Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 141 No. 3940 (2011)

Time lag between Ambrosia sensitisation and Ambrosia allergy

  • A Tosi
  • M Bonini
  • B Wüthrich
  • B Pietragalla-Köhler
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13253
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13253
Published
26.09.2011

Summary

Objectives: Ambrosia is spreading invasively in many European countries. Therefore, surveys showing the long-term consequences regarding the prevalence of sensitisation and allergy rates are needed. The aim of this study was to analyse the development of Ambrosia sensitisation and clinical symptoms over a period of 20 years among the patients of the allergy unit in Legnano in relation to the measured pollen concentrations. Legnano is situated near Milan in a region in northern Italy, known for its high Ambrosia pollen loads.

METHODS: The sensitisation of patients to Ambrosia and other aeroallergens was tested by a skin prick test. The patients were interviewed about their clinical symptoms and the time of incidence of the symptoms. On average, 1100 patients per year were included in this study in the years 1989–2008. The daily pollen concentration was measured with volumetric Hirst type pollen traps.

RESULTS: The sensitisation rate to Ambrosia increased from 24% to over 70% among the patients whose skin prick tests were positive to pollen. In 1989, about 45% of the Ambrosia sensitised patients suffered from respiratory symptoms (rhinitis and/or asthma) in late summer. After 5 years, this percentage increased to 70% and finally reached 90%. The prevalence of asthma was initially 30% among the Ambrosia sensitised patients and increased slightly to 40%.

CONCLUSION: The extent of the consequences of high Ambrosia pollen concentrations is not ascertainable over the short term. Sensitisation rates have constantly increased over a period of more than 15 years, and moreover the incidence of allergy is delayed during the first years.

