Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 149 No. 0708 (2019)

The impact of interventions by pharmacists collected in a computerised physician order entry context: a prospective observational study with a 10-year reassessment

  • Marie-Caroline Loustalot
  • Sarah Berdot
  • Pierre Sabatier
  • Pierre Durieux
  • Germain Perrin
  • Alexandre Karras
  • Brigitte Sabatier
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2019.20015
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20015
Published
15.02.2019

Summary

AIMS OF THE STUDY

This study assesses clinical interventions by pharmacists prospectively collected from medical and surgical wards, notably the acceptance of interventions, computerised physician order entry (CPOE)related problems, the potential impact of interventions on patient safety evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee, and their evolution over the 10 years since a first assessment.

METHODS

A prospective observational study covering 13 months was conducted in a French teaching hospital with a patient information system that integrates an electronic health record (EHR) with a CPOE. Interventions by pharmacists were prospectively recorded using CPOE. All interventions were reviewed by two pharmacists. We assessed the interventions, the possible implications of the CPOE in prescribing errors, and the acceptance of interventions by physicians. A committee reviewed the potential clinical impact for patients. The results were compared with the same outcomes collected 10 years ago in the same hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 2141 interventions by pharmacists were reviewed. Among them, 1589 (74.1%) were accepted by physicians. Regarding the potential clinical impact, a total of 1136 (53%) interventions concerned prescriptions that were potentially significant or serious for patients and 42 (2%) of them were potentially life-threatening. Ten years earlier, the acceptance rate was 23%. Moreover, 14.7% of errors were attributed to the use of the software, whereas 10 years earlier the rate of errors was 49%.

CONCLUSIONS

The acceptance rate and frequency of CPOE-related errors were better than 10 years before, which is encouraging and shows the importance of regular training and collaboration with healthcare givers to reduce errors. The routine analysis of interventions by pharmacists with medical staff feedback should continue to improve their relevance and effectiveness.

References

  1. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(4):313–21. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1999.00660313
  2. Charpiat B, Bedouch P, Conort O, Rose FX, Juste M, Roubille R, et al. Opportunités d’erreurs médicamenteuses et interventions pharmaceutiques dans le cadre de la prescription informatisée : revue des données publiées par les pharmaciens hospitaliers français [Opportunities for medication errors and pharmacist’s interventions in the context of computerized prescription order entry: a review of data published by French hospital pharmacists]. Ann Pharm Fr. 2012;70(2):62–74. Article in French. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2012.02.002
  3. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–203. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.10.1197
  4. Villamañán E, Larrubia Y, Ruano M, Vélez M, Armada E, Herrero A, et al. Potential medication errors associated with computer prescriber order entry. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(4):577–83. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-013-9771-2
  5. Estellat C, Colombet I, Vautier S, Huault-Quentel J, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Impact of pharmacy validation in a computerized physician order entry context. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(5):317–25. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm025
  6. Conort O, Bedouch P, Juste M, Augereau L, Charpiat B, Roubille R, et al. Validation d’un outil de codification des interventions de pharmacie clinique. J Pharm Clin. 2004;23:141–7.
  7. Caruba T, Boussadi A, Lenain E, Korb-Savoldelli V, Gillaizeau F, Durieux P, et al. A simulation study of the interception of prescribing errors by clinical pharmacists in an acute hospital setting. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(4):673–80. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12363
  8. Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Feinglass J, Yarnold PR, Noskin GA. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(7):785–92. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.7.785
  9. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, et al.; ADE Prevention Study Group. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530010043033
  10. Charpiat B, Conort O, Juste M, Rose FX, Roubille R, Bedouch P, et al. The French Society of Clinical Pharmacy ACT-IP© project: Ten years onward, results and prospects. Pharm Hosp Clin. 2015;50(2):e15–24. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phclin.2015.04.006
  11. Bedouch P, Sylvoz N, Charpiat B, Juste M, Roubille R, Rose F-X, et al.; French Society of Clinical Pharmacy’s Act-IP© Group. Trends in pharmacists’ medication order review in French hospitals from 2006 to 2009: analysis of pharmacists’ interventions from the Act-IP© website observatory. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015;40(1):32–40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12214
  12. Blix HS, Viktil KK, Reikvam A, Moger TA, Hjemaas BJ, Pretsch P, et al. The majority of hospitalised patients have drug-related problems: results from a prospective study in general hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;60(9):651–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0830-4
  13. Kucukarslan SN, Peters M, Mlynarek M, Nafziger DA. Pharmacists on rounding teams reduce preventable adverse drug events in hospital general medicine units. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(17):2014–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2014
  14. Bedouch P, Charpiat B, Conort O, Rose F-X, Escofier L, Juste M, et al. Assessment of clinical pharmacists’ interventions in French hospitals: results of a multicenter study. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42(7–8):1095–103. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L045
  15. Bouchand F, Thomas A, Zerhouni L, Dauphin A, Conort O. [Pharmacists’ interventions before and after prescription computerization in an internal medicine department]. Presse Med. 1983;2007(36):410–8.
  16. Ferracini AC, Rodrigues AT, de Barros AA, Derchain SF, Mazzola PG. Prescribing errors intercepted by pharmacist intervention in care of patients hospitalised with breast and gynaecological cancer at a Brazilian teaching hospital. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(1).
  17. Bedouch P, Tessier A, Baudrant M, Labarere J, Foroni L, Calop J, et al. Computerized physician order entry system combined with on-ward pharmacist: analysis of pharmacists’ interventions. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(4):911–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01704.x
  18. Vialle V, Tiphine T, Poirier Y, Raingeard E, Feldman D, Freville J-C. Connaître, comprendre et lutter contre les erreurs médicamenteuses induites par l’informatisation du circuit du médicament [To know, understand and combating medication errors related to computerized physician order entry]. Ann Pharm Fr. 2011;69(3):165–76. Article in French. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2011.01.005
  19. Abdel-Qader DH, Harper L, Cantrill JA, Tully MP. Pharmacists’ interventions in prescribing errors at hospital discharge: an observational study in the context of an electronic prescribing system in a UK teaching hospital. Drug Saf. 2010;33(11):1027–44. doi:.https://doi.org/10.2165/11538310-000000000-00000
  20. Hellot-Guersing M, Jarre C, Molina C, Leromain A-S, Derharoutunian C, Gadot A, et al. Erreurs médicamenteuses induites par l’informatisation de la prescription à l’hôpital : recueil et analyse sur une période de 4ans [Medication errors related to computerized physician order entry at the hospital: Record and analysis over a period of 4 years]. Ann Pharm Fr. 2016;74(1):61–70. Article in French. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2015.06.001
  21. Korb-Savoldelli V, Boussadi A, Durieux P, Sabatier B. Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems-related medication prescription errors: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2018;111:112–22. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.022
  22. Sellier E, Colombet I, Sabatier B, Breton G, Nies J, Zapletal E, et al. Effect of alerts for drug dosage adjustment in inpatients with renal insufficiency. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(2):203–10. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2805
  23. Slight SP, Eguale T, Amato MG, Seger AC, Whitney DL, Bates DW, et al. The vulnerabilities of computerized physician order entry systems: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(2):311–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv135
  24. Brown CL, Mulcaster HL, Triffitt KL, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Reygate K, et al. A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(2):432–40. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw119

Most read articles by the same author(s)