Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 151 No. 2930 (2021)

Evolution of gynaecologists’ practices regarding the implementation of Swiss legislation on maternity protection at work between 2008 and 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2021.20537
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w20537
Published
28.07.2021

Summary

BACKGROUND

In accordance with the International Labour Organization’s Maternity Protection Convention (No. 183) and European Union Directive 92/857CEE (1992), Switzerland’s Labour Law and its Maternity Protection Ordinance (OProMa) aim to protect the health of pregnant employees and their future children while enabling them to pursue their working activities. Gynaecologists-obstetricians have a key role in this legislation, particularly through the prescription of preventive leave for patients who would otherwise face dangerous or arduous tasks in the absence of an adequate risk analysis or suitable protective measures. However, international and national literature suggests that gynaecologists-obstetricians may encounter difficulties in fulfilling their role.

AIMS

This study aimed to: (1) describe the practices and difficulties encountered by gynaecologists-obstetricians in the practical implementation of the OProMa; and (2) compare the evolution of these practices and difficulties between 2008 and 2017.

METHODS

A survey by questionnaire was conducted in 2008 and repeated in 2017. Both surveys focused on gynaecologists-obstetricians working in the French-speaking part of Switzerland (in private practices, hospitals or both). Descriptive and comparative analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

83 gynaecologists-obstetricians responded in 2008 and 93 in 2017: response rates of 47% and 32%, respectively. In 2017, gynaecologists-obstetricians were more likely to ask questions about occupational risks faced by their patients when consulted by working mothers about their pregnancies. The estimated percentage of patients exposed to an occupational risk remained constant (20% in 2008 and 22% in 2017). Communication and collaboration with employers were reported to be difficult in both surveys, even though these are key elements in the implementation of the OProMa. Collaboration with occupational physicians, however, was more frequent in 2017.

CONCLUSION

In 2017, gynaecologists-obstetricians showed a greater awareness of occupational risks and collaborated more frequently with occupational health specialists. However, the application of the OProMa remained limited over the studied time period. Improving training of gynaecologists-obstetricians in this field could be a significant factor in encouraging better implementation of the current legislation. Moreover, gynaecologists-obstetricians need to be given the necessary support to enable their clinical practice to evolve towards a more preventive type of medicine. Collaboration with relevant stakeholders, including occupational physicians, midwives and workers, should be encouraged.

