Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 146 No. 3334 (2016)

Reimbursement of care for severe trauma under SwissDRG

  • Rudolf M Moos
  • Kai Sprengel
  • Kai Oliver Jensen
  • Thorsten Jentzsch
  • Hans-Peter Simmen
  • Burkhardt Seifert
  • Bernhard Ciritsis
  • Valentin Neuhaus
  • Jörk Volbracht
  • Tarun Mehra
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14334
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14334
Published
14.08.2016

Summary

QUESTIONS: Treatment of patients with severe injuries is costly, with best results achieved in specialised care centres. However, diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based prospective payment systems have difficulties in depicting treatment costs for specialised care. We analysed reimbursement of care for severe trauma in the first 3 years after the introduction of the Swiss DRG reimbursement system (2012–2014).

MATERIAL/METHODS: The study included all patients with solely basic insurance, hospital admission after 01.01.2011 and discharge in 2011 or 2012, who were admitted to the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Zurich, aged ≥16 years and with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥16 (n = 364). Clinical, financial and administrative data were extracted from the electronic medical records. All cases were grouped into DRGs according to different SwissDRG versions. We considered results to be significant if p ≤0.002.

RESULTS: The mean deficit decreased from 12 065 CHF under SwissDRG 1.0 (2012) to 2 902 CHF under SwissDRG 3.0 (2014). The main reason for the reduction of average deficits was a refinement of the DRG algorithm with a regrouping of 23 cases with an ISS ≥16 from MDC 01 to DRGs within MDC21A. Predictors of an increased total loss per case could be identified: for example, high total number of surgical interventions, surgeries on multiple anatomical regions or operations on the pelvis (p ≤0.002). Psychiatric diagnoses in general were also significant predictors of deficit per case (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION: The reimbursement for care of severely injured patients needs further improvement. Cost neutral treatment was not possible under the first three versions of SwissDRG.