References

  1. Rybnicek O, Jäger S. Ambrosia (ragweed) in Europe. ACI International. 2001;13:60–6.
  2. Járai-Komlódi M, Juhász M. Ambrosia Elatior (L.) in Hungary (1989–1990). Aerobiologia. 1993;9:75–8.
  3. Dervaderics M, Fust G, Otos M. Differences in the sensitisation to ragweed and occurence of late summer allergic symptoms between natives and immigrant workers of the nuclear power plant of Hungary. Immunol Invest. 2002;31:29–40.
  4. Dechamp C, Le Gal M, Deviller P. Prevalence of ragweed hayfever in the south and east of greater Lyon region in 1993. Allerg Immunol. 1995;27:320–5.
  5. Thibaudon M, Lachasse C, Finet F. Ragweed in France and in the Rhône Alpes region. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;35:87–91.
  6. Corsico R, Falagiani P, Ariano R. An epidemiological survey on the importance of some emerging pollens in Italy. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2000;10:155–61.
  7. Bottero P, Venegoni E, Riccio G, Vignati G, Brivio M, Novi C, Ortolani C. Pollinosi da Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Provincia di Milano. Folia Allergol Immunol Clin. 1990;37(2):99–105.
  8. Asero R. Birch and ragweed pollinosis north of Milan: a model to investigate the effects of exposure to “new” airborne allergens. Allergy. 2002;57:1063–6.
  9. Asero R. The changing pattern of ragweed allergy in the area of Milan, Italy. Allergy. 2007;62:1097–9.
  10. White J, Bernstein DI. Key pollen allergens in North America. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;91:425–35.
  11. Jäger S. Ragweed (Ambrosia) sensitization rates correlate with the amount of inhaled airborne pollen. A 14 year study in Vienna, Austria. Aerobiologia. 2000;16:149–53.
  12. Comtois P, Gagnon L. Concentration polliniques et fréquence des symptômes de pollinose: une méthode pour déterminer les seuils cliniques. Rev fr Allergol. 1988;28(4):279–86.
  13. Bergmann K-C, Werchan D, Maurer M, Zuberbier. The threshold value of Ambrosia pollen inducing acute nasal reactions is very low. Allergo J. 2008;17:375–6.
  14. Gehrig R, Pietragalla-Köhler B, Clot B, Herren T, Graber MJ, Hauser M et al. Luftpollengehalt in der Schweiz 2010. Zürich, MeteoSchweiz, 2011.
  15. Pozzi P, Zanon P, Berra D, Chiodini E. Results of three years of aerobiological sampling in the atmosphere of Busto Arsizio. Aerobiologia. 1992;8:21–6.
  16. Bonini M, Bottero P, Milani M. Prevalence and Clinical severity of Ragweed allergy in a Health care population in Magenta town: an epidemiological study on 1373 subjects. Allergy. 2009;64(Suppl. 90):S429.
  17. Bonini M, Cislaghi G, Colombo P, Graziano E, Pellino P. Ambrosia a ovest di Milano. Eur J Aerobiol Environ Med. 2006;(Suppl. 1):S168–169.
  18. Mandrioli P, Di Cecco M, Andina G. Ragweed pollen: the aeroallergen is spreading in Italy. Aerobiologia. 1998;14:13–20.
  19. Peeters Annie G. Ambrosia sp. pollen in Switzerland. Aerobiologia. 2000;16:295–7.
  20. Leuschner RM. Registrierte Luftpollen von Ambrosia L als Hinweis auf ein Vorkommen dieser Adventivpflanzen. Bauhinia. 1978;6:265–271.
  21. Taramarcaz P, Lambelet B, Clot, B, Keimer C, Hauser C. Ragweed progression and its health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135:538–48.
  22. Ackermann-Liebrich U, Schindler C, Frei P, Probst-Hensch NM, Imboden M, Gemperli A, et al. and the SAPALDIA team. Sensitization to Ambrosia in Switzerland: a public health threat on the wait. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:70–5.
  23. Köhler B, Gehrig R, Clot B, Ciotti V, Maspoli M. Ambrosialuftpollenmessungen in der Schweiz: Quantifizierung des Gefahrenpotentials und Indikator für die Ausbreitung der Pflanze. Nachrichtenbl Deut Pflanzenschutzd. 2006;58(11):299–303.
  24. Köhler B, Gehrig R, Pauling A, Clot B. Which factors influence ragweed pollen concentration in Ticino? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;39:135.
  25. Clot B, Schneiter D, Tercier P, Gehrig R, Annie G, Thibaudon M. Ambrosia pollen in Switzerland – produced locally or transported? Allerg Immunol. (Paris), 2002;34(4):126–8.
  26. Mandrioli P, Comtois P, Dominguez Vilches E, Galan Soldevilla C, Isard S, Syzdek L. Sampling: Principles and Techniques. In: Mandrioli P, Comtois P, Levizzani V, editors. Methods in Aerobiology. Bologna: Pitagora Editrice;1998. p. 47–112.
  27. Mann H. Nonparametric test against trends. Econometrica. 1945;13:245–59.
  28. Kendall MG. Rank correlation methods 4th ed. London: Griffin;1970.
  29. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2010. ISBN 3-900051-07-0;[cited 2010 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
  30. Wöhrl S, Stingl G. Underestimation of allergies in elderly patients. Lancet. 2004;363:249.
  31. Wüthrich B, Schnyder UW, Henauer SA, et al. Häufigkeit der Pollinosis in der Schweiz: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen demoskopischen Umfrage unter Berücksichtigung anderer allergischer Erkrankungen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986;116:909–17.
  32. Asero R. Analysis of new respiratory allergies in patients monosensitized to airborne allergens in the area North of Milan. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2004;14(3):208–13.
  33. Wüthrich B. Prevalence of atopy and pollinosis in the adult population of Switzerland (SAPALDIA Study). Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1995;106:149–56.
  34. Colombo VM. Zum Sensibilisierungsspektrum von Pollenallergikern im Kanton Tessin: Eine prospektive Studie in Locarno und Lugano 2009. [dissertation]. Universität Zürich;2010.