Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 148 No. 0304 (2018)

Hospital discharge of patients with ongoing care needs: a cross-sectional study using data from a city hospital under SwissDRG

  • Insa Koné
  • Bettina Zimmermann
  • Tenzin Wangmo
  • Silvia Richner
  • Markus Weber
  • Bernice Elger
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14575
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14575
Published
16.01.2018

Summary

AIM OF THE STUDY

Switzerland introduced the SwissDRG in 2012. The goal of this reimbursement system was to promote cost containment and efficiency in hospital care. To ensure that patients with care needs are not released prematurely because of constraints under the new hospital financing system, the Swiss law on Acute and Transitional Care (ATC) was introduced one year earlier. The objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of ATC and its effects on discharge of patients with persisting care needs after hospitalisation.

METHODS

Social service workers, nurses and palliative care team members at a Swiss municipal hospital were asked to complete a four-page closed-ended questionnaire about patients who require care after their hospital discharge. This included questions on discharge management, their perceptions of the appropriateness of discharge timing and details about conflicts regarding discharge. Information on length of stay, discharge location, age and sex was extracted from hospital records and matched to the information from the questionnaires. Demographic data are presented descriptively, differences between patients released to ATC and patients released elsewhere (home, nursing home, rehabilitation, etc.) were evaluated with chi-square tests. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate differences between those sent to ATC and rehabilitation with age, length of stay and sex as predictors.

​

RESULTS: A total 1410 of valid questionnaires were collected, comprised of 746 female patients (52.9%) and 664 male patients (47.1%). The mean age of our patient cohort was 73.2 years (SD 15.1), and the mean hospital stay was 12.8 days (SD 9.1). After their hospital stay, 553 patients (39.2%) returned home either alone, or with the help of family members or Spitex. More than a quarter of the sample, 387 (27.4%) patients, was sent to rehabilitation. Less than a fifth, 199 (14.1%) patients, received ATC in an inpatient institution (e.g., nursing home). Compared with patients released elsewhere, significantly more problems/conflicts with regard to hospital discharge were reported for ATC patients (28.6 vs 20.6%, p = 0.01) and their relatives (12.6 vs 7.2%, p = 0.01). Women had a higher probability of being discharged to ATC (OR 1.522, p = 0.014) and a lower chance of receiving rehabilitation upon discharge (OR 0.733, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The study identified important concerns related to receiving ATC after a hospital stay, that is, more problems/conflicts occur with patients discharged to ATC and that the introduction of ATC might particularly disadvantage female patients, who are less likely to receive rehabilitation care.

References

  1. Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG). Allgemeine Information zum Krankenversicherungsgesetz (KVG). Bern: BAG; 2010.
  2. Busato A, von Below G. The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: A population-based perspective. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8(1):31. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-31
  3. Reinhold T, Thierfelder K, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Willich SN. Gesundheitsökonomische Auswirkungen der DRG-Einführung in Deutschland--eine systematische Ubersicht [Health economic effects after DRG-implementation--a systematic overview]. Gesundheitswesen. 2009;71(5):306–12. Article in German. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1119399
  4. Gächter T, Leu A, Elger B. 365 Tage SwissDRG: Anreize, Instrumente, Wirkungen. Hill - Zeitschrift für Recht und Gesundheit. 2013;(95).
  5. Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, Reinisch EJ, Sherwood MJ, Rubenstein LV, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited. JAMA. 1990;264(15):1980–3. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450150080035
  6. Botschaft zum Bundesgesetz über die Neuordnung der Pflegefinanzierung vom 16. Februar. 2005. BBI. 2005. 2033–94. Available from: https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/federal-gazette/2005/2033.pdf.
  7. Leu A. Einfluss der SwissDRG auf die vulnerablen Patientengruppen in der Schweiz, Ethische Kriterien und rechtliches Korrelat. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2015.
  8. Leu A, Gächter T, Elger BS. Führt SwissDRG zu einer Minderversorgung vulnerabler Patientengruppen? Pflegerecht. 2015;4:9–14.
  9. Padrutt Y. Akut- und Übergangspflege – wirtschaftlich sinnvoll oder blosse Mehrbelastung der Patienten? Pflegerecht. 2016;2:109–13.
  10. Schariatzadeh R, Imoberdorf R, Ballmer PE. Klinikinterne und -externe Determinanten der Spitalaufenthaltsdauer. Praxis (Bern). 2011;100(2):75–83. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a000410
  11. Eugster G. Soziale Sicherheit. In: Meyer U, editor. Schweizerisches Bundesverwaltungsrecht, Band XIV: Soziale Sicherheit. Basel; 2016, p. 385–884.
  12. Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340(apr20 2):c1718. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1718
  13. Haaf H-G. Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Rehabilitation [Findings on the effectiveness of rehabilitation]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005;44(5):259–76. Article in German. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-867015
  14. Stadtspital Triemli Zürich. 2017 [updated 2017 May 2]. Available from: https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/triemli/en/index/about-us.html.
  15. Griffiths PD, Edwards MH, Forbes A, Harris RL, Ritchie G. Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD002214. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002214.pub3
  16. Dahl U, Johnsen R, Sætre R, Steinsbekk A. The influence of an intermediate care hospital on health care utilization among elderly patients--a retrospective comparative cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):48. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0708-4
  17. Herfjord JK, Heggestad T, Ersland H, Ranhoff AH. Intermediate care in nursing home after hospital admission: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):889. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-889
  18. Geschwindner H, Bieri-Brüning G. Nahtlose Übergangspflege: Von der institutionellen Betreuung bis nach Hause. ZögU. 2013;36(2-3):106–18. Article in German. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5771/0344-9777-2013-2-3-106
  19. Ture M, Barth J, Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Schnyder U, Zerkiebel N, et al. Use of inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients in Switzerland: who undergoes cancer rehabilitation? Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14214. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14214
  20. Samayoa L, Grace SL, Gravely S, Scott LB, Marzolini S, Colella TJF. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(7):793–800. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2013.11.007
  21. Gravely S, Anand SS, Stewart DE, Grace SL ; CRCARE Investigators. Effect of referral strategies on access to cardiac rehabilitation among women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(8):1018–25. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487313482280
  22. Daniels KM, Arena R, Lavie CJ, Forman DE. Cardiac rehabilitation for women across the lifespan. Am J Med. 2012;125(9):937.e1–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.028
  23. Mosca L, Linfante AH, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Hayes SN, Walsh BW, et al. National study of physician awareness and adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Circulation. 2005;111(4):499–510. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000154568.43333.82
  24. Mabire C, Büla C, Morin D, Goulet C. Nursing discharge planning for older medical inpatients in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study. Geriatr Nurs. 2015;36(6):451–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.07.002
  25. Gächter T, Leu A, Elger B. 365 Tage SwissDRG: Anreize, Instrumente, Wirkungen. Hill - Zeitschrift für Recht und Gesundheit. 2013(95).

Most read articles by the same author(s)