##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 155 No. 11 (2025)

Primary prevention of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: impact of an informational video in a Swiss gynaecology emergency department

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025;155:4329
Published
17.11.2025

Summary

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to measure the impact of passive exposure to an educational video about Chlamydia trachomatis infection shown in a gynaecology department waiting room on young women’s knowledge on the subject. The secondary objective was to explore the participants’ interest in improving their knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis and their opinions on receiving this information during a consultation in the emergency room.

METHODS: A prospective, interventional, controlled, non-randomised study. Participants were recruited between January and June 2022. 120 women aged 15–35 years were included. The intervention consisted of passive exposure to a 2-minute cartoon presenting basic foundational points of Chlamydia trachomatis displayed in the waiting room. The control group was not exposed to the video. After the intervention, an in-person knowledge interview was performed with each participant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the knowledge scores obtained in the interviews with the exposed and control groups.

RESULTS: Both groups were similar regarding sociodemographic variables. The average knowledge scores from the interview were similar in the two groups. Video exposure was not associated with diminution of lower scores. Participants’ baseline knowledge was higher than expected on the basis of a literature review.

CONCLUSION: The passive learning intervention described in this study did not improve the participants’ knowledge about Chlamydia trachomatis. During the one-to-one interview, participants were keen to receive information about Chlamydia trachomatis but the quantitative results show that the short video in the waiting room had no impact on their knowledge. Future studies should focus on pre-assessed, randomised, one-to-one or small-group active interventions.

References

  1. 1. Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021 n.d. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240027077
  2. 2. Jacot-Guillarmod M, Pasquier J, Greub G, Bongiovanni M, Achtari C, Sahli R. Impact of HPV vaccination with Gardasil® in Switzerland. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(1):790. 10.1186/s12879-017-2867-x
  3. 3. Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul;70(4):1–187. 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1
  4. 4. Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug;97(8):548–562P. 10.2471/BLT.18.228486
  5. 5. Torrone E, Papp J, Weinstock H; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection among persons aged 14-39 years—united States, 2007-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Sep;63(38):834–8.
  6. 6. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Guidance on chlamydia control in Europe, 2015. LU. Publications Office; 2016.
  7. 7. Dielissen PW, Teunissen DA, Lagro-Janssen AL. Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;13(1):534. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-534
  8. 8. Chlamydia infection - Annual Epidemiological Report for 2018. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 2020. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/chlamydia-infection-annual-epidemiological-report-2018
  9. 9. Lanjouw E, Ouburg S, de Vries HJ, Stary A, Radcliffe K, Unemo M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int J STD AIDS. 2016 Apr;27(5):333–48. 10.1177/0956462415618837
  10. 10. Price MJ, Ades AE, Soldan K, Welton NJ, Macleod J, Simms I, et al. The natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a multi-parameter evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(22):1–250. 10.3310/hta20220
  11. 11. Tang W, Mao J, Li KT, Walker JS, Chou R, Fu R, et al. Pregnancy and fertility-related adverse outcomes associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Aug;96(5):322–9. 10.1136/sextrans-2019-053999
  12. 12. He W, Jin Y, Zhu H, Zheng Y, Qian J. Effect of Chlamydia trachomatis on adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;302(3):553–67. 10.1007/s00404-020-05664-6
  13. 13. Witkin SS, Minis E, Athanasiou A, Leizer J, Linhares IM. Chlamydia trachomatis: the Persistent Pathogen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 Oct;24(10):e00203–17. 10.1128/CVI.00203-17
  14. 14. Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, Low N, Xu F, Ness RB. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis. 2010 Jun;201(S2 Suppl 2):S134–55. 10.1086/652395
  15. 15. Baud D, Regan L, Greub G. Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb;21(1):70–6. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282f3e6a5
  16. 16. van Bergen JE, Hoenderboom BM, David S, Deug F, Heijne JC, van Aar F, et al. Where to go to in chlamydia control? From infection control towards infectious disease control. Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Nov;97(7):501–6. 10.1136/sextrans-2021-054992
  17. 17. Low N. Screening programmes for chlamydial infection: when will we ever learn? BMJ. 2007 Apr;334(7596):725–8. 10.1136/bmj.39154.378079.BE
  18. 18. Sagor RS, Golding J, Giorgio MM, Blake DR. Power of Knowledge: Effect of Two Educational Interventions on Readiness for Chlamydia Screening. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Jul;55(8):717–23. 10.1177/0009922815604597
  19. 19. Keizur EM, Bristow CC, Baik Y, Klausner JD. Knowledge and testing preferences for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections among female undergraduate students. J Am Coll Health. 2020 Oct;68(7):754–61. 10.1080/07448481.2019.1616742
  20. 20. Greaves A, Lonsdale S, Whinney S, Hood E, Mossop H, Olowokure B. University undergraduates’ knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009 Feb;14(1):61–8. 10.1080/13625180802434884
  21. 21. Samkange-Zeeb FN, Spallek L, Zeeb H. Awareness and knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among school-going adolescents in Europe: a systematic review of published literature. BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep;11(1):727. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-727
  22. 22. Grouzmann E, Mathevet P, Jacot-Guillarmod M. L’éradication de l’infection à Chlamydia trachomatis : un objectif quotidien [Chlamydia trachomatis infection’s eradication : a daily goal]. Rev Med Suisse. 2019 Oct;15(668):1926–31.
  23. 23. Visalli G, Cosenza B, Mazzù F, Bertuccio MP, Spataro P, Pellicanò GF, et al. Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections and risky behaviours: a survey among high school and university students. J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Jun;60(2):E84–92. 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.2.1079
  24. 24. Jaworski BC, Carey MP. Effects of a brief, theory-based STD-prevention program for female college students. J Adolesc Health. 2001 Dec;29(6):417–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00271-3
  25. 25. Goldsberry J, Moore L, MacMillan D, Butler S. Assessing the effects of a sexually transmitted disease educational intervention on fraternity and sorority members’ knowledge and attitudes toward safe sex behaviors. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016 Apr;28(4):188–95. 10.1002/2327-6924.12353
  26. 26. "La Chlamydia, c’est quoi? " : l’épisode 2 de “DépISTés.” 2017. [Internet]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBaUstjmvso
  27. 27. Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846–54. 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  28. 28. Braun V, Clarke V. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Volume 2. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2012. pp. 57–71. 10.1037/13620-004
  29. 29. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146
  30. 30. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted infections surveillance, 2023. Report. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/index.html
  31. 31. Herzog SA, Heijne JC, Althaus CL, Low N. Describing the progression from Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to pelvic inflammatory disease: systematic review of mathematical modeling studies. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Aug;39(8):628–37. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31825159ff
  32. 32. Warner L, Klausner JD, Rietmeijer CA, Malotte CK, O’Donnell L, Margolis AD, et al.; Safe in the City Study Group. Effect of a brief video intervention on incident infection among patients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. PLoS Med. 2008 Jun;5(6):e135. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050135