References

  1. Westhoff J, Hildebrand F, Grotz M, Richter M, Pape HC, Krettek C. Trauma care in Germany. Injury 2003;34:674–83.
  2. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:366–78.
  3. Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, Pracht E, Papa L, Lottenberg L, Flint L. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006;60:371–8; discussion 8.
  4. Papa L, Langland-Orban B, Kallenborn C, Tepas JJ, 3rd, Lottenberg L, Celso B, Durham R, Flint L. Assessing effectiveness of a mature trauma system: Association of trauma center presence with lower injury mortality rate. J Trauma. 2006;61:261–6; discussion 6–7.
  5. Twijnstra MJ, Moons KG, Simmermacher RK, Leenen LP. Regional trauma system reduces mortality and changes admission rates: a before and after study. Ann Surg. 2010;251:339–43.
  6. Morshed S, Knops S, Jurkovich GJ, Wang J, MacKenzie E, Rivara FP. The impact of trauma-center care on mortality and function following pelvic ring and acetabular injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:265–72.
  7. Mahlke L, Lefering R, Siebert H, Windolf J, Roeder N, Franz D. Description of the severely injured in the DRG system. Is treatment of the severely injured still affordable? Chirurg. 2013;84:978–86.
  8. Fallpauschalen in Schweizer Spitälern – Basisinformationen für Gesundheitsfachleute [monograph on the internet]. SwissDRG AG, Bern; 2011. Available from: http://www.swissdrg.org/assets/pdf/Broschuere/Broschuere_SwissDRG_d_A4.pdf
  9. Liener UC, Rapp U, Lampl L, Helm M, Richter G, Gaus M, et al. Incidence of severe injuries. Results of a population-based analysis. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:483–90. German.
  10. Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G, Michelutto V, Nardi G, Burba I, Francescutti C, et al. Epidemiology of major injury in the population of Friuli Venezia Giulia-Italy. Injury. 2004;35:391–400.
  11. W F, H B, N R. Ist eine Kalkulation von seltenen und sehr aufwendigen Krankenhausfällen im G-DRG-System sachgerecht? Krankenhaus. 2011;7:680–6.
  12. Mehra T, Muller CT, Volbracht J, Seifert B, Moos R. Predictors of High Profit and High Deficit Outliers under SwissDRG of a Tertiary Care Center. PLoS One 2015;10: e0140874.
  13. Mehra T, Koljonen V, Seifert B, Volbracht J, Giovanoli P, Plock J, Moos RM. Total inpatient treatment costs in patients with severe burns: towards a more accurate reimbursement model. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14217.
  14. Juhra C, Franz D, Roeder N, Vordemvenne T, Raschke MJ. Classification of severely injured patients in the G-DRG System 2008. Unfallchirurg. 2009;112:525–32. German.
  15. Flohe S, Buschmann C, Nabring J, Merguet P, Luetkes P, Lefering R, Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S. Definition of polytrauma in the German DRG system 2006. Up to 30% “incorrect classifications”. Unfallchirurg. 2007;110:651–8. German.
  16. Franz D, Schemmann F, Selter DD, Auhuber T, Wirtz DC, Roeder N, et al. Remuneration for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery in the German an Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) System Current Developments and Future Action. Unfallchirurg. 2013;116:760–6.
  17. Franz D, Schemmann F, Roeder N, Mahlke L. Financing of inpatient orthopedics and trauma surgery in the G-DRG system 2010. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:682–9.
  18. Probst C, Schaefer O, Hildebrand F, Krettek C, Mahlke L. The economic challenges of polytrauma care. Unfallchirurg. 2009;112:975–80.
  19. Franz D, Schemmann F, Roeder N, Mahlke L. Financing of inpatient orthopedics and trauma surgery in the G-DRG system 2010. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:682–9.
  20. Freitas A, Silva-Costa T, Lopes F, Garcia-Lema I, Teixeira-Pinto A, Brazdil P, Costa-Pereira A. Factors influencing hospital high length of stay outliers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:265.
  21. Obertacke U, Neudeck F, Wihs HJ, Schmit-Neuerburg KP. Emergency care and treatment costs of polytrauma patients. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1996;113:641–5.
  22. Obertacke U, Neudeck F, Wihs HJ, Schmit-Neuerburg KP. Cost analysis of primary care and intensive care treatment of multiple trauma patients. Unfallchirurg. 1997;100:44–9.
  23. Wilke MH, Hocherl E, Scherer J, Janke L. Introduction of the new DRG-based reimbursement system in German hospitals – a difficult operation? Experiences and possible solutions from the viewpoint of trauma surgery. Unfallchirurg. 2001;104:372–9.
  24. Schwermann T, Grotz M, Blanke M, Ruchholtz S, Lefering R, JM VdS, et al. Evaluation of costs incurred for patients with multiple trauma particularly from the perspective of the hospital. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:563–74.
  25. Grotz M, Schwermann T, Lefering R, Ruchholtz S, Graf v d Schulenburg JM, Krettek C, Pape HC. DRG reimbursement for multiple trauma patients – a comparison with the comprehensive hospital costs using the German trauma registry. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:68–75.
  26. Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, Thompson JD. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care. 1980;18: iii, 1–53.
  27. Geissler A, Quentin W, Busse R. Heterogeneity of European DRG systems and potentials for a common EuroDRG system Comment on “Cholecystectomy and Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4:319–20.
  28. Mathauer I, Wittenbecher F. Hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups: experiences in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91:746–56A.
  29. Whitebook – Medical Care of the Severely Injured. 2 ed: German Society for Trauma Surgery (reg. assoc.), Berlin, 2012.
  30. REKOLE® Handbuch – Betriebliches Rechnungswesen im Spital [monograph on the internet]. Bern, Switzerland; 2014. Available from: http://www.hplus.ch/de/dienstleistungen/betriebswirtschaft/rechnungswesen_spital/rekoler_handbuch/
  31. Zürich GdK. Handbuch PRISMA Wegleitung zur Erhebung des Patientenrecord in der Somatik [monograph on the internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.gd.zh.ch/dam/gesundheitsdirektion/direktion/themen/gesundheitsinstitutionen/spitaeler_kliniken/handbuecher_vorgaben_erhebungsunterlagen/handbuecher_und_vorgaben/prisma/handbuch_prisma_2.1.pdf.spooler.download.1421054735957.pdf/handbuch_prisma_2.1.pdf
  32. The Casemix Service HRG4, Guide to Unbundling. Leeds: NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care 2009.
  33. Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe. In: Reinhard Busse AG, Wilm Quentin, Miriam Wiley, ed. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals, 2011.
  34. Ganzoni D, Zellweger R, Trentz O. Cost analysis of acute therapy of polytrauma patients. Swiss Surg. 2003;9:268–74.
  35. Webfeedback 2013 Fallkostendaten 2012 Grouperversion 1.0, 2.0 und 3.0 [monograph on the internet]. Bern, Switzerland: SwissDRG AG; 2014. Available from: https://apps.swissdrg.org/webfeedback2013_10/users/sign_in

Most read articles by the same author(s)