Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 152 No. 1314 (2022)

Government recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: clarity, compliance and impact on the daily life of seniors in a population-based cohort

  • Camille Poroes
  • Yves Henchoz
  • Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2022.w30161
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152:w30161
Published
08.04.2022

Summary

CONTEXT: In March 2020, the Swiss Federal Council issued recommendations for a partial lockdown, with an emphasis on people aged 65 years and over because of their vulnerability to COVID-19. This study investigated whether seniors clearly understood the meaning of four recommendations (do not go grocery shopping; do not use public transport; avoid personal contact; stay at home), whether they complied with them, and what was the impact of the partial lockdown on their daily life, including difficulties and opportunities.

METHODS: In April 2020, a questionnaire about how seniors experienced the partial lockdown was sent to the participants in the Lausanne Cohort Lc65+, a population-based study. The response rate reached 89%, with 2746 participants aged 72–86 years included in the analysis. Bivariable analyses and multivariable logistic models were used to identify sociodemographic and health-related characteristics associated with each outcome (clarity; compliance; impact).

RESULTS: Most seniors rated the recommendations as clear (84–91%, depending on the recommendation) and complied with them (70–94%). In multivariable analyses, men were more likely to rate the recommendations as unclear. Perceiving the recommendation as unclear and having a low level of fear of the virus were associated with noncompliance. People who complied with the recommendations were more likely to experience difficulties, but also to seize opportunities during the partial lockdown.

CONCLUSION: Most seniors followed the recommendations and found them clearly worded. However, some subgroups, such as men and seniors who do not fear the virus, were less likely to clearly understand the recommendations. As a correct understanding is a key factor for compliance, the findings emphasise the importance of tailoring public health communications to the characteristics of the target group, and of testing whether they are correctly understood.

