Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 143 No. 3738 (2013)

Origin and outcome of multiple pregnancies in Bern, Switzerland, 1995–2006 and the current proposal of the Swiss parliament to revise the Swiss law of reproductive medicine: Switzerland quo vadis?

  • Dorothea Wunder
  • Eva-Maria Neurohr
  • Mohamed Faouzi
  • Martin H Birkhäuser
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2013.13864
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13864
Published
08.09.2013

Summary

INTRODUCTION: Infertility treatments are a major source of the increase in multiple pregnancies (MPs).

AIMS: The aims of the present study were (1.) to investigate the origin and maternal/neonatal outcomes of MP and (2.) to review the different measures that can be adopted to reduce these serious complications.

METHODS: The study included all women with multiple births between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2006 at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland. The outcomes associated with the various origins of MP (natural conception, ovarian stimulation [OS] ‒ in-vitro fertilisation [IVF-ICSI]) were analysed using a multinomial logistic regression model.

An analysis of the Swiss law on reproductive medicine and its current proposed revision, as well as a literature review using Pubmed, was carried out.

RESULTS: A total of 592 MP were registered, 91% (n = 537) resulted in live births. There was significantly more neonatal/maternal morbidity in MP after OS compared with natural conception and even with the IVF-ICSI group.

With a policy of elective single embryo transfer (eSET), twin rates after IVF-ICSI can be reduced to <5% and triplets to <1%.

CONCLUSIONS: After OS, more triplets are found and the outcome of MP is worse. MP is known to be associated with morbidity, mortality, and economic and social risks. To counteract these complications (1.) better training for physicians performing OS should be encouraged and (2.) the Swiss law on reproductive medicine needs to be changed, with the introduction of eSET policies. This would lead to a dramatic decrease in neonatal and maternal morbidity/mortality as well as significant cost reductions for the Swiss healthcare system.

References

  1. BFS (Bundesamt für Statistik), Bevölkerungsbewegung – Detaillierte Daten, Geburten und Todesfälle 1970–2009. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/
  2. B. Blondel, M. Kaminski, The increase in multiple births and its consequences on perinatal health. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2002;31:725–40.
  3. Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:773–90.
  4. Fisher J, Stocky A. Maternal perinatal mental health and multiple births: implications for practice. Twin Res. 2003;6:506–13.
  5. Choi Y, Bishai D, Minkovitz CS. Multiple births are a risk factor for postpartum maternal depressive symptoms. Pediatrics 2009;123:1147–54.
  6. Ross LE, McQueen K, Vigod S, Dennis CL. Risk for postpartum depression associated with assisted reproductive technologies and multiple births: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;17:96–06.
  7. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Andersen AN. Morbidity in a Danish national cohort of 472 IVF/ICSI twins, 1132 non-IVF/ICSI twins and 634 IVF/ICSI singletons: health-related and social implications for the children and their families. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1234–43.
  8. Adamson D, Baker V. Multiple births from assisted reproductive technologies: a challenge that must be met. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:517–22.
  9. Barker DJ, Bull AR, Osmond C, Simmonds SJ. Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. BMJ. 1990;301(6746):259–62.
  10. Barker DJ, Osmond C, Forsén TJ, Kajantie E. Eriksson JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1802–9.
  11. Newsome CA, Shiell AW, Fall CH, Phillips DI, Shier R, Law CM. Is birth weight related to later glucose and insulin metabolism? A systematic Review. Diabet Med. 2003;20(5):339–48.
  12. Bardis N, Maruthini D, Balen AHB. Modes of conception and multiple pregnancies: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1727–32.
  13. Pinborg A, Loft A, Nyboe Andersen A. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1071–8.
  14. Fortunato A, Tosti E. The impact of in vitro fertilization on health of the children: an update. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):125–9.
  15. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1159–62.
  16. FMedG, Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz: Bundesgesetz über die medizinisch unterstützte Fortpflanzung vom 18. Dezember 1998: http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/annot/linksswisslaw.htmhttp://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/8/814.90.de.pdf
  17. Arlettaz Mieth R, Ersfeld S, Douchet N, Wellmann S, Bucher HU. Higher multiple births in Switzerland: neonatal outcome and evolution over the last 20 years. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Nov 30;141:w13308. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13308.
  18. McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al.. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945.
  19. Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:936–45.
  20. Thurin-Kjellberg A, Olivius C, Bergh C. Cumulative Live-Birth Rates in a Trial of Single-Embryo or Double-Embryo Transfer. N Engl J Med. 2009;36:1812–3.
  21. Van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Evers JL. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:433–6.
  22. Hamberger L, Hardarson T, Nygren KG. Avoidance of multiple pregnancy by use of single embryo transfer. Minerva Ginecol 2005;57:15-19.
  23. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–2402.
  24. De Sutter P. Single embryo transfer (SET) not only leads to a reduction in twinning rates after IVF/ICSI, but also improves obstetrical and perinatal outcome of singletons. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2006;68:319–27.
  25. Ombelet W, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, Martens G. Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction – the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:3–14.
  26. De Geyter C: Assisted reproductive medicine in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13569.
  27. Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, Spong CY, Howson CP, Cairns-Smith S, et al. Born Too Soon preterm prevention analysis group. Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet. 2013;381:223–34.

Most read articles by the same author(s)