Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 153 No. 10 (2023)

Contact tracing for COVID-19 in a Swiss canton: analysis of key performance indicators

  • Leonie Heron
  • Catrina Mugglin
  • Kathrin Zürcher
  • Erich Brumann
  • Bettina Keune-Dübi
  • Nicola Low
  • Lukas Fenner
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2023.40112
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2023;153:40112
Published
22.10.2023

Summary

BACKGROUND: Contact tracing (CT) has played an important role in strategies to control COVID-19. However, there is limited evidence on the performance of digital tools for CT and no consensus on which indicators to use to monitor their performance. We aimed to describe the system and analyse outcomes of CT with a partially automated workflow in the Swiss canton of Solothurn, using key performance indicators (KPIs).

METHODS: We describe the process of CT used in the canton of Solothurn between November 2020 and February 2022, including forward and backward CT. We developed 16 KPIs representing CT structure (S1–2), process (P1–11) and outcome (O1–3) based on previous literature to analyse the relative performance of CT. We report the changes in the indicators over waves of SARS-CoV-2 infections caused by several viral variants.

RESULTS: The CT team in Solothurn processed 57,363 index cases and 71,809 contacts over a 15-month period. The CT team successfully contacted 99% of positive cases within 24 hours (KPI P7) throughout the pandemic and returned almost all test results on the same or next day (KPI P6), before the delta variant emerged. Three-quarters of contacts were notified within 24 hours of the CT interview with the index (KPI P8) before the emergence of the alpha, delta and omicron variants, when the proportions decreased to 64%, 36% and 54%, respectively. The percentage of new symptomatic cases tested and interviewed within 3 days of symptom onset was high at >70% (KPI P10) and contacts started quarantine within a median of 3 days of index case symptom onset (KPI P3). About a fifth of new index cases had already been in quarantine by the time of their positive test (KPI O1), before the delta variant emerged. The percentage of index cases in isolation by day of testing remained at almost 100% throughout the period of analysis (KPI O2).

CONCLUSIONS: The CT in Solothurn used a partially automated workflow and continued to perform well throughout the pandemic, although the relative performance of the CT system declined at higher caseloads. CT remains an important tool for controlling the spread of infectious diseases, but clearer standards should improve the performance, comparability and monitoring of infection in real time as part of pandemic preparedness efforts.

