Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 152 No. 0304 (2022)

A qualitative analysis of critical incident reporting in a paediatric hospital: benefits and weaknesses

  • Luisa Heuer
  • Markus Lehner
  • Martin Stocker
  • Philipp Szavay
  • Sabine Zundel
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2022.w30051
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152:w30051
Published
17.01.2022

Summary

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The value of critical incident reporting systems (CIRSs) has been shown before but data for paediatric facilities are scarce. We aimed to evaluate a CIRS in a paediatric hospital to analyse its benefits, weaknesses and opportunities.

METHODS: In a qualitative analysis, all incidents reported in 2018 with the anonymous reporting tool (CIRS) of the Children's Hospital Lucerne were evaluated. In an iterative process, categories to group the incidents were created and the data analysed accordingly. The focus was on the problem created through the incident, the type of error and possible avoidance.

RESULTS: 496 incidents were reported in 2018: 307 incidents led to medical errors directly effecting patients, 82 incidents led to organisational problems increasing expenditure and 107 incidents were found to not result in any problem. In the majority of cases (398/496) there was no evidence that the caregiver responsible was informed. Personal feedback was documented in 46 cases. Fifty-two incidents were self-reported.

CONCLUSION: A number of reported incidents helped to identify system-based errors and for these the reporting system proved indispensable. Many of the reported errors were found to have an individual component, or only organisational or no consequences. Our data give evidence that instead of giving direct personal feedback, the anonymous reporting system was utilised. The CIRS is essential to identify system-based errors, but personal feedback needs to become obligatory so caregivers can learn from their error: an additional tool to ensure individual feedback and overcome communication difficulties needs to be created.

References

  1. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):327–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470
  2. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. Anesthesiology. 1978 Dec;49(6):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197812000-00004
  3. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000 Mar;320(7237):768–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
  4. Reason J. James Reason: patient safety, human error, and Swiss cheese. Interview by Karolina Peltomaa and Duncan Neuhauser. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;21(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0b013e3182418294
  5. Short TG, O’Regan A, Jayasuriya JP, Rowbottom M, Buckley TA, Oh TE. Improvements in anaesthetic care resulting from a critical incident reporting programme. Anaesthesia. 1996 Jul;51(7):615–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07841.x
  6. Beydon L, Conreux F, Le Gall R, Safran D, Cazalaa JB ; ‘Sous-commission de Materiovigilance’ for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Analysis of the French health ministry’s national register of incidents involving medical devices in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Mar;86(3):382–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.3.382
  7. Frey B, Buettiker V, Hug MI, Waldvogel K, Gessler P, Ghelfi D, et al. Does critical incident reporting contribute to medication error prevention? Eur J Pediatr. 2002 Nov;161(11):594–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-002-1055-0
  8. Ghaleb MA, Barber N, Franklin BD, Yeung VW, Khaki ZF, Wong IC. Systematic review of medication errors in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Oct;40(10):1766–76. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1G717
  9. Miller MR, Robinson KA, Lubomski LH, Rinke ML, Pronovost PJ. Medication errors in paediatric care: a systematic review of epidemiology and an evaluation of evidence supporting reduction strategy recommendations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):116–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.019950
  10. Shojania KG. The frustrating case of incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):400–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.029496
  11. Bordun LA, Butt W. Drug errors in intensive care. J Paediatr Child Health. 1992 Aug;28(4):309–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02674.x
  12. Raju TN, Kecskes S, Thornton JP, Perry M, Feldman S. Medication errors in neonatal and paediatric intensive-care units. Lancet. 1989 Aug;2(8659):374–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90548-5
  13. Folli HL, Poole RL, Benitz WE, Russo JC. Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children’s hospitals. Pediatrics. 1987 May;79(5):718–22.
  14. Scharein P, Trendelenburg M. Critical incidents in a tertiary care clinic for internal medicine. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul;6(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-276
  15. Hubertus J, Piehlmeier W, Heinrich M. Communicating the improvements developed from Critical Incident Reports is an essential part of CIRS. Klin Padiatr. 2016 Sep;228(5):270–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-113311
  16. Lawton R, McEachan RR, Giles SJ, Sirriyeh R, Watt IS, Wright J. Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443
  17. Ramírez E, Martín A, Villán Y, Lorente M, Ojeda J, Moro M, et al.; SINOIRES Working Group. Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital: prospective evaluation through real-time observations of patient safety incidents. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12509. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012509

Most read articles by the same author(s)