Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 141 No. 4142 (2011)

Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland

  • Alama El
  • I Hösli
  • M Nelle
  • D Surbek
  • J Wisser
  • R Zimmermann
  • JC Fauchère
  • AC Truttmann
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13280
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13280
Published
10.10.2011

Summary

Perinatal care of pregnant women at high risk for preterm delivery and of preterm infants born at the limit of viability (22–26 completed weeks of gestation) requires a multidisciplinary approach by an experienced perinatal team. Limited precision in the determination of both gestational age and foetal weight, as well as biological variability may significantly affect the course of action chosen in individual cases.

The decisions that must be taken with the pregnant women and on behalf of the preterm infant in this context are complex and have far-reaching consequences. When counselling pregnant women and their partners, neonatologists and obstetricians should provide them with comprehensive information in a sensitive and supportive way to build a basis of trust. The decisions are developed in a continuing dialogue between all parties involved (physicians, midwives, nursing staff and parents) with the principal aim to find solutions that are in the infant’s and pregnant woman's best interest.

Knowledge of current gestational age-specific mortality and morbidity rates and how they are modified by prenatally known prognostic factors (estimated foetal weight, sex, exposure or nonexposure to antenatal corticosteroids, single or multiple births) as well as the application of accepted ethical principles form the basis for responsible decision-making. Communication between all parties involved plays a central role.

The members of the interdisciplinary working group suggest that the care of preterm infants with a gestational age between 22 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks should generally be limited to palliative care. Obstetric interventions for foetal indications such as Caesarean section delivery are usually not indicated. In selected cases, for example, after 23 weeks of pregnancy have been completed and several of the above mentioned prenatally known prognostic factors are favourable or well informed parents insist on the initiation of life-sustaining therapies, active obstetric interventions for foetal indications and provisional intensive care of the neonate may be reasonable.

In preterm infants with a gestational age between 24 0/7 and 24 6/7 weeks, it can be difficult to determine whether the burden of obstetric interventions and neonatal intensive care is justified given the limited chances of success of such a therapy. In such cases, the individual constellation of prenatally known factors which impact on prognosis can be helpful in the decision making process with the parents.

In preterm infants with a gestational age between 25 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks, foetal surveillance, obstetric interventions for foetal indications and neonatal intensive care measures are generally indicated. However, if several prenatally known prognostic factors are unfavourable and the parents agree, primary non-intervention and neonatal palliative care can be considered.

All pregnant women with threatening preterm delivery or premature rupture of membranes at the limit of viability must be transferred to a perinatal centre with a level III neonatal intensive care unit no later than 23 0/7 weeks of gestation, unless emergency delivery is indicated. An experienced neonatology team should be involved in all deliveries that take place after 23 0/7 weeks of gestation to help to decide together with the parents if the initiation of intensive care measures appears to be appropriate or if preference should be given to palliative care (i.e., primary non-intervention). In doubtful situations, it can be reasonable to initiate intensive care and to admit the preterm infant to a neonatal intensive care unit (i.e., provisional intensive care). The infant’s clinical evolution and additional discussions with the parents will help to clarify whether the life-sustaining therapies should be continued or withdrawn.

Life support is continued as long as there is reasonable hope for survival and the infant’s burden of intensive care is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the health care team and the parents have to recognise that in the light of a very poor prognosis the burden of the currently used therapies has become disproportionate, intensive care measures are no longer justified and other aspects of care (e.g., relief of pain and suffering) are the new priorities (i.e., redirection of care). If a decision is made to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapies, the health care team should focus on comfort care for the dying infant and support for the parents.

