Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 147 No. 4344 (2017)

Swiss Adult Congenital HEart disease Registry (SACHER) – rationale, design and first results

  • Daniel Tobler
  • Markus Schwerzmann
  • Judith Bouchardy
  • Reto Engel
  • Dominik Stambach
  • Christine Attenhofer Jost
  • Kerstin Wustmann
  • Fabienne Schwitz
  • Tobias Rutz
  • Harald Gabriel
  • Hans-Peter Kuen
  • Christoph auf der Maur
  • Angela Oxenius
  • Theresa Seeliger
  • Bruno Santos Lopes
  • Francesca Bonassin
  • Matthias Greutmann
  • on behalf of SACHER
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14519
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14519
Published
27.10.2017

Summary

BACKGROUND

In 2013, a prospective registry for adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) was established in Switzerland, providing detailed data on disease characteristics and outcomes: Swiss Adult Congenital HEart disease Registry (SACHER). Its aim is to improve the knowledge base of outcomes in adults with CHD. The registry design and baseline patient characteristics are reported.

METHODS

All patients with structural congenital heart defects or hereditary aortopathies, followed-up at dedicated adult CHD clinics, are asked to participate in SACHER. Data of participants are pseudonymised and collected in an electronic, web-based, database (secuTrial®). Collected data include detailed diagnosis, type of repair procedures, previous complications and adverse outcomes during follow-up.

RESULTS

From May 2014 to December 2016, 2836 patients (54% male, mean age 34 ± 14 years), with a wide variety of congenital heart lesions, have been enrolled into SACHER. Most prevalent were valve lesions (25%), followed by shunt lesions (22%), cyanotic and other complex congenital heart disease (16%), diseases affecting the right heart, i.e., tetralogy of Fallot or Ebstein anomaly (15%), and diseases of the left ventricular outflow tract (13%); 337 patients (12%) had concomitant congenital syndromes. The majority had undergone previous repair procedures (71%), 47% of those had one or more reinterventions.

CONCLUSION

SACHER collects multicentre data on adults with CHD. Its structure enables prospective data analysis to assess detailed, lesion-specific outcomes with the aim to finally improve long-term outcomes.

References

  1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241–7. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025
  2. Warnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK, Jr, Dore A, Harris L, Hoffman JI, et al. Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1170–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01272-4
  3. Moons P, Bovijn L, Budts W, Belmans A, Gewillig M. Temporal trends in survival to adulthood among patients born with congenital heart disease from 1970 to 1992 in Belgium. Circulation. 2010;122(22):2264–72. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.946343
  4. Marelli AJ, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Guo L, Dendukuri N, Kaouache M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;130(9):749–56. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008396
  5. Padrutt M, Bracher I, Bonassin F, Santos Lopes B, Gruner C, Stämpfli SF, et al. Impact of growing cohorts of adults with con-genital heart disease on clinical workload: a 20-year experience at a tertiary care centre. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14443. Available at: https://smw.ch/en/article/doi/smw.2017.14443/.
  6. Greutmann M, Tobler D, Kovacs AH, Greutmann-Yantiri M, Haile SR, Held L, et al. Increasing mortality burden among adults with complex congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10(2):117–27. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12201
  7. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, Child JS, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease); American Society of Echocardiography; Heart Rhythm Society; International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(23):e143–263. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001
  8. Bouchardy J, Greutmann M, Schwerzmann M, Attenhofer Jost CH, De Pasquale G, Oxenius A, et al. Grown-up congenital heart disease: recommendations for standards of care. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2015;18(04):144–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2015.00317
  9. Rutz T, Wustmann K, Prsa M, Vallée J, Donner B, Bremerich J, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2016;19(06):176–84. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2016.00411
  10. van der Velde ET, Vriend JWJ, Mannens MMAM, Uiterwaal CSPM, Brand R, Mulder BJM. CONCOR, an initiative towards a national registry and DNA-bank of patients with congenital heart disease in the Netherlands: rationale, design, and first results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(6):549–57. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-4264-9
  11. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, de Haan F, Deanfield JE, Galie N, et al.; Task Force on the Management of Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2915–57. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq249
  12. Bauer U, Niggemeyer E, Lange PE. Das Kompetenznetz Angeborene Herzfehler (KN AHF): Vernetzung statt Insellösungen für optimierte Forschung und Versorgung [The Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects. Networking Instead of Isolated Efforts for Optimized Research and Care]. Med Klin (Munich). 2006;101(9):753–8. Article in German. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-006-1104-4

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2