Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 154 No. 7 (2024)

The Swiss National MD-PhD Grants Programme: an analysis of the career trajectories of grant recipients between 1992 and 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3615
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024;154:3615
Published
04.07.2024

Summary

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to provide an analysis of the career trajectory of the recipients of a Swiss National MD-PhD grant thirty years after the creation of the Swiss interuniversity MD-PhD programme.

METHODS: The study surveyed 277 recipients of a Swiss National MD-PhD grant using an online questionnaire in April 2022. There were twenty questions about participants’ demographics, the duration of their MD-PhD training, their career trajectory, current position, research and clinical activity, the impact of the support on the recipients’ careers, and their satisfaction with various aspects of the grant.

RESULTS: The study showed that 141 out of the 277 grant recipients contacted returned the survey (51% response rate). The gender distribution of the participants was 33% women, 63% men, 4% unknown, which is almost the same as that of all grantees (35% women, 65% men). One hundred and fourteen (81%) respondents had completed their MD-PhD thesis and were graduates, while 27 (19%) were still MD-PhD students. The mean duration of the MD-PhD training was 4.27 years, with a slight upward trend over time. A large proportion of graduates, 81%, remained scientifically active after the grant, most of them in academic settings. Of the grantees who had completed their MD-PhD at least eight years before the survey, 55% had a paid research position with 40% combining research and clinical roles, and 15% doing research only. Seventy-six per cent remained clinically active, 54% occupied leadership positions, and 25% were professors. Most grantees believed that the grant had had a positive impact on their career trajectory. The main challenges included a delay in clinical training, a limited number of clinical positions with dedicated research time after the MD-PhD period, and sub-optimal recognition by hospital hierarchies.

CONCLUSION: The data collected for this study confirm that the competitive Swiss National MD-PhD Grants Programme excels in supporting promising physician scientists who remain active in both research and clinical contexts in the long term. The individual grants are perceived as a distinction that acts as the basis for a successful career in academic medicine. Continued support and alternative funding sources, however, will be essential to ensure the programme’s sustainability.

References

  1. Harding CV, Akabas MH, Andersen OS. History and Outcomes of 50 Years of Physician-Scientist Training in Medical Scientist Training Programs. Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1390–8. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001779
  2. Kuehnle K, Winkler DT, Meier-Abt PJ. Swiss national MD-PhD-program: an outcome analysis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Sep;139(37-38):540–6. 10.4414/smw.2009.12790
  3. Details on the current National MD-PhD Grants Program. Available from: https://www.sams.ch/md-phd (accessed: 15 March 2024)
  4. O’Rahilly S. Academic clinician-scientists risk becoming an endangered species. Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):2989. 10.1038/s41591-023-02626-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02626-8
  5. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. White Paper: Clinical Research. Swiss Academies Communications. 2021; 16 (4): 1-42. 10.5281/zenodo.4772725
  6. Dos Santos Rocha A, Scherlinger M, Ostermann L, Mehler DM, Nadiradze A, Schulze F, et al. Characteristics and opinions of MD-PhD students and graduates from different European countries: a study from the European MD-PhD Association. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Apr;150(150):w20205. 10.4414/smw.2020.20205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20205
  7. Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. Predictors of full-time faculty appointment among MD-PhD program graduates: a national cohort study. Med Educ Online. 2016 May;21(1):30941. 10.3402/meo.v21.30941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30941
  8. Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs. Acad Med. 2010 Apr;85(4):692–701. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d3ca17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d3ca17
  9. Andriole DA, Whelan AJ, Jeffe DB. Characteristics and career intentions of the emerging MD/PhD workforce. JAMA. 2008 Sep;300(10):1165–73. 10.1001/jama.300.10.1165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1165
  10. Skinnider MA, Twa DD, Squair JW, Rosenblum ND, Lukac CD; Canadian MD/PhD Program Investigation Group. Predictors of sustained research involvement among MD/PhD programme graduates. Med Educ. 2018 May;52(5):536–45. 10.1111/medu.13513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13513
  11. Alamri Y. The combined medical/PhD degree: a global survey of physician-scientist training programmes [London]. Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;16(3):215–8. 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-215
  12. Gendermonitoring SwissUniversities. https://www.swissuniversities.ch/themen/chancengleichheit-diversity/gendermonitoring (accessed: 15 March 2024).
  13. Bundesamt für Statistik. Personal der universitären Hochschulen: Basistabellen. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken.assetdetail.25505882.html (accessed: 15 March 2024).
  14. Akabas MH, Tartakovsky I, Brass LF. The national MD-PhD program outcomes study. American Association of Medical Colleges Reports. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/report/national-md-phd-program-outcomes-study (accessed: 15 March 2024)