Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Viewpoint

Vol. 154 No. 6 (2024)

Swiss Medical Weekly’s methods review in a nutshell ─ the whys and hows

  • Jan Roth
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3967
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3967
Published
21.06.2024

References

  1. Aguzzi A. ‘Broken access’ publishing corrodes quality. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7760):139. 10.1038/d41586-019-01787-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01787-2
  2. Else H, Van Noorden R. The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science. Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):516–9. 10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5
  3. Tropini C, Finlay BB, Nichter M, Melby MK, Metcalf JL, Dominguez-Bello MG, et al. Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis. MBio. 2023 Nov;14(6):e0109123. 10.1128/mbio.01091-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01091-23
  4. Künzli N, Berger A, Czabanowska K, Lucas R, Madarasova Geckova A, Mantwill S, et al. «I Do Not Have Time»-Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences? Public Health Rev. 2022 Nov;43(1):1605407. 10.3389/phrs.2022.1605407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2022.1605407
  5. ‘The situation has become appalling’: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point | Peer review and scientific publishing | The Guardian [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 25]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
  6. Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994 Jan;308(6924):283–4. 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
  7. Aguzzi A, Waeber G. Swiss Medical Weekly: quo vadis? Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Nov;152(4546):40030–40030. 10.57187/smw.2022.40030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2022.40030
  8. Young J. When should you use statistics? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005 Jun;135(23-24):337–8.
  9. EQUATOR Network | Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/
  10. Andaur Navarro CL, Damen JA, Ghannad M, Dhiman P, van Smeden M, Reitsma JB, et al. SPIN-PM: a consensus framework to evaluate the presence of spin in studies on prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jun;170:111364. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111364
  11. Review Commons – Improve your paper and streamline publication through journal-independent peer-review. [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.reviewcommons.org/
  12. Review of study proposals [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 8]. Available from: https://smw.pub/support-for-researchers-review-of-study-proposals/