Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 154 No. 10 (2024)

Primary care physician eHealth profile and care coordination: a cross-sectional study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3851
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3851
Published
27.10.2024

Summary

BACKGROUND: Digital health holds promise for enhancing care coordination and supporting patient self-management. However, various barriers, including at the healthcare professional level, hinder its adoption. This cross-sectional study explored the eHealth profile of primary care physicians and its relationship with care coordination.

METHODS: As part of “The Commonwealth Fund’s 2022 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians in 10 Countries”, 1114 physicians in Switzerland completed a questionnaire on their sociodemographic and workplace characteristics, digital health use and care coordination practices. Based on their responses concerning the modality, frequency and application of digital health tools, we created a digital health score. Based on responses describing the collaboration with specialists and paramedical health professionals, we created a care coordination score. The associations between both scores were assessed using stratified analyses and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS: Among the 1114 participants (46% women, mean age 52 years), 83% used electronic patient records, 96% used teleconsultations for less than 5% of consultations, and 63% never used connected health tools to monitor patients with chronic diseases. Further, 16% allowed online appointments, 20% online medical prescriptions, 52% the possibility of electronically communicating lists of medications with other healthcare professionals, and 89% the possibility of email or web communications with the patient. The eHealth score was positively associated with the number of weekly working hours, being an internal medicine specialist or practising physician, the number of full-time equivalents in the practice and being in a group practice setting. The higher the eHealth profile score, the higher the care coordination score.

CONCLUSION: Digital health and care coordination were positively associated. This could underscore the potential benefits of digital health in enhancing collaborative and interprofessional care practices.

References

  1. What is Digital Health? FDA. 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/what-digital-health
  2. Wu X, Guo X, Zhang Z. The Efficacy of Mobile Phone Apps for Lifestyle Modification in Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan;7(1):e12297. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/12297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/12297
  3. Bhardwaj V, Spaulding EM, Marvel FA, LaFave S, Yu J, Mota D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a Digital Health Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Recovery. Med Care. 2021 Nov;59(11):1023–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001636
  4. Bassi G, Mancinelli E, Dell’Arciprete G, Rizzi S, Gabrielli S, Salcuni S. Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug;18(17):1–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178982
  5. Pais B, Buluschek DP, Nef T, Schütz N, Saner H, Gatica D, et al. De nouvelles technologies au service du maintien à domicile des personnes âgées. Rev Med Suisse. 2019;15(658):5. doi: https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2019.15.658.1407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2019.15.658.1407
  6. Pouls BP, Vriezekolk JE, Bekker CL, Linn AJ, van Onzenoort HA, Vervloet M, et al. Effect of Interactive eHealth Interventions on Improving Medication Adherence in Adults With Long-Term Medication: systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan;23(1):e18901. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/18901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/18901
  7. Santschi V, Rodondi N, Bugnon O, Burnier M. Impact of electronic monitoring of drug adherence on blood pressure control in primary care: a cluster 12-month randomised controlled study. Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;19(6):427–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2007.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2007.12.007
  8. Sovran V, Ytsma A, Husak L, Johnson T. Coordination of Care Could Improve: Canadian Results from the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians. Healthc Q. 2020 Jul;23(2):6–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2020.26283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2020.26283
  9. Ashrafzadeh S, Hamdy O. Patient-Driven Diabetes Care of the Future in the Technology Era. Cell Metab. 2019 Mar;29(3):564–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.005
  10. Chiolero A, Rodondi N, Santschi V. High-value, data-informed, and team-based care for multimorbidity. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Feb;5(2):e84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30007-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30007-4
  11. Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016 Oct;11(1):146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7
  12. Saukkonen P, Elovainio M, Virtanen L, Kaihlanen AM, Nadav J, Lääveri T, et al. The Interplay of Work, Digital Health Usage, and the Perceived Effects of Digitalization on Physicians’ Work: Network Analysis Approach. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug;24(8):e38714. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/38714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/38714
  13. Wangler J, Jansky M. How can primary care benefit from digital health applications? – a quantitative, explorative survey on attitudes and experiences of general practitioners in Germany. BMC Digit Health. 2024 Mar;2(1):14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00068-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00068-x
  14. Henry TA. 5 insights into how physicians view, use digital health tools. American Medical Association. 2022. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/5-insights-how-physicians-view-use-digital-health-tools
  15. Golder L, Keller T, Schena C, Rellstab S. Baromètre cybersanté suisse (eHealth Barometer) 2024: vers l’avenir avec l’IA. gfs.bern. 2024. Available from: https://cockpit.gfsbern.ch/fr/cockpit/ehealth-professionnels-de-sante-2024/
  16. Rapoport R, Manley R, Kline C. Metholodogy report. International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Doctors; 2022.
  17. The Commonwealth Fund - International Surveys. The Commonwealth Fund. 2023. Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-surveys
  18. ISFM. Médecin praticien. 2023. Available from: https://www.siwf.ch/fr/formation-postgraduee/medecin-praticien.cfm
  19. Pahud O, Dorn M. Ärztinnen und Ärzte in der Grundversorgung – Situation in der Schweiz und im internationalen Vergleich. Swiss Health Observatory. 2023. Available from: https://www.obsan.admin.ch/de/publikationen/2023-aerztinnen-und-aerzte-der-grundversorgung-situation-der-schweiz-und-im
  20. Kruse CS, Kristof C, Jones B, Mitchell E, Martinez A. Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review. J Med Syst. 2016 Dec;40(12):252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9
  21. Ibrahim MS, Mohamed Yusoff H, Abu Bakar YI, Thwe Aung MM, Abas MI, Ramli RA. Digital health for quality healthcare: A systematic mapping of review studies. Digit Health. 2022 Mar;8:20552076221085810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221085810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221085810
  22. Whitelaw S, Pellegrini DM, Mamas MA, Cowie M, Van Spall HG. Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Feb;2(1):62–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005
  23. Tossaint-Schoenmakers R, Versluis A, Chavannes N, Talboom-Kamp E, Kasteleyn M. The Challenge of Integrating eHealth Into Health Care: Systematic Literature Review of the Donabedian Model of Structure, Process, and Outcome. J Med Internet Res. 2021 May;23(5):e27180. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/27180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27180
  24. Hostettler S, Kraft E. Statistique médicale 2022. Bull Médecins Suisses. 2023;104(12):24–9.

Most read articles by the same author(s)