Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 151 No. 4748 (2021)

Perceptions of vaccination certificates among the general population in Geneva, Switzerland

  • Mayssam Nehme
  • Helene Baysson
  • Nick Pullen
  • Ania Wisniak
  • Francesco Pennacchio
  • María-Eugenia Zaballa
  • Vanessa Fargnoli
  • Laurent Kaiser
  • Samia Hurst
  • Claudine Burton-Jeangros
  • Silvia Stringhini
  • Idris Guessous
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2021.w30079
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30079
Published
29.11.2021

Summary

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the public perception of COVID-19 vaccination certificates as well as potential differences between individuals.

METHODS: Between 17 March and 1 April 2021, a self-administered online questionnaire was proposed to all persons aged 18 years and older participating in the longitudinal follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies in Geneva, Switzerland. The questionnaire covered aspects of individual and collective benefits, and allowed participants to select contexts in which vaccination certificates should be presented. Results were presented as the proportion of persons agreeing or disagreeing with the implementation of vaccination certificates, selecting specific contexts where certificates should be presented, and agreeing or disagreeing with the potential risks related to certificates. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for factors associated with certificate non-acceptance.

RESULTS: Overall, 4067 individuals completed the questionnaire (response rate 77.4%; mean age 53.3 ± standard deviation 14.4 years; 56.1% were women). About 61.0% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that a vaccination certificate was necessary in certain contexts and 21.6% believed there was no context where vaccination certificates should be presented. Contexts where a majority of participants perceived a vaccination certificate should be presented included jobs where others would be at risk of COVID-related complications (60.7%), jobs where employees would be at risk of getting infected (58.7%), or to be exempt from quarantine when travelling abroad (56.0%). Contexts where fewer individuals perceived the need for vaccination certificates to be presented were participation in large gatherings (36.9%), access to social venues (35.5%), or sharing the same workspace (21.5%). Younger age, no intent for vaccination, and not believing vaccination to be an important step in surmounting the pandemic were factors associated with certificate non-acceptance.

CONCLUSION: This large population-based study showed that the general adult population in Geneva, Switzerland, agreed with the implementation of vaccination certificates in work-related and travel-related contexts. However, this solution was perceived as unnecessary for access to large gatherings or social venues, or to share the same workspace. Differences were seen with age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, and vaccination willingness and perception, highlighting the importance of taking personal and sociodemographic variation into consideration when predicting acceptance of such certificates.

