Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Osteogenesis imperfecta: from diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment to future perspectives

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14322
Publication Date: 20.06.2016
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14322

Aline Bregou Bourgeoisa, Bérengère Aubry-Rozierb, Luisa Bonaféc, Lee Ann Applegated, Dominique P. Piolettie, Pierre-Yves Zambellia

a Unité Pédiatrique de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique UPCOT, Hôpital de l’Enfance, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
b Rheumatology and Centre of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
c Molecular Disease Centre, Child Medicine Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
d Regenerative Therapy Unit, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Service of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
e Laboratory of Biomechanical Orthopaedics, Institute of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland

Summary

Osteogenesis imperfecta is an inherited connective tissue disorder with wide phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity. A common issue associated with the molecular abnormality is a disturbance in bone matrix synthesis and homeostasis inducing bone fragility. In very early life, this can lead to multiple fractures and progressive bone deformities, including long bone bowing and scoliosis. Multidisciplinary management improves quality of life for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. It consists of physical therapy, medical treatment and orthopaedic surgery as necessary. Medical treatment consists of bone-remodelling drug therapy. Bisphosphonates are widely used in the treatment of moderate to severe osteogenesis imperfecta, from infancy to adulthood. Other more recent drug therapies include teriparatide and denosumab. All these therapies target the symptoms and have effects on the mechanical properties of bone due to modification of bone remodelling, therefore influencing skeletal outcome and orthopaedic surgery. Innovative therapies, such as progenitor and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, targeting the specific altered pathway rather than the symptoms, are in the process of development.

Key words: osteogenesis imperfecta; bisphosphonates; mesenchymal stem cell; telescopic rods

Introduction

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), commonly referred to as brittle bone disease, is a rare genetic disease with an incidence of 1/15 000–20 000. In 1979, Sillence et al. published the first description of four OI groups (OI I–IV) (table 1) with specific genetic inheritance, based on specific phenotypes (clinical, radiographic and pedigree features) [1]. In 1983, Chu et al. reported the presence of an internal deletion in a collagen gene (COL1A1) [2] implicated in OI. Altogether, several autosomal mutations in the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes, coding for the alpha-1 and alpha-2 chains of collagen type I, were discovered in the four OI groups known at that time. In 2004, Glorieux and Rauch described three new OI groups, with specific clinical characteristics and without genetic modification in COL1A1 or COL1A2 (OI V–VII) [3]. Barnes et al. described the first non-COL1A1/2 autosomal recessive mutation in 2006 [4]. Since this time, multiple new genes implicated in collagen expression, structure and function have been discovered, elaborating a more extensive genetic classification. The majority of OI patients have autosomal dominant mutations affecting type I collagen genes (COL1A1, COL1A2), resulting in reduced production or abnormal type I collagen formation and thus leading to bone fragility (fig. 1). Rare autosomal recessive or X-linked mutations (6–8% of all OI cases) have been identified, involving procollagen modifications, collagen fibre maturation, and bone formation and mineralisation [5]. In the 2015 revision of the nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders, the Sillence classification based on phenotype is still used [6], since the diagnosis, classification and severity assessment of OI is based on the clinical phenotype over time [7].

fullscreen
Figure 1
Collagen type I biosynthesis and bone formation. Collagen I is a triple helix with two alpha-1 and one alpha-2 chains encoded by COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes. After translation, the pro-alpha-chains are translocated in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) where posttranslational modifications occur (1)(2). The chains are folded in a triple helix, composed of two alpha-1 and one alpha-2 chains (2). These steps are, among others, under the control of CRTAP, LEPRE 1, PPIB and FKBP10 genes. The procollagen is then further modified during the transport to the Golgi apparatus (influence of SERPINH1, PLOD2 and FKBP10 genes). The procollagen is then delivered into the extracellular matrix by exocytosis. There, cleavage and removal of the pro-peptides N and C results in collagen I formation (3). Crosslinking of collagen molecules leads to fibril formation. Assembly of multiple collagen type 1 fibrils leads to collagen fibres which are constituents of bone (4). Osteoblasts produce a collagen-rich extracellular matrix that will be mineralised and osteoclasts degrade bone. Bone formation and resorption is regulated through cross-talk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. In osteogenesis imperfecta, altered quality and/or quantity of collagen I formation, altered cross-talk between osteoblasts and osteoblasts, leads to a defect in bone formation. Bisphosphonates concentrate in the mineralised osseous matrix where they inhibit bone resorption by osteoclasts.
Table 1: 1979 Sillence classificationof osteogenesis imperfecta.
OI TypeInheritanceFeatures
IADOsseous fragility (variable)

Adulthood hearing loss

Blue sclerae
IIAD, ARExtremely severe osseous fragility

Perinatally lethal
IIIARModerate to severe osseous fragility

Normal sclerae

Severe deformity of long bones and spine

Variable clinical and radiographic phenotypes
IVAD, AROsseous fragility

Generally normal sclerae

Severe deformity of long bones and spine
AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; OI = osteogenesis imperfecta

