##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57187/5256

Viewpoint

Vol. 156 No. 11 (2026)

Fracture Liaison Services in Switzerland: current status and challenges

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2026;156:5256
Published
04.11.2026

Summary

Switzerland is one of the very high-risk countries for osteoporosis. The Fracture Liaison Service is the internationally endorsed model for secondary fracture prevention and for reducing mortality after a person has sustained a fragility fracture. In this article, we describe current Fracture Liaison Service coverage and structure in Switzerland and the challenges Fracture Liaison Services are facing. Good interdisciplinary cooperation, especially with general practitioners, is a key factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) for the detection of vertebral fractures, shared electronic medical records, digital platforms and telemedicine are emerging and evolving approaches to overcome the existing barriers to osteoporosis treatment.

References

  1. 1. Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R. Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporosis International. 2009 Jul;20(7):1131-1140. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0779-8
  2. 2. Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, et al. SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2021 Dec;16(1):82. doi:10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9
  3. 3. Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey NC, Odén A, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, et al. Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporosis International. 2017 Mar;28(3):775-780. doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0
  4. 4. Lindsay R. Risk of New Vertebral Fracture in the Year Following a Fracture. JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):320. doi:10.1001/jama.285.3.320
  5. 5. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004 Aug;35(2):375-382. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024
  6. 6. Wong RMY, Wong PY, Liu C, Wong HW, Chung YL, Chow SKH, et al. The imminent risk of a fracture—existing worldwide data: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 2022 Dec;33(12):2453-2466. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06473-0
  7. 7. Kates SL, Miclau T. The fracture liaison service: its history, current state, how it works, and future directions. OTA International: The Open Access Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2022 Jun;5(3S):e192. doi:10.1097/oi9.0000000000000192
  8. 8. Tajeu GS, Delzell E, Smith W, Arora T, Curtis JR, Saag KG, et al. Death, Debility, and Destitution Following Hip Fracture. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2014 Mar;69A(3):346-353. doi:10.1093/gerona/glt105
  9. 9. Buecking B, Eschbach D, Knobe M, Oberkircher L, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Dodel R, et al. Predictors of noninstitutionalized survival 1 year after hip fracture. Medicine. 2017 Sep;96(37):e7820. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000007820
  10. 10. Peeters CMM, Visser E, Van de Ree CLP, Gosens T, Den Oudsten BL, De Vries J. Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: A systematic literature review. Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1369-1382. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.018
  11. 11. Curtis EM, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Harvey NC. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2022 Sep;36(3):101754. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2022.101754
  12. 12. Saito T, Sterbenz JM, Malay S, Zhong L, MacEachern MP, Chung KC. Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 2017 Dec;28(12):3289-3300. doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4175-0
  13. 13. Conley RB, Adib G, Adler RA, Åkesson KE, Alexander IM, Amenta KC, et al. Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2020 Dec 1;35(1):36-52. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3877
  14. 14. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Can U, Staehelin HB, Platz A, Henschkowski J, Michel BA, et al. Severe vitamin D deficiency in Swiss hip fracture patients. Bone. 2008 Mar;42(3):597-602. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.026
  15. 15. Curtis EM, Woolford S, Holmes C, Cooper C, Harvey NC. General and Specific Considerations as to why Osteoporosis-Related Care Is Often Suboptimal. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 2020 Feb;18(1):38-46. doi:10.1007/s11914-020-00566-7
  16. 16. Barton DW, Griffin DC, Carmouche JJ. Orthopedic surgeons’ views on the osteoporosis care gap and potential solutions: survey results. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019 Dec;14(1):72. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1103-3
  17. 17. McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C. The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporosis International. 2003 Dec 1;14(12):1028-1034. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1507-z
  18. 18. Chevalley T, Chevalley T, Hoffmeyer P, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R. An Osteoporosis Clinical Pathway for the Medical Management of Patients with Low-Trauma Fracture. Osteoporosis International. 2002 Jun;13(6):450-455. doi:10.1007/s001980200053
  19. 19. Åkesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, et al. Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporosis International. 2013 Aug;24(8):2135-2152. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z
  20. 20. Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, Mitchell P, Thomas T, Singer A, et al. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporosis International. 2020 Jul;31(7):1193-1204. doi:10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1
  21. 21. Wu C, Tu S, Chang Y, Chan D, Chien J, Lin C, et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018
  22. 22. Li N, Hiligsmann M, Boonen A, van Oostwaard MM, de Bot RTAL, Wyers CE, et al. The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 2021 Aug;32(8):1517-1530. doi:10.1007/s00198-021-05911-9
  23. 23. Wu CH, Kao IJ, Hung WC, Lin SC, Liu HC, Hsieh MH, et al. Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporosis International. 2018 Jun;29(6):1227-1242. doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4411-2