References

  1. Brown RC, Savulescu J, Williams B, Wilkinson D. Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19. J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct;46(10):652–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106365
  2. Hall MA, Studdert DM. “Vaccine Passport” Certification - Policy and Ethical Considerations. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep;385(11):e32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2104289; Epub ahead of print.
  3. Saladino V, Algeri D, Auriemma V. The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct;11:577684. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577684
  4. Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ, et al. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):170–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00384.x
  5. Osama T, Razai MS, Majeed A. Covid-19 vaccine passports: access, equity, and ethics. BMJ. 2021 Apr;373(861):n861. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n861
  6. European Commission. EU Digital COVID Certificate https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/covid-19_en. Published April 21, 2021. [Accessed 23 September 2021]
  7. Federal Office of Public Health. Switzerland. Coronavirus: COVID certificate. https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/covid-zertifikat.html. [Accessed 23 September 2021]
  8. Brown RC, Kelly D, Wilkinson D, Savulescu J. The scientific and ethical feasibility of immunity passports. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):e58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30766-0
  9. Schmelz K. Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021 Jan;118(1):e2016385118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016385118
  10. Sesa G, Wong B, Czabanowska K, Reid J, Davidovitch N, Martin-Moreno JM, Middleton J. Covid-19 vaccine passports and vaccine hesitancy: freedom or control? BMJ opinion. March 30, 2021.
  11. Wilf-Miron R, Myers V, Saban M. Incentivizing Vaccination Uptake: The “Green Pass” Proposal in Israel. JAMA. 2021 Apr;325(15):1503–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4300
  12. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, Gostin LO, Larson HJ, Rabin K, et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine [Erratum in: Nat Med. 2021 Jan 11; PMID: 33082575; PMCID: PMC7573523]. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9
  13. de Figueiredo A, Larson HJ, Reicher S. The potential impact of vaccine passports on inclination to accept COVID-19 vaccinations in the United Kingdom: evidence from a large cross-sectional survey and modelling study. medRxiv 2021;2021.05.31.21258122.
  14. Drury J, Mao G, John A, et al. Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: A rapid review. medRxiv 2021;2021.04.07.21255072.
  15. Aranzales I, Chan HF, Eichenberge R, Hegselmann R, Stadelmann D, Torgler B. Scientists’ Opinions on Immunity Certificates: Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey Among more than 12,000 Scientists (No. 2021-08). Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
  16. Nehme M, Stringhini S, Guessous I ; SEROCoV-Pop Study Team. Perceptions of immunity and vaccination certificates among the general population: a nested study within a serosurvey of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (SEROCoV-POP). Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Nov;150:w20398. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20398
  17. Stringhini S, Wisniak A, Piumatti G, Azman AS, Lauer SA, Baysson H, et al. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study. Lancet. 2020 Aug;396(10247):313–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31304-0
  18. Stringhini S, Zaballa ME, Perez-Saez J, Pullen N, de Mestral C, Picazio A, et al.; Specchio-COVID19 Study Group. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the second pandemic peak. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):600–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00054-2
  19. Baysson H, Pennacchio F, Wisniak A, Zaballa ME, Collombet P, Joost S, Balavoine JF, Bachmann D, Trono D, Pittet D, Chappuis F, Kherad O, Kaiser L, Guessous I, Stringhini S, on behalf of the Specchio COVID19 study group The Specchio-COVID19 study cohort: a web-based prospective study of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveys participants in the canton of Geneva (Switzerland) (in preparation).
  20. de Mestral C, Stringhini S, Guessous I, Jornayvaz FR. Thirteen-year trends in the prevalence of diabetes in an urban region of Switzerland: a population-based study. Diabet Med. 2020 Aug;37(8):1374–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14206
  21. Fargnoli V, Nehme M, Guessous I, Burton-Jeangros C. Acceptability of COVID-19 Certificates: A Qualitative Study in Geneva, Switzerland, in 2020. Front Public Health. 2021 Aug;9:682365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.682365
  22. Office Cantonal des Statistiques (OCSTAT). T 20.02.7.01 - Statistique cantonale du revenu et de la fortune des ménages - Quantiles du revenu annuel brut des ménages selon le type de ménage en 2015-2017 - Canton de Genève. 2020. [Accessed 23 September 2021]
  23. Office cantonal des statistiques (OCSTAT) STATISTIQUES CANTONALES, POPULATION, Etat et évolution de la population. Version 2020. Available at: https://www.ge.ch/statistique/domaines/apercu.asp?dom=01_01 [Accessed 12 September 2021].
  24. Ward J, Bonneton M, Botelho-Nevers E, et al. Enquête COVIREIVAC: les français et la vaccination. ORS PACA- June 2021.
  25. YouGov. Would Britons support a vaccine passport for COVID-19? [Internet]. YouGov; 2021 March 5. Available from: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/articles-reports/2021/03/05/britons-support-covid-19-vaccine-passport-system. [Accessed 23 September 2021]
  26. Direction générale de la santé Chiffres et campagne de vaccination à Genève Available at https://www.ge.ch/se-faire-vacciner-contre-covid-19/chiffres-campagne-vaccination-geneve [Accessed September 15 2021].
  27. Hall MA, Studdert D. Public Views about COVID-19 “Immunity Passports” medRxiv 2021.01.26.21250184; doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250184
  28. Voo TC, Reis AA, Thomé B, Ho CW, Tam CC, Kelly-Cirino C, et al. Immunity certification for COVID-19: ethical considerations. Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Feb;99(2):155–61. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.280701
  29. Kofler N, Baylis F. Covid-19 vaccination certificates: Prospects and problems. The Hastings Center. March 10, 2021.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>