Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 152 No. 2728 (2022)

Residential exposure to greenspace and life satisfaction in times of COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis of 9444 participants from a population-based study in Basel-Stadt and Basel-Landschaft

  • Ayoung Jeong
  • Fiona Galliker
  • Medea Imboden
  • Dirk Keidel
  • Kees de Hoogh
  • Danielle Vienneau
  • Michael Siegrist
  • Luca Crivelli
  • Gianfranco Lovison
  • Nicole Probst-Hensch
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2022.w30204
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022;152:w30204
Published
12.07.2022

Summary

BACKGROUND: Subjective well-being is an important target in the COVID-19 pandemic. Residential greenness may help cope with stress and hence influence subjective well-being during this mentally and physically challenging time.

METHODS: We analysed the association between residential greenness and life satisfaction in 9,444 adults in the COVCO-Basel cohort. We assessed if the association is modified by age, sex, household income, financial worries, canton of residence, or month of study entry. In addition, we assessed if the association is attributed to specific types of greenspace or accessibility to greenspace.

RESULTS: The association between residential greenness and life satisfaction varied by age groups, household income, and financial worries. Residential greenness was positively associated with life satisfaction in those with high household income and the least financially worried, and negatively associated with life satisfaction in the youngest age group (18–29 years) and the most financially worried. Living closer to a forest, but not to a park or an agricultural area, was associated with lower life satisfaction in the youngest age group.

CONCLUSIONS: Residential greenness effects on life satisfaction vary according to sociodemographic characteristics. Living in a greener area does not benefit all dwellers in Basel and its region equally, with the most apparent benefit for those with high household income and without financial concerns.

References

  1. Fancourt D, Steptoe A, Bu F. Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30482-X
  2. Möhring, K., et al., The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family. European Societies, 2021. 23(sup1): p. S601-S617.
  3. Talevi D, Socci V, Carai M, Carnaghi G, Faleri S, Trebbi E, et al. Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Riv Psichiatr. 2020 May-Jun;55(3):137–44.
  4. Keidel D, et al. COVCO-Basel Wissenschaftlicher Schlussbericht. URL: https://www.swisstph.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/CoVCoBasel_Schlussbericht_20211028.pdf. 2021.
  5. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being. 2011;3(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
  6. Veenhoven R. Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9(3):449–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9042-1
  7. Huppert, U., Measurement really matters. Measuring wellbeing series; discussion paper, 2017. 2.
  8. DiMaria CH, Peroni C, Sarracino F. Happiness Matters: Productivity Gains from Subjective Well-Being. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(1):139–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00074-1
  9. Jalali Z, Heidari A. The relationship between happiness, subjective well-being, creativity and job performance of primary school teachers in Ramhormoz city. Int Educ Stud. 2016;9(6):45–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p45
  10. Knight SJ, Howley P. Can clean air make you happy? Examining the effect of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on life satisfaction. 2017, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
  11. Dadvand P, Bartoll X, Basagaña X, Dalmau-Bueno A, Martinez D, Ambros A, et al. Green spaces and General Health: roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environ Int. 2016 May;91:161–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029
  12. Hart EA, Lakerveld J, McKee M, Oppert JM, Rutter H, Charreire H, et al. Contextual correlates of happiness in European adults. PLoS One. 2018 Jan;13(1):e0190387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190387
  13. Jimenez MP, DeVille NV, Elliott EG, Schiff JE, Wilt GE, Hart JE, et al. Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr;18(9):4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094790
  14. D’Alessandro D, Buffoli M, Capasso L, Fara GM, Rebecchi A, Capolongo S ; Hygiene on Built EnvironmentWorking Group on Healthy Buildings of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health (SItI). Green areas and public health: improving wellbeing and physical activity in the urban context. Epidemiol Prev. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4 Suppl 1):8–13.
  15. de Vries S, van Dillen SM, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P. Streetscape greenery and health: stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
  16. Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):207–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
  17. Honold, J., et al., Restoration in urban spaces: Nature views from home, greenways, and public parks. 2016. 48(6): p. 796-825.
  18. Jenkins A. Biotic systems as a critical urban infrastructure during crisis: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities Health. 2020;•••:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1789821
  19. Venter ZS, Barton DN, Gundersen V, Figari H, Nowell M. Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(10):104075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb396
  20. West EA, Anker D, Amati R, Richard A, Wisniak A, Butty A, et al.; Corona Immunitas Research Group. Corona Immunitas: study protocol of a nationwide program of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and seroepidemiologic studies in Switzerland. Int J Public Health. 2020 Dec;65(9):1529–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01494-0
  21. Layard R. Economics. Measuring subjective well-being. Science. 2010 Jan;327(5965):534–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186315
  22. VanderWeele TJ, Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Allin P, Farrelly C, Fletcher G, Frederick DE, et al. Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Prev Med. 2020 Feb;133:106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106004
  23. VanderWeele TJ. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017 Aug;114(31):8148–56. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114
  24. Weier J, Herring D. Measuring Vegetation (NDVI & EVI). URL: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/MeasuringVegetation. 2000.
  25. Vienneau D, de Hoogh K, Faeh D, Kaufmann M, Wunderli JM, Röösli M ; SNC Study Group. More than clean air and tranquillity: residential green is independently associated with decreasing mortality. Environ Int. 2017 Nov;108:176–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.012
  26. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. 2020.
  27. Robinson JM, Brindley P, Cameron R, MacCarthy D, Jorgensen A. Nature’s Role in Supporting Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Geospatial and Socioecological Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb;18(5):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052227
  28. Heo S, Desai MU, Lowe SR, Bell ML. Impact of Changed Use of Greenspace during COVID-19 Pandemic on Depression and Anxiety. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May;18(11):5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115842
  29. Soga M, Evans MJ, Tsuchiya K, Fukano Y. A room with a green view: the importance of nearby nature for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecol Appl. 2021 Mar;31(2):e2248. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2248
  30. Larson LR, Mullenbach LE, Browning MH, Rigolon A, Thomsen J, Metcalf EC, et al. Greenspace and park use associated with less emotional distress among college students in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt D):112367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112367
  31. Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, et al. Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;95(3):130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010
  32. Peschardt KK, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter UK. Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban For Urban Green. 2012;11(3):235–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
  33. da Schio N, Phillips A, Fransen K, Wolff M, Haase D, Ostoić SK, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of and attitudes towards urban forests and green spaces: exploring the instigators of change in Belgium. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;65:127305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127305
  34. Schultchen D, Reichenberger J, Mittl T, Weh TR, Smyth JM, Blechert J, et al. Bidirectional relationship of stress and affect with physical activity and healthy eating. Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):315–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12355
  35. Liu Y, Wang R, Xiao Y, Huang B, Chen H, Li Z. Exploring the linkage between greenness exposure and depression among Chinese people: mediating roles of physical activity, stress and social cohesion and moderating role of urbanicity. Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102168
  36. Hansmann R, Hug SM, Seeland K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban For Urban Green. 2007;6(4):213–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004
  37. Burnett H, Olsen JR, Nicholls N, Mitchell R. Change in time spent visiting and experiences of green space following restrictions on movement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study of UK adults. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar;11(3):e044067. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044067

Most read articles by the same author(s)