##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57187/4743

Original article

Vol. 156 No. 8 (2026)

Management of chronic non-cancer pain in Swiss nursing homes: an observational mixed-methods study

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2026;156:4743
Published
28.08.2026

Summary

STUDY AIMS: The management of chronic non-cancer pain in nursing home residents represents a major challenge, given the complexity and fragility of this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate professional practice in this management in nursing homes of the French-speaking part of Switzerland.

METHODS: Our observational study was based on a panel of 124 nursing homes in the Vaud canton. Two convergent parallel approaches were carried out to collect data: an online questionnaire for nurses and referring physicians about the chronic pain management practices of their nursing home, as well as a retrospective observational study analysing analgesic consumption in nursing homes of the Vaud canton between 2017 and 2021.

RESULTS: Our study highlights that mixed pain evaluation (self- and hetero-assessment) and non-pharmacological measures (i.e. physiotherapy, psychological and adapted physical activities) are used in the management of chronic non-cancer pain within the studied nursing homes. Opioid analgesics are mainly considered when non-pharmacological measures and step 1 analgesics are insufficient to manage the pain. When an opioid analgesic is considered, tramadol and morphine are the most frequently prescribed drugs among step 2 and 3 analgesics. Collaboration between nurses and physicians in pain management is evaluated as good or excellent by most interviewees, with mutual recognition of each other’s professional role. The pharmacist’s role seems more limited, mainly to providing reminders of best prescribing practices for analgesics during quality circle sessions, and routinely verifying the adequacy of analgesic treatments prescribed. The lack of time at the resident’s bedside, the nurses’ specific skills in pain management, and the reluctance of patients to report their pain were the main obstacles mentioned by the interviewed professionals. A disparity between nursing homes was observed in terms of quantitative and qualitative consumption of analgesics.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that healthcare professionals in nursing homes considered are aware and adhere to recommendations for chronic non-cancer pain management, whether in terms of pain assessment, or non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures. This management is supported by interprofessional practice within these nursing homes, in terms of defining the roles of each and sharing tasks between physicians and nurses. However, a strengthening of the interprofessional collaboration, a more extensive training of nurses as well as audit and feedback on analgesic use would be levers to foster better management of chronic non-cancer pain among nursing home residents.