References

  1. Aleta A, Martín-Corral D, Pastore Y Piontti A, Ajelli M, Litvinova M, Chinazzi M, et al. Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4:964–71. 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9
  2. Kucharski AJ, Klepac P, Conlan AJ, Kissler SM, Tang ML, Fry H, et al.; CMMID COVID-19 working group. Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151–60. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6
  3. Kojaku S, Hébert-Dufresne L, Mones E, Lehmann S, Ahn YY. The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks. Nat Phys. 2021 May;17:652–8. 10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01187-2
  4. Raymenants J, Geenen C, Thibaut J, Nelissen K, Gorissen S, Andre E. Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19. Nat Commun. 2022 Aug;13(1):4750. 10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6
  5. Ashcroft P, Lehtinen S, Bonhoeffer S. Test-trace-isolate-quarantine (TTIQ) intervention strategies after symptomatic COVID-19 case identification. PLoS One. 2022 Feb;17(2):e0263597. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263597
  6. Koetter P, Pelton M, Gonzalo J, Du P, Exten C, Bogale K, et al. Implementation and Process of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing Initiative: Leveraging Health Professional Students to Extend the Workforce During a Pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2020 Dec;48(12):1451–6. 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.012
  7. Jian SW, Cheng HY, Huang XT, Liu DP. Contact tracing with digital assistance in Taiwan’s COVID-19 outbreak response. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;101:348–52. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1483
  8. Braithwaite I, Callender T, Bullock M, Aldridge RW. Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e607–21. 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9
  9. World Health Organization. Digital tools for COVID-19 contact tracing: annex: contact tracing in the context of COVID-19, 2 June 2020 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 14 December 2022]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332265
  10. Daniore P, Ballouz T, Menges D, von Wyl V. The SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App after one year: were expectations fulfilled? Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Sep;151(35-36):w30031. 10.4414/SMW.2021.w30031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2021.w30031
  11. Vogt F, Kurup KK, Mussleman P, Habrun C, Crowe M, Woodward A, et al. Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: rapid scoping review and conceptual framework. PLoS One. 2022 Feb;17(2):e0264433. 10.1371/journal.pone.0264433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264433
  12. Frieden T. COVID Contact Tracing Indicator list for consideration [Unpublished work]. 2020.
  13. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988 Sep;260(12):1743–8. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.12.1743
  14. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Coronavirus: Measures and ordinances [Internet]. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH; 2022 [cited September 20 2022]. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/massnahmen-des-bundes.html
  15. Anderegg N, Schwab T, Borcard L, Mugglin C, Keune-Dübi B, Ramette A, et al. Population-based SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing and contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(3):251-260. 10.1093/infdis/jiad074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiad074
  16. Kanton Solothurn. Bevölkerungszahlen [Internet]. Kanton Solothurn; 2022 [cited 20 September 2022]. Available from: https://so.ch/verwaltung/finanzdepartement/amt-fuer-finanzen/statistikportal/bevoelkerung/bevoelkerungszahlen/
  17. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Communicable Diseases Legislation – Epidemics Act, (EpidA) [Internet]. Bern: Federal Office of Public Health; 2020 [cited 13 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/gesetze-und-bewilligungen/gesetzgebung/gesetzgebung-mensch-gesundheit/epidemiengesetz.html
  18. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. COVID-19 Switzerland [Internet]. Swiss Confederation; 2022 [cited 21 October 2022]. Available from: https://www.covid19.admin.ch/en/epidemiologic/
  19. World Health Organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants [Internet]. 2022 [cited 12th August 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/
  20. CumulusPro. Straatos. CumulusPro; 2022.
  21. GmbH SP. Menschen. Prozesse. Digitalisierung. . Lenzburg: Strub & Partner GmbH; 2022.
  22. Resolve to Save Lives. Covid-19 Contact Tracing Playbook [Internet]. 2022 [cited 11 August 2022]. Available from: https://contacttracingplaybook.resolvetosavelives.org/checklists/metrics
  23. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Coronavirus: SwissCovid app [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/swisscovid-app-und-contact-tracing.html
  24. Nadeau SA, Vaughan TG, Beckmann C, Topolsky I, Chen C, Hodcroft E, et al. Swiss public health measures associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission using genome data. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(680):eabn7979. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn7979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn7979
  25. Borah BF, Pringle J, Flaherty M, Oeltmann JE, Moonan PK, Kelso P. High Community Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Decreased Contact Tracing Effectiveness for Identifying Persons at Elevated Risk of Infection – Vermont. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(S2):S334-7. 10.1093/cid/ciac518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac518
  26. Herrero M, Ciruela P, Mallafré-Larrosa M, Mendoza S, Patsi-Bosch G, Martínez-Solanas È, et al.; Epidemiological Surveillance Network of Catalonia. SARS-CoV-2 Catalonia contact tracing program: evaluation of key performance indicators. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul;22(1):1397. 10.1186/s12889-022-13695-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13695-8
  27. Pei S, Kandula S, Cascante Vega J, Yang W, Foerster S, Thompson C, et al. Contact tracing reveals community transmission of COVID-19 in New York City. Nat Commun. 2022 Oct;13(1):6307. 10.1038/s41467-022-34130-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34130-x
  28. Walker A, Houwaart T, Finzer P, Ehlkes L, Tyshaieva A, Damagnez M, et al.; German COVID-19 OMICS Initiative (DeCOI). Characterization of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection Clusters Based on Integrated Genomic Surveillance, Outbreak Analysis and Contact Tracing in an Urban Setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;74(6):1039–46. 10.1093/cid/ciab588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.13.21251678

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>