Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 148 No. 4950 (2018)

What makes internal medicine attractive for the millennial generation? A survey of residents in internal medicine in Switzerland

  • Marco Cribari
  • Barbara M. Holzer
  • Edouard Battegay
  • Christoph E. Minder
  • Lukas Zimmerli
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14696
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14696
Published
04.01.2019

Summary

AIMS

A new generation of physicians, millennials (also known as Generation Y), are entering residency programmes in internal medicine, and these young men and women learn and work in ways that are different from those of past generations. The aim of the present study was to investigate aspects contributing to the attractiveness to young residents of a career in general internal medicine (GIM) compared with medical subspecialties (SUB).

METHODS

In a cross-sectional online survey, we included residents working in residency facilities in GIM in German-speaking Switzerland. A total of 1818 junior residents were eligible. We looked for personal preferences, characteristics, and criteria influencing the choice of a career in GIM or SUB.

RESULTS

392 out of 1818 (22%) residents participated in the survey (66% females); they had been in clinical training for 35.5 months on average. 87% of the respondents aspired to a title in GIM, and 29% of these to a SUB title as well. 71% of the women chose GIM and not a SUB vs 58% of the men (p <0.019). GIM residents gave significantly higher ratings to “broad range of expertise,” “flexible work hours” (p = 0.007), “work-life balance”, and “reconciliation of work, family and private life” than residents aiming at a SUB. SUB residents evaluated career-related criteria as significantly more important (p <0.0001). With regard to career motivation, GIM residents and female residents rated extraprofessional concerns significantly higher than SUB residents did (p = 0.019). In contrast, SUB residents showed significantly higher intrinsic motivation than GIM residents (p = 0.025). Only 28.2% of GIM residents had a mentor, compared to 49.6% of SUB residents (p <0.0005). Concerning personal perceptions of the future within the next 5 years, GIM residents attached significantly more importance to part-time work (p = 0.001), whereas SUB residents attached more importance to getting a leading position as a main goal (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are considerable differences between GIM and SUB residents regarding career motivation and their views on working conditions and work-life balance. It is essential to understand the factors that motivate or deter the next generation in order to ensure the attractiveness of the profession of GIM.

