Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 150 No. 3132 (2020)

Do fathers care about their own immunisation status? The Child-Parent-Immunisation Survey and a review of the literature

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20289
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20289
Published
02.08.2020

Summary

AIMS

We recently conducted a large survey amongst parents of young children exploring attitudes concerning immunisation and the general immunisation status of the children and their parents in Switzerland. Since little is known about the immunisation status of fathers of young children, we present our findings here; data on mothers were previously published elsewhere.

METHODS

We performed standardised interviews with parents of children born on or after 1 January 2013, and hospitalised at the University of Basel Children’s Hospital, Switzerland, between January and June 2017. If participation was declined, partial consent was sought for four questions regarding age, education level, attitudes towards vaccinations in general and availability of vaccination records of the parents. To compare our study results with other studies focusing on the completeness of the immunisation status of fathers, we conducted a literature search using broad search terms for studies published between 1 April 2009 and 1 December 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (20%) fathers of 199 enrolled children participated. The great majority had a positive or mostly positive attitude towards vaccinations, but only 2 (15%) of 13 fathers who participated in immunisation counselling were up-to-date with all generally recommended immunisations. Fifty-two percent of participating fathers reported that the last assessment of their immunisation status by a physician was >5 years ago. After the birth of their child, 56% of fathers had received a recommendation for immunisation against pertussis and 65% of them followed the recommendation. We identified three studies matching our review’s inclusion criteria. None of them reported specific findings for fathers.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to analyse the complete immunisation status of fathers of young children. It is often incomplete with potentially missed opportunities for updating vaccinations during recent physician consultations. The low participation rate of fathers is a limitation which prohibits generalisation of our findings. However, as healthcare personnel have been shown to have the strongest impact on vaccination uptake, we propose that this group be further sensitised and educated with the goal of improving immunisation rates in fathers of young children.

References

  1. https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019. [Accessed 2020 May 6]
  2. Valeri F, Hatz C, Jordan D, Leuthold C, Czock A, Lang P. Immunisation coverage of adults: a vaccination counselling campaign in the pharmacies in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13955. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.13955
  3. Erb ML, Erlanger TE, Heininger U. Child-parent immunization survey: How well are national immunization recommendations accepted by the target groups? Vaccine X. 2019;1:100013. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2019.100013
  4. ISCE. 2011. 2018. pp. 1–88. Http://uis.Unesco.org/en/topic/international-Standard-Classification-Education-Isced. Last accessed May 6, 2020
  5. Cheffins T, Spillman M, Larkins S, Heal C. Recommending vaccination - general practice intervention with new parents. Aust Fam Physician. 2011;40(6):437–9.
  6. Rossmann Beel E, Rench MA, Montesinos DP, Healy CM. Acceptability of immunization in adult contacts of infants: possibility of expanding platforms to increase adult vaccine uptake. Vaccine. 2014;32(22):2540–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.056
  7. Spaan DH, Ruijs WLM, Hautvast JLA, Tostmann A. Increase in vaccination coverage between subsequent generations of orthodox Protestants in The Netherlands. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(3):524–30. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx017
  8. Wiley KE, Zuo Y, Macartney KK, McIntyre PB. Sources of pertussis infection in young infants: a review of key evidence informing targeting of the cocoon strategy. Vaccine. 2013;31(4):618–25. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.052
  9. Paterson P, Meurice F, Stanberry LR, Glismann S, Rosenthal SL, Larson HJ. Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers. Vaccine. 2016;34(52):6700–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.042
  10. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Europäische Impfwoche 23.-29. April 2018: der schweizerische elektronische Impfausweis. Bull BAG 17/2018 Apr 23: p 11.
  11. Urwyler P, Heininger U. Protecting newborns from pertussis - the challenge of complete cocooning. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):397. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-397
  12. Donnan EJ, Fielding JE, Rowe SL, Franklin LJ, Vally H. A cross sectional survey of attitudes, awareness and uptake of the parental pertussis booster vaccine as part of a cocooning strategy, Victoria, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):676. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-676
  13. Suryadevara M, Bonville CA, Cibula DA, Valente M, Handel A, Domachowse JR, et al. Pertussis vaccine for adults: Knowledge, attitudes, and vaccine receipt among adults with children in the household. Vaccine. 2014;32(51):7000–4. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.018

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>