduction.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the emergency department of the University Hospital Basel (Switzerland) between February 2014 and October 2017. Adults with an isolated forearm fracture were eligible. The intervention group was treated with UGRA of the brachial plexus and subsequent ultrasound-assisted fracture reduction. Patients in the control group received usual care, which is blind fracture reduction with extension and immobilisation under procedural sedation.

RESULTS

71 patients were enrolled in the intervention group and 142 were to the control group. There was one (1.4%) complication (pneumothorax) in the UGR group. Twenty-five patients (35%) in the intervention group and 67 patients (47%) in the control group underwent surgery. The association between surgery and study group was not significant (p = 0.08). The patient’s age was negatively associated with surgery (p <0.001). The association between surgery and study group was significant in patients ≥60 years (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia and ultrasound-guided reduction of distal radius fractures is feasible. Safety was shown by 70 out of 71 cases of UGRA being without complication. Effectiveness regarding the necessity of subsequent operation was comparable to usual care; in patients over 60 it may be lower with UGR.

References

  1. MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther. 2016;29(2):136–45. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2016.03.003
  2. Gehrmann SV, Windolf J, Kaufmann RA. Distal radius fracture management in elderly patients: a literature review. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(3):421–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.016
  3. Schmid GL, Lippmann S, Unverzagt S, Hofmann C, Deutsch T, Frese T. The investigation of suspected fracture-a comparison of ultrasound with conventional imaging. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(45):757–64. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0757
  4. Sabzghabaei A, Shojaee M, Arhami Dolatabadi A, Manouchehrifar M, Asadi M. Ultrasound-Guided Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures. Emergency (Tehran). 2016;4(3):132–5.
  5. Ang S-H, Lee S-W, Lam K-Y. Ultrasound-guided reduction of distal radius fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(9):1002–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.05.022
  6. Bhakta HC, Marco CA. Pain management: association with patient satisfaction among emergency department patients. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(4):456–64. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.018
  7. Stone MB, Wang R, Price DD. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block vs procedural sedation for the treatment of upper extremity emergencies. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(6):706–10. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.09.011
  8. Galos DK, Taormina DP, Crespo A, Ding DY, Sapienza A, Jain S, et al. Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(5):1247–54. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4735-1
  9. Schoell E, Feissli S, Bingisser R, Ammann S, Mueller AM, Haeni DL. Comparison of ultrasound-guided interscalene block versus procedural sedation for closed shoulder reduction in a Swiss university emergency department. Emergency Medicine and Healthcare. 2017;5(1):1–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.7243/2052-6229-5-1
  10. Alimohammadi H, Shojaee M, Samiei M, Abyari S, Vafaee A, Mirkheshti A. Nerve Stimulator Guided Axillary Block in Painless Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Emergency (Tehran). 2013;1(1):11–4.
  11. Herring AA. Bringing Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia to Emergency Medicine. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(2):165–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10027
  12. Gauss A, Tugtekin I, Georgieff M, Dinse-Lambracht A, Keipke D, Gorsewski G. Incidence of clinically symptomatic pneumothorax in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):327–36. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12586
  13. Kodama N, Takemura Y, Ueba H, Imai S, Matsusue Y. Ultrasound-assisted closed reduction of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(7):1287–94. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.031
  14. Anzarut A, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, Lambert RGW, Blitz S, Majumdar SR. Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(6):1121–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002
  15. Jaremko JL, Lambert RGW, Rowe BH, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR. Do radiographic indices of distal radius fracture reduction predict outcomes in older adults receiving conservative treatment? Clin Radiol. 2007;62(1):65–72. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.013

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2