Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 149 No. 5152 (2019)

Impact of an intra-abdominal cooling device during open kidney transplantation in pigs

  • Alban Longchamp
  • Raphael P.H. Meier
  • Nicola Colucci
  • Alexandre Balaphas
  • Lorenzo A. Orci
  • Antonio Nastasi
  • Grégoire Longchamp
  • Solange Moll
  • Antoine Klauser
  • Manuel Pascual
  • François Lazeyras
  • Jean-Marc Corpataux
  • Leo Bühler
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20143



Transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors is still associated with a high rate of postoperative renal dysfunction. During implantation into the recipient, the kidney rewarms. This second warm ischaemia time, which is not monitored, is harmful especially if prolonged. We recently developed an intra-abdominal cooling device that efficiently prevents kidney rewarming during robotic transplantation, and prevents ischaemia-reperfusion injuries. We tested the benefits of this cooling device during open kidney transplantation in pigs.


Kidneys were procured from large pigs by open bilateral nephrectomy. Following procurement, kidneys were flushed with 4°C Institut Georges Lopez-1 preservation solution, and placed on ice. Animals then underwent double sequential autologous open renal transplantation with (n = 7) and without (n = 6) intra-abdominal cooling.


Mean anastomosis time was similar between groups (43.9 ± 13 minutes). At reperfusion, the renal cortex temperature was lower in the group with cooling (4.3 ± 1.1°C vs 26.5 ± 5.5°C, p <0.001). The cooled kidneys tended to be protected from injury, including some histopathological ischaemia-reperfusion lesions. With the device, kidneys had a better immediate postoperative urine output (p = 0.05).


Our results indicate that the intra-abdominal cooling device significantly reduced second warm ischaemic time during transplantation, is technically safe and does not prolong anastomotic time.


  1. Garfield SS, Poret AW, Evans RW. The cost-effectiveness of organ preservation methods in renal transplantation: US projections based on the machine preservation trial. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(9):3531–6. doi:.
  2. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, Krueger H, Ferguson B, Wong C, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1996;50(1):235–42. doi:.
  3. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30. doi:.
  4. Legendre C, Canaud G, Martinez F. Factors influencing long-term outcome after kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2014;27(1):19–27. doi:.
  5. Tennankore KK, Kim SJ, Alwayn IP, Kiberd BA. Prolonged warm ischemia time is associated with graft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2016;89(3):648–58. doi:.
  6. Ward JP. Determination of the Optimum temperature for regional renal hypothermia during temporary renal ischaemia. Br J Urol. 1975;47(1):17–24. doi:.
  7. Feuillu B, Cormier L, Frimat L, Kessler M, Amrani M, Mangin P, et al. Kidney warming during transplantation. Transpl Int. 2003;16(5):307–12. doi:.
  8. Creagh TA, McLoughlin F, Broe PJ, McLean PA, Murphy DM, Bouchier-Hayes DJ. A novel method of induced renal hypothermia. J Urol. 1992;147(1):249–52. doi:.
  9. Marzouk K, Lawen J, Alwayn I, Kiberd BA. The impact of vascular anastomosis time on early kidney transplant outcomes. Transplant Res. 2013;2(1):8. doi:.
  10. Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(14):809–15. doi:.
  11. Heylen L, Naesens M, Jochmans I, Monbaliu D, Lerut E, Claes K, et al. The effect of anastomosis time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after brain death: a cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(11):2900–7. doi:.
  12. Dittrich S, Groneberg DA, von Loeper J, Lippek F, Hegemann O, Grosse-Siestrup C, et al. Influence of cold storage on renal ischemia reperfusion injury after non-heart-beating donor explantation. Nephron, Exp Nephrol. 2004;96(3):e97–102. doi:.
  13. Belzer FO, Ashby BS, Dunphy JE. 24-hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet. 1967;200(7515):536–9. doi:.
  14. Davison JM, Uldall PR, Taylor RM. Relation of immediate post-transplant renal function to long-term function in cadaver kidney recipients. Transplantation. 1977;23(4):310–5. doi:.
  15. Forsythe JL, Dunnigan PM, Proud G, Lennard TW, Taylor RM. Reducing renal injury during transplantation. Br J Surg. 1989;76(10):999–1001. doi:.
  16. Hameed AM, Yuen L, Pang T, Rogers N, Hawthorne WJ, Pleass HC. Techniques to Ameliorate the Impact of Second Warm Ischemic Time on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(10):3144–51. doi:.
  17. Karipineni F, Campos S, Parsikia A, Durinka JB, Chang PN, Khanmoradi K, et al. Elimination of warm ischemia using the Ice Bag Technique does not decrease delayed graft function. Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):551–6. doi:.
  18. Meier RPH, Piller V, Hagen ME, Joliat C, Buchs JB, Nastasi A, et al. Intra-Abdominal Cooling System Limits Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury During Robot-Assisted Renal Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(1):53–62. doi:.
  19. Goujon JM, Hauet T, Menet E, Levillain P, Babin P, Carretier M. Histological evaluation of proximal tubule cell injury in isolated perfused pig kidneys exposed to cold ischemia. J Surg Res. 1999;82(2):228–33. doi:.
  20. Modi P, Pal B, Modi J, Singla S, Patel C, Patel R, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic kidney transplantation: experience of initial 72 cases. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):100–5. doi:.
  21. Azuma H, Nadeau K, Takada M, Mackenzie HS, Tilney NL. Cellular and molecular predictors of chronic renal dysfunction after initial ischemia/reperfusion injury of a single kidney. Transplantation. 1997;64(2):190–7. doi:.
  22. Salvadori M, Rosso G, Bertoni E. Update on ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation: Pathogenesis and treatment. World J Transplant. 2015;5(2):52–67. doi:.
  23. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA, Dykstra DM, Gillespie BW, Young EW, et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002;74(9):1281–6. doi:.
  24. Tullius SG, Rabb H. Improving the Supply and Quality of Deceased-Donor Organs for Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(20):1920–9. doi:.
  25. Aubert O, Reese PP, Audry B, Bouatou Y, Raynaud M, Viglietti D, et al. Disparities in Acceptance of Deceased Donor Kidneys Between the United States and France and Estimated Effects of Increased US Acceptance. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. doi:.
  26. Sung RS, Guidinger MK, Leichtman AB, Lake C, Metzger RA, Port FK, et al. Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on candidates for and recipients of expanded criteria donor kidneys. Transplantation. 2007;84(9):1138–44. doi:.
  27. Halloran PF, Venner JM, Madill-Thomsen KS, Einecke G, Parkes MD, Hidalgo LG, et al. Review: The transcripts associated with organ allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(4):785–95. doi:.
  28. Seyda M, Quante M, Uehara H, Slegtenhorst BR, Elkhal A, Tullius SG. Immunosenescence in renal transplantation: a changing balance of innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20(4):417–23. doi:.

Most read articles by the same author(s)