Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 154 No. 6 (2024)

Case managers within general practices in 11 Western countries: repeat cross-sectional studies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3425
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3425
Published
17.06.2024

Summary

BACKGROUND: In the context of an ageing population and increasing health needs, primary care reform is needed and several new models have emerged, including the introduction of case managers in general practitioner practices.

AIM: To describe the frequency of case managers in general practices in eleven Western countries between 2012 and 2019 and to investigate the characteristics of general practitioners and their practices associated with case manager frequency.

METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys of Primary Care Physicians, which were international cross-sectional studies conducted in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Random samples of general practitioners were selected in 11 Western countries (2012: n = 9776; 2015: n = 12,049; 2019: n = 13,200). The use of case managers in general practitioner practices was determined with the question “Does your practice use personnel, such as nurses or case managers, to monitor and manage care for patients with chronic conditions that need regular follow-up care?”, with possible answers “Yes, within the practice”, “Yes, outside the practice”, “Yes, both within and outside the practice” or “No”. Other variables characterising general practitioners and their practices were considered. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS: The frequency of case managers within general practitioner practices varied greatly by country, with an overall trend towards an increase from 2012 to 2019. In the multivariate analysis, more case managers were found in practices located in small towns (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.7) and in rural areas (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5–2.4) compared to cities. The frequency of case managers was higher in larger practices, as shown in comparisons of practices in the second, third and fourth quartile of full-time equivalent employee counts compared to those in the first quartile (Q2: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–1.9; Q3: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6–2.9; Q4: OR 3.8, 95% CI 3.0–4.9). There was no significant difference in frequency with respect to the age and sex of the general practitioners.

CONCLUSION: The use of case managers in general practitioner practices is a promising approach, but its practice varies greatly. This practice has been developing in Western countries and is tending to increase. The implementation of case managers seems to be associated with certain characteristics linked to general practitioner practices (practice location, practice size), whereas it does not seem to depend on the personal characteristics of general practitioners, such as age or sex.

