##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57187/4775

Original article

Vol. 156 No. 8 (2026)

iDecide: the Advance Directive app to facilitate engagement in Advance Care Planning

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2026;156:4775
Published
25.08.2026

Summary

STUDY AIMS: Advance Directives (AD) are central to Advance Care Planning (ACP), allowing patients to document medical preferences in legally binding documents. Despite broad public awareness and support, only one-fifth of the Swiss population has completed an AD. Consequently, the roadmap for ACP implementation by the ACP National Task Force calls for the development of digital applications to promote ACP in Switzerland. This study details the development process for the mobile application “iDecide” for AD creation based on the Swiss Medical Association (FMH) AD template. The primary aim is to ensure optimal usability and user satisfaction with the app.

METHODS: Using a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, four research cycles were conducted to create an evidence-based AD creation tool. The iDecide app, published in October 2024 (www.idecide.ch), was reviewed by users through an online survey. The survey evaluated the app’s user-friendliness, educational information quality and concordance with ACP goals, measuring 14 items on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS: The PAR approach led to the successful development of the iDecide app for AD creation. The app guides users through the process of drafting their personalised AD. It provides multimedia patient information on the content and value of AD, encourages reflection on personal preferences and promotes communication with surrogate decision-makers and healthcare professionals. The drafted AD is available in both print and in a digital format via an offline QR code. This QR code allows AD information to be stored, shared and accessed when needed. Survey responses from 94 app users indicated high usability, information quality and user satisfaction. On a 5-star rating system, the mean overall rating was 4.69 (SD: 0.57, 95% CI: 4.56–4.81), consistent across age groups. Users rated the app as easy to use and making AD creation more attractive.

DISCUSSION: While various online forms for AD creation exist in Switzerland, no mobile app has previously enabled the public to complete an AD. iDecide is a ready-to-use AD application, operating without the need for additional infrastructure and freely available to the general public. The tool aligns with the national roadmap for ACP implementation and adheres to key recommendations for digital ACP tool design. It effectively tackles barriers to widespread AD implementation in Switzerland, addressing engagement and accessibility issues. iDecide thus has the potential to empower people to actively engage in their ACP.