References

  1. 1. Cole CS, Carpenter JS, Chen CX, Blackburn J, Hickman SE. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Pain in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):1916–1925.e1. 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.08.008
  2. 2. Sommerhalder K, Gugler E, Conca A, et al. Residents’ Perspectives of Living in Nursing Homes in Switzerland (RESPONS). 2015. https://www.bfh.ch/dam/jcr:8e0d20fd-56c9-4e33-a249-f48536d30f24/ergebnisse-studie-respons.PDF
  3. 3. Allaz AF. Prendre en soins les douleurs chroniques - Des dimensions émotionnelles aux aspects organisationnels Caring for chronic pain - From emotional dimensions to organizational aspects. 2024. https://www.artiset.ch/files/MC59U5I/ws_3_anne_francoise_allaz_prendre_en_soins_les_douleurs_chroniques.pdf
  4. 4. Schofield P. The Assessment of Pain in Older People: UK National Guidelines. Age Ageing. 2018 Mar;47 suppl_1:i1–22. 10.1093/ageing/afx192
  5. 5. Martin R, Williams J, Hadjistavropoulos T, Hadjistavropoulos HD, MacLean M. A qualitative investigation of seniors’ and caregivers’ views on pain assessment and management. Can J Nurs Res. 2005 Jun;37(2):142–64.
  6. 6. NHS. Ways to manage chronic pain. https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/pain/ways-to-manage-chronic-pain/
  7. 7. American Geriatrics Society Panel on Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1331–46. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02376.x
  8. 8. Herman AD, Johnson TM 2nd, Ritchie CS, Parmelee PA. Pain management interventions in the nursing home: a structured review of the literature. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jul;57(7):1258–67. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02315.x
  9. 9. Brunkert T, Simon M, Ruppen W, Zúñiga F. A Contextual Analysis to Explore Barriers and Facilitators of Pain Management in Swiss Nursing Homes. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Jan;52(1):14–22. 10.1111/jnu.12508
  10. 10. Brunkert T, Simon M, Haslbeck J, Zúñiga F. Who to Talk to About my Pain? A Brief Qualitative Study on Perception of Pain and its Management in Swiss Nursing Home Residents. Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Apr;21(2):151–6. 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.06.003
  11. 11. Brunkert T, Ruppen W, Simon M, Zúñiga F. A theory-based hybrid II implementation intervention to improve pain management in Swiss nursing homes: A mixed-methods study protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):432–42. 10.1111/jan.13817
  12. 12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct;147(8):573–7. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
  13. 13. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents. 2018. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550390
  14. 14. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. International language for drug utilization research. 2025. https://atcddd.fhi.no/
  15. 15. World Health Organization. Defined Daily Dose (DDD). https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/about-ddd
  16. 16. Confédération suisse. 810.30 Loi fédérale relative à la recherche sur l’être humain 810.30 Federal law on human research. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2013/617/fr
  17. 17. Association Doloplus. L’échelle Doloplus Doloplus Scale. https://doloplus.fr/lechelle-doloplus/
  18. 18. Association Doloplus. L’échelle Algoplus. Algoplus Scale. https://doloplus.fr/lechelle-algoplus/
  19. 19. Warden V, Hurley AC, Volicer L. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003;4(1):9–15. 10.1097/01.JAM.0000043422.31640.F7
  20. 20. Direction Générale de la Santé du Canton de Vaud. Plateforme d’information du système de santé vaudois Vaud healthcare system information platform. https://infosan.vd.ch/
  21. 21. Abdulla A, Adams N, Bone M, Elliott AM, Gaffin J, Jones D, et al.; British Geriatric Society. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age Ageing. 2013 Mar;42 Suppl 1:i1–57. 10.1093/ageing/afs200 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs199
  22. 22. Schofield P. Managing chronic pain in older people. Nurs Times. 2013 Jul;109(30):26–7.
  23. 23. Schofield P, Dunham M, Martin D, Bellamy G, Francis SA, Sookhoo D, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of pain in older people - a summary report. Br J Pain. 2022 Feb;16(1):6–13. 10.1177/2049463720976155
  24. 24. The australian pain society. Pain in Residential Aged Care Facilities: Management Strategies. https://www.apsoc.org.au/Pain-in-RACF2-Resources
  25. 25. Association Alzheimer Suisse. Personnes atteintes de démence dans les EMS suisses : des défis multiples People with dementia in Swiss NHs: multiple challenges. https://www.alzheimer-schweiz.ch/fileadmin/dam/Alzheimer_Schweiz/Dokumente/Publikationen-Produkte/200F_2014_demence-ems.pdf
  26. 26. Nimmaanrat S, Thepsuwan A, Tipchatyotin S, Jensen MP. Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun;24(1):556. 10.1186/s12877-024-05127-6
  27. 27. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Les options non opioïdes dans la prise en charge de la douleur chronique chez l’adulte Non-opioid options in the management of chronic pain in adults. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/les_options_non_opio%C3%AFdes_dans_la_prise_en_charge_de_la_douleur_chronique_chez_l%E2%80%99adulte.pdf
  28. 28. Anekar AA, Hendrix JM, Cascella M. WHO Analgesic Ladder. 2023 Apr 23. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. PMID: 32119322.
  29. 29. Dowell D, Ragan KR, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Chou R. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov;71(3):1–95. 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1
  30. 30. Haute Autorité de Santé. Traitement antalgique opioïde de la douleur chronique non cancéreuse Opioid analgesic treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. 2022. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-03/traitement_antalgique_opioide_de_la_douleur_chronique_non_cancereuse_-_fiche.pdf
  31. 31. Gálvez R, Pérez C. Is morphine still the best reference opioid? Pain Manag. 2012 Jan;2(1):33–45. 10.2217/pmt.11.78
  32. 32. World Health Organization. Clinical management of COVID-1. 2022. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/4908ec34-8b15-4d89-b1d7-3d9b1f1fc696/content
  33. 33 Capriz F, Chapiro S, David L, et al. Consensus multidisciplinaire d’experts en douleur et gériatrie : utilisation des antalgiques dans la prise en charge de la douleur de la personne âgée (hors anesthésie) Multidisciplinary consensus of experts in pain and geriatrics: use of analgesics in the management of pain in older adults (excluding anesthesia). Douleurs Éval - Diagn - Trait 2017; 18: 234–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.douler.2017.07.007.
  34. 34. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève. Interactions médicamenteuses, cytochromes P450 et P-glycoprotéine (Pgp) Drug interactions, cytochromes P450 and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) 2017. https://www.hug.ch/sites/interhug/files/structures/pharmacologie_et_toxicologie_cliniques/a5_cytochromes_6_2.pdf
  35. 35. Schlereth T. Guideline “diagnosis and non interventional therapy of neuropathic pain” of the German Society of Neurology (deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie). Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Jun;2(1):16. 10.1186/s42466-020-00063-3
  36. 36. Morgan KH, Barroso CS, Bateman S, Dixson M, Brown KC. Patients’ Experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature. J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1466–75. 10.1177/2374373520925725
  37. 37. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS®: National Implementation Research/Evidence Base. https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/evidence-base/primary-care.html
  38. 38 Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften. Patienten und Angehörige beteiligen Involving patients and relatives. Swiss Academies Communications. Basel. 2016.11(10):24.
  39. 39. Brunkert T, Simon M, Zúñiga F. Use of Pain Management Champions to Enhance Guideline Implementation by Care Workers in Nursing Homes. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Apr;18(2):138–46. 10.1111/wvn.12499
  40. 40. Cateau D, Ballabeni P, Niquille A. Effects of an interprofessional Quality Circle-Deprescribing Module (QC-DeMo) in Swiss nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021 May;21(1):289. 10.1186/s12877-021-02220-y
  41. 41. Swiss Health Observatory. Length of stay in nursing homes. https://ind.obsan.admin.ch/fr/indicator/obsan/duree-de-sejour-en-ems
  42. 42. Vallon N, Eggli Y, Niquille A, et al. Utilisation de médicaments potentiellement inappropriés dans la population gériatrique du Valais et comparaison intercantonale Use of potentially inappropriate medications in the geriatric population of Valais and inter-cantonal comparison. 2023. https://api.unil.ch/iris/server/api/core/bitstreams/43388acd-f90f-43dc-b681-01de92e8ca2e/content