Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 150 No. 2526 (2020)

Supporting health professionals after an adverse event in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional study

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20278
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20278
Published
24.06.2020

Summary

STUDY AIM

The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of organisational structures and processes for the support of second victims in Swiss hospitals.

METHODS

To identify institutional policies and support for health professionals who have been involved in an adverse patient event and become traumatised from the event, also called second victims, we conducted a cross-sectional, multicentre survey study. We targeted Swiss acute care, university and psychiatric hospitals, as well as rehabilitation and speciality clinics. A 13-item questionnaire was used to collect information from hospital quality managers regarding their institutions’ policies and support practices with respect to second victims. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, respondents from 116 hospitals completed the questionnaire (response rate 50.2%). Most institutional respondents reported both that they would like to receive information about adverse events and that their institutions offer related support. Of participating institutions, 60% indicated that they actively inform their personnel about second-victim support possibilities; however, only 31% specifically train supervisory personnel to deliver that support, and only 32% have hospital-specific guidelines in place for second victim support. University, acute care and speciality clinics were more likely to use such guidelines than psychiatric and rehabilitation clinics. Analysis indicated an association between hospital size and the existence of guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

In Swiss hospitals, second victim support is generally prevalent, but often in an unstructured way. This lack of methodology increases the risk that, following adverse events, both the quantity and quality of support provided to health professionals will be insufficient. A firm commitment on the part of institutional leaders to implement related policies could foster the adoption of high-quality second victim guidelines in Swiss hospitals.