  24. 24. González-Quevedo D, Pérez-del-Río V, Moriel-Garceso D, Fernández-Arroyabe N, García-Meléndez G, Montañez-Ruiz M, et al. A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study. Osteoporosis International. 2022 Aug;33(8):1695-1702. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06298-x
  25. 25. Vranken L, de Bruin IJA, Driessen AHM, Geusens PPM, Eisman JA, Center JR, et al. Decreased Mortality and Subsequent Fracture Risk in Patients With a Major and Hip Fracture After the Introduction of a Fracture Liaison Service: A 3-Year Follow-Up Survey. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2020 Dec 1;37(10):2025-2032. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4674
  26. 26. Aubry-Rozier B, Stoll D, Gonzalez Rodriguez E, Hans D, Prudent V, Seuret A, et al. Impact of a fracture liaison service on patient management after an osteoporotic fracture: the CHUV FLS. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2018 Jan 4;148(0102):w14579. doi:10.4414/smw.2018.14579
  27. 27. Spechbach H, Fabreguet I, Saule E, Hars M, Stirnemann J, Ferrari S, et al. Higher rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence in patients with newly diagnosed vertebral fracture when introduced in inpatients than later in outpatients. Osteoporosis International. 2019 Jul;30(7):1353-1362. doi:10.1007/s00198-019-04900-3
  28. 28. Kim MS, Yang J, Cha Y, Kim SH, Park M, Kim J. The impact of a fracture liaison service for patients with femoral fractures on subsequent fractures and mortality: focusing on systematic literature review and metaanalysis. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2025 Feb 16;20(1):24. doi:10.1007/s11657-025-01505-8
  29. 29. Danazumi MS, Lightbody N, Dermody G. Effectiveness of fracture liaison service in reducing the risk of secondary fragility fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 2024 Jul;35(7):1133-1151. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07052-1
  30. 30. González-Quevedo D, Bravo-Bardají M, Rubia-Ortega C, Sánchez-Delgado A, Moriel-Garceso D, Sánchez-Siles J, et al. Real-life effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Service in reducing short-term mortality and second fractures after hip fracture: a five-year prospective study. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2025 Sep 24;20(1):129. doi:10.1007/s11657-025-01612-6
  31. 31. Andreasen C, Dahl C, Frihagen F, Borgen TT, Basso T, Gjertsen J, et al. Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative). Osteoporosis International. 2025 Mar;36(3):501-512. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07376-y
  32. 32. van Geel TACM, Bliuc D, Geusens PPM, Center JR, Dinant G, Tran T, et al. Reduced mortality and subsequent fracture risk associated with oral bisphosphonate recommendation in a fracture liaison service setting: A prospective cohort study. PLOS ONE. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198006. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198006
  33. 33. Yoel U, Alkobi Weiss H, Goldbart A, Silverman Siris E, Fisher DL, Hassan L, et al. The impact of a fracture liaison service with in-hospital anti-osteoporosis treatment on subsequent hip fracture and mortality rates—a single-center retrospective study. Osteoporosis International. 2025 Feb;36(2):299-309. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07325-9
  34. 34. Silva SP, Mazeda C, Vilas-Boas P, Portelada MDC, Eugénio G, Barcelos A. The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2023 Dec 18;19(1):4. doi:10.1007/s11657-023-01363-2
  35. 35. Lu K, Wu Y, Shi Q, Gong Y, Zhang T, Li C. A novel fracture liaison service using digital health: impact on mortality in hospitalized elderly osteoporotic fracture patients. Osteoporosis International. 2024 Jan;35(1):53-67. doi:10.1007/s00198-023-06905-5
  36. 36. Astrone P, Perracini MR, Martin FC, Marsh DR, Cesari M. The potential of assessment based on the WHO framework of intrinsic capacity in fragility fracture prevention. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2022 Jul 13;34(11):2635-2643. doi:10.1007/s40520-022-02186-w
  37. 37. Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, et al. Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International. 2013 Feb;24(2):393-406. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2090-y
  38. 38. Osuna PM, Ruppe MD, Tabatabai LS. Fracture Liaison Services: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Secondary Fracture Prevention. Endocrine Practice. 2017 Feb;23(2):199-206. doi:10.4158/ep161433.ra
  39. 39. Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE, McLellan A, et al. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2012 Oct 1;27(10):2039-2046. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1698
  40. 40. Javaid MK, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Shah A, Mohsin Z, Hiligsmann M, Motek-Soulié A, et al. The Capture the Fracture® Partnership: an overview of a global initiative to increase the secondary fracture prevention care for patient benefit. Osteoporosis International. 2023 Nov;34(11):1827-1835. doi:10.1007/s00198-023-06759-x
  41. 41. Le HV, Van BW, Shahzad H, Teng P, Punatar N, Agrawal G, et al. Fracture liaison service—a multidisciplinary approach to osteoporosis management. Osteoporosis International. 2024 Oct;35(10):1719-1727. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07181-7
  42. 42. Woisetschläger M, Baldimtsi E, Lindblom M, Davidson T, Bjerner T, Spångeus A. Clinical implementation of AI for vertebral fracture detection in CT aligned with fracture liaison services: high prevalence of undiagnosed vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis International. 2026 May;37(5):1157-1167. doi:10.1007/s00198-026-07907-9
  43. 43. Namireddy SR, Gill SS, Peerbhai A, Kamath AG, Ramsay DSC, Ponniah HS, et al. Artificial intelligence in risk prediction and diagnosis of vertebral fractures. Scientific Reports. 2024 Dec 19;14(1):30560. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75628-2
  44. 44. Gani LU, Tan FCL, King TFJ. Telecarers improve osteoporosis treatment and compliance rates in secondary osteoporosis prevention for elderly hip fracture patients. Singapore Medical Journal. 2023 Apr;64(4):244-248. doi:10.11622/smedj.2022068