Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 148 No. 2728 (2018)

Termination of pregnancy in a border region between Switzerland and Italy (2008–2015)

  • Danuta Reinholz
  • Simona Casati
  • Ottavio Beratta
  • Giorgio Marlani
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2018.14636
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14636
Published
12.07.2018

Summary

In Switzerland, voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) can be performed in all public and private hospitals with an obstetrics/gynaecology department. For various reasons, many Italian women use the Swiss healthcare system, in particular in Canton Ticino, a border region adjacent to Italy in the southern part of Switzerland, when they want to have a VTP. In this study, we aimed to illustrate trends in the VTPs in the Canton Ticino between 2008 and 2015 and demonstrate differences between the Swiss women resident in Switzerland (SSR), foreign women resident in Switzerland (FSR) and foreign women resident abroad (FAR), focusing in particular on the Italian women as during this period there were legal changes in Italy. The number of VTPs was constant on a national level (10,924 in 2008, 10,255 in 2015); in contrast, since 2012 the number has progressively decreased (41%) in Ticino, mainly because of the significant reduction in VTPs in women resident in Italy (decrease of 75.7%). In addition, we wanted to evaluate the impact of the pre-VTP counselling at a family planning centre (FPC) on the VTP decision. The high number of pre-VTP consultations suggests that this service is appreciated and helpful. We observed an encouraging trend in changing the decision to have a VTP after the consultation at the FPC, where 12% of the pregnant women decided to continue the pregnancy. Because of its location, the Canton Ticino is an example how availability of certain drugs, methods and laws can influence the cross-border flow of the patients.

References

  1. Boland R, Katzive L. Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008;34(3):110–20. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1363/3411008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/3411008
  2. Ufficio di statistica: https://www4.ti.ch/dfe/dr/ustat/ufficio/
  3. Swiss federal office for statistics: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home.html
  4. Sedgh G, Henshaw SK, Singh S, Bankole A, Drescher J. Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33(3):106–16. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1363/3310607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/3310607
  5. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-4
  6. Day M. Medical abortion becomes available in Italy. BMJ. 2010;340(apr12 2):c2001. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2001
  7. Minerva F. Conscientious objection in Italy. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(2):170–3. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101656
  8. Di Carlo C, Savoia F, Ferrara C, Sglavo G, Tommaselli GA, Giampaolino P, et al. “In patient” medical abortion versus surgical abortion: patient’s satisfaction. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(8):650–4. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2016.1149162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2016.1149162
  9. Perrin E, Berthoud M, Pott M, Toledo Vera AG, Perrenoud D, Bianchi-Demicheli F. Clinical course in women undergoing termination of pregnancy within the legal time limit in French-speaking Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13282. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13282
  10. Vandamme J, Wyverkens E, Buysse A, Vrancken C, Brondeel R. Pre-abortion counselling from women’s point of view. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18(4):309–18. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.796586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.796586
  11. Baron C, Cameron S, Johnstone A. Do women seeking termination of pregnancy need pre-abortion counselling? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(3):181–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101161
  12. Brown S. Is counselling necessary? Making the decision to have an abortion. A qualitative interview study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18(1):44–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.750290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.750290
  13. Bianchi-Demicheli F, Perrin E, Lüdicke F, Campana A. Contraception and sexuality after termination of pregnancy: a comparison between Lugano and Geneva. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001;131(35-36):515–20. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2001.09768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2001.09768
  14. Cerutti B, Lazzaro M. Cassis I. Consequences of the Italian laws on reproductive health and abortion on the neighborhood swiss jealth care system. Poster presentation at the 134th APHA (American Public Health Association) Meeting, Boston, 2006. Available at: https://apha.confex.com/apha/responses/134am/7312.pdf