References

  1. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272(23):1851–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520230061039
  2. Makeham MAB, County M, Kidd MR, Dovey SM. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002;177(2):68–72. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04668.x
  3. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):370–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102073240604
  4. Schwendimann R, Blatter C, Dhaini S, Simon M, Ausserhofer D. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):521. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z
  5. Panagioti M, Khan K, Keers RN, Abuzour A, Phipps D, Kontopantelis E, et al. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4185. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4185
  6. Vanhaecht K, Seys D, Schouten L, Bruyneel L, Coeckelberghs E, Panella M, et al.; Dutch Peer Support Collaborative Research Group. Duration of second victim symptoms in the aftermath of a patient safety incident and association with the level of patient harm: a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e029923. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029923
  7. Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Brandt J, Hall LW. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):325–30. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.032870
  8. Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, Vleugels A, Euwema M, Panella M, et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(2):135–62. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712458918
  9. Ajri-Khameslou M, Abbaszadeh A, Borhani F. Emergency Nurses as Second Victims of Error: A Qualitative Study. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2017;39(1):68–76. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000133
  10. Rassin M, Kanti T, Silner D. Chronology of medication errors by nurses: accumulation of stresses and PTSD symptoms. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005;26(8):873–86. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840500184566
  11. Crigger NJ, Meek VL. Toward a theory of self-reconciliation following mistakes in nursing practice. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):177–83. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00164.x
  12. Schelbred AB, Nord R. Nurses’ experiences of drug administration errors. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(3):317–24. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04437.x
  13. Delacroix R. Exploring the experience of nurse practitioners who have committed medical errors: A phenomenological approach. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(7):403–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12468
  14. McLennan SR, Engel-Glatter S, Meyer AH, Schwappach DL, Scheidegger DH, Elger BS. The impact of medical errors on Swiss anaesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(8):990–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12517
  15. Van Gerven E, Vander Elst T, Vandenbroeck S, Dierickx S, Euwema M, Sermeus W, et al. Increased risk of burnout for physicians and nurses involved in a patient safety incident. Med Care. 2016;54(10):937–43. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000582
  16. Burlison JD, Quillivan RR, Scott SD, Johnson S, Hoffman JM. The Effects of the Second Victim Phenomenon on Work-Related Outcomes: Connecting Self-Reported Caregiver Distress to Turnover Intentions and Absenteeism. J Patient Saf. 2016. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000301
  17. Schwappach DL, Boluarte TA. The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organisational accountability. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139(1-2):9–15.
  18. Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Hahn-Cover K, Epperly KM, et al. Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(5):233–40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(10)36038-7
  19. Conway J, Federico F, Stewart K, Campbell M. Respectful Mangagemnt of Serious Clinical Adverse Events (Second Editon). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011.
  20. National Quality Forum. Safe Practices for Better Healthcare - 2010. Update: A Consensus Report. Washington, DC: NQF; 2010.
  21. Pratt S, Kenney L, Scott SD, Wu AW. How to develop a second victim support program: a toolkit for health care organizations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38(5):235–40, 193. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(12)38030-6
  22. Edrees H, Connors C, Paine L, Norvell M, Taylor H, Wu AW. Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e011708. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708
  23. Edrees H, Wu A. The aftermath of medical errors: Supporting our second victim colleagues. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(suppl 1):65. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw104.103
  24. White AA, Brock DM, McCotter PI, Hofeldt R, Edrees HH, Wu AW, et al. Risk managers’ descriptions of programs to support second victims after adverse events. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015;34(4):30–40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21169
  25. Mira JJ, Lorenzo S, Carrillo I, Ferrús L, Pérez-Pérez P, Iglesias F, et al.; Research Group on Second and Third Victims. Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):341. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0994-x
  26. Edrees HH, Morlock L, Wu AW. Do Hospitals Support Second Victims? Collective Insights From Patient Safety Leaders in Maryland. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(9):471–83. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.01.008
  27. H+ Die Spitäler der Schweiz. Mitgliederverzeichnis 2018 Available from: http://www.hplus.ch/de/servicenav/ueber_uns/mitglieder/mitgliederverzeichnis/nocache/1/.
  28. Medically Induced Trauma Support Services (MITSS). MITTS Organizational Assessment Tool For Clinicaian Support 2017 Available from: http://mitss.org/.
  29. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  30. Meadows S, Baker K, Butler J. Advances in Patient Safety The Incident Decision Tree: Guidelines for Action Following Patient Safety Incidents. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005.
  31. McLennan S, Engel S, Ruhe K, Leu A, Schwappach D, Elger B. Implementation status of error disclosure standards reported by Swiss hospitals. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13820. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2013.13820
  32. Edrees HH, Wu AW. Does One Size Fit All? Assessing the Need for Organizational Second Victim Support Programs. J Patient Saf. 2017. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000321
  33. McLennan SR, Engel-Glatter S, Meyer AH, Schwappach DL, Scheidegger DH, Elger BS. The impact of medical errors on Swiss anaesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(8):990–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12517
  34. Cabilan CJ, Kynoch K. Experiences of and support for nurses as second victims of adverse nursing errors: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2017;15(9):2333–64. doi:.https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003254
  35. Vrbnjak D, Denieffe S, O’Gorman C, Pajnkihar M. Barriers to reporting medication errors and near misses among nurses: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:162–78. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.019
  36. Birks Y, Harrison R, Bosanquet K, Hall J, Harden M, Entwistle V, et al. An exploration of the implementation of open disclosure of adverse events in the UK: a scoping review and qualitative exploration. Southampton (UK): Health Services and Delivery Research; 2014.
  37. Wenn etwas schief geht [Internet]. Stiftung für Patientensicherheit. 2006. Available from: https://www.patientensicherheit.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/3_Bildung/KOM-Kurse/1_SR_1_Wenn_etwas_schief_geht_D_160725_.pdf.
  38. Schwappach D, Hochreutener A-M, von Laue N, Frank O. Täter als Opfer. Zurich: Stiftung für Patientensicherheit Schweiz; 2010
  39. Van Gerven E, Bruyneel L, Panella M, Euwema M, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K. Psychological impact and recovery after involvement in a patient safety incident: a repeated measures analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011403. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011403
  40. Scott SD, McCoig MM. Care at the point of impact: Insights into the second-victim experience. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2016;35(4):6–13. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21218
  41. Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit, Platform Patientensicherheit, Patientensicherheit Schweiz. Einrichtung und erfolgreicher Betrieb eines Berichts- und Lernsystems (CIRS). Handlungsempfehlung für stationäre Einrichtungen im Gesundheitswesen. Berlin: 2016.

Most read articles by the same author(s)