Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 149 No. 3536 (2019)

Outpatient management of individuals transporting drugs by body packing is feasible

  • Christian Wirth
  • Christian H. Nickel
  • Artur Stickel
  • Juerg Mueller
  • Simon Fuchs
  • Roland Bingisser
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2019.20113
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20113
Published
02.09.2019

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Drug traffickers are increasingly making use of the human body for illegal drug transport. Three ways of intracorporeal drug transport are practiced, namely “body packing”, “body stuffing” and “body pushing.” Since police and border guards cannot accurately detect intracorporeal drug transport, authorities require medical professionals for examination and radiological imaging. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess outcomes in all presentations of suspected intracorporeal drug transport referred to the Emergency Department (ED) of the University Hospital of Basel.

METHODS

We screened the electronic health records (EHRs) of all presentations to the ED between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 for combinations of keywords “body”, “pack”, “stuff” and “push” in the diagnosis and history of presenting complaints. All presentations with suspicion of intracorporeal drug transport were included. Patient characteristics, imaging modality and the results of imaging were assessed. Outcomes were length of stay, hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit, surgical intervention and mortality. The main outcome was the rate of surgical interventions during follow-up in hospital and in prison.

RESULTS

We included 363 presentations in 347 patients. The median age was 35 years and 46 (12.7%) were female. Positive results of imaging were found in 81 of 353 (22.9%) presentations assessed by imaging. In four presentations (1.1%), the result of imaging was indeterminate; in 10 presentations, no imaging was obtained owing to lack of consent or pregnancy. We observed 36 instances of body packing, 10 of body stuffing and 15 of body pushing, and 20 mixed or indeterminate presentations. The number of suspected presentations has risen over the last decade, and the relative number of positive results has almost remained stable over the last six years. No severe or life-threatening complications, interventions, or deaths were observed. Among the presentations with positive imaging results, ten (12.3%) were observed in hospital, as compared with four (1.5%) of those with negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Presentations have increased over the last decade while no severe complications or deaths were observed. The consistently low complication rate supports outpatient observation. Considering the ongoing discussion in media and politics, we suggest validation of medical, legal, and ethical guidelines.

References

  1. Deitel M, Syed AK. Intestinal obstruction by an unusual foreign body. Can Med Assoc J. 1973;109(3):211–2.
  2. Bulakci M, Cengel F. The role of radiology in diagnosis and management of drug mules: an update with new challenges and new diagnostic tools. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150888. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150888
  3. Cappelletti S. Medico-legal issues of body packing: what do clinicians need to know? Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14494. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14494
  4. Heymann-Maier L, Trueb L, Schmidt S, Carron PN, Hugli O, Heymann E, et al. Emergency department management of body packers and body stuffers. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14499.
  5. Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften (SAMW). Medizinisch-ethische Richtlinien zur Ausübung der ärztlichen Tätigkeit bei inhaftierten Personen. Incl. Anhang H: Medizinische Betreuung von Personen mit mutmasslichem Bodypacking. 2002, aktualisiert 2012, Anhang Lit. H ergänzt 2018. Available at: https://www.samw.ch/dam/jcr:1ad584ee-ad5f-4aa1-9f8b-96335d329a3e/richtlinien_samw_inhaftierte.pdf
  6. Art. 252, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) vom 5. Oktober 2007, SR 312.0.
  7. Art. 102, Zollgesetz vom 18. März 2005, SR 631.0.
  8. Stellungnahme der Eidgenoessischen Zollverwaltung (EZV) vom 09. Juli 2018 auf den Bericht der Nationalen Kommission zur Verhuetung von Folter (NKVF). Available at: https://www.nkvf.admin.ch/dam/data/nkvf/Berichte/2017/rancate/stellungnahme-rancate.pdf.
  9. Booker RJ, Smith JE, Rodger MP. Packers, pushers and stuffers--managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(5):316–20. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.057695
  10. Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD, Wolff H, Elger B, Lock E, et al. Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT. Radiology. 2012;265(3):772–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112767
  11. Shahnazi M, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Gachkar L, Ahmadi N, Zamani N, Bahrami-Motlagh H, et al. Comparison of abdominal computed tomography with and without oral contrast in diagnosis of body packers and body stuffers. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53(7):596–603. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1054501
  12. Eidgenoessischen Zollverwaltung (EZV). Medienmitteilung; Zoll 2012: gegen organisierten Schmuggel grenzüberschreitende Kriminalität und illegale Migration. 2013. Available at: https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-47656.html
  13. Antwort der Eidgenoessischen Zollverwaltung (EZV) auf eigene Anfrage, 04 Dezember 2018.
  14. Reginelli A, Russo A, Urraro F, Maresca D, Martiniello C, D’Andrea A, et al. Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(7):2127–42. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0469-x
  15. Moreira M, Buchanan J, Heard K. Validation of a 6-hour observation period for cocaine body stuffers. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(3):299–303. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.11.022
  16. de Prost N, Lefebvre A, Questel F, Roche N, Pourriat JL, Huchon G, et al. Prognosis of cocaine body-packers. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(7):955–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2660-y
  17. Glovinski PV, Lauritsen ML, Bay-Nielsen M, Brandstrup B, Bisgaard T. Asymptomatic body packers should be treated conservatively. Dan Med J. 2013;60(11):A4723.
  18. Pinto A, Reginelli A, Pinto F, Sica G, Scaglione M, Berger FH, et al. Radiological and practical aspects of body packing. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1036):20130500. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130500
  19. Berger FH, Nieboer KH, Goh GS, Pinto A, Scaglione M. Body packing: a review of general background, clinical and imaging aspects. Radiol Med (Torino). 2015;120(1):118–32. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0458-0
  20. Bulakci M, Kalelioglu T, Bulakci BB, Kiris A. Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(8):1248–54. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.022
  21. Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G, Ebert L, Germerott T, Hatch GM, et al. “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2518–26. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.025

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>