Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Short communication

Vol. 141 No. 5152 (2011)

Freedom of choice of specialist physicians is important to Swiss residents

  • I Peytremann-Bridevaux
  • C Ruffieux
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13315
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13315
Published
19.12.2011

Summary

QUESTION UNDER STUDY: To assess how important the possibility to choose specialist physicians is for Swiss residents and to determine which variables are associated with this opinion.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2007 Swiss population-based health survey and included 13,642 non-institutionalised adults who responded to the telephone and paper questionnaires. The dependent variable included answers to the question “How important is it for you to be able to choose the specialist you would like to visit?” Independent variables included socio-demographics, health and past year healthcare use measures. Crude and adjusted logistic regressions for the importance of being able to choose specialist physicians were performed, accounting for the survey design.

RESULTS: 45% of participants found it very important to be able to choose the specialist physician they wanted to visit. The answers “rather important”, “rather not important” and “not important” were reported by 28%, 20% and 7% of respondents. Women, individuals in middle/high executive position, those with an ordinary insurance scheme, those reporting ≥2 chronic conditions or poorer subjective health, or those who had had ≥2 outpatient visits in the preceding year were more likely to find this choice very important.

CONCLUSIONS: In 2007, almost half of all Swiss residents found it very important to be able to choose his/her specialist physician. The further development of physician networks or other chronic disease management initiatives in Switzerland, towards integrated care, need to pay attention to the freedom of choice of specialist physicians that Swiss residents value. Future surveys should provide information on access and consultations with specialist physicians.

References

  1. Berchtold P, Peytremann- Bridevaux I. Integrated care organizations in Switzerland. Int J Integrated Care [Internet]. 2011; Vol. 11, March 14. Available from: http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/575/1231
  2. Berchtold P, Peier C, Peier K. Ärztenetze in der Schweiz 2010 – auf dem Sprung zu Integrierter Versorgung [Swiss physician networks 2010 – towards integrated care]. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 2010;91:1222–4. [in German].
  3. Interpharmaph [Internet]. Bâle: Interpharma; Modèles de soins intégrés [cited 2011 May 11]. Available from: http://www.interpharma.ch/fr/faites-et-statistiques/moniteur-de-la-sante.asp. French
  4. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008.
  5. Deom M, Agoritsas T, Bovier PA, Perneger TV. What doctors think about the impact of managed care tools on quality of care, costs, autonomy, and relations with patients. BMH Health Services Research. 2010;10:331.
  6. Tabenkin H, Gross R, Brammli S, Shvartzman P. Patients’ views of direct access to specialists. An Israeli experience. JAMA. 1998;279:1943–8.
  7. Gross R, Tabenkin H, Brammli-Greenberg S. Who needs a gatekeeper? Patients’ views of the role of the primary care physician. Fam Pract. 2000;17:222–9.
  8. Marques-Vidal P, Bovet P, Paccaud F, Chiolero A. Changes of overweight and obesity in the adult Swiss population according to educational level, from 1992 to 2007. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:87.
  9. Office fédéral de la statistique. Statistique suisse [Internet]. Berne: OFS; c20111. Enquêtes sources – Enquête suisse sur la santé (ESS);[cited 2011 May 11]; Available from: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/fr/index/infothek/erhebungen__quellen/blank/blank/ess/04.html French.
  10. Yu W, Ellis RP, Ash A. Risk selection in the Massachusetts State employee health insurance program. Health Care Manag Sci. 2001;4:281–7.
  11. Etter JF, Perneger TV. Health care expenditures after the introduction of a gatekeeper and global budget in a Swiss health insurance plan. J Epidemiol Commmunity Health. 1998;52:370–6.
  12. Himmel W, Dieterich A, Kochen MM. Will German patients accept their family physician as a gatekeeper? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:496–502.
  13. Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, Bindman AB, Quesenberry C, Truman A, et al. Resolvig the gatekeeper conundrum. What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;281:261–6.
  14. Gross R, Tabenkin H, Brammli-Greenberg S. Who needs a gatekeeper? Patients’ views of the role of the primary care physician. Fam Practice. 2000;17:222–9.
  15. Tabenkin H, Gross R, Brammli S, Shvartzman P. Patients’ views of direct access to specialists. An Israeli experience. JAMA. 1998;279:1943–8.
  16. Lewis CL, Wickstrom CG, Kolar MM, Keyserling TC, Bognar BA, DuPre CT, et al. Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:75–83.
  17. Rosemann T, Wensing M, Rueter G, Szecsenyi J. Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients’ experiences are more positive. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6:5.
  18. Berendsen AJ, de Jong GM, Meyboom-de Jong B, Dekker JH, Schuling J. Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface – a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9:62.
  19. Groenewegen PP, Kerssens JJ, Sixma HJ, van der Eijk I, Boerma WG. What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5:16.
  20. Lin CT, Albertson G, Price D, Swaney R, Anderson S, Anderson RJ. Patient desire and reasons for specialist referral in a gatekeeper-model managed care plan. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6:669–78.
  21. Lauvergeon S, Mettler D, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Exploration des expériences et des besoins des patients diabétiques et des professionnels de la santé du canton de Vaud: Programme cantonal Diabète Vaud [Internet]. Lausanne: Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive, 2010 [cited 2011 May 11]. 55 p. (Raisons de Santé ; 1749. Available from: http://www.iumsp.ch/Publications/pdf/rds174_fr.pdf
  22. Aromaa A, Koponen P, Tafforeau J, Vermeire C, and the HIS/HES core group. Evaluation of health interview surveys and health examination surveys in the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13:67-72.
  23. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:643e53.
  24. Garrido MV, Zentner A, Busse R. The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29:28–38.
  25. Schwenglenks M, Preiswerk G, Lehner R, Weber F, Szucs TD. Economic efficiency of gatekeeping compared with fee for service plans: a Swiss example. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:24–30.