References

  1. Casas M, Cordier S, Martínez D, Barros H, Bonde JP, Burdorf A, et al. Maternal occupation during pregnancy, birth weight, and length of gestation: combined analysis of 13 European birth cohorts. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(4):384–96. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3500
  2. Fowler JR, Culpepper L. Working during pregnancy. UpToDate [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/working-during-pregnancy.
  3. Cai C, Vandermeer B, Khurana R, Nerenberg K, Featherstone R, Sebastianski M, et al. The impact of occupational activities during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):224–38. doi:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.051
  4. Cai C, Vandermeer B, Khurana R, Nerenberg K, Featherstone R, Sebastianski M, et al. The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):563–76. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.051
  5. Croteau A. Occupational lifting and adverse pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(7):496–505. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-106334
  6. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). The Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Guide to Pregnancy and Work. Australasian Faculty of Occupational & Environmental Medicine (AFOEM) of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) 2017. p. 4.
  7. Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C. Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):846–55. doi:.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.058552
  8. Croteau A, Marcoux S, Brisson C. Work activity in pregnancy, preventive measures, and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(8):951–65. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm171
  9. Adams L, Winterbotham M, Oldfield K, McLeish J, Stuart A, Large A, et al. Pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination and disadvantage: experiences of mothers. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission; 2016.
  10. Lembrechts L, Valgaeren E. Grossesse au travail. Le vécu et les obstacles rencontrés par les travailleuses en Belgique. Etude quantitative et qualitative. Bruxelles: Institut pour l’égalité des femmes et des hommes, hommes Iplédfed; 2010.
  11. Rudin M, Stutz H, Bischof S, Jäggi J, Bannwart L. Erwerbsunterbrüche vor der Geburt. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (BSV); 2018.
  12. Baud D, Greub G, Favre G, Gengler C, Jaton K, Dubruc E, et al. Second-Trimester Miscarriage in a Pregnant Woman With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2198–200. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7233
  13. Favre G, Pomar L, Musso D, Baud D. 2019-nCoV epidemic: what about pregnancies? Lancet. 2020;395(10224):e40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30311-1
  14. Schwartz DA, Morotti D, Beigi B, Moshfegh F, Zafaranloo N, Patane L. Confirming Vertical Fetal Infection With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Neonatal and Pathology Criteria for Early Onset and Transplacental Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Infected Pregnant Mothers. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(12):1451–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0442-SA
  15. Baud D, Martinez De Tejada B. « Docteur, mon employeur vous demande un certificat médical ». Rev Med Suisse. 2020;16(712):2023–4.
  16. C183 - Maternity Protection Convention. 2000 (No. 183). International Labour Organization.
  17. Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). The Council Of The European Communitie; 1992.
  18. Loi fédérale sur le travail dans l'industrie, l'artisanat et le commerce (Loi sur le travail, LTr). L'Assemblée fédérale de la Confédération suisse. 1964. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1966/57_57_57/fr
  19. Ordonnance du DEFR sur les activités dangereuses ou pénibles en cas de grossesse et de maternité (Ordonnance sur la protection de la maternité) du 20 mars 2001. Le Département fédéral de l’économie, de la formation et de la recherche (DEFR). Available from: https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/filestore/fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/2001/127/20150701/fr/pdf-a/fedlex-data-admin-ch-eli-cc-2001-127-20150701-fr-pdf-a.pdf
  20. Secrétariat d'Etat à l'Economie (SECO). Protection de la maternité et mesures de protection (tableau synoptique) Bern: Secrétariat d'Etat à l'Economie (SECO); 2019. Available from: https://www.seco.admin.ch/seco/fr/home/Publikationen_Dienstleistungen/Publikationen_und_Formulare/Arbeit/Arbeitsbedingungen/Merkblatter_und_Checklisten/mutterschutz-und-schutzmassnahmen.html.
  21. 822.111 Ordonnance 1 relative à la loi sur le travail (OLT 1) du 10 mai 2000. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/243/fr
  22. De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, Crivelli L, Edwards-Garavoglia S, Spranger A, et al. Switzerland: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(4):1–288, xix.
  23. Grajewski B, Rocheleau CM, Lawson CC, Johnson CY. “Will my work affect my pregnancy?” Resources for anticipating and answering patients’ questions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):597–602. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.005
  24. Larsson C, Sydsjö A, Alexanderson K, Sydsjö G. Obstetricians’ attitudes and opinions on sickness absence and benefits during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):165–70. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500430345
  25. Stotland NE, Sutton P, Trowbridge J, Atchley DS, Conry J, Trasande L, et al. Counseling patients on preventing prenatal environmental exposures--a mixed-methods study of obstetricians. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98771. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098771
  26. Glover V. Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):25–35. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017
  27. Lojewski J, Flothow A, Harth V, Mache S. Employed and expecting in Germany: A qualitative investigation into pregnancy-related occupational stress and coping behavior. Work. 2018;59(2):183–99. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172673
  28. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). Deuxième enquête européenne des entreprises sur les risques nouveaux et émergents - ESENER-2. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.
  29. Le stress et les risques psychosociaux ont augmenté dans le monde professionnel en 2017 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/sante/etat-sante/psychique.assetdetail.9366232.html#:~:text=20.08.2019%20%2D%20Le%20stress%20p%C3%A8se,physiques%20est%20par%20contre%20stable.
  30. Chouanière D, Praz-Christinaz S-M, Danuser B. Mieux connaître la médecine du travail. Rev Med Suisse. 2009;5:694–5.
  31. EBCOG Scientific Committee. The public health importance of antenatal care. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2015;7(1):5–6.
  32. Frazier LM, Ho HL, Molgaard CA. Variability in physician management of employment during pregnancy. Women Health. 2001;34(4):51–63. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v34n04_04
  33. Polańska K, Jurewicz J, Marcinkiewicz A, Makowiec-Dabrowska T, Hanke W. [Occupational activity during pregnancy based on the Polish mother and child cohort study]. Med Pr. 2014;65(1):65–72. doi:.https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.2014.004
  34. Secrétariat d'Etat à l'Economie (SECO). GUIDE pour les médecins traitants des femmes enceintes. Berne 2017. Available from: https://www.seco.admin.ch/seco/fr/home/Publikationen_Dienstleistungen/Publikationen_und_Formulare/Arbeit/Arbeitsbedingungen/Broschuren/leitfaden_gynaekologisch_taetige_aertze.html
  35. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). Maternity Care in Australia. A framework for a healthy new generation of Australians. Melbourne: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG); 2017.
  36. Danuser B. Comment soigner la santé au travail? REISO [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.reiso.org/articles/themes/travail/277-comment-soigner-la-sante-au-travail.
  37. van Teijlingen E. A critical analysis of the medical model as used in the study of pregnancy and childbirth. Sociol Res Online. 2005;10(2):63–77. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1034
  38. Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):32. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z

Most read articles by the same author(s)