Classification

Since the Sillence description of four OI types (OI I–IV), more than 1500 dominant mutations in COL1A1/2 genes have been identified. These mutations alter the structure or the quantity of collagen type I and lead to skeletal phenotypes ranging from subclinical to lethal OI [8]. Recessive mutations in collagen-related genes, where the related proteins interact with type I collagen, cause lethal to moderate OI phenotypes. It became, therefore, impossible to maintain a close correlation between the molecular genetic basis and the Sillence OI types. In 2010, the Nosology Group of International Skeletal Dysplasia Society decided to use the Sillence classification as the prototypic and universal way to classify the degree of severity in OI (INCDS classification). They separated the Sillence classification from molecular reference, and listed separately many genes involved in OI [9]. At this time, arabic numbers instead of roman numerals were used for types of OI, to emphasise the phenotypic aspect, since roman numbers have been used to classify new genetic mutations [7]. In 2015, the revised INCDS classification was still associated with the Sillence classification, being phenotypically rather than molecularly based. OI type 5 was introduced into the classification as it is radiologically phenotypically distinguishable from types 1–4.

Therefore, despite the multiplicity of new genes discovered in the field of OI, genetic classification (table 2) is not currently used in clinical practice, and the phenotype classification is still the rule (table 3) [6]. Concomitantly with the new INCDS OI classification, universal criteria to classify the degree of severity of OI were needed. Van Dijk and Sillence proposed a severity grading scale (table 4) [7]. This relies on clinical and historical data, overall skeletal condition with fracture timing (prenatal/prepubertal) and frequency, bone densitometry, mobility and ambulatory level. It allows comprehension of the course of the disease for patients, highlights the treatment possibilities (surgical, pharmacological and conservative) and helps the physician to evaluate therapy. The grade of severity of the disease is based on phenotype observations and OI is clinically graded from mild to extremely severe (table 4). This scale has been already used in a multicentre study [10]. Possible treatment has been included by the scale authors. The scale is still under validation in specialised centres, but importantly gives a wide overview of the OI severity spectrum.

Table 2: Genetic and molecular classification of osteogenesis imperfecta.
Molecular pathwayGeneHereditySillence phenotypeFeatures
Collagen I structural defect or haploinsufficiencyCOL1A1ADI, II, III, IVBlue/grey/normal sclerae

Hyperlaxity

Hypoaccousia

Dentinogenesis imperfecta
COL1A2ADI, II, III, IV
Prolyl-3-hydroxylase complexCRTAPARII, III, IV (VII) 
LEPREIARII, III (VIII) 
PPIBARII, III, IV (IX) 
Lysyl-hydroxylase telopeptidePLOD2ARIIIPterygium

Congenital articular contractures (Bruck syndrome type 2)
Collagen chaperoneFKBP10ARIII, IV (XI)Eventual congenital articular contracture (Bruck syndrome type 1)
SERPINH1AARII, III (X)Blue sclerae

Dentinogenesis imperfecta
Collagen type I maturationBMP1ARXIIIElevated bone density

Blue sclerae
Osseous homeostasis and formation, bone mass regulationSERPINF1ARIII, IV (VI)Progressive low bone mass

Poor response to bisphosphonates

Good response to anti-RANKL antibody
SP7ARIII (XII)Delayed dental eruption
LRP5ARIII, IVVisual impairment (osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome)
WNT1ARIII, IV (XV)Progressive evolution

Poor response to bisphosphonates
TMEM38BARIII (XIV) 
CREB3L1ARII, III 
Unknown functionIFITM5ADVHypertrophic callous

Interosseous membrane calcifications

Sclerotic metaphyseal band
PLS3X-linkedIEarly osteoporosis for heterozygous female

Type I OI for hemizygous males
AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; OI = osteogenesis imperfecta; RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand 

Roman numbers are used for Sillence types as this concerns the genetic classification (cf text)

Clinical findings

OI diagnosis is based on clinical and radiographic findings. OI types 1, 4 and 5 are phenotypes with mild to moderate severity, while OI types 2 and 3 are severe to extremely severe phenotypes. OI type 1 is the non-deforming form with blue sclerae (fig. 2); OI type 4 is a common variable form with normal sclerae; OI type 5 is a form with interosseous membrane calcification. OI type 3 is a severe, progressively deforming form and OI type 2 is an extremely severe, perinatally lethal form.

fullscreen
Figure 2
Characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) types 1–5, illustrating morphological features for each stage.

