Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 148 No. 3738 (2018)

Video analysis for the evaluation of vaginal births

  • Amr Hamza
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14658


  1. Polk HC, Jr. Quality, safety, and transparency. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):293–301.
  2. Kimmich N, Zimmermann R, Kreft M. Video analysis for the evaluation of vaginal births: a prospective observational study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14634. doi:.
  3. Leape LL. Reporting of medical errors: time for a reality check. Qual Health Care. 2000;9(3):144–5. doi:.
  4. Spelten ER, Martin L, Gitsels JT, Pereboom MT, Hutton EK, van Dulmen S. Introducing video recording in primary care midwifery for research purposes: procedure, dataset, and use. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):95–102. doi:.
  5. Fuglenes D, Oian P, Kristiansen IS. Obstetricians’ choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(1):48.e1–8. doi:.
  6. Leape LL. Why should we report adverse incidents? J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5(1):1–4. doi:.
  7. Ahn KH, Oh MJ. Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(6):427–35. doi:.
  8. Fransen AF, de Boer L, Kienhorst D, Truijens SE, van Runnard Heimel PJ, Oei SG. Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:184–91. doi:.
  9. Sau A, Sau M, Ahmed H, Brown R. Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(5):466–70. doi:.
  10. Mola GD, Amoa AB, Edilyong J. Factors associated with success or failure in trials of vacuum extraction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(1):41–5. doi:.
  11. Burkhardt T, Zimmermann R. [A Structured and Photographic Documentation of the Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2018;222(1):25–7.