Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 143 No. 1920 (2013)

The relevance of relevance in research

  • David Martin Shaw
  • Bernice S. Elger
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2013.13792
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13792
Published
05.05.2013

Abstract

A new Swiss law requires that any research involving humans must aim to answer “a relevant research question”. This paper explains the relevance of the relevance criterion in research, analyses the Swiss and British guidelines on relevance, and proposes a framework for researchers and research ethics committee (REC) members that enables a clearer conception of the role of relevance in research. We conclude that research must be either scientifically or societally beneficial in order to qualify as relevant, and RECs therefore cannot avoid reviewing the scientific aspects of proposed studies. Normally only scientifically relevant studies can be of benefit to society, but research of low scientific relevance can nonetheless be relevant to society if it forms part of the education of new doctors and scientists.

References

  1. Swiss Federal Government. Human Research Act. (Loi fédérale relative à la recherche sur l’être humain.) http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/medizin/00701/00702/07558/index.html?lang=fr (accessed 18/9/12)
  2. UK Department of Health. Governance arrangements for research ethics committees: a harmonised edition. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_126474 (accessed 18/9/12)
  3. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701–11.
  4. GCS Smith, JC Pell. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003;327:1459.
  5. Lairumbi GM, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R and MC English. Ethics in practice: the state of the debate on promoting the social value of global health research in resource poor settings particularly Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 2011;12:22.
  6. Swiss Federal Government. Message sur la loi fédérale relative à la recherche sur l’être humain. http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/ff/2009/7259.pdf (accessed 18/9/12)
  7. Swiss Federal Government. Explanatory Report on the Human Research Act. (Rapport explicatif sur les ordonnances découlant de la loi relative à la re-cherche sur l’être humain.) http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/medizin/00701/00702/12310/index.html (accessed 18/9/12)
  8. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Research with Human Subjects: A Manual for General Practice. http://www.samw.ch/en/Projects/Research-in-Humans.html (accessed 18/9/12)
  9. Swiss Federal Government. Clinical trials ordinance. (Ordonnance sur les essais cliniques de produits thérapeutiques.) http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/8/812.214.2.fr.pdf (accessed 18/9/12)
  10. Swiss Federal Government. Therapeutic Products Act. (Loi fédérale du 15 décembre 2000 sur les médicaments et les dispositifs médicaux). http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/c812_21.html (accessed 18/9/12)
  11. Swiss Federal Government. Clinical trial ordinance. (Ordonnance sur les essais cliniques) http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/812_214_2/index.html (accessed 18/9/12)
  12. Swiss Federal Government. Non-clinical ordinance. (Ordonnance sur les projets de recherche sur l'être humain à l’exception des essays cliniques.) http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/medizin/00701/00702/12310/index.html http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/medizin/00701/00702/12310/index.html?lang=fr&download=NHzLpZeg7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1ae2IZn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCKfH96fWym162epYbg2c_JjKbNoKSn6A-- (accessed 18/9/12)
  13. Shaw D. The Ethics Committee as Ghost Author. J Med Ethics. 2011;37:706.
  14. Economic and Social Research Council. Framework for research ethics. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/about-esrc/information/research-ethics.aspx (accessed 18/9/12)
  15. Goldacre B. Bad Pharma. Fourth Estate, London, 2012.
  16. Edwards S. Student Projects in Medicine: A Lesson in Science and Ethics. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 2009;16:285–306.