Clinical features are directly linked to the fact that OI is a generalised, predominantly collagen-tissue disorder. Depending of the causative mutation, the primary structural defect of type I collagen, insufficient collagen quantity, and the posttranslational modification, folding, intracellular transport or matrix incorporation of abnormal collagen lead to an abnormal bone matrix and reduced bone strength, with resulting bone fragility, higher fracture risk, bone deformity and linear growth deficiency (fig. 2). Iterative fractures with mild trauma are then observed even at a young age, as well as joint laxity and weak muscle tone. Progressive skeletal deformities including bowing deformities of long bones, scoliosis, kyphosis, basilar impression, and chest wall deformities such as pectus excavatus or carinatus (i.e. barrel chest) are possible. Depending on OI severity, patients present variable degrees of short stature, OI type 1 having none to mild linear growth deficiency, OI type 4 having mild to moderate, and OI type 3 with very severe [11, 12]. Ambulation and mobility is limited in severely affected patients. Radiographic characteristics include osteopenia, bowed long bones, thin and under-tubularised long bones, gracilis ribs, vertebral compression and narrow thoracic apex (fig. 2 radiograph) [13]. Extraskeletal manifestations include blue sclerae, easy bruising owing to cutaneous and vascular fragility, progressive hearing loss in young adulthood, variable progressive impairment of pulmonary function and dentinogenesis imperfecta (fig. 2) [5, 7, 14]. Compared with healthy controls, OI patients seem to have a slightly increased risk of developing cardiac valvular disease, but more studies are needed to support this hypothesis [15]. Differential diagnosis is sometimes difficult between the mild forms of OI and of child abuse in children, or between OI and primary osteoporosis in older patients. Distinction between OI and child abuse (also called nonaccidental injury: NAI) is mainly based on history, clinical examination and radiography. Trauma description should be consistent with the clinical and radiological findings. OI and NAI children may have multiple bruises and contusions, but, despite a tendency for bruising capacity in OI, multiple and unusually localised hematomas are not the rule and should raise the suspicion of NAI. Radiological features of NAI and OI include multiple fractures of various ages, diaphyseal and vertebral fractures, anterior and lateral rib fractures, and hyperplastic callus formation. NAI children do not have osteopenia, long bone or skull deformities. Children with OI do not usually have typical corner metaphyseal lesions, spinous processes or posterior rib fractures. Multiple fractures in a child with OI type 1 are uncommon and NAI cannot be ruled out in favour of OI [16].

Clinical management

Amelioration of mobility, self-care, functional independence and better quality of life at an adult age are the main goals of the proposed therapeutic approaches. These treatment plans are based on a multidisciplinary approach, which includes medical management of bone-remodelling drug therapy; orthopaedic treatment (conservative or surgical) for fractures and deformity stabilisation; rehabilitation for muscular strengthening and movement or a walking strategy. The multidisciplinary approach has led to better functional outcomes for patients but its practical application depends nevertheless on the degree of OI severity [17–19].

As shown in table 3, prognosis and management are strongly related to the type of OI. It is noteworthy that severity is highly variable even within OI families, and treatment is guided by the severity rather than the type of OI. In mild non-deforming OI, diagnosis is usually accomplished during childhood or early puberty, when fractures for minor trauma or bone pain in association with low bone mineral density occur. These patients rarely develop long bone deformities. Surgery is rarely necessary and is more dependent on the fracture type than the disease itself. Fracture healing is normal in OI, and if no internal fixation is needed, cast immobilisation duration is the same as for healthy children. Casts should not be maintained more than necessary and mobilisation should be as soon as possible to minimise secondary bone fragility and mobility diminution.

In moderate or severe OI, very early fractures and/or bone deformities occur. Early correction of long bone deformities and bone fragility stabilisation with intramedullary rodding has been associated with better motor status improvement and ambulation in severe OI [20, 21]. Plates are contraindicated as all the stress could be transferred to the plate and thus the underlying bone would become less strong, with subsequent fractures at the plate extremities. Telescopic growing rods can be used and have been associated with a lower rate of re-rodding [18]. Together with surgery, moderate and severe forms of OI benefit from specific drug therapies. Generally, long bone deformations, vertebral fractures and frequent fractures should raise the possibility of bisphosphonate treatment. Bisphosphonate treatment is the most frequently used. Bisphosphonate concentrates in the mineralised osseous matrix where it inhibits bone resorption by osteoclasts (fig. 1) and correspondingly favours an increase in bone mineral density. Prior to starting a bisphosphonate it is essential to maximise calcium and vitamin D supplementation, as sufficient concentrations are necessary for an optimal treatment response [22]. Bisphosphonate can be administered to children younger than 24 months old with net results on decreased fractures rates and increased patient mobility [23, 24], but without reversing the fracture rate or scoliosis evolution of severe OI to a mild OI situation [25]. Studies have shown a diminished fracture risk for children without alteration of linear growth [10, 23, 24, 26, 27]. Augmentation of cortical thickness and vertebral height, and diminution of musculoskeletal pain and fatigue are described as results of bisphosphonate treatment [28]. Bisphosphonates have a half-life in bone of more than a decade, and at the end of the treatment they still have an impact on bone modelling and quality [29, 30]. Bisphosphonates do not delay bone healing after fracture, but it is recommended to avoid sawing techniques for surgical osteotomies as heating may alter bone consolidation; there is a generally accepted consensus to keep an interval of 2–4 months after surgery free of bisphosphonate infusions [31, 32]. Bisphosphonate treatments have, however, raised some concerns about atypical femoral stress fractures due to suppression of remodelling and the secondary loss of bone elasticity on the long bone mechanical stress zone. Awareness about their benefits and risks, limited duration and a bone mechanical axis as physiological as possible seem to be the better guarantee against these atypical fracture risks [33–36]. Therefore, although they are commonly used, due to potential risks, the decision to use bisphosphonate therapies must still be individualised.