References

  1. Mitchell DA. Generation Z--striking the balance: healthy doctors for a healthy community. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37(8):665–7.
  2. Waljee JF, Chopra V, Saint S. Mentoring Millennials. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1547–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3804
  3. Hostettler S, Kraft E. FMH-Ärztestatistik 2016 – 36175 berufstätige Ärztinnen und Ärzte. Schweiz Arzteztg. 2017;98(13):394–400. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/saez.2017.05522
  4. fmh.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Swiss Medical Association [cited 2018 June 03]. FMH-Ärztestatistik. Available from: https://www.fmh.ch/services/statistik/aerztestatistik.html
  5. hausaerzteschweiz.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Haus- und Kinderärzte Schweiz [cited 2018 June 3]. Zeller A, Tschudi B. Medizinische Grundversorgung: Neue Studie prognostiziert rasant steigenden Hausarztmangel mit hohen Kostenfolgen, 31 March 2016. Available from: http://www.hausaerzteschweiz.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/hausaerzteschweiz/Dokumente/Tag_der_Hausarztmedizin/mfe_Medienmitteilung_310316_D.pdf
  6. sgaim.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine [cited 2018 June 3]. Offensive für mehr ärztlichen Nachwuchs in der Allgemeinen Inneren Medizin, 1 December 2017. Available from: http://www.sgaim.ch/nc/de/meta/mediennews/newsdetail/news/offensive-fuer-mehr-aerztlichen-nachwuchs-in-der-allgemeinen-inneren-medizin.html
  7. Tandjung R, Senn O, Marty F, Krauss L, Rosemann T, Badertscher N. Career after successful medical board examination in general practice--a cross-sectional survey. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13839. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2013.13839
  8. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. Swiss residents’ speciality choices--impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):137. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-137
  9. Jones L, Fisher T. Workforce trends in general practice in the UK: results from a longitudinal study of doctors’ careers. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(523):134–6.
  10. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R. The new generation of family physicians--career motivation, life goals and work-life balance. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138(21-22):305–12. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2008.12103
  11. Studerus L, Ahrens R, Häuptle C, Goeldlin A, Streit S. Optional part-time and longer GP training modules in GP practices associated with more trainees becoming GPs - a cohort study in Switzerland. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0706-1
  12. siwf.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Allgemeine Innere Medizin: Schweizerisches Institut für ärztliche Weiter- und Fortbildung [cited 2018 June 3]. Available from: https://www.fmh.ch/bildung-siwf/fachgebiete/facharzttitel-und-schwerpunkte/allgemeine-innere-medizin.html
  13. siwf-register.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Allgemeine Innere Medizin: Schweizerisches Institut für ärztliche Weiter- und Fortbildung [cited 2018 August 25]. Available from: https://www.siwf-register.ch/
  14. Abel T, Kohlmann T. Der Fragebogen zum Kohärenzsinn. In: Brähler E, Schumacher J, Strauss B, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Höttingen: Hogrefe, 2002. p. 326-330.
  15. Abele AE. Karriereorientierungen angehender Akademikerinnen und Akademiker. Bielefeld: Kleine; 1994.
  16. Abele AE, Stief M, Andrä MS. Zur ökonomischen Erfassung beruflicher Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen: Neukonstruktion einer BSW-Skala. Z Arb Organpsychol. 2000;44(3):145–51. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1026//0932-4089.44.3.145
  17. Poehlmann K, Brunstein JC. GOALS: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung von Lebenszielen. Diagnostica. 1997;43:63–79.
  18. vsao.ch. [Internet]. Bern: Verband Schweizerischer Assistenz- und Oberärztinnen und -ärzte [cited 2018 June 3]. Mitgliederbefragung 2017. Available from: http://www2.vsao.ch/content/default.asp?txtParentID=47&txtCatID=675#collapse1
  19. Wenger N, Méan M, Castioni J, Marques-Vidal P, Waeber G, Garnier A. Allocation of internal medicine resident time in a Swiss hospital: a time and motion study of day and evening shifts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(8):579–86. doi:.https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2238
  20. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Klaghofer R. Career paths in physicians’ postgraduate training - an eight-year follow-up study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140:w13056. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2010.13056
  21. Aaron M, Levenberg P. The millennials in medicine: tips for teaching the next generation of physicians. Journal of Academic Ophthalmology. 2014;7:e17–20.
  22. Bassetti S, Héritier F. Wir brauchen ein möglichst flexibles Weiterbildungsprogramm. Schweiz Arzteztg. 2018;99(11):357–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/saez.2018.06398
  23. Gaspoz JM, Héritier F, Aujesky D, Capaul R, Providoli R, Tronnolone D, et al. Allgemeine Innere Medizin: Nachwuchs ins Zentrum gerückt. Schweiz Arzteztg. 2018;99(10):300–2. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/saez.2018.06512
  24. Armstrong K, Keating NL, Landry M, Crotty BH, Phillips RS, Selker HP ; Council of the Society of General Internal Medicine. Academic general internal medicine: a mission for the future. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):845–51. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2334-3
  25. Aujesky D. Allgemeine Innere Medizin am Universitätsspital. Schweiz Arzteztg. 2015;96:71–4.
  26. forbes.com. [Internet]. New York: Forbes Magazine [cited 2018 August 25]. Moore K: The modern mentor in a millennial workplace, 11 September 2014. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/consent/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/karlmoore/2014/09/11/the-modern-mentor-in-a-millennial-workplace/
  27. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103–15. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1103
  28. Luckhaupt SE, Chin MH, Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Bell D, Leonard AC, et al. Mentorship in academic general internal medicine. Results of a survey of mentors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(11):1014–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.215.x
  29. Chopra V, Arora VM, Saint S. Will you be my mentor? - Four archetypes to help mentees succeed in academic medicine. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(2):175–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6537
  30. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Marty F. Attraktivitätssteigerung der Hausarztmedizin- Ansichten und Vorschläge von praktizierenden Hausärzten. Prim Care. 2007;42:639–41.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>