Peer reviewed letter

Changes in the perception of primary care practice during the medical curriculum in Geneva, Switzerland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14124
Publication Date: 26.03.2015
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14124

Bernard Ceruttia, Noëlle Junod Perronb, Elisabeth van Gesselc, Klaus-Dieter Haensgend, Johanna Sommerb

a Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland
b Department of Primary Care Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
c Interprofessional Simulation Centre, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland
d Centre for the development of test and diagnostic, University of Freiburg, Switzerland

 

Primary care is the pedestal base that should guarantee rapid and efficient access to high-quality care while optimising the experience of the patient and minimising cost [1]. Nevertheless, stagnation or a career shift from primary care to medical specialities has been observed over the last decades [2]. This is predominant in countries such as Switzerland where healthcare organisations rely mainly on specialty care services [3]: fewer than 20% of graduate doctors intend to go into primary care [4, 5], whereas 50–60% are needed to cover population needs [6].

Simultaneously, the image of primary care among students suffers [7, 8]. Students consider the role of primary care physicians to be versatile and challenging, but too hasty, lonely and uncertain, dealing with non-medical problems and with working conditions difficult to control [9, 10].

In 2010, students about to start a medical curriculum in Geneva had to take a preregistration test designed to measure their ability to think and reason abstractly, and to learn from past experiences and apply this learning to specific situations. At the end of the test, they were asked about their career choice and image of primary care. The objective of the present study was to compare the image of primary care among the same students three years later, at the end of the preclinical years, and investigate potential links with gender or intention to work as primary care physician.

Material and methods

This single site (University of Geneva) cross-sectional study, based on self-administered questionnaires, was repeated twice: a paper survey made during the preregistration test held on July 2010 (N1 = 353), and an online survey held in June 2013 among all the students who were about to finish their third year (N2.1 = 144), which concludes the preclinical curriculum. Because many students repeat the first year, which is a selection year, the survey was also carried out among second year students (N2.2 = 172).

In both surveys, a 15-item ad hoc questionnaire developed by the Centre for the Development of Tests and Diagnostics of Fribourg was used. The 15 items (on 1 to 4 Likert scale) dealt with different aspects of the occupation as primary care physician (table 1). Gender and intention to work as a primary care physician were also asked. The 2013 survey included two additional questions: current level of study (second or third year), and participation in the 2010 preregistration test.

Anonymity of the participating students and data safety were ensured. Completion of the survey was understood to imply consent for participation in the study.

The main outcome was the set of 15 items regarding the occupation as primary care physician. Analyses of variance were used to investigate an effect associated with year of survey and, for the 2013 survey, gender and the intention to work as a primary care physician. The Bonferroni correction was used to control the family-wise error rate: levels of significance were set to 0.05/15 = 0.0033.

Table 1: Opinion (mean ± standard deviation) of the students regarding the occupation as primary care (PC) physician before starting the medical curriculum (2010), at the end of the bachelor years (2013).
ItemLeft side label Right side label 20102013  2013Gender2013Considering PC
 1 on the Likert scale4 on the Likert scalen = 302

Mean ± SD
n = 206

Mean ± SD
Effect

size
p-valueMen

n = 95

Mean ± SD
Women

n = 110

Mean ± SD
p-valueYes

n = 41

Mean ± SD
No

n = 160

Mean± SD
p-value
  1It would be too risky for me to become an independent PC physicianI can easily take the risk to become an independent PC physician2.7 ± 0.93.0 ± 0.8+3.90.0001*3.0 ± 0.83.0 ± 0.80.67423.5 ± 0.72.9 ± 0.8<0.0001*
  2Easy to follow continuous specialised trainingDifficult to follow continuous specialised training2.4 ± 0.82.3 ± 0.7–0.50.61082.3 ± 0.72.3 ± 0.70.83642.3 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.60.0124
  3No career opportunityGood career opportunities2.9 ± 0.92.6 ± 0.9–3.70.0003*2.4 ± 0.92.8 ± 0.80.0006*3.1 ± 0.92.5 ± 0.90.0002*
  4High prestige among peersLow prestige among peers2.8 ± 0.93.0 ± 0.9–1.80.10323.1 ± 0.92.8 ± 0.90.07332.9 ± 0.93.0 ± 0.90.41624
  5Few interesting patientsMany interesting patients2.7 ± 1.02.7 ± 0.9–1.00.31542.6 ± 0.92.7 ± 1.00.68253.2 ± 0.82.5 ± 0.9<0.0001*
  6Low emotional burdenHigh emotional burden3.0 ± 0.93.5 ± 0.6+8.5<0.0001*3.5 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.60.98093.6 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.60.3093
  7DependenceIndependence3.0 ± 1.03.1 ± 0.8+1.50.12943.1 ± 0.83.1 ± 0.80.86363.4 ± 0.63.0 ± 0.80.0034
  8Unattractive jobAttractive job3.0 ± 0.92.4 ± 1.0–7.6<0.0001*2.2 ± 0.92.5 ± 1.00.01753.4 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.8<0.0001*
  9High financial riskLow financial risk3.0 ± 0.82.5 ± 0.9–6.8<0.0001*2.5 ± 0.92.5 ± 0.90.94022.5 ± 0.82.4 ± 0.90.6925
10High social prestigeLow social prestige2.2 ± 0.82.6 ± 0.8+5.7<0.0001*2.6 ± 0.82.6 ± 0.80.71362.5 ± 0.92.6 ± 080.4313
11Varied workBoring work, lot of routine2.2 ± 1.02.5 ± 1.0+3.80.0001*2.6 ± 1.02.5 ± 1.00.79962.0 ± 0.82.7 ± 1.0<0.0001*
12Low incomeHigh income2.9 ± 0.82.2 ± 0.8–10.0<0.0001*2.1 ± 0.82.3 ± 0.70.10352.4 ± 0.82.1 ± 080.0595
13Light workload 

schedules
Heavy workload schedules3.2 ± 0.83.1 ± 0.7–2.10.03833.1 ± 0.73.1 ± 0.80.85233.2 ± 0.73.0 ± 0.80.0952
14Not modernModern3.2 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.8–7.1<0.0001*2.7 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.70.70003.0 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.80.0053
15Sparsely regulatedHighly regulated3.3 ± 0.73.0 ± 0.7–4.7<0.0001*3.1 ± 0.72.9 ± 0.70.04113.1 ± 0.73.0 ± 0.70.3683
* p-value lower than 0.0033 = 0.05/15 (Bonferroni correction)

Results

The response rate was 85.6% in 2010 and 65.2% in June 2013. Between the beginning of the medical curriculum in 2010 and the end of the preclinical years, the image of primary care significantly changed for 10 out of 15 evaluation items (table 1).

There was no difference between students in their second or third year (the 2013 survey), nor between the students who attended or did not attend the preregistration test held in 2010. Before starting the medical curriculum, 5.9% of the students (5.7% of women and 6.4% of men) were considering working as a primary care physician in a private practice. Three years later, 20.5% (25.9% of women and 14.1% of men) were considering working as a primary care physician in a private practice. This subgroup thought that the profession was more attractive, more varied, with many interesting patients, and offering good career opportunities.

Women generally considered this activity to offer good career opportunities.

Discussion

The image of primary care clearly deteriorated during first years of the curriculum with respect to emotional burden, job attractiveness, financial risk, income and regulation. However, a significantly higher proportion of students considered working in a primary care practice.

This deterioration can be explained by a preclinical curriculum with very little exposure to primary care experiences, and mostly structured by basic science teaching sessions provided by specialists. It has been reported that specialised physicians tend to convey more or less consciously a negative image of general medicine to students during training [11, 12].

The perceptions that changed most after three years essentially dealt with extrinsic factors such as prestige, income, financial risk and career opportunities, whereas many intrinsic factors such as perception of patients’ profiles and variety of work changed to a lesser extent. These negative perceptions may have been shaped by personal, familial or even media/political representations of primary care practice [13]. It may also reflect a loss of idealism when students face the reality of medicine in general. Indeed, pressure on doctors resulting from different healthcare reforms, combined with high medical practice rental conditions, may impact on the autonomy, prestige and income of physicians.

The fact that female students considered a primary care career more positively than men, and that students interested in primary care did not have high income expectations and were not interested in prestige and modernity (high tech) is not new. The option of primary care medicine as a career choice on entry is fundamental [15] and has been found to be one of the most important predictors for the ultimate career choice of students [16].

One asset of the study was the follow-up of the same cohort of students, and the good response rates. Weaknesses included the carrying out in one site (sample size and representativeness), the repeated cross-sectional design (no follow-up at an individual level). This study should be repeated among the same cohort after the three-year clinical curriculum.

Since 2012, strong political commitments have been made to make the primary care activity more attractive, and to remedy the shortage of primary care physicians in Switzerland [17]. Regular surveys are necessary to monitor these changes and determine whether such reforms influence the perception of primary care among students, and their processes of career decision.

Acknowledgement: We wish to thank all the students who participated in one or both surveys.

Disclosures: No specific financial support has been used or claimