Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 149 No. 5152 (2019)

Current prevalence of self-reported interpersonal violence among adult patients seen at a university hospital emergency department in Switzerland

  • Tobias Douet
  • Alix Ohl
  • Olivier Hugli
  • Nathalie Romain-Glassey
  • Pierre-Nicolas Carron
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2019.20147
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20147
Published
17.12.2019

Summary

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current prevalence of self-reported interpersonal violence amongst patients consulting at the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital and to describe the characteristics of the violence sustained.

METHODS

Ours was a cross-sectional study using a modified version of the Partner Violence Screen questionnaire, which was distributed to every patient over 16 years old consulting at the ED between the 1st and 30th September 2016. Excluded were those incapable of decision-making, unable to understand owing to language difficulties, or in police detention. Questions pertained to violence endured during the year prior to their attendance at the ED and, where relevant, the date, place, and type of violence (physical or psychological), the perpetrator and the means used (firearms or other weapons). Demographic details were taken from the hospital records.

RESULTS

Of 628 patients included (participation rate 86%), 19% were victims of violence, for 27% of whom it was the motive for ED attendance. The median age of these victims of violence was 28 years (interquartile range 22–43), 39% were female, 71% single and 38% foreign nationals. Typical characteristics of self-reported violence were: (1) violence sustained within the previous 24 h (26%); (2) perpetrators unknown (35%); (3) occurrence at a café, bar, restaurant or nightclub (32%); (4) use of knives (19%); (5) prior consumption of alcohol by the victims themselves (28%). Females were more susceptible to domestic violence than males (45 vs 7%), the latter mostly reporting public violence (64 vs 43% in women).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of self-reported interpersonal violence has reached one patient in five in our ED. Our results underline the importance of screening for this, as well as providing the means to offer specific follow-up.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Consultation on Violence and Health. Violence: a public health. Geneva. document WHO/EHA/SPI. POA. 2). Available from: http://www. who. int/violenceprevention/approach/definition/en; 1996.
  2. Killias M, Staubli S, Biberstein L, Bänziger M, Iadanza S. Sondage au sujet des expériences et opinions sur la criminalité à Neuchâtel. Institut de Criminologie de l’Université de Zürich; 2011. Available from: https://www.fr.ch/sites/default/files/2018-07/icvs_2011_canton_fribourg.pdf.
  3. Vilpert S. Consultations dans un service d’urgence en Suisse. Neuchâtel: Obsan: Observatoire suisse de la santé; 2013. Available from: https://www.obsan.admin.ch/sites/default/files/publications/2015/obsan_bulletin_2013-03_f.pdf
  4. Waalen J, Goodwin MM, Spitz AM, Petersen R, Saltzman LE. Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers. Barriers and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(4):230–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00229-4
  5. Della Rocca GJ, Sprague S, Dosanjh S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. Orthopaedic surgeons’ knowledge and misconceptions in the identification of intimate partner violence against women. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(4):1074–80. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2749-x
  6. Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLain J, Lowenstein SR. Domestic violence against women. Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA. 1995;273(22):1763–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520460045033
  7. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency department response to domestic violence--California, 1992. JAMA. 1993;270(10):1174–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510100024008
  8. Hofner M-C, Python NV, Martin E, Gervasoni JP, Graz B, Yersin B. Prevalence of victims of violence admitted to an emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(7):481–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.013979
  9. Kyriacou DN, Anglin D, Taliaferro E, Stone S, Tubb T, Linden JA, et al. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(25):1892–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199912163412505
  10. Arslan ED, Solakoglu AG, Komut E, Kavalci C, Yilmaz F, Karakilic E, et al. Assessment of maxillofacial trauma in emergency department. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):13. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-9-13
  11. Rutschmann OT, Hugli OW, Marti C, Grosgurin O, Geissbuhler A, Kossovsky M, et al. Reliability of the revised Swiss Emergency Triage Scale: a computer simulation study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018;25(4):264–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000449
  12. Lanfranconi B. Nouvelle montée de la violence chez les jeunes: résultats des statistiques de l’assurance-accidents selon la LAA. Lucerne; 2011. Available from: http://www.lips-org.ch/documents/SuvaStudieGewaltFrz-UpdateGewalt_20072011_F.pdf
  13. Statistiques sur l’aide aux victimes 2018, Criminalité et droit pénal. Office Fédérale de la Statistique; 2019. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/catalogues-banques-donnees/tableaux.assetdetail.8166964.html
  14. Exadaktylos AK, Häuselmann S, Zimmermann H. Are times getting tougher? A six year survey of urban violence related injuries in a Swiss university hospital. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(37-38):525–30.
  15. Domestic violence. Police Crime Statistics (PCS) 2018 [Internet]. Federal Statistical Office - Switzerland; 2019. Available from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/crime-criminal-justice/police/domestic-violence.html
  16. Gillioz L, De Puy J, Ducret V. Domination et violence envers la femme dans le couple. Lausanne: Payot; 1997.
  17. Merçay C. Le recours aux services d’urgence en Suisse. Description des différences cantonales (Obsan Dossier 64) [Internet]. Neuchâtel: Observatoire suisse de la santé; 2018 p. 44. Available from: https://www.obsan.admin.ch/sites/default/files/publications/2018/obsan_dossier_64_0.pdf
  18. Hurley KF, Brown-Maher T, Campbell SG, Wallace T, Venugopal R, Baggs D. Emergency department patients’ opinions of screening for intimate partner violence among women. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(2):97–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2002.002626
  19. Kuendig H, Hasselberg M, Laflamme L, Daeppen J-B, Gmel G. Acute alcohol consumption and injury: risk associations and attributable fractions for different injury mechanisms. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):218–26. doi:.https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.218
  20. Canton de Vaud SCRIS. Chiffres-clés annuels de la population, 1981-2016 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.scris.vd.ch/Default.aspx?DocID=6808&DomId=2605
  21. Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, He T, Howes DS, Levinson W. “Between me and the computer”: increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40(5):476–84. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.127181
  22. Mucchielli L. Une société plus violente?: Une analyse socio-historique des violences interpersonnelles en france, des années 1970 à nos jours. Déviance et Société [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2017 Nov 29];32(2):115. Available from: http://www.cairn.info/revue-deviance-et-societe-2008-2-page-115.htm

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>