Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original article

Vol. 154 No. 6 (2024)

Cantonal opioid agonist treatment authorisation systems – a mixed-method qualitative investigation

  • Caroline Schmitt-Koopmann
  • Carole-Anne Baud
  • Stéphanie Beuriot
  • Valérie Junod
  • Barbara Broers
  • Olivier Simon
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3629
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3629
Published
03.06.2024

Summary

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Switzerland, a cantonal authorisation is required to introduce opioid agonist treatments (OAT). We investigated and compared the terms of these cantonal OAT authorisations throughout Switzerland. The primary objective was to determine how the overseeing cantonal officials implemented and perceived the legal requirements.

METHOD: We started with a cross-sectional analysis of legal texts and cantonal OAT guidelines. Based on the document analysis, we conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with the cantonal officials who grant OAT authorisations.

FINDINGS: In most cantons (21 of 25), the OAT authorisation is specific to the person treated and must be renewed every year. Today, 21 cantons either have implemented or are implementing the same web-based software to process and manage OAT authorisation requests. Cantons have implemented diverging requirements regarding, amongst others, the involvement of third parties in OAT and the training required of prescribing physicians. Lastly, the OAT process does not seem to be a high priority for the overseeing officials.

CONCLUSIONS: From a legal standpoint, OAT authorisations should be straightforward, yet we found significant divergences among cantonal systems. We could not find scientific evidence that supports a given framework. We recommend harmonizing the 26 cantonal systems while reviewing the need for OAT authorisation.