Despite the amelioration of bone density and fracture risk, patients under bisphosphonate treatment still have long bone fractures and progressive scoliosis, and these are still of concern, even in mild forms of OI [37]. Scoliosis is the second major orthopaedic concern in OI, with a prevalence ranging from 39% to 88% [38]. In mild OI the majority are self-limited, but in moderate to severe OI evolution can be severe, even with bisphosphonate treatment. This leads to the hypothesis that, although deformity from repetitive vertebral fractures, and altered bone quantity and quality are commonly reported as contributory factors, ligament laxity and muscle weakness are also important factors in the pathophysiology of scoliosis in OI [39]. Bracing is ineffective and contraindicated because of secondary chest and rib deformities [40, 41]. Arthrodesis with posterior spinal instrumentation is needed for a progressive curve reaching 50° to stop curve progression and prevent pulmonary impairment; types 3 and 4 OI are mainly concerned. The arthrodesis may be preceded by a period of cranial halo traction for very severe curves [42]. Other spinal deformities such as thoracolombar kyphosis, lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, and basilar invagination at the craniocervical junction are frequently seen and may necessitate interventions [40].

In severe OI, upper limb long bone deformities with severe bowing and radial head dislocation are frequent and very disabling. Surgical correction is indicated in order to relieve pain if present, and when functional abilities are affected (self-care, wheelchair autonomous hand-rolling) [43, 44]. Pelvic and hip progressive deformations occur in severe OI: coxa vara has a very negative effect on the functional status of the patient and hip correction interventions may be necessary [45, 46]; severe acetabular protrusion induces hip stiffness and can have some urinary or gastrointestinal tract implications that, however, rarely need intervention. Report of one case requiring colostomy, femoral traction and pelvic osteotomy to release intestinal compression does exist [47, 48].

Besides drug therapy and orthopaedic management, physiotherapy is key in OI management. For many years, rehabilitation programmes have been proposed for OI patients and have gained in efficacy since the introduction of bisphosphonates into OI management [49]. In children, gross motor development acquisition, safety in active movement and minimisation of the development of early complications are the predominant targets. Rehabilitation strategies are individualised depending on clinical assessment and function [50]. OI type and total muscle strength being strongly associated with ambulation, particular attention to muscle training and maintenance is warranted [51, 52]. Indeed, regular physical activity is important in OI management. The type of activity is directly linked to the type of OI. Compared with healthy children, OI type 1 children have muscle weakness independent of a hypoactive activity level [52–54].

Table 3: Current modified phenotypic Sillence classification of osteogenesis imperfecta from the Nosology Group of the International Skeletal Dysplasia Society (adapted from Bonafé L, et al. Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal disorders: 2015 Revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(12):2869-92 9999A:1–24).
OI TypeInheritanceFeatures
1ADNon-deforming form
Osseous fragility

Presenile hearing loss

Blue sclerae
2AD, ARPerinatal lethal form
Extremely severe osseous fragility
3AD, ARProgressively deforming form
Moderate to severe osseous fragility
4AD, ARModerate form
Generally normal sclerae
5AD, ARCalcification of the interosseous membrane and/or hypertrophic callus
AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; OI = osteogenesis imperfecta
Table 4: Pre- and postnatal severity grading scale (adapted from Van Dijk FS, Sillence DO. Osteogenesis imperfecta: Clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity assessment. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:1470–81).
 Intrauterine (ultrasound at 20 weeks of pregnancy)Growth velocity and heightIntrinsic bone deformationsAnnualised prepubertal # rateLocomotion status
Mild OINo #, No long bone deformitiesNormal or near normalNone≤1Ambulant
Moderate OIRare fetal long bone # or bowingDecreasedAnterior femoral and tibial bowing>1Ambulant
Severe OILong bones shortening

Long bone # and bowing

Rib #
Severely decreasedLong bone and spine progressive deformity >3Wheel-chair dependent
Extremely severe OILong bone shortening

Long bone # and bowing

Rib #

↓Mineralisation
Multiple long bone fractures at birth, all vertebrae are crushed, small thorax, respiratory distress

Perinatally lethal course
# = fracture; OI = osteogenesis imperfecta

Recent medical treatment options

Despite the use of bisphosphonates, several potential interesting alternatives could be used in the drug therapy for OI. Teriparatide (derived from recombinant human parathyroid hormone) has been shown to stimulate bone formation and has a beneficial effect on bone mineral density, but has no impact on the fracture risk in this population (insufficient data). There is some evidence that teriparatide could ameliorate healing of atypical femoral stress fracture in adults [33], but no evaluation has been reported of teriparatide use in children with OI and there is concern about a neoplastic risk in children [55, 56].

Denosumab (an anti-RANK [receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB] ligand antibody) inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption. It has been approved during the last decade for the treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and recently for men [57]. In children, 2-year periods of treatment in four OI type VI patients have been reported. OI type VI bone is characterised by an increased amount of non-mineralised osteoid. Bisphosphonate binds to mineralised bone surface and lack of bisphosphonate binding is thought to be one of the reasons for a low response to bisphosphonate treatment in OI type VI. During the treatment period no severe side effects were noticed but slight hypocalcaemia suggested that calcium supplementation should be given. Denosumab is degraded within 3–4 months and has no long-term accumulation such as bisphosphonates have. During the observed period, there was no impact on longitudinal bone growth and denosumab led to an increase of bone mineral density and mobility, and a marked and reversible suppression of bone resorption [58, 59]. However, no long-term data exist in children and further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term safety and benefits.

A new treatment, an antisclerostin antibody, is in development in osteoporosis and has shown an interesting benefit in OI. Already tested in OI mice, the antisclerostin antibody is promising through its mechanism of action: it decouples bone formation and resorption in favour of bone formation, with an important gain in bone quantity [60]. Human studies in OI are ongoing.

Innovative therapies for a cure for osteogenesis imperfecta

The current treatments and new drug therapies proposed for OI target only the symptoms and there is a definite need to develop a solution that could lead to a cure for OI. Progress in genetic or molecular diagnosis have led to a better understanding of the physiopathology of OI, permitting, for example, a specific molecular treatment for OI type VI with denosumab [58, 61], and potentially could open the door to more appropriate treatments, targeting the specific altered pathway [62]. Gene targeting in mesenchymal stem cells from OI individuals has been possible in mice, with resultant normal collagen and bone production in vivo. [63, 64] Gene silencing using small interfering RNAs has been possible in vitro in human bone derived cells. There is still necessity for clinical trials of gene therapy. Preclinical studies using different in-vivo models [65–67] suggest some potential effect with bone marrow transplantation in treating OI and are consistent with clinical transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells or whole bone marrow in children with severe forms of OI. The first clinical trial involved the treatment of children suffering from OI with allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells from HLA-identical or single-antigen-mismatched siblings. An increase in bone condition (increase in growth velocity and bone mineral content, reduced frequency of bone fracture) during 6 months following the infusion was observed [68]. A further study by the same group involving five OI children was performed (again with HLA-compatible donors). It was mentioned that, ideally, therapy for OI should be directed toward improving bone strength by improving the structural integrity of collagen and thereby the quality of the bone. The positive effect of the first study was still observed after 36 months, while a decrease in efficacy compared with the initial 6 months was also observed. The working hypothesis of the study was that bone marrow transplants contain mesenchymal precursor cells that can engraft in the skeleton and generate osteoblasts capable of modifying abnormal bone structure. The cell engraftment in the bone marrow is then a key aspect for a successful and, hopefully, long-lasting treatment of OI with a cell therapy strategy.

As a result of the promising results of the previous clinical trials, a study involving the injection of mesenchymal stem cells obtained from the same donors as those used for bone marrow transplantation was performed. It was found that allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells could engraft in bone, marrow stroma and skin without the requirement for preparative chemotherapy, and then produce clinically measurable benefits. However, it was also suggested that a beneficial effect from transplanted whole marrow might not be available from infusions of isolated donor mesenchymal stem cells. It is proposed that other cell types should be used [69]. An additional study was performed on a single human fetus presenting an OI disorder. Allogeneic fetal mesenchymal stem cells were transplanted in utero, and the cells were shown to engraft and differentiate into bone even when the recipient was immunocompetent and HLA-incompatible. However, very low engraftment (0.3%) could still be demonstrated in bone at 9 months of age [70]. Ideal cell types to be engrafted could include bone marrow, mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow or adipose tissue, preosteoblasts and fetal bone cells (genetically modified or not). The technical requirements for obtaining and expanding each of these cell types vary considerably and should be taken into consideration. Indeed, if cells can be expanded easily to very large numbers and stored in liquid nitrogen with high survival, the cell source will perhaps be more dependable for implantation. Mesenchymal cells are known for low viability upon engraftment and techniques to assure increased stability of cell sources are imperative. Fetal bone cells have been evaluated for therapeutic use since they can be expanded from one small tissue fragment to develop a clinically dedicated cell bank capable of stocking cells for hundreds of thousands of treatments. These cells have the advantages of a high proliferation rate and early mineralisation and, unlike mesenchymal cells, are already differentiated and dedicated to bone formation without dedifferentiation to other cell types. Overall, they may provide a stable cell source for therapeutic use in the future, potentially in all types of OI [71, 72].

