Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 148 No. 1314 (2018)

Patient experience in primary care: association with patient, physician and practice characteristics in a fee-for-service system

  • Christine Cohidon
  • Pascal Wild
  • Nicolas Senn
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14601
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14601
Published
03.04.2018

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays we typically use patient experience as a quality of care indicator, although this has some limitations. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patient, physician and practice characteristics were associated with patient-reported experience of care in the major dimensions in family medicine in a fee-for-service system.

METHODS

The data came from the Swiss part of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study, an international cross-sectional survey. A random sample of 194 Swiss family physicians and 1540 of their patients were included in this analysis. We assessed patient experience using three scores characterising access, communication and continuity-coordination. Multilevel statistical methods were used to analyse these scores based on patient-level, physician-level and practice-level factors.

RESULTS

Poor experience of access was associated with poor health (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54–2.55) but was lower among older patients (IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.88). Experience of access was also reported as poorer in urban areas and in practices including other paramedical professionals (besides medical assistants) (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). Communication was reported as poorer in practices where physicians achieve greater daily face-to-face consultations (IRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08–1.25) and in patients reporting higher incomes (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.52). Additionally, younger patients reported poorer continuity-coordination experience. In the continuity-coordination domain, patient experience appeared better in group practices (including other family physicians) and in those of physicians with a greater weekly workload in terms of hours. Finally, we found experience of communication and continuity better in the French-speaking area than German-speaking area of Switzerland.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that patient experience in family medicine in Switzerland was very good for all domains studied; access, family physician-patient communication and continuity-coordination of care. Most often, predictive factors of care experience relate to the patient’s characteristics, such as age and health status. However, several practice characteristics such as size, composition and functioning (in particular, time spent with the patient) represent potential levers for improving patient-reported experience. The variations observed between the three linguistic areas in Switzerland are also interesting, since they raise the issue of the role of sociocultural factors in this field.

References

  1. Black N, Burke L, Forrest CB, Sieberer UH, Ahmed S, Valderas JM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1103–12. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1168-3
  2. Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201–3. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1211775
  3. Wong ST, Haggerty J. Measuring patient experiences in primary health care. Vancouver: Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. 2013.
  4. Browne K, Roseman D, Shaller D, Edgman-Levitan S. Analysis & commentary. Measuring patient experience as a strategy for improving primary care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):921–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0238
  5. Sequist TD, Schneider EC, Anastario M, Odigie EG, Marshall R, Rogers WH, et al. Quality monitoring of physicians: linking patients’ experiences of care to clinical quality and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(11):1784–90. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0760-4
  6. Groenewegen PP, Kerssens JJ, Sixma HJ, van der Eijk I, Boerma WG. What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5(1):16. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-16
  7. Kerssens JJ, Groenewegen PP, Sixma HJ, Boerma WG, van der Eijk I. Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(2):106–14.
  8. Salisbury C, Wallace M, Montgomery AA. Patients’ experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling. BMJ. 2010;341(oct12 1):c5004. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5004
  9. Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen CV, Peters L. Quality of care from the patients’ perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expect. 1998;1(2):82–95. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x
  10. Bleich SN, Ozaltin E, Murray CK. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(4):271–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.050401
  11. Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients’ assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(2):90–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.10.2.90
  12. Kontopantelis E, Roland M, Reeves D. Patient experience of access to primary care: identification of predictors in a national patient survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):61. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-61
  13. Muggah E, Hogg W, Dahrouge S, Russell G, Kristjansson E, Muldoon L, et al. Patient-reported access to primary care in Ontario: effect of organizational characteristics. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(1):e24–31.
  14. Lyratzopoulos G, Elliott M, Barbiere JM, Henderson A, Staetsky L, Paddison C, et al. Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):21–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000088
  15. Mead N, Roland M. Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices. BMJ. 2009;339(sep16 3):b3450. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3450
  16. Paddison CA, Saunders CL, Abel GA, Payne RA, Campbell JL, Roland M. Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006172. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006172
  17. Heje HN, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Olesen F. Doctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):46. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-46
  18. Haggerty JL, Pineault R, Beaulieu MD, Brunelle Y, Gauthier J, Goulet F, et al. Practice features associated with patient-reported accessibility, continuity, and coordination of primary health care. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(2):116–23. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.802
  19. Eide TB, Straand J, Melbye H, Rortveit G, Hetlevik I, Rosvold EO. Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):428. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1684-z
  20. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A, et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ. 2001;323(7316):784–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784
  21. Beaulieu MD, Haggerty J, Tousignant P, Barnsley J, Hogg W, Geneau R, et al. Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care. CMAJ. 2013;185(12):E590–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121802
  22. Rocque R, Leanza Y. A Systematic Review of Patients’ Experiences in Communicating with Primary Care Physicians: Intercultural Encounters and a Balance between Vulnerability and Integrity. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139577. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139577
  23. Kert S, Švab I, Sever M, Makivić I, Pavlič DR. A cross-sectional study of socio-demographic factors associated with patient access to primary care in Slovenia. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14(1):39. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0166-y
  24. Papanicolas I, Cylus J, Smith PC. An analysis of survey data from eleven countries finds that ‘satisfaction’ with health system performance means many things. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):734–42. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1338
  25. Schäfer WL, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, De Maeseneer J, Gress S, Heinemann S, et al. QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(1):115. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-115
  26. Selby K, Cornuz J, Senn N. Establishment of a Representative Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) for the Monitoring of Primary Care in Switzerland. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(5):673–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150110
  27. Schäfer WL, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, De Ryck E, Greß S, Heinemann S, et al. Measures of quality, costs and equity in primary health care instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 35 countries. Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(2):67–79.
  28. Cohidon C, Cornuz J, Senn N. Primary care in Switzerland: evolution of physicians’ profile and activities in twenty years (1993-2012). BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):107. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0321-y
  29. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1(1):27–41. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
  30. Siegrist J, Shackelton R, Link C, Marceau L, von dem Knesebeck O, McKinlay J. Work stress of primary care physicians in the US, UK and German health care systems. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(2):298–304. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.043
  31. Kong MC, Camacho FT, Feldman SR, Anderson RT, Balkrishnan R. Correlates of patient satisfaction with physician visit: differences between elderly and non-elderly survey respondents. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):62. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-62
  32. Linzer M, Manwell LB, Williams ES, Bobula JA, Brown RL, Varkey AB, et al.; MEMO (Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome) Investigators. Working conditions in primary care: physician reactions and care quality. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):28–36, W6-9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00006
  33. Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1714–21. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61424-0
  34. Williams ES, Skinner AC. Outcomes of physician job satisfaction: a narrative review, implications, and directions for future research. Health Care Manage Rev. 2003;28(2):119–39. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-200304000-00004

Most read articles by the same author(s)