Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Viewpoint

Vol. 151 No. 0708 (2021)

Medical student selection: the quest for the Grail

  • Mathieu Nendaz
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2021.20467
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w20467
Published
27.02.2021

References

  1. Krings R, Huwendiek S, Walsh N, Stricker D, Berendonk C. Predictive power of high school educational attainment and the medical aptitude test for performance during the Bachelor program in human medicine at the University of Bern: a cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20389. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20389
  2. Spicher B. Eignungstest für das Medizinstudium in der Schweiz [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 December 2]. Available from: https://www.swissuniversities.ch/fileadmin/swissuniversities/Dokumente/Lehre/Medizin/Bericht_ZTD_EMS_2020.pdf
  3. Patterson F, Roberts C, Hanson MD, Hampe W, Eva K, Ponnamperuma G, et al. 2018 Ottawa consensus statement: Selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1091–101. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1498589
  4. Stegers-Jager KM. Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):86–95. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13462
  5. Hänsgen K, Spicher B. Numerus clausus: le «test d’aptitudes pour les études de médecine» (AMS) permet-il de trouver les personnes les plus aptes? Schweiz Arzteztg. 2002;83(31):1653–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.4414/saez.2002.09156
  6. Powis D, Munro D, Bore M, Eley D. Why is it so hard to consider personal qualities when selecting medical students? Med Teach. 2020;42(4):366–71. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1703919
  7. Mazer BL. Accepting randomness in medical school admissions: The case for a lottery. Med Teach. 2020;0(0):1–3. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1832206
  8. Wouters A, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. Selection and lottery in medical school admissions: who gains and who loses? MedEdPublish. 2018;7(4):50. doi:.https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000271.1
  9. Alexander K, Cleland J. Satisfying the hydra: the social imperative in medical school admissions. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):587–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13586
  10. Sohrmann M, Berendonk C, Nendaz M, Bonvin R ; Swiss Working Group For Profiles Implementation. Nationwide introduction of a new competency framework for undergraduate medical curricula: a collaborative approach. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20201.
  11. de Visser M, Fluit C, Fransen J, Latijnhouwers M, Cohen-Schotanus J, Laan R. The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(1):43–56. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9681-x
  12. Nendaz M, Hartley O, Chanson M, Savoldelli G. Étudier la médecine humaine à l’Université de Genève: Un programme d’études intégré et innovant. Praxis (Bern). 2020;109(11):871–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a003554
  13. Abbiati M, Baroffio A, Gerbase MW. Personal profile of medical students selected through a knowledge-based exam only: are we missing suitable students? Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):29705. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.29705
  14. Schwartzstein RM. Getting the right medical students--nature versus nurture. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):1586–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1501440

Most read articles by the same author(s)