Altogether, the clinical studies to date suggest promising beneficial effects of cell transplantation in OI even if statistical significance of the reported studies was often lacking owing to the small number of patients involved in each study. The delivery methods and cell choice, as well as the question of the role and the side effects of cell chimerism, have to be addressed in order to improve long-lasting effects of cell therapies in OI.

Conclusion

There is currently no completely satisfactory treatment for OI, and any treatments either altering bone resorption or stimulating bone formation have an impact on the mechanical properties of bone. Bisphosphonates are an adjuvant treatment to intramedullary rodding and other surgical procedures, but concern about properties of bone microarchitecture remodelling capacities persists. Bone remodelling with future cell therapies may be promising in OI treatment.

Acknowledgement: We thank Murielle Michetti for her valuable help with the figure creation, and Dr George Finidori for the dentinogenesis imperfecta and blue sclerae pictures.

Funding / potential competing interests: No financial support and no other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Correspondence

Correspondence: Aline Bregou Bourgeois, MD, Unité Pédiatrique de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique UPCOT, Hôpital de l’Enfance de Lausanne, Chemin de Montétan 16, CH-1000 Lausanne 7, Aline.Bregou[at]chuv.ch

References

  1 Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks D. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. 1979;16(2):101–16.

  2 Chu ML, Williams CJ, Pepe G, Hirsch JL, Prockop DJ, Ramirez F. Internal deletion in a collagen gene in a perinatal lethal form of osteogenesis imperfecta. Nature. 1983;304(5921):78–80.

  3 Rauch F, Glorieux FH. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet. 2004;363(9418):1377–85.

  4 Barnes AM, Chang W, Morello R, Cabral WA, Weis M, Eyre DR, et al. Deficiency of cartilage-associated protein in recessive lethal osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2757–64.

  5 Forlino A, Marini JC. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1657–71.

  6 Bonafe L, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Lachman R, Mortier G, Mundlos S, et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2015 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(12):2869–92

  7 Van Dijk FS, Sillence DO. Osteogenesis imperfecta: clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity assessment. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(6):1470–81.

  8 Marini JC, Forlino A, Cabral WA, Barnes AM, San Antonio JD, Milgrom S, et al. Consortium for osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in the helical domain of type I collagen: regions rich in lethal mutations align with collagen binding sites for integrins and proteoglycans. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(3):209–21.

  9 Warman ML, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Krakow D, Lachman R, LeMerrer M, et al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(5):943–68.

10 Bishop N, Adami S, Ahmed SF, Antón J, Arundel P, Burren CP, et al. Risedronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9902):1424–32

11 Vetter U, Pontz B, Zauner E, Brenner RE, Spranger J. Osteogenesis imperfecta: a clinical study of the first ten years of life. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;50(1):36–41.

12 Zeitlin L, Rauch F, Plotkin H, Glorieux FH. Height and weight development during four years of therapy with cyclical intravenous pamidronate in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta types I, III, and IV. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 Pt 1):1030–6.

13 Calder AD. Radiology of Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Rickets and Other Bony Fragility States. Endocr Dev. 2015;28:56–71.

14 Forlino A, Cabral WA, Barnes AM, Marini JC. New perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(9):540–57.

15 Ashournia H, Johansen FT, Folkestad L, Diederichsen AC, Brixen K. Heart disease in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta – A systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2015;196:149–57.

16 Renaud A, Aucourt J, Weill J, Bigot J, Dieux A, Devisme L, et al. Radiographic features of osteogenesis imperfecta. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(4):417–29.

17 Montpetit K, Palomo T, Glorieux FH, Fassier F, Rauch F. Multidisciplinary Treatment of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Functional Outcomes at Skeletal Maturity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(10):1834–9.

18 Zeitlin L, Fassier F, Glorieux FH. Modern approach to children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003;12(2):77–87.

19 Aubry-Rozier B, Unger S, Bregou A, Freymond Morisod M, Vaswani A, Scheider P, et al. News in osteogenesis imperfecta: from research to clinical management. Rev Med Suisse. 2015;11(466):657–8, 660–2. French.

20 Ruck J, Dahan-Oliel N, Montpetit K, Rauch F, Fassier F. Fassier-Duval femoral rodding in children with osteogenesis imperfecta receiving bisphosphonates: functional outcomes at one year. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(3):217–24.

21 Sinikumpu JJ, Ojaniemi M, Lehenkari P, Serlo W. Severe osteogenesis imperfecta Type-III and its challenging treatment in newborn and preschool children. A systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(8):1440–6.

