Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 150 No. 3940 (2020)

Healthcare professionals’ opinions on psychological screening in follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors

Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20356



Implementation of screening for psychological distress in populations at risk, as recommended in existing guidelines, can be challenging on different levels: structural, organisational and personal (provider and patient). A specific group at risk for psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, is the growing population of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). In many countries, including Switzerland, the standardised assessment of psychological late effects during follow-up care is not yet established. The emotion thermometer, a short and validated assessment tool to screen for psychological distress, might facilitate implementation of psychological screening in Swiss CCS follow-up care.


To inform implementation strategy and assess readiness of centres to integrate standardised psychological screening, we conducted a cross-sectional survey. We describe healthcare professionals’ opinions on (i) the current standard of psychological screening in follow-up care, (ii) their experience using the emotion thermometer, and (iii) perceived barriers and facilitators of possible implementation of psychological screening, including the emotion thermometer.


We contacted 49 healthcare professionals involved in CCS follow-up care in all nine paediatric oncology clinics in Switzerland. The electronic survey included closed and open questions.


A majority of the healthcare professionals (17/24, 71%) stated that assessment of psychological distress is currently not standard in follow-up care. On the contrary, about half of them (11/24, 46%) think that psychological distress is adequately assessed in follow-up care. None of the participants had any previous experience with the emotion thermometer. After being informed about the emotion thermometer, nearly 80% (19/24) agree that it appears to be a good screening instrument and support the idea of regular application during follow-up care. Facilitators of implementation included the instrument’s brevity, its ability to visualise psychological topics and raising awareness of the need to think about the psychological side of follow-up care. Barriers included lack of time, the additional effort and the perception that instead an informal assessment would be sufficient. Concerns about using an artificial assessment, rather than a natural conversation, were also expressed.


There is overall agreement that screening for psychological late effects is not yet standard in follow-up care in Switzerland. It is important to mitigate perceived barriers and concerns of healthcare professionals to enable a successful implementation of psychological distress screening according to the established standards of care.