References

  1. 1. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2014 Sep;28(8):1000–25. 10.1177/0269216314526272
  2. 2. Rietjens JA, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, et al.; European Association for Palliative Care. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543–51. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X
  3. 3. Bundesrat der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft. Bessere Betreuung und Behandlung von Menschen am Lebensende: Bericht des Bundesrates in Erfüllung des Postulates 18.3384 der Kommission für soziale Sicherheit und Gesundheit des Ständerats (SGK-SR) vom 26. April 2018. Bern: Bundeskanzlei; 2020.
  4. 4. Nationale AG. Roadmap für die Umsetzung der Gesundheitlichen Vorausplanung (GVP) in der Schweiz. Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG) und Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften (SAMW); 2023.
  5. 5. Schweizer Akademie der medizinischen Wissenschaften. Medizin-ethische Richtlinien und Empfehlungen - Patientenverfügungen [Internet]. Basel: SAMW; 2020 [cited 2024 Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.samw.ch/de/Publikationen/Richtlinien.html
  6. 6. Biller-Andorno N, Biller A. The Advance Care Compass- A New Mechanics for Digitally Transforming Advance Directives. Front Digit Health. 2021 Oct;3:753747. 10.3389/fdgth.2021.753747
  7. 7. Hemsley B, Meredith J, Bryant L, Wilson NJ, Higgins I, Georgiou A, et al. An integrative review of stakeholder views on Advance Care Directives (ACD): barriers and facilitators to initiation, documentation, storage, and implementation. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jun;102(6):1067–79. 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.007
  8. 8. McMahan RD, Knight SJ, Fried TR, Sudore RL. Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):355–65. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006
  9. 9. Berkowitz CM, Ma J, Lowe J, Dolor RJ. Assessing Quality in Advance Care Planning Documentation: A Survey of Current Methods. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Aug;39(8):945–50. 10.1177/10499091211060341
  10. 10. Vilpert S, Meier C, Berche J, Borasio GD, Jox RJ, Maurer J. Older adults’ medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul;13(7):e071444. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071444
  11. 11. Bundesamt für Gesundheit BAG und palliative ch. Gesundheitliche Vorausplanung mit Schwerpunkt «Advance Care Planning». Nationales Rahmenkonzept für die Schweiz. Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit; 2018.
  12. 12. Vilpert S, Borrat-Besson C, Maurer J, Borasio GD. Awareness, approval and completion of advance directives in older adults in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul;148(2930):w14642–14642. 10.4414/smw.2018.14642
  13. 13. Schweiz PS, editor. Selbstbestimmen bei Urteilsunfähigkeit – Zahlen und Fakten [Internet]Zürich: Pro Senectute Schweiz; 2017., Available from https://gfs-zh.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Zahlen-und-Fakten-zur-Selbstbestimmung-bei-Urteilsunf%C3%A4higkeit.pdf[ [cited 2024 Dec 2]].
  14. 14. Stettler P, Bischof S, Bannwart L. Bevölkerungsbefragung Palliative Care 2017: Ergebnisse der Befragung 2017 und Vergleich zur Erhebung von 2009. Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit; 2018.
  15. 15. Otte IC, Elger B, Jung C, Bally KW. The utility of standardized advance directives: the general practitioners’ perspective. Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):199–206. 10.1007/s11019-016-9688-3
  16. 16. McDarby M, Llaneza D, George L, Kozlov E. Mobile Applications for Advance Care Planning: A Comprehensive Review of Features, Quality, Content, and Readability. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Aug;38(8):983–94. 10.1177/1049909120959057
  17. 17. Duffy A, Christie GJ, Moreno S. The Challenges Toward Real-world Implementation of Digital Health Design Approaches: narrative Review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep;9(3):e35693. 10.2196/35693
  18. 18. Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Oct;60(10):854–7. 10.1136/jech.2004.028662
  19. 19. Bradbury H, editor. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research [Internet]3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015., Available from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research-3e[ [cited 2024 Nov 5]]. 10.4135/9781473921290
  20. 20. White GW, Suchowierska M, Campbell M. Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Apr;85(4 Suppl 2):S3–12. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.109
  21. 21. Patrick K, Hekler EB, Estrin D, Mohr DC, Riper H, Crane D, et al. The Pace of Technologic Change: Implications for Digital Health Behavior Intervention Research. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):816–24. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.001
  22. 22. Morton E, Barnes SJ, Michalak EE. Participatory digital health research: A new paradigm for mHealth tool development. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;66:67–9. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.07.005
  23. 23. Fitze T. Überprüfung der Verständlichkeit der FMH-Patientenverfügung Kurzversion [Internet]Bern: University of Bern; 2024.[ [cited 2024 Dec 2]], Available from https://palliativzentrum.insel.ch/fileadmin/Palliativzentrum/Dokumente/Publikationen/Masterarbeit_Tamara_Fitze.pdf
  24. 24. FMH (Foederatio Medicorum Helveticorum). Patientenverfügung FMH – Kurzversion [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.fmh.ch/files/pdf27/fmh-patientenverfuegung-kurz-de.pdf
  25. 25. Hartmann C. Neue Patientenverfügung FMH [Internet]. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung. 2022 [cited 2024 Nov 28]. Available from: https://saez.swisshealthweb.ch/de/article/doi/saez.2022.21104
  26. 26. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar;3(1):e27. 10.2196/mhealth.3422
  27. 27. Biller A, Biller-Andorno N. From text to interaction: the digital advance directive method for advance directives. Digit Health. 2023 Jan;9:20552076221147414. 10.1177/20552076221147414
  28. 28. Ferreira J, Ferreira M, Fernandes CS, Castro J, Campos MJ. Digitisation of patient preferences in palliative care: mobile app prototype. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 18;spcare-2023-004516. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004516.
  29. 29. Houben CH, Spruit MA, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Janssen DJ. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):477–89. 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008
  30. 30. Haesen S, Shaw D. Directing citizens to create advance directives. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2018 May 16;148(1920):w14628–w14628. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14628.
  31. 31. Schöpfer C, Ehrler F, Berger A, Bollondi Pauly C, Buytaert L, De La Serna C, et al. A Mobile App for Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives (Accordons-nous): Development and Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr;9(2):e34626. 10.2196/34626
  32. 32. Dupont C, Smets T, Monnet F, Pivodic L, De Vleminck A, Van Audenhove C, et al. Publicly Available, Interactive Web-Based Tools to Support Advance Care Planning: systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr;24(4):e33320. 10.2196/33320
  33. 33. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
  34. 34. Swisstransplant. Informationsmaterial - Swisstransplant [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.swisstransplant.org/de/informationsmaterial
  35. 35. Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG). Organspende: Zustimmungslösung oder Widerspruchslösung [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/medizin-und-forschung/transplantationsmedizin/willensaeusserung-zur-spende-von-organen-geweben-zellen/zustimmungsmodelle-in-der-transplantationsmedizin.html
  36. 36. Statista. Statistiken zur Smartphone-Nutzung in der Schweiz [Internet]. Hamburg: Statista GmbH. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 3]. Available from: https://de.statista.com/themen/3581/smartphone-nutzung-in-der-schweiz/
  37. 37. Lin LH, Cheng HC, Chen YC, Chien LY. Effectiveness of a video-based advance care planning intervention in hospitalized elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Jun;21(6):478–84. 10.1111/ggi.14158
  38. 38. Kang E, Lee J, Choo J, Min J, Yun YH. Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Care Planning Video Decision Aid for the General Population. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jun;59(6):1239–47. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.353

Most read articles by the same author(s)