References

  1. Berger TM, Büttiker V, Fauchère JC, Holzgreve W, Kind C, Largo R, et al. Empfehlungen zur Betreuung von Frühgeborenen an der Grenze der Lebensfähigkeit (Gestationsalter 22–26 SSW). Schweiz Ärztezeitung. 2002;83:1589–95.
  2. Gee H, Dunn P, for the BAPM Executive Committee. Fetuses and newborn infants at the threshold of viability. A framework for practice, 2000.
  3. Pohlandt F. Frühgeburt an der Grenze der Lebensfähigkeit des Kindes. PerinatalMedizin. 1998;10:99–101.
  4. Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, and Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. CMAJ. 1994;151:547–53.
  5. SAMW. Medizinisch-ethische Richtlinien für die ärztliche Betreuung sterbender und zerebral schwerst geschädigter Patienten. Schweiz Ärztezeitung. 1995;76:1223–5.
  6. SAMW. Medizinisch-ethische Richtlinien zu Grenzfragen der Intensivmedizin. Schweiz Ärztezeitung. 1999;80:2134–8.
  7. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J, et al. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1400–13.
  8. MacDonald H. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics. 2002;110:1024–7.
  9. Pohlandt F. Premature birth at the boundary of infant viability. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2008;212:109–13.
  10. Richmond S, Wyllie J. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2010. Section 7: Resuscitation of babies at birth. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1389–99.
  11. Wilkinson AR, Ahluwalia J, Cole A, Crawford D, Fyle J, Gordon A, et al. Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F2–5.
  12. Lui K, Bajuk B, Foster K, Gaston A, Kent A, Sinn J, et al. Perinatal care at the borderlines of viability: a consensus statement based on a NSW and ACT consensus workshop. Med J Aust. 2006;185:495–500.
  13. Miljeteig I, Markestad T, Norheim OF. Physicians’ use of guidelines and attitudes to withholding and withdrawing treatment for extremely premature neonates in Norway. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:825–9.
  14. Moriette G, Rameix S, Azria E, Fournie A, Andrini P, Caeymaex L, et al. [Very premature births: Dilemmas and management. Part 1. Outcome of infants born before 28 weeks of postmenstrual age, and definition of a gray zone]. Arch Pediatr. 2010;17:518–26.
  15. Moriette G, Rameix S, Azria E, Fournie A, Andrini P, Caeymaex L, et al. [Very premature births: Dilemmas and management. Second part: Ethical aspects and recommendations]. Arch Pediatr. 2010;17:527–39.
  16. Pignotti MS, Scarselli G, Barberi I, Barni M, Bevilacqua G, Branconi F, et al. Perinatal care at an extremely low gestational age (22-25 weeks). An Italian approach: the “Carta di Firenze”. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal, Ed. 2007;92:F515–516.
  17. Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Management of the neonate at the limits of viability: the Dutch viewpoint. BJOG. 2006;113(Suppl 3):13–6.
  18. Doyle LW, Roberts G, Anderson PJ. Outcomes at age 2 years of infants <28 weeks’ gestational age born in Victoria in 2005. J Pediatr. 2010;156:49-53 e41.
  19. Fellman V, Hellstrom-Westas L, Norman M, Westgren M, Kallen K, Lagercrantz H, et al. One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA. 2009;301:2225–33.
  20. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity--moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1672–81.
  21. Mercier CE, Dunn MS, Ferrelli KR, Howard DB, Soll RF. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford Network: 1998–2003. Neonatology. 2009;97:329–38.
  22. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–56.
  23. Fischer N, Steurer MA, Adams M, Berger TM. Survival rates of extremely preterm infants (gestational age <26 weeks) in Switzerland: impact of the Swiss guidelines for the care of infants born at the limit of viability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F407–413.
  24. Bajwa N, Berner M, Worley S, Pfister R, and the Swiss Neonatal Network. Population-based age stratified morbidities of premature infants in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13212.
  25. Sabbagha R. Gestational age. In Diagnostic ultrasound applied to obstetrics and gynaecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1987, 91–111.
  26. Wisser J, Dirschedl P, Krone S. Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4:457–62.
  27. Bader D, Kugelman A, Boyko V, Levitzki O, Lerner-Geva L, Riskin A, et al. Risk factors and estimation tool for death among extremely premature infants: a national study. Pediatrics. 2010;125:696–703.
  28. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:378–84.
  29. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:9–19.
  30. Mikkola K, Ritari N, Tommiska V, Salokorpi T, Lehtonen L, Tammela O, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996–1997. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1391–400.
  31. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th edition, Oxford, New York, Toronto, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  32. Kind C. Ethische Überlegungen als besondere Herausforderung für den Geburtshelfer und den Neonatologen. Der Gynäkologe. 2001;8.
  33. Batton DG. Clinical report – Antenatal counselling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009;124:422–7.
  34. Haward MF, Murphy RO, Lorenz JM. Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics. 2008;122:109–18.
  35. Crowther CA, Doyle LW, Haslam RR, Hiller JE, Harding JE, Robinson JS. Outcomes at 2 years of age after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1179–89.
  36. Murphy KE, Hannah ME, Willan AR, Hewson SA, Ohlsson A, Kelly EN, et al. Multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth (MACS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:2143–51.
  37. Surbek D, Drack G, Irion O, Nelle M, Hösli I. Lungenreifungsinduktion bei drohender Frühgeburt: Standardindikationen und Dosierung. Expertenbrief SGGG, 2009.
  38. Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Mele L, Johnson F, Dudley DJ, Spong CY, et al. Long-term outcomes after repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1190–8.
  39. Hayes EJ, Paul DA, Stahl GE, Seibel-Seamon J, Dysart K, Leiby BE, et al. Effect of antenatal corticosteroids on survival for neonates born at 23 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:921–6.
  40. Garite TJ, Kurtzman J, Maurel K, Clark R. Impact of a “rescue course” of antenatal corticosteroids: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:248 e241–249.
  41. ACOG: ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologist. Number 43, May 2003. Management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1039–47.
  42. Cazan-London G, Mozurkewich EL, Xu X, Ransom SB. Willingness or unwillingness to perform caesarean section for impending preterm delivery at 24 weeks’ gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1187–92.
  43. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Caesarean Section. In Clinical Guideline 13. London, 2004.
  44. Grant A. Elective versus selective caesarean section for delivery of the small baby. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD000078.
  45. Marlow N, Hennessy EM, Bracewell MA, Wolke D. Motor and executive function at 6 years of age after extremely preterm birth. Pediatrics. 2007;120:793–804.
  46. Hogberg U, Holmgren PA. Infant mortality of very preterm infants by mode of delivery, institutional policies and maternal diagnosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:693–700.
  47. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.
  48. Malloy MH. Impact of caesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000–2003. Pediatrics. 2008;122:285–92.
  49. Lee HC, Gould JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1836–1844.
  50. Patterson LS, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with classic and inverted T caesarean incisions. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:633–7.
  51. Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology. 2008;93:138–44.
  52. Manley BJ, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Donath SM, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Clinical assessment of extremely premature infants in the delivery room is a poor predictor of survival. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e559–564.
  53. Arlettaz R, Mieth D, Bucher HU, Duc G, Fauchère JC. End-of-life decisions in delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:1626–31.
  54. Berner ME, Rimensberger PC, Hüppi PS, Pfister RE. National ethical directives and practical aspects of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in newborn infants in a Swiss intensive care unit. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136:597–602.
  55. Berger TM, Hofer A. Causes and circumstances of neonatal deaths in 108 consecutive cases over a 10-year-period at the Children’s Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland. Neonatology. 2009:95:157–63.