  1. Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, et al.; EUROCARE Working Group. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):35–47. doi:.
  2. Gianinazzi ME, Rueegg CS, Wengenroth L, Bergstraesser E, Rischewski J, Ammann RA, et al.; for Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG). Adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: are they vulnerable for psychological distress? Psychooncology. 2013;22(9):2051–8. doi:.
  3. Michel G, Rebholz CE, von der Weid NX, Bergstraesser E, Kuehni CE. Psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer: the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1740–8. doi:.
  4. Kaye EC, Brinkman TM, Baker JN. Development of depression in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: a multi-level life course conceptual framework. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(6):2009–17. doi:.
  5. Zeltzer LK, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D, Zebrack B, Casillas J, Tsao JC, et al. Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(14):2396–404. doi:.
  6. Bruce M. A systematic and conceptual review of posttraumatic stress in childhood cancer survivors and their parents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(3):233–56. doi:.
  7. Rourke MT, Hobbie WL, Schwartz L, Kazak AE. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(2):177–82. doi:.
  8. D’Agostino NM, Edelstein K, Zhang N, Recklitis CJ, Brinkman TM, Srivastava D, et al. Comorbid symptoms of emotional distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Cancer. 2016;122(20):3215–24. doi:.
  9. Wiener L, Battles H, Bernstein D, Long L, Derdak J, Mackall CL, et al. Persistent psychological distress in long-term survivors of pediatric sarcoma: the experience at a single institution. Psychooncology. 2006;15(10):898–910. doi:.
  10. Secinti E, Thompson EJ, Richards M, Gaysina D. Research Review: Childhood chronic physical illness and adult emotional health - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(7):753–69. doi:.
  11. Jacobsen PB. Screening for psychological distress in cancer patients: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(29):4526–7. doi:.
  12. Foster C, Wright D, Hill H, Hopkinson J, Roffe L. Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009;18(3):223–47. doi:.
  13. Calaminus G, Weinspach S, Teske C, Göbel U. Quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer. First results of an evaluation of 49 patients with the PEDQOL questionnaire. Klin Padiatr. 2000;212(4):211–5. doi:.
  14. Wengenroth L, Gianinazzi ME, Rueegg CS, Lüer S, Bergstraesser E, Kuehni CE, et al. Health-related quality of life in young survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(9):2151–61. doi:.
  15. Gianinazzi ME, Rueegg CS, von der Weid NX, Niggli FK, Kuehni CE, Michel G ; Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG). Mental health-care utilization in survivors of childhood cancer and siblings: the Swiss childhood cancer survivor study. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(2):339–49. doi:.
  16. Zebrack BJ, Gurney JG, Oeffinger K, Whitton J, Packer RJ, Mertens A, et al. Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):999–1006. doi:.
  17. Jankovic M, Haupt R, Spinetta JJ, Beck JD, Byrne J, Calaminus G, et al. Long-term survivors of childhood cancer: cure and care—the Erice Statement (2006) revised after 10 years (2016). J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(5):647–50. doi:.
  18. Michel G, Mulder RL, van der Pal HJH, Skinner R, Bárdi E, Brown MC, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the organization of long-term follow-up care for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the PanCareSurFup Guidelines Working Group. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(5):759–72. doi:.
  19. Pfeiffer V, Redmond S, Kuonen R, Sommer G, Spycher B, Singh P, et al. Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry Annual Report 2015/2016. Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry; 2017
  20. Schindler M, Belle FN, Grotzer MA, von der Weid NX, Kuehni CE ; Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG). Childhood cancer survival in Switzerland (1976-2013): Time-trends and predictors. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(1):62–74. doi:.
  21. (SIGN) SIGN. Long-term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer. Edinburgh, 2013
  22. CsOG. Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Cancers. Monrovia, CA: Children's Oncology Group; 2013
  23. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Distress Management. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2007
  24. Sieswerda E, Postma A, van Dalen EC, van der Pal HJH, Tissing WJE, Rammeloo LAJ, et al.; Late Effects of Childhood Cancer task force of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG LATER). The Dutch Childhood Oncology Group guideline for follow-up of asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2191–8. doi:.
  25. Wiener L, Kazak AE, Noll RB, Patenaude AF, Kupst MJ. Standards for the Psychosocial Care of Children With Cancer and Their Families: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(S5, Suppl 5):S419–24. doi:.
  26. Mitchell AJ. Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(29):4670–81. doi:.
  27. Wiener L, Battles H, Zadeh S, Widemann BC, Pao M. Validity, specificity, feasibility and acceptability of a brief pediatric distress thermometer in outpatient clinics. Psychooncology. 2017;26(4):461–8. doi:.
  28. Beck KR, Tan SM, Lum SS, Lim LE, Krishna LK. Validation of the emotion thermometers and hospital anxiety and depression scales in Singapore: Screening cancer patients for distress, anxiety and depression. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016;12(2):e241–9. doi:.
  29. Harju E, Michel G, Roser K. A systematic review on the use of the emotion thermometer in individuals diagnosed with cancer. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2018
  30. Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Granger L, Symonds P. Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the Emotion Thermometers tool. Psychooncology. 2010;19(2):125–33. doi:.
  31. Schubart JR, Emerich M, Farnan M, Stanley Smith J, Kauffman GL, Kass RB. Screening for psychological distress in surgical breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(10):3348–53. doi:.
  32. Meier JH, Ansari M, Popovic MB, Bergstraesser E, Brazzola P, Eisenreich B, et al. Aftercare in Pediatric Oncology in Switzerland - Current State, Challenges and Future Directions. Schweizer Krebsbulletin. 2018:273–9
  33. Scialla MA, Canter KS, Chen FF, Kolb EA, Sandler E, Wiener L, et al. Delivery of care consistent with the psychosocial standards in pediatric cancer: Current practices in the United States. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(3):e26869. doi:.
  34. Barrera M, Alexander S, Shama W, Mills D, Desjardins L, Hancock K. Perceived benefits of and barriers to psychosocial risk screening in pediatric oncology by health care providers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(12):e27429. doi:.
  35. Mitchell A, Waller A, Carlson LE. Implementing a screening programme for distress in cancer settings Science and practice. Psychooncology. 2012;9:259–75.
  36. Schouten B, Bergs J, Vankrunkelsven P, Hellings J. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the prevalence, barriers and management of psychosocial issues in cancer care: A mixed methods study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(1):e12936. doi:.
  37. Fagerlind H, Kettis Å, Glimelius B, Ring L. Barriers against psychosocial communication: oncologists’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3815–22. doi:.
  38. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP ; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9. doi:.
  39. Leiner DJ. SoSci Survey (Version 2.5.00-i)) 2014. Available from:
  40. Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Park B, Granger L, Symonds P. Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part II. What is the optimal combination of Emotion Thermometers? Psychooncology. 2010;19(2):134–40. doi:.
  41. Mitchell A. Emotion Thermometers Tool [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 January 7]. Available from:
  42. Clarke V, Braun V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London, UK: SAGE Publishing; 2013
  43. van Nes F, Abma T, Jonsson H, Deeg D. Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? Eur J Ageing. 2010;7(4):313–6. doi:.
  44. Michel G, Vetsch J. Screening for psychological late effects in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27(4):297–305. doi:.
  45. Butow PN, Brown RF, Cogar S, Tattersall MH, Dunn SM. Oncologists’ reactions to cancer patients’ verbal cues. Psychooncology. 2002;11(1):47–58. doi:.
  46. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(4):714–24. doi:.
  47. Schepers SA, Haverman L, Zadeh S, Grootenhuis MA, Wiener L. Healthcare Professionals’ Preferences and Perceived Barriers for Routine Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Oncology Practice: Moving Toward International Processes of Change. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(12):2181–8. doi:.
  48. Patel SK, Mullins W, Turk A, Dekel N, Kinjo C, Sato JK. Distress screening, rater agreement, and services in pediatric oncology. Psychooncology. 2011;20(12):1324–33. doi:.

Most read articles by the same author(s)