Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 148 No. 1718 (2018)

Point prevalence of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in three large Swiss acute-care hospitals

  • Aliki Metsini
  • Miriam Vazquez
  • Rami Sommerstein
  • Jonas Marschall
  • Cathy Voide
  • Nicolas Troillet
  • Céline Gardiol
  • Didier Pittet
  • Walter Zingg
  • the Swissnoso network
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14617
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14617
Published
26.04.2018

Summary

BACKGROUND

The overall burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remains high, even in high-income countries. However, the current burden of HAI in Switzerland is unknown. Prevalence surveys have a long tradition in the field of infection prevention and control for measuring both HAI and antimicrobial use. The objective of this survey was to test the point prevalence survey (PPS) methodology of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) in acute-care hospitals in Switzerland.

METHODS

Two tertiary care hospitals and one secondary care hospital in central and western Switzerland participated in the survey. Patients from all wards except for emergency departments and psychiatric wards were included. Data were collected on a single day for every ward with a maximum time frame of 2 weeks for completing data collection. Methodology and definitions were based on the most recent ECDC PPS protocol.

RESULTS

Data on a total of 2421 patients were analysed. One hundred thirty-six patients had 153 HAIs, corresponding to a prevalence of 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7–6.5%). Rapidly fatal McCabe score, hospitalisation in the intensive care unit (ICU), and having a medical device in place were independent risk factors for HAI. Lower respiratory tract infection was the most frequent HAI type (24.8%), followed by surgical site infection (22.2%), bloodstream infection (17.0%) and urinary tract infection (13.7%). The highest HAI prevalence (26.2%) was observed in the ICU. In total, 60.8% of all HAIs were microbiologically confirmed. The most common microorganism was Escherichia coli (21.1%). Six hundred sixty-nine patients (27.6%, 95% CI 25.9–29.4%) received 893 antimicrobials for 705 indications. Community-acquired infections (39.0%) were the most common indication for antimicrobial use and amoxicillin-clavulanate was the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial (18.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

HAI prevalence and antimicrobial use in this survey were similar to findings of the past ECDC PPS. The ECDC methodology proved applicable to Swiss acute-care hospitals.

References

  1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, et al.; Emerging Infections Program Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use Prevalence Survey Team. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1198–208. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306801
  2. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228–41. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4
  3. Zingg W, Huttner BD, Sax H, Pittet D. Assessing the burden of healthcare-associated infections through prevalence studies: what is the best method? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(6):674–84. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1086/676424
  4. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG, Munn VP, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(2):182–205. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990
  5. Mayon-White RT, Ducel G, Kereselidze T, Tikomirov E. An international survey of the prevalence of hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect. 1988;11(Suppl A):43–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(88)90164-8
  6. Sax H, Ruef C, Pittet D. Resultate der Schweizerischen Präalenzstudie nosokomialer Infektionen 2003 (snip03). Swissnoso Bulletin. 2004;11:1–8.
  7. Sax H, Pittet D. Resultate der Schweizerischen Präalenzstudie der nosokomialen Infektionen 2004 (snip04). Swissnoso Bulletin. 2005;12:1–8.
  8. Magill SS, Hellinger W, Cohen J, Kay R, Bailey C, Boland B, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(3):283–91. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1086/664048
  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013. Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/healthcare-associated-infections-antimicrobial-use-PPS.pdf.
  10. Report on the National Strategy for the Monitoring, Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Infections (NOSO Strategy). Available from https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/service/publikationen/broschueren/publikationen-uebertragbare-krankheiten/publikation-nationale-strategie-noso.html, (accessed 3 January 2018). 2016.
  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals – protocol version 5.3. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publications/PPS-HAI-antimicrobial-use-EU-acute-care-hospitals-V5-3.pdf.
  12. Neo-KISS. Protokoll. December 2009. Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen. Available from http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/dwnld/NEOKISSProtokoll221209.pdf (accessed 3 January 2018). 2009.
  13. Zingg W, Holmes A, Dettenkofer M, Goetting T, Secci F, Clack L, et al.; systematic review and evidence-based guidance on organization of hospital infection control programmes (SIGHT) study group. Hospital organisation, management, and structure for prevention of health-care-associated infection: a systematic review and expert consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(2):212–24. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70854-0
  14. McCabe WR, Jackson GG. Gram-negative bacteremia: I. Etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110(6):847–53. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1962.03620240029006
  15. Troillet N, Aghayev E, Eisenring MC, Widmer AF ; Swissnoso. First Results of the Swiss National Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Program: Who Seeks Shall Find. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38(6):697–704. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.55

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>