References

  1. Nordt C, Vogel M, Dey M, Moldovanyi A, Beck T, Berthel T, et al. One size does not fit all-evolution of opioid agonist treatments in a naturalistic setting over 23 years. Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):103–11. 10.1111/add.14442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14442
  2. Santo T Jr, Clark B, Hickman M, Grebely J, Campbell G, Sordo L, et al. Association of Opioid Agonist Treatment With All-Cause Mortality and Specific Causes of Death Among People With Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;78(9):979–93. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0976
  3. Stotts AL, Dodrill CL, Kosten TR. Opioid dependence treatment: options in pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Aug;10(11):1727–40. 10.1517/14656560903037168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1517/14656560903037168
  4. Strang J, Volkow ND, Degenhardt L, Hickman M, Johnson K, Koob GF, et al. Opioid use disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Jan;6(1):3. 10.1038/s41572-019-0137-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0137-5
  5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2021 Aug 23]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43948
  6. Nicholas R. Opioid Agonist Therapy in Australia: A History [Internet]. Adelaide: National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA), Flinders University; 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 31]. Available from: http://www.connections.edu.au/opinion/opioid-agonist-therapy-australia-history#
  7. Priest KC, Gorfinkel L, Klimas J, Jones AA, Fairbairn N, McCarty D. Comparing Canadian and United States opioid agonist therapy policies. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:257–65. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.020
  8. Expert group on the regulatory framework for the treatment of opioid dependence syndrome and the prescription of opioid agonist medicines. Opioid agonist treatment. Guiding principles for legislation and regulations [Internet]. Strasbourg: Groupe Pompidou/Conseil de l’Europe; 2017 p. 14,15. Available from: https://idpc.net/fr/publications/2018/08/traitements-agonistes-opioides-principes-directeurs-pour-les-legislations-et-reglementations
  9. Amey L, Brunner N. Traitement de substitution à la dépendance aux opioïdes - Etude de la réglementation de quelques pays francophones. Neuchâtel; 2013 p. 20, 21, 24, 25, 37.
  10. Casselman J, Meuwissen K, Opdebeeck A. Legal Aspects of Substitution Treatment: An Insight into nine EU Countries [Internet]. EMCDDA; 2003. Available from: https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/html.cfm/index10273EN.html
  11. Jin H, Marshall BD, Degenhardt L, Strang J, Hickman M, Fiellin DA, et al. Global opioid agonist treatment: a review of clinical practices by country. Addiction. 2020 Dec;115(12):2243–54. 10.1111/add.15087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15087
  12. Prathivadi P, Sturgiss EA. When will opioid agonist therapy become a normal part of comprehensive health care? Med J Aust. 2021 Jun;214(11):504–505.e1. 10.5694/mja2.51095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51095
  13. Art. 29d BetmG [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1952/241_241_245/en#art_29_d
  14. Art. 3e para.1-2 BetmG [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1952/241_241_245/en#art_3_e
  15. BetmSV - Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2011 über Betäubungsmittelsucht und andere suchtbedingte Störungen (Betäubungsmittelsuchtverordnung, SR 812.121.6) [Internet]. May 25, 2011. Available from: https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/2011/364
  16. Labhart F, Maffli E. Nationale Statistik der Substitutionsbehandlungen mit Opioid-Agonisten – Ergebnisse 2020. Lausanne: Sucht Schweiz; 2021.
  17. Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Substitution-assisted treatments in case of opioid dependence [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/gesund-leben/sucht-und-gesundheit/suchtberatung-therapie/substitutionsgestuetzte-behandlung.html
  18. Jährliche Statistik Substitution. 2020 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.substitution.ch/de/jahrliche_statistik.html&year=2020&full
  19. Gmel G, Labhart F, Maffli E. Heroingestützte/ diacetylmorphingestützte Behandlung in der Schweiz - Resultate der Erhebung 2019 (Forschungsbericht Nr. 118) [Internet]. Lausanne: Sucht Schweiz; 2020 Sep p. 39. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/bag/de/dokumente/npp/sucht/hegebe/erhebungen/hegebe_schweiz_2019.pdf.download.pdf/HeGeBe-Jahresbericht_2019.pdf
  20. Schmitt-Koopmann C, Baud CA, Junod V, Simon O. Switzerland’s Narcotics Regulation Jungle: Off-Label Use, Counterfoil Prescriptions, and Opioid Agonist Therapy in the French-Speaking Cantons. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec;18(24):13164. 10.3390/ijerph182413164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413164
  21. Baud CA, Junod V, Schmitt-Koopmann C, Simon O. Rôle des cantons en matière de traitements de la dépendance. Jusletter [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 13];(1140). Available from: https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/juslissues/2023/1140/role-des-cantons-en-_6d593f126e.html__ONCE&login=false 10.38023/7b1358f3-0990-429a-bb33-297ffb9c10b2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38023/7b1358f3-0990-429a-bb33-297ffb9c10b2
  22. Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016 Jan;2:8–14. 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
  23. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep;13(1):117. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
  24. Plus MA. 2022 [Internet]. Berlin: VERBI Software; 2022. Available from: www.maxqda.com
  25. Patton MQ. Qualitative Analysis and Interpretation. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications; 2014. pp. 519–649.
  26. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  27. Art. 9 para.1 BetmSV [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2011/364/de#art_9
  28. See for example: État de Fribourg. Traitement de substitution formulaire d'admission. https://www.fr.ch/sites/default/files/contens/smc/_www/files/pdf88/kt-fr_start_fr.pdf
  29. Valais - Mehrparteientherapievertrag für die Substitutionsbehandlung opiatabhängiger Personen. no longer online accessible.
  30. Art. 8 para.2 BetmSV [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2011/364/de#art_8
  31. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Erläuterungen zu den Verordnungen BetmKV und BetmSV (Commentaires sur Ordonnances OAStup et OCStup) [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.admin.ch/ch/f/gg/pc/documents/1698/Berichte_1_2.pdf
  32. BO 1974 IV 1444 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.amtsdruckschriften.bar.admin.ch/viewOrigDoc/20003209.pdf?ID=20003209
  33. BO 1974 V 596 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.amtsdruckschriften.bar.admin.ch/viewOrigDoc/20003534.pdf?ID=20003534
  34. LU - Vademecum Betäubungsmittelgestützte Behandlung im Kanton Luzern. («Substitutionstherapie») [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 5]. Available from: https://gesundheit.lu.ch/-/media/Gesundheit/Dokumente/Heilmittel/Vademecum_Substitutionstherapie.pdf?la=de-CH
  35. NE - Recommandations du médecin cantonal concernant la prescription de stupéfiants destinés au traitement de personnes dépendantes [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: https://www.ne.ch/autorites/DFS/SCSP/medecin-cantonal/Documents/RecommMethadone_2017.pdf
  36. Hämmig R, Société Suisse de Médecine de l’Addiction (SSAM). Substitutionsgestützte Behandlungen (SGB): neue Empfehlungen/Traitements basés sur la substitution (TBS): nouvelles recommandations. 2014 Nov 6; Fribourg.
  37. Praxis-Suchtmedizin [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 27]. Available from: https://praxis-suchtmedizin.ch/index.php/de/
  38. Muscat R. Pompidou Group. Treatment systems overview [Internet]Strasbourg: Council of Europe Pub.; 2010.[ [cited 2019 Oct 4]], Available from https://rm.coe.int/1680746114
  39. World Health Organization. World Health Organization model list of essential medicines: 21st list 2019. World Health Organization; 2019.

Most read articles by the same author(s)