##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 155 No. 4 (2025)

Analysis of the need for a mobile application to support family caregivers of patients with incurable cancer – The development of the “Angehörigen-App”: a qualitative study in Switzerland

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025;155:4089
Published
10.04.2025

Summary

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cancer is rising continuously worldwide. Relatives play an important role in caring for cancer patients and are at the same time affected by the illness and treatment of their loved ones. They have often been referred to as a forgotten group. Advances in digital technology offer various opportunities to enhance the well-being of and care for relatives.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the utility of a mobile application to support the relatives of palliative cancer patients in Switzerland, the potential content elements of such an app, and its optimal functional and structural design.

METHOD: Using a purposive sampling strategy, three focus group discussions were conducted at the University Hospital of Bern. The 15 participants included both relatives and experts. Data was analysed using content structuring qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz and Rädiker.

RESULTS: Statements from the focus groups were summarised in four main categories. These included statements from participants about the need for and potential benefits of an app, such as resource gains or easier access to care. Statements regarding possible content components of the app, such as tools for professional support and coordination or the provision of information, were also summarised. Statements were also included on the necessary functional features and the structural embedding of the app.

CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a need for a caregivers app in Switzerland. The app should reduce gaps in care, focus on family members, and strengthen their empowerment and access to resources. In terms of content, bundled information, low-threshold support offers, coordination tools, and self-care options should be guaranteed. The modular and simply structured app should be designed in a needs-oriented manner to be used safely throughout Switzerland.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660
  2. Cirillo P, Feller A, Hošek M, et al. Schweizerischer Krebsbericht 2021: Stand und Entwicklungen. Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS); 2021. Available from https://www.swissstats.bfs.admin.ch/collection/ch.admin.bfs.swissstat.de.issue211411772100/article/issue211411772100-01
  3. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Psychoonkologie. Leitlinien zur psychoonkologischen Betreuung von erwachsenen Krebskranken und ihren Angehörigen. SGPO. 2023. Available from: https://www.psychoonkologie.ch/storage/app/media/downloads/2024_SGPO_Leitlinien.pdf
  4. Pan YC, Lin YS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of depression among caregivers of cancer patients. Front Psychiatry. 2022 May;13:817936. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.817936
  5. Rosenberger C, Höcker A, Cartus M, Schulz-Kindermann F, Härter M, Mehnert A. Angehörige und Patienten in der ambulanten psychoonkologischen Versorgung: Zugangswege, psychische Belastungen und Unterstützungsbedürfnisse [Outpatient psycho-oncological care for family members and patients: access, psychological distress and supportive care needs]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2012 May;62(5):185–94. 10.1055/s-0032-1304994
  6. Holland J; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial distress. Oncology (Williston Park). 1999 May;13 5A:113–47.
  7. Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C, Koch U. Die deutsche Version des NCCN Distress-Thermometers: Empirische Prüfung eines Screening-Instruments zur Erfassung psychosozialer Belastung bei Krebspatienten. Z Psychiatr Psychol Psychother. 2006;54(3):213–23. 10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213
  8. Ahn S, Romo RD, Campbell CL. A systematic review of interventions for family caregivers who care for patients with advanced cancer at home. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1518–30. 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.012
  9. Dilworth S, Higgins I, Parker V, Kelly B, Turner J. Patient and health professional’s perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014 Jun;23(6):601–12. 10.1002/pon.3474
  10. Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012 Nov;28(4):205–12. 10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.002
  11. Stocker D, Stettler P, Jäggi J, et al. Versorgungssituation psychisch erkrankter Personen in der Schweiz. Büro Für Arb- Sozialpolitische Stud BASS. 2016. Available from: https://www.buerobass.ch/fileadmin/Files/2016/BAG_2016_VersorgungssituationPsychischErkrankterPersonen_Schlussbericht.pdf
  12. Angerer A, Hollenstein E, Russ C. Der Digital Health Report 21/22: die Zukunft des Schweizer Gesundheitswesens. ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften; 2021. Available from: https://www.zhaw.ch/storage/hochschule/medien/news/2021/210914-digital-health-report-2021.pdf
  13. Springer F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A. Content features and its implementation in novel app-based psycho-oncological interventions for cancer survivors: a narrative review. Curr Opin Oncol. 2022 Jul;34(4):313–9. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000836
  14. Neary M, Schueller SM. State of the field of mental health apps. Cogn Behav Pract. 2018 Nov;25(4):531–7. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.01.002
  15. Kelley MM, Powell T, Camara D, Shah N, Norton JM, Deitelzweig C, et al. Mobile Health Apps, Family Caregivers, and Care Planning: scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2024 May;26:e46108. 10.2196/46108
  16. Shaffer KM, Turner KL, Siwik C, Gonzalez BD, Upasani R, Glazer JV, et al. Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e316–27. 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3
  17. Park JY, Tracy CS, Gray CS. Mobile phone apps for family caregivers: A scoping review and qualitative content analysis. Digit Health. 2022 Feb;8:20552076221076672. 10.1177/20552076221076672