References

  1. Office Fédéral de la santé publique. Coronavirus: situation en Suisse: Office fédéral de la santé publique; 2020 [Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/fr/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/situation-schweiz-und-international.html
  2. Liu YC, Kuo RL, Shih SR. COVID-19: the first documented coronavirus pandemic in history. Biomed J. 2020 Aug;43(4):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.04.007
  3. World Health Organization. COVID-19 Strategy Update. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-strategy-update
  4. United Nations. The impact of COVID-19 on older persons. 2020. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/un_policy_brief_on_covid-19_and_older_persons_1_may_2020.pdf
  5. Nguyen S, Major K, Cochet C, Bizzozzero T, Barbarossa L, Bosshard W, et al. [COVID-19 infection in the elderly in French-speaking Switzerland: an inventory of beliefs, convictions and certainties]. Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Apr;16(691-2):835–8. https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2020.16.691.0835
  6. Office Fédéral de la santé publique. Nouveau coronavirus : campagne d’information de l’OFSP intitulée « Voici comment nous protéger » [press release]. 2020.
  7. Office Fédéral de la santé publique. Le Conseil fédéral renforce les mesures contre le coronavirus pour protéger la santé de la population et soutient les secteurs touchés [press release]. 2020.
  8. Office Fédéral de la santé publique. Coronavirus : le Conseil fédéral qualifie la situation de « situation extraordinaire » et renforce les mesures [press release]. 2020.
  9. Hartmann D. Mourir de «fatigue de vivre». Courrier. 2020.
  10. Rubín MA ; Domínguez N. La pandémie a mis à nu la fragilité des seniors. Swiss Info (swissinfo.ch).
  11. Genecand M. Confinement, la révolte des aînés. Le Temps. 2020 Apr;2020:23.
  12. Ayalon L, Chasteen A, Diehl M, Levy BR, Neupert SD, Rothermund K, et al. Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan;76(2):e49–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa051
  13. Seifert A. Older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic - Forgotten and stigmatized? Int Soc Work. 2021;64(2):275–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872820969779
  14. Tagliabue F, Galassi L, Mariani P. The “Pandemic” of Disinformation in COVID-19. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020 Aug;•••:1–3.
  15. Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Zani B. A social-cognitive model of pandemic influenza H1N1 risk perception and recommended behaviors in Italy. Risk Anal. 2011 Apr;31(4):645–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01529.x
  16. Asmundson GJ, Taylor S. Coronaphobia: fear and the 2019-nCoV outbreak. J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102196
  17. Lennon RP, Sakya SM, Miller EL, Snyder B, Yaman T, Zgierska AE, et al. Public Intent to Comply with COVID-19 Public Health Recommendations. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Aug;4(3):e161–5. https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20200708-01
  18. Macdonald B, Hülür G. Well-Being and Loneliness in Swiss Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Social Relationships. Gerontologist. 2021 Feb;61(2):240–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa194
  19. Santos-Eggimann B, Karmaniola A, Seematter-Bagnoud L, Spagnoli J, Büla C, Cornuz J, et al. The Lausanne cohort Lc65+: a population-based prospective study of the manifestations, determinants and outcomes of frailty. BMC Geriatr. 2008 Aug;8(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-20
  20. Henchoz Y, Blanco JM, Fustinoni S, Nanchen D, Büla C, Seematter-Bagnoud L, et al. Cohort Profile: the Lausanne cohort 65+ (Lc65+). Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;dyab245. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab245
  21. Abolhassani N, Santos-Eggimann B, Büla C, Goy R, Guessous I, Henchoz Y. Quality of life profile in three cohorts of community-dwelling Swiss older people. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr;19(1):96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1112-4
  22. Gustavsson J, Beckman L. Compliance to Recommendations and Mental Health Consequences among Elderly in Sweden during the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Cross Sectional Online Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul;17(15):E5380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155380
  23. Rattay P, Michalski N, Domanska OM, Kaltwasser A, De Bock F, Wieler LH, et al. Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 by education level among women and men in Germany. Results from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study. PLoS One. 2021 May;16(5):e0251694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251694
  24. Zhong BL, Luo W, Li HM, Zhang QQ, Liu XG, Li WT, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar;16(10):1745–52. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45221
  25. Lazarus JV, Ratzan S, Palayew A, Billari FC, Binagwaho A, Kimball S, et al. COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10). PLoS One. 2020 Oct;15(10):e0240011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240011
  26. Beier ME, Ackerman PL. Determinants of health knowledge: an investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):439–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.439
  27. Molina-Barceló A, Salas Trejo D, Peiró-Pérez R, Málaga López A. To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Sep;20(5):669–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01263.x
  28. Varghese NE, Sabat I, Neumann-Böhme S, Schreyögg J, Stargardt T, Torbica A, et al. Risk communication during COVID-19: A descriptive study on familiarity with, adherence to and trust in the WHO preventive measures. PLoS One. 2021 Apr;16(4):e0250872. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250872
  29. Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
  30. Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, Latzman RD. Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Ment Health Ad. 2020.
  31. Leung GM, Lam TH, Ho LM, Ho SY, Chan BH, Wong IO, et al. The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Nov;57(11):857–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.11.857
  32. Barari S, Caria S, Davola A, Falco P, Fetzer T, Fiorin S, et al. Evaluating COVID-19 Public Health Messaging in Italy: Self-Reported Compliance and Growing Mental Health Concerns. medRxiv. 2020:2020.03.27.20042820. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20042820
  33. Brouard S, Vasilopoulos P, Becher M. Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in France. Can J Polit Sci. 2020;53(2):253–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000335
  34. Rosenstock IM. Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior. Health Educ Q. 1974;2(4):354–86.
  35. Wollschläger D, Gianicolo E, Blettner M, Hamann R, Herm-Stapelberg N, Schoeps M. Association of COVID-19 mortality with COVID-19 vaccination rates in Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany) from calendar week 1 to 20 in the year 2021: a registry-based analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;36(12):1231–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00825-6
  36. Pullen C, Steele J, Patrick J. Ageism Predicts Prioritizing COVID-19 Vaccines for Older Adults and LTC Residents. Innov Aging. 2021;5 Supplement_1:602. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.2296
  37. Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak. 2006;1(1):48–63.
  38. Mehta PH, Welker KM, Zilioli S, Carré JM. Testosterone and cortisol jointly modulate risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jun;56:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.023
  39. de la Vega R, Ruíz-Barquín R, Boros S, Szabo A. Could attitudes toward COVID-19 in Spain render men more vulnerable than women? Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1278–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1791212
  40. Adams LM, Gell NM, Hoffman EV, Gibbons LE, Phelan EA, Sturgeon JA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 ‘Stay Home, Stay Healthy’ Orders on Function among Older Adults Participating in a Community-Based, Behavioral Intervention Study. J Aging Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(7-8):458–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264321991314
  41. Sepúlveda-Loyola W, Rodríguez-Sánchez I, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Ganz F, Torralba R, Oliveira DV, et al. Impact of Social Isolation Due to COVID-19 on Health in Older People: Mental and Physical Effects and Recommendations. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):938–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1500-7
  42. Varma P, Junge M, Meaklim H, Jackson ML. Younger people are more vulnerable to stress, anxiety and depression during COVID-19 pandemic: A global cross-sectional survey. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;109:110236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110236
  43. Lades LK, Laffan K, Daly M, Delaney L. Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):902–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12450
  44. Schwinger M, Trautner M, Kärchner H, Otterpohl N. Psychological Impact of Corona Lockdown in Germany: Changes in Need Satisfaction, Well-Being, Anxiety, and Depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec;17(23):E9083. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239083
  45. Wilson JM, Lee J, Shook NJ. COVID-19 worries and mental health: the moderating effect of age. Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jul;25(7):1289–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1856778
  46. Maggiori C, Dif-Pradalier, M. Les 65 ans et plus au coeur de la crise COVID-19 (Rapport général). Fribourg: HES-SO – Haute école de travail social – Fribourg; 2020.
  47. Escasain L, Gilles, I, Perriraz, M. Compréhension du public de la COVID-19 (COP – COVID) : influence du genre et de l’âge sur la compréhension de la pandémie après la 1ère vague. Raisons de santé, Les Essentiels N°28. Lausanne: Unisanté, Université de Lausanne.
  48. Heid AR, Cartwright F, Wilson-Genderson M, Pruchno R. Challenges Experienced by Older People During the Initial Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gerontologist. 2021 Jan;61(1):48–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa138
  49. Parsons Leigh J, Fiest K, Brundin-Mather R, Plotnikoff K, Soo A, Sypes EE, et al. A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors. PLoS One. 2020 Oct;15(10):e0241259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241259
  50. Monsch GA, Ehrler F, Steinmetz S. FORS Covid-19 – Enquêtes, fiche d’information n° 2 Politique, droits fondamentaux et enjeux environnementaux pendant la période de confinement.; 2020.

Most read articles by the same author(s)