Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 151 No. 4142 (2021)

Barriers and facilitators to a health information exchange system between general practitioners and hospitals: a qualitative study in Southern Switzerland

  • Nicolò Saverio Centemero
  • Bernd Rechel
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2021.w30063
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30063
Published
14.10.2021

Summary

BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) systems are computer tools that healthcare providers use to share patients’ medical information electronically. Our study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by general practitioners (GPs) when using an HIE system in the Canton of Ticino, a region in southern Switzerland.

METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Ten GPs participated in the study. We analysed transcripts using thematic content analysis and following an abductive approach (a mix of deductive and inductive approaches).

RESULTS: Our findings indicate the following main facilitators of the HIE system: (a) the perception of having to do with a secure system; (b) the possibility of delegating its management to secretaries and healthcare assistants; (c) technical support and training; (d) high quality of the information exchanged; (e) positive impact on clinical practice; and (f) regional context. However, major challenges still persist, and GPs reported the following main barriers to using an HIE system: (a) a frequent lack of all the patient documentation they needed; (b) no effective workflow improvements; and (c) lack of some technical features.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study provide a qualitative perspective of opinions and experiences of GPs that can inform improvements of the current HIE system and future federal and cantonal HIE initiatives in Switzerland and elsewhere.

References

  1. van Walraven C, Taljaard M, Bell CM, Etchells E, Zarnke KB, Stiell IG, et al. Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community. CMAJ. 2008 Nov;179(10):1013–8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080430
  2. Hoyt RE, Hersh WR, Bernstam EV. Overview of Health Informatics, in: R.E. Hoyt, W.R. Hersh (Eds.), Heal. Informatics Pract. Guid., 7th ed., lulu.com, 2018: pp. 1–27.
  3. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003 Nov;327(7425):1219–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219
  4. Sittig DF, Wright A, Ash J, Singh H. New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records. Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov;2016(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2016-023
  5. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Healthit.Gov. (2013). https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr (accessed October 20, 2018).
  6. W. Hersh, A. Totten, K. Eden, B. Devine, P. Gorman, S. Kassakian, S.S. Woods, M. Daeges, M. Pappas, M.S. McDonagh, Health Information Exchange, 2015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA220.
  7. Eden KB, Totten AM, Kassakian SZ, Gorman PN, McDonagh MS, Devine B, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.004
  8. Kruse CS, Marquez G, Nelson D, Palomares O. The use of health information exchange to augment patient handoff in long-term care: A systematic review. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):752–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670651
  9. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  10. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  11. Barriball KL, While A. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Feb;19(2):328–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
  12. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health ResearchB, 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, London, 2013.
  13. ATLAS.ti, (2018).
  14. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis. An introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed., SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England, 2018.
  15. Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
  16. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  17. The federal Council. Federal Act on Research involving Human Beings, Portal Swiss Gov. (2014). https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20061313/index.html (accessed March 23, 2019).
  18. Health Info Net. Information about Health Info Net AG (HIN), Heal. Info Net. (2012). https://www.hin.ch/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Information-about-Health-Info-net-0.1.pdf (accessed July 14, 2019).
  19. Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):655–70. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090192
  20. Wright A, Soran C, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Bates DW, Simon SR. Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3241
  21. Vayena E, Haeusermann T, Adjekum A, Blasimme A. Digital health: meeting the ethical and policy challenges. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jan;148(34):w14571. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14571
  22. Rudin R, Volk L, Simon S, Bates D. What affects clinicians’ usage of health information exchange? Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jan;2(3):250–62. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2011-03-RA-0021
  23. Hincapie AL, Warholak TL, Murcko AC, Slack M, Malone DC. Physicians’ opinions of a health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):60–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.006502
  24. Messer LC, Parnell H, Huffaker R, Wooldredge R, Wilkin A. The development of a health information exchange to enhance care and improve patient outcomes among HIV+ individuals in rural North Carolina. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):e46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.009
  25. Cochran GL, Lander L, Morien M, Lomelin DE, Sayles H, Klepser DG. Health care provider perceptions of a query-based health information exchange: barriers and benefits. J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Jun;22(2):302–8. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v22i2.135
  26. Sadoughi F, Nasiri S, Ahmadi H. The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;161:209–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.023
  27. Yaraghi N, Du AY, Sharman R, Gopal RD, Ramesh R. Health information exchange as a multisided platform: Adoption, usage, and practice involvement in service co-production. Inf Syst Res. 2015;26(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0547
  28. Chantler T. Qualitative interviewing, in: M.A. Durand, T. Chantler (Eds.), Princ. Soc. Res., 2nd ed., Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2014: pp. 50–62.
  29. Cartier T, Senn N, Cornuz J, Bourgueil Y. Switzerland, (2015). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459012/ (accessed 2021 August 21).
  30. eHealth Suisse, What is the EPR? EHealth Suisse. (2018). https://www.patientendossier.ch/en/health-professionals/briefly-explained (accessed 2019 August 24).