22 Carmel AS, , Shieh A, Bang H, Bockman RS. The 25(OH)D level needed to maintain a favorable bisphosphonate response is >/=33 ng/ml. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(10):2479–87.

23 Kusumi K, Ayoob R, Bowden SA, Ingraham S, Mahan JD. Beneficial effects of intravenous pamidronate treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta under 24 months of age. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015;33(5):560–8.

24 Lindahl K, Kindmark A, Rubin CJ, Malmgren B, Grigelioniene G, Söderhäll S, et al. Decreased fracture rate, pharmacogenetics and BMD response in 79 Swedish children with osteogenesis imperfecta types I, III and IV treated with Pamidronate. Bone. 2016;87:11–8.

25 Palomo T, Fassier F, Ouellet J, Sato A, Montpetit K, Glorieux FH, et al. Intravenous Bisphosphonate Therapy of Young Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Skeletal Findings During Follow Up Throughout the Growing Years. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(12):2150–7.

26 Rijks EB, Bongers BC, Vlemmix MJ, Boot AM, van Dijk AT, Sakkers RJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Bisphosphonate Therapy in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Systematic Review. Horm Res Paediatr. 2015;84(1):26–42.

27 Dwan K, Phillipi CA, Steiner RD, Basel D. Bisphosphonate therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7: CD005088.

28 Glorieux FH, Bishop NJ, Plotkin H, Chabot G, Lanoue G, Travers R. Cyclic administration of pamidronate in children with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(14):947–52.

29 Marini JC. Bone: Use of bisphosphonates in children-proceed with caution. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(5):241–3.

30 Uveges TE, Kozloff KM, Ty JM, Ledgard F, Raggio CL, Gronowicz G, et al. Alendronate treatment of the brtl osteogenesis imperfecta mouse improves femoral geometry and load response before fracture but decreases predicted material properties and has detrimental effects on osteoblasts and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(5):849–59.

31 Munns CF, Rauch F, Zeitlin L, Fassier F, Glorieux FH. Delayed osteotomy but not fracture healing in pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta patients receiving pamidronate. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(11):1779–86.

32 Anam EA, Rauch F, Glorieux FH, Fassier F, Hamdy R. Osteotomy Healing in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta Receiving Bisphosphonate Treatment. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(8):1362–8.

33 Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, Cheung AM, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(1):1–23.

34 Schilcher J, Koeppen V, Ranstam J, Skripitz R, Michaëlsson K, Aspenberg P. Atypical femoral fractures are a separate entity, characterized by highly specific radiographic features. A comparison of 59 cases and 218 controls. Bone. 2013;52(1):389–92.

35 Hegazy A, Kenawey M, Sochett E, Tile L, Cheung AM, Howard AW. Unusual Femur Stress Fractures in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Intramedullary Rods on Long-term Intravenous Pamidronate Therapy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 June 8. [Epub ahead of print]

36 Nicolaou N, Agrawal Y, Padman M, Fernandes JA, Bell MJ. Changing pattern of femoral fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta with prolonged use of bisphosphonates. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(1):21–7.

37 Ben Amor IM, Roughley P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Skeletal clinical characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta caused by haploinsufficiency mutations in COL1A1. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(9):2001–7.

38 Anissipour AK, Hammerberg KW, Caudill A, Kostiuk T, Tarima S, Zhao HS, et al. Behavior of scoliosis during growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(3):237–43.

39 Engelbert RH, Uiterwaal CS, van der Hulst A, Witjes B, Helders PJ, Pruijs HE. Scoliosis in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: influence of severity of disease and age of reaching motor milestones. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(2):130–4.

40 Benson DR, Newman DC. The spine and surgical treatment in osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981(159):147–53.

41 Yong-Hing K, MacEwen GD. Scoliosis associated with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64(1):36–43.

42 Janus GJ, Finidori G, Engelbert RH, Pouliquen M, Pruijs JE. Operative treatment of severe scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: results of 20 patients after halo traction and posterior spondylodesis with instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(6):486–91.

43 Amako M, Fassier F, Hamdy RC, Aarabi M, Montpetit K, Glorieux FH. Functional analysis of upper limb deformities in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(6):689–94.

44 Fassier AM, Rauch F, Aarabi M, Janelle C, Fassier F. Radial head dislocation and subluxation in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2694–704.

45 Fassier F, Sardar Z, Aarabi M, Odent T, Haque T, Hamdy R. Results and complications of a surgical technique for correction of coxa vara in children with osteopenic bones. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(8):799–805.

46 Aarabi M, Rauch F, Hamdy RC, Fassier F. High prevalence of coxa vara in patients with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(1):24–8.

47 Lee JH, Gamble JG, Moore RE, Rinsky LA. Gastrointestinal problems in patients who have type-III osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(9):1352–6.

48 Violas P, Fassier F, Hamdy R, Duhaime M, Glorieux FH. Acetabular protrusion in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(5):622–5.

49 Gerber LH, Binder H, Weintrob J, Grange DK, Shapiro J, Fromherz W, et al. Rehabilitation of children and infants with osteogenesis imperfecta. A program for ambulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990(251):254–62.

50 Brizola E, Staub AL, Felix TM. Muscle strength, joint range of motion, and gait in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(2):245–52.

51 Engelbert RH, Uiterwaal CS, Gerver WJ, van der Net JJ, Pruijs HE, Helders PJ. Osteogenesis imperfecta in childhood: impairment and disability. A prospective study with 4-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):772–8.

52 Pouliot-Laforte A, Veilleux LN, Rauch F, Lemay M. Physical activity in youth with osteogenesis imperfecta type I. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2015;15(2):171–6.

53 Van Brussel M, Takken T, Uiterwaal CS, Pruijs HJ, Van der Net J, Helders PJ, et al. Physical training in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr. 2008;152(1):111–6, 116 e1.

54 Montpetit K, Dahan-Oliel N, Ruck-Gibis J, Fassier F, Rauch F, Glorieux F. Activities and participation in young adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2011;4(1):13–22.

55 Gatti D, Rossini M, Viapiana O, Povino MR, Liuzza S, Fracassi E, et al. Teriparatide treatment in adult patients with osteogenesis imperfecta type I. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(5):448–52.

56 Orwoll ES, Shapiro J, Veith S, Wang Y, Lapidus J, Vanek C, et al. Evaluation of teriparatide treatment in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(2):491–8.

57 Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756–65.

58 Hoyer-Kuhn H, Netzer C, Koerber F, Schoenau E, Semler O. Two years’ experience with denosumab for children with osteogenesis imperfecta type VI. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:145.

59 Semler O, Netzer C, Hoyer-Kuhn H, Becker J, Eysel P, Schoenau E. First use of the RANKL antibody denosumab in osteogenesis imperfecta type VI. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2012;12(3):183–8.

60 Sinder BP, Lloyd WR, Salemi JD, Marini JC, Caird MS, Morris MD, et al. Effect of anti-sclerostin therapy and osteogenesis imperfecta on tissue-level properties in growing and adult mice while controlling for tissue age. Bone. 2016;84:222–229.

61 Hoyer-Kuhn H, Franklin J, Allo G, Kron M, Netzer C, Eysel P, Hero B, et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab in children with osteogenesis imperfecta – a first prospective trial. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016;16(1):24–32.

62 Marini JC, Reich A, Smith SM. Osteogenesis imperfecta due to mutations in non-collagenous genes: lessons in the biology of bone formation. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2014;26(4):500–7.

63 Chamberlain JR, , Deyle DR, Schwarze U, Wang P, Hirata RK, Li Y, et al. Gene targeting of mutant COL1A2 alleles in mesenchymal stem cells from individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta. Mol Ther. 2008;16(1):187–93.

64 Chamberlain JR, Schwarze U, Wang PR, Hirata RK, Hankenson KD, Pace JM, et al. Gene targeting in stem cells from individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta. Science. 2004;303(5661):1198–201.

65 Li F, Wang X, Niyibizi C. Bone marrow stromal cells contribute to bone formation following infusion into femoral cavities of a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta. Bone. 2010;47(3):546–55.

66 Guillot PV, Abass O, Bassett JH, Shefelbine SJ, Bou-Gharios G, Chan J, et al. Intrauterine transplantation of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells from first-trimester blood repairs bone and reduces fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta mice. Blood. 2008;111(3):1717–25.

67 Vanleene M, Saldanha Z, Cloyd KL, Jell G, Bou-Gharios G, Bassett JH, et al. Transplantation of human fetal blood stem cells in the osteogenesis imperfecta mouse leads to improvement in multiscale tissue properties. Blood. 2011;117(3):1053–60.

68 Horwitz EM, Prockop DJ, Fitzpatrick LA, Koo WW, Gordon PL, Neel M, et al. Transplantability and therapeutic effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med. 1999;5(3):309–13.

69 Horwitz EM, Gordon PL, Koo WK, Marx JC, Neel MD, McNall RY, et al. Isolated allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells engraft and stimulate growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: Implications for cell therapy of bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(13):8932–7.

70 Le Blanc K, Götherström C, Ringdén O, Hassan M, McMahon R, Horwitz E, et al. Fetal mesenchymal stem-cell engraftment in bone after in utero transplantation in a patient with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Transplantation. 2005;79(11):1607–14.

71 Pioletti DP, Montjovent MO, Zambelli PY, Applegate L. Bone tissue engineering using foetal cell therapy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136(35–36):557–60.

72 Montjovent MO, Burri N, Mark S, Federici E, Scaletta C, Zambelli PY, et al. Fetal bone cells for tissue engineering. Bone. 2004;35(6):1323–33.

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!

close