References

  1. Tran HT, Leonard SD. Geriatric Assessment for Primary Care Providers. Prim Care. 2017 Sep;44(3):399–411. 10.1016/j.pop.2017.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2017.05.001
  2. Ageing [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing
  3. Hassenteufel P, Naiditch M, Schweyer FX. Les réformes de l’organisation des soins primaires : perspectives multi-situées. Avant-propos. Rev Fr Aff Soc. 2020;(1):11–31. 10.3917/rfas.201.0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfas.201.0011
  4. Bourgueil Y, Ramond-Roquin A, Schweyer FX. 1. Qu’appelle-t-on « soins primaires »? In: Les soins primaires en question(s) [Internet]. Rennes: Presses de l’EHESP; 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 7]. p. 5–13. (Débats Santé Social). Available from: https://www.cairn.info/les-soins-primaires-en-question--9782810908820-p-5.htm
  5. Sangaleti C, Schveitzer MC, Peduzzi M, Zoboli EL, Soares CB. Experiences and shared meaning of teamwork and interprofessional collaboration among health care professionals in primary health care settings: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2017 Nov;15(11):2723–88. 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003016
  6. Morgan S, Pullon S, McKinlay E. Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: an integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1217–30. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008
  7. Rawlinson C, Carron T, Cohidon C, Arditi C, Hong QN, Pluye P, et al. An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: barriers and Facilitators. Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun;21(2):32. 10.5334/ijic.5589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5589
  8. Askerud A, Conder J, Askerud A, Conder J. Patients’ experiences of nurse case management in primary care: a meta-synthesis. Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Oct;23(5):420–8. 10.1071/PY17040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY17040
  9. Davy C, Bleasel J, Liu H, Tchan M, Ponniah S, Brown A. Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May;15(1):194. 10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8
  10. Tello J, Barbazza E, Yelgezekova Z, Kruse I, Klazinga N, Kringos D. Glossary of Terms : WHO European Primary Health Care Impact Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT). In 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Glossary-of-Terms-%3A-WHO-European-Primary-Health-and-Tello-Barbazza/ae5467b291d3319a2ac532df2e825b0dc341d050#citing-papers
  11. Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Pluye P, El Sherif R, Bush PL, Rihoux B, et al. Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):448–58. 10.1370/afm.2419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2419
  12. What Is A. Case Manager | Case Management Society of America [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://cmsa.org/who-we-are/what-is-a-case-manager/
  13. Ross S, Curry N, Goodwin N. Case Management: What It Is and How It Can Best Be Implemented. King’s Fund; 2011. 32 pp.
  14. Barceló A, Luciani S, Agurto I, Ordunez P, Tasca R, Sued O. Improving Chronic Illness Care through Integrated Health Service Delivery Networks. Pan Am Health Organ Wash DC. 2012 Jan 1;
  15. Russell M, Roe B, Beech R, Russell W. Service developments for managing people with long-term conditions using case management approaches, an example from the UK. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9(1):e02. 10.5334/ijic.303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.303
  16. Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Aubrey-Bassler K, Muhajarine N, Burge F, Bush PL, et al. Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Realist Synthesis. Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):218–26. 10.1370/afm.2499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2499
  17. Malebranche M, Grazioli VS, Kasztura M, Hudon C, Bodenmann P. Case management for frequent emergency department users: no longer a question of if but when, where and how. CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):12–4. 10.1007/s43678-020-00024-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00024-4
  18. Teper MH, Vedel I, Yang XQ, Margo-Dermer E, Hudon C. Understanding Barriers to and Facilitators of Case Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jul;18(4):355–63. 10.1370/afm.2555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2555
  19. Ferguson JA, Weinberger M. Case management programs in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Feb;13(2):123–6. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00029.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00029.x
  20. Cohidon C, Wild P, Senn N. Job stress among GPs: associations with practice organisation in 11 high-income countries. Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug;70(698):e657–67. 10.3399/bjgp20X710909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710909
  21. Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Shah A, Schneider EC. Primary Care Physicians’ Role In Coordinating Medical And Health-Related Social Needs In Eleven Countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):115–23. 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01088
  22. Rapoport R, Czyzewicz E, Manley R. 2019 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Doctors. Methodology Report. 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 4]; Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/bag/en/dokumente/e-f/forschung/ihp-befragungen-cwf/aerztinnen-und-aerzte-in-der-grundversorgung/2019-methodenbericht-ihpbefragung.pdf.download.pdf/ihp-befragung-2019-methodology-report.pdf
  23. Pierson R, Applebaum S. International Health Perspectives 2012: A Survey of Physicians in Eleven Countries. 2012;
  24. Rapoport R, Tipan L, Czyzewicz E. 2015 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Doctors. Methodology Report. 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 4]; Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/bag/de/dokumente/e-f/forschung/ihp-befragungen-cwf/aerztinnen-und-aerzte-in-der-grundversorgung/2015-methodenbericht-ihpbefragung.pdf.download.pdf/2015-ihp-method-report-e.pdf
  25. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Rasmussen P, Pierson R, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2805–16. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884
  26. Osborn R, Moulds D, Schneider EC, Doty MM, Squires D, Sarnak DO. Primary Care Physicians In Ten Countries Report Challenges Caring For Patients With Complex Health Needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2104–12. 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1018
  27. Tikkanen R, Osborn R, Mossialos E, Djordjevic A, Wharton G. International Profiles of Health Care Systems 2020. 2020.
  28. Bourgueil Y, Ramond-Roquin A, Schweyer FX. Les soins primaires en question(s). Rennes: Presses de l’EHESP; 2021. 120 p. (Débats Santé Social).
  29. Kringos DS, Boerma WG, Hutchinson A, Saltman RB. Building primary care in a changing Europe [Internet]. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2015 [cited 2022 Oct 14]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/154350
  30. Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Dedeu T, Hasvold T, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e742–50. 10.3399/bjgp13X674422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X674422
  31. van Loenen T, van den Berg MJ, Heinemann S, Baker R, Faber MJ, Westert GP. Trends towards stronger primary care in three western European countries; 2006-2012. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May;17(1):59. 10.1186/s12875-016-0458-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0458-3
  32. Jabbarpour Y, Jetty A, Dai M, Magill M, Bazemore A. The Evolving Family Medicine Team. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(4):499–501. 10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.190397
  33. Schütz Leuthold M, El-Hakmaoui F, Senn N, Cohidon C. General Practitioner’s Experience of Public-Private Partnerships to Develop Team-Based Care: A Qualitative Study. Int J Public Health. 2023 Nov;68:1606453. 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2023.1606453
  34. Delnoij D, Klazinga N, Glasgow IK. Integrated care in an international perspective [Internet]. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2(2):e04. [cited 2022 Oct 14] Available from: http://www.ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.62/ 10.5334/ijic.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.62
  35. Cachou De Camaret A, Wild P, Senn N, Cohidon C. The professional composition of general practices in Western countries and associations with their perceived ability to manage patients with chronic conditions. Fam Pract. Forthcoming.
  36. Pavlič DR, Sever M, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Švab I, Vainieri M, Seghieri C, et al. Strength of primary care service delivery: a comparative study of European countries, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 May;19(3):277–87. 10.1017/S1463423617000792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423617000792
  37. Joo JY, Huber DL. Barriers in Case Managers’ Roles: A Qualitative Systematic Review. West J Nurs Res. 2018 Oct;40(10):1522–42. 10.1177/0193945917728689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945917728689

Most read articles by the same author(s)