Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 141 No. 2526 (2011)

Strengths and weaknesses of chest compression training – a preliminary retrospective study

  • Jj Osterwalder
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2011.13221
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13221
Published
20.06.2011

Summary

BACKGROUND: High quality chest compression is one of the key factors in successful resuscitation. A high standard of training is therefore decisive. We aimed to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of teaching chest compression in a study designed to highlight where targeted improvements in the quality of our chest compression training can and must be made.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively documented data with 234 participants, and recording and analysis of chest compression variables before and after a BLS training course.

RESULTS: The results after the course were good for compression depth (94% correct), moderate for compression frequency (83% correct) and decompression (82% correct), unsatisfactory for hand positioning (74% correct) and poor for the compression/decompression ratio (32% correct). Practical instruction brought about improvements of between 9% and 48%. The greatest improvement was seen for hand positioning (48%), followed by compression depth (32%), compression rate (32%), and the compression/decompression ratio (20%). Training had only a slight effect on the degree of decompression (9%). Significant deteriorations were also noted after the course, for compression rate (11%) and the compression/decompression ratio (12%).

CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression training showed weakness for four out of five variables. Only the end results for compression depth were satisfactory. The deficits observed in the training on chest compression were relevant and must be remedied. One possibility would be initial step-by-step training and assessment of each component of chest compression, concentrating in particular on hand positioning and compression/decompression ratio.

References

  1. Nolan JP, Hazinski MF. 2005 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Part 2: Adult basic life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:187–201.
  2. Hazinski MF, Nolan JP. 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Part 5: Adult basic life support. Circulation. 2010;122(Suppl.2): S298–S324.
  3. Abella BS, Sandbo N. Chest Compression Rates During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Are Suboptimal. Circulation. 2005;111:428–34.
  4. Bellamy RF, DeGuzman LR. Coronary blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Circulation. 1984(69);1:174–80.
  5. Edelson DP, Abella BS: Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006;71:137–45.
  6. Yannopoulos D, McKnite S. Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2005;64:363–72.
  7. Kaye W, Mancini ME. Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general public. Crit Care Med. 1986;14(7):620–2.
  8. Chamberlain D, Smith A, Colquhoun M, Handley AJ, Kern KB, Woollard M. Randomized controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support: 2. Comparison of CPR performance and skill retention using either staged instruction or conventional training. Resuscitation. 2001;50(1):27–37.
  9. Pottle A, Brant S. Does resuscitation training affect outcome from cardiac arrest? Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000;8(1):46–51.
  10. Hollis S, Gillespie N. An audit of basic life support skills amongst general practitioner principals: Is there a need for regular training? Resuscitation. 2000;44(3):171–5.
  11. Chamberlain D, Smith A, Woollard M, Colquhoun M, Handley AJ, Leaves S, Kern KB. Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training. Resuscitation. 2002;53(2):179–87.
  12. Done ML, Parr M. Teaching basic life support skills using self-directed learning, a self-instructional video, access to practice manikins and learning in pairs. Resuscitation. 2002;52(3):287–91.
  13. Berden HJ, Bierens JJ, Willems FF, Hendrick JM, Pijls NH, Knape JT. Resuscitation skills of lay public after recent training. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(5):1003–8.
  14. Gasco C, Avellanal M, Sanchez M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for students of odontology: skills acquisition after two periods of learning. Resuscitation. 2000;45(3):189–94.
  15. Wik L, Thowsen J, Steen PA. An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training. Resuscitation. 2001;50(2):167–72.
  16. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, Steen PA. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation. 2002;52(3):273–9.
  17. Ward P, Johnson LA, Mulligan NW, Ward MC, Jones DL. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention: effect of two checklists designed to prompt correct performance. Resuscitation. 1997;34(3):221–5.
  18. Wik L, Brennan RT, Braslow A. A peer-training model for instruction of basic cardiac life support. Resuscitation. 1995;29:119–28.
  19. Assar D, Chamberlain D, Colquhoun M, Donnelly P, Handley AJ, Leaves S, et al. Randomized controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stage. Resuscitation. 2000;45:7–15.
  20. Reder S, Cummings P, Quan L. Comparison of three instructional methods for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an automatic external defibrillator to high school students. Resuscitation. 2006;69:443–53.
  21. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Ando M, Yonemoto N, Hiraide A, Nonogi H. Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training for the general public: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2008;79:90–6.
  22. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Ando M, Kajino K, Yonemoto N, et al. Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: A randomized controlled trial. Resusciation. 2009;80:1164–8.
  23. Braun D. Welchen Einfluss haben Musik und Rhythmus sowie eine initiale Videopräsentation auf die Durchführung von Thoraxkompression im Rahmen der Reanimation? Inaugural dissertation Universität Basel 2004.
  24. Safar P. Wiederbelebung Herz-Lunge-Gehirn; Thieme Verlag.
  25. Rosafio T, Cichella C, Vetrugno L, Ballone E, Orlandi P, Scesi M. Chain of survival: differences in early access and early CPR between policemen and high-school students. Resuscitation. 2001;49(1):25–31.
  26. Lynch B, Einspruch EL, Nichol G, Aufderheide TP. Assessment of BLS skills: Optimizing use of instructor and manikin measures. Resuscitation. 2008;76:233–43.
  27. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Ando M, Yonemoto N, Hiraide A, Nonogi H. Quality of chest decompressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1152–5.