Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Viewpoint

Vol. 148 No. 0304 (2018)

Availability and accessibility of perinatal data for the Robson classification of caesarean sections in Switzerland

  • Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin
  • Thomas H. Hess
  • Rebekka Erdin
  • Elke Prentl
  • Jessica Pehlke-Milde
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14578
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14578
Published
16.01.2018

References

  1. EUROPERISTAT. European Perinatal Health Report, Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. 2013. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR2010_w_disclaimer.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  2. Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004
  3. Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2016;123(5):745–53. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13592
  4. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6
  5. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al.; WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819–29. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7
  6. Radin RG, Mikkelsen EM, Rothman KJ, Hatch EE, Sorensen HT, Riis AH, et al. Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability. Epidemiology. 2016;27(6):889–93. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000553
  7. Stokholm J, Thorsen J, Chawes BL, Schjørring S, Krogfelt KA, Bønnelykke K, et al. Cesarean section changes neonatal gut colonization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(3):881–889.e2. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.028
  8. Sevelsted A, Stokholm J, Bønnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e92–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0596
  9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schweizer Frauenkliniken. Erfassungsbogen ASF-Statistik. http://www.sevisa.ch/files/2714/8230/7839/Bogen_D.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  10. Hess TH. Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten und Voraussetzungen von der Statistik zum Qualitätssicherungsinstrument am Beispiel der ASF-Statistik der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. 2008. https://www.ksw.ch/Portaldata/1/Resources/FRA/Dokumente/Masterarbeit_ASF-Statistik_Dr._med._Th._Hess.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  11. Mueller M, Kolly L, Bauman M, Imboden S, Surbek D. Analysis of caesarean section rates over time in a single Swiss centre using a ten-group classification system. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13921. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.13921

Most read articles by the same author(s)