Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 142 No. 2122 (2012)

The Swiss report on homeopathy: a case study of research misconduct

  • David Martin Shaw
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13594


  1. Gudrun Bornhöft and Peter Matthiessen (eds.) Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs. Springer, 2012.
  2. NHS National Institute of Health. Health Technology Assessment programme. Available at: (accessed 9/3/12)
  3. Ben Goldacre. Benefits and risks of homeopathy. The Lancet. 2007;370:1672–3.
  4. David Shaw. Homeopathy is where the harm is. Five unethical effects of funding unscientific remedies. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(3):130–1.
  5. Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Integrity in scientific research: principles and procedures. (accessed 9/3/12)
  6. Edzard Ernst. Written submission. In: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (see reference 8), p.88 (Evidence 28).
  7. Swissinfo. Swiss make New Year’s regulations (accessed 9/3/12)
  8. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Evidence check 2: Homeopathy. 2009. Available at:
  9. Dana Ullman. The Swiss government’s remarkable feport on homeopathic medicine. The Huffington Post. The Swiss government’s remarkable report on homeopathic medicine (accessed 9/3/12).