  18. Breuer F. Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen qualitativer Methodik in der Psychologie. In: Mey G, Mruck K, editors. Handb Qual Forsch Psychol Band 1 Ansätze Anwendungsfelder. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2020. p. 27–48.
  19. Schulz M, Mack B, Renn O, editors. Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft: von der Konzeption bis zur Auswertung. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag; 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7
  20. Bär G, Kasberg A, Geers S, et al. Fokusgruppen in der partizipativen Forschung. In: Hartung S, Wihofszky P, Wright MT, editors. Partizipative Forsch. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2020. pp. 207–32., Available from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-30361-7_7. 10.1007/978-3-658-30361-7_7 10.1007/978-3-658-30361-7_7
  21. Benighaus C, Benighaus L. Moderation, Gesprächsaufbau und Dynamik in Fokusgruppen. In: Schulz M, Mack B, Renn O, editors. Fokusgruppen Empirischen Sozialwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2012. pp. 111–32., Available from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_6. 10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_6 10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_6
  22. Albrecht UV. Einheitlicher Kriterienkatalog zur Selbstdeklaration der Qualität von Gesundheits-Apps. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Bibliothek; 2019. Available from: https://mhh-publikationsserver.gbv.de/receive/mhh_mods_00000021 https://doi.org/10.26068/MHHRPM/20190416-004
  23. Kuckartz U, Dresing T, Rädiker S, et al. Qualitative Evaluation: Der Einstieg in die Praxis. 2. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften! GWV Fachverlage GmbH; 2008.
  24. Kuckartz U, Rädiker S. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung: Grundlagentexte Methoden. 5th ed. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa; 2022.
  25. MAXQDA. Software für qualitative Datenanalyse. Berlin, Deutschland: VERBI Software. Berlin, Deutschland: Consult. Sozialforschung GmbH; 2022.
  26. Harmonised Guideline IC. Integrated Addendum to ICH E6 (R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH); 2016. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E6_R2_Addendum.pdf
  27. Hämmerli M, Müller T, Biesdorf S, et al. Digitalisierung im Gesundheitswesen: Die 8,2-Mrd.-CHF-Chance für die Schweiz. McKinsey Digital; 2021. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/ch/~/media/mckinsey/locations/europe%20and%20middle%20east/switzerland/our%20insights/digitization%20in%20healthcare/digitalisierung%20im%20gesundheitswesen%20%20die%2082mrdchance%20fr%20die%20schweiz%20de.pdf
  28. Uysal N, Bağçivan G, Özkaraman A, Karaaslan Eşer A, Çetin F, Çalışkan BB, et al. Empowering caregivers in the radiotherapy process: the results of a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2021 May;29(5):2395–404. 10.1007/s00520-020-05743-z
  29. Mehnert A, Vehling S. Psychoonkologische Unterstützung von Patienten und Angehörigen in der Terminalphase [Psychooncological support for patients and relatives in the terminal phase]. Forum (Genova). 2018;33(1):30–4. 10.1007/s12312-017-0363-2
  30. Johannsen LJ, Geertz W, Bergelt C, Inhestern L. Belastungen bei Angehörigen von Krebserkrankten erkennen und versorgen. InFo Hamatol Onkol. 2022;25(6):15–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15004-022-9086-3
  31. Li Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Hu X. The effectiveness of e-Health interventions on caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life in informal caregivers of patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Mar;127:104179. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104179
  32. Rudolph I, Seilacher E, Köster MJ, Stellamanns J, Liebl P, Zell J, et al. Der Informationsbedarf von Patienten mit Krebserkrankungen in Deutschland - eine Befragung von Patienten und Angehörigen [Survey on information needs of cancer patients and ther relatives in Germany]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Mar;140(5):e43–7. 10.1055/s-0041-100585
  33. Parker Oliver D, Patil S, Benson JJ, Gage A, Washington K, Kruse RL, et al. The effect of Internet group support for caregivers on social support, self-Efficacy, and caregiver burden: A meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2017 Aug;23(8):621–9. 10.1089/tmj.2016.0183
  34. Basch E, Charlot M, Dueck AC. Population-level evidence of survival benefits of patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring software systems in routine cancer care. Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7797–9. 10.1002/cam4.3480
  35. Wang C, Qi H. Influencing factors of acceptance and use behavior of mobile Health application users: systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar;9(3):357. 10.3390/healthcare9030357
  36. Kessel KA, Vogel MM, Kessel C, Bier H, Biedermann T, Friess H, et al. Mobile health in oncology: A patient survey about app-assisted cancer care. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Jun;5(6):e81. 10.2196/mhealth.7689
  37. KMU-Portal, für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. Neues Datenschutzgesetz (revDSG). 2023. Available from: https://www.kmu.admin.ch/kmu/de/home/fakten-trends/digitalisierung/datenschutz/neues-datenschutzgesetz-rev-dsg.html
  38. Fenton AT, Keating NL, Ornstein KA, Kent EE, Litzelman K, Rowland JH, et al. Comparing adult-child and spousal caregiver burden and potential contributors. Cancer. 2022 May;128(10):2015–24. 10.1002/cncr.34164
  39. Höglinger M. Mehr Transparenz für alle – der Schweizer Atlas der Gesundheitsversorgung. Gesundheitsökonomie ZHAW. 2023. Available from: https://blog.zhaw.ch/gesundheitsoekonomie/2023/04/20/mehr-transparenz-fuer-alle-der-schweizer-atlas-der-gesundheitsversorgung/
  40. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. 13. Überarb. Weinheim: Beltz Pädagogik; 2022.
  41. Baur N, Blasius J, editors. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. 3., vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37985-8
  42. Mayring P. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. 6., überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz; 2016.