Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 148 No. 1920 (2018)

Directing citizens to create advance directives

  • Sophie Haesen
  • David Shaw
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14628
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14628
Published
16.05.2018

Summary

This article describes the Swiss law on advance directives that was passed at the beginning of 2013 and led to more certainty about the legally binding character of such directives. However, for various reasons the drafting of advance directives is not yet widespread in Switzerland, and many resources might be put to better use if this became a common practice. A recent proposal by members of a political party to make the discussion, although not the actual drafting, of advance directives mandatory was rejected by the Swiss Federal Parliament, and the proposal was written off after having been pending for 2 years. We consider that the rejection of this proposal was not justified and that discussion of advance directives should become mandatory, so that individuals can fully assume their role as responsible citizens taking proactive decisions. The decision not to draft advance directives should be a deliberate one, marking a shift from the current “opt-in” approach to an “opt-out” scenario.

References

  1. Breitschmid P, Wittwer C. Die Stellung der Medizinalberufe im neuen Erwachsenenschutzrecht. Jusletter 31 January 2011.
  2. Bobbert M. Patientenverfügungen zwischen Antizipation, Selbstbestimmung und Selbstdiskriminierung. Jusletter 25 January 2016.
  3. Conti M, Merlani P, Ricou B. Prognosis and quality of life of elderly patients after intensive care. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13671. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13671
  4. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series No. 164. 1997. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98.
  5. Pro Senectute Schweiz. Selbstbestimmen bei Urteilsunfähigkeit – Zahlen und Fakten. 1 October 2017. Available at: https://www.prosenectute.ch/de/medien/newsroom.html. Accessed 11 April 2018
  6. Lenherr G, Meyer-Zehnder B, Kressig RW, Reiter-Theil S. To speak, or not to speak -- do clinicians speak about dying and death with geriatric patients at the end of life? Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13563. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13563
  7. Shaw D. Organ donation is the right decision: a delicate truth. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(8):1487–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3891-1
  8. Perkins HS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):51–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00008
  9. Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34(2):30–42. doi:.https://doi.org/10.2307/3527683
  10. Sahm S, Will R, Hommel G. Attitudes towards and barriers to writing advance directives amongst cancer patients, healthy controls, and medical staff. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(8):437–40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009605
  11. Otte IC, Jung C, Elger BS, Bally K. Advance directives and the impact of timing. A qualitative study with Swiss general practitioners. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w14035. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.14035
  12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001
  13. Nicholas LH, Bynum JPW, Iwashyna TJ, Weir DR, Langa KM. Advance Directives And Nursing Home Stays Associated With Less Aggressive End-Of-Life Care For Patients With Severe Dementia. Health Aff. 2014;33(4):667–74. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1258
  14. Roscam Abbing HDC. Health and Human Rights in the European Context. In: Rynning E, Hartlev M (2012). Nordic Health Law in a European Context. Welfare State Perspectives on patients’ Rights and Biomedicine. Malmö: Liber; 2012.
  15. Wiesing U, Jox RJ, Hessler HJ, Borasio GD. A new law on advance directives in Germany. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(12):779–83. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.036376
  16. Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschafte. Medizin-ethische Richtlinien und Empfehlungen. Patientenverfügungen. Bern: SAMW; 2017. Available at: https://www.rwi.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:f7c5b696-6fab-4e8a-9004-18800a87c0e7/SAMW-RL%20Patientenverf%C3%BCgung.pdf.
  17. Castillo LS, Williams BA, Hooper SM, Sabatino CP, Weithorn LA, Sudore RL. Lost in translation: the unintended consequences of advance directive law on clinical care. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(2):121–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-2-201101180-00012
  18. Burkle CM, Mueller PS, Swetz KM, Hook CC, Keegan MT. Physician perspectives and compliance with patient advance directives: the role external factors play on physician decision making. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;13(1):31. Published online 21 November 2012. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-31
  19. Pope TM. Legal Briefing: New Penalties for Ignoring Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders. J Clin Ethics. 2017;28(1):74–81.
  20. Serna P, Seoane JA, Eds. Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 70. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3.
  21. Andorno R. A Human Rights Approach to Bioethics. In: Serna P, Seoane JA (Eds.). Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 70. Cham: Springer; 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3.
  22. Malpas PJ. Advance directives and older people: ethical challenges in the promotion of advance directives in New Zealand. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(5):285–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.039701
  23. Zambrano P. Types of Action and Criteria for Individualizing Them: The Case of Omission of Life-Saving Care. In: Serna P, Seoane JA (Eds.). Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 70. Cham: Springer; 2016. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3.
  24. Hickman RL, Jr, Daly BJ, Clochesy JM, O’Brien J, Leuchtag M. Leveraging the lived experience of surrogate decision makers of the seriously ill to develop a decision support intervention. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;30:67–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2015.10.012
  25. Lord K, Livingston G, Cooper C. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to and interventions for proxy decision-making by family carers of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(8):1301–12. Published online 14 April 2015. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215000411
  26. Rietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, et al.; European Association for Palliative Care. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e543–51. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X
  27. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing: 1950-2050. New York: United Nations; 2001.
  28. MacKay D, Robinson A. The Ethics of Organ Donor Registration Policies: Nudges and Respect for Autonomy. Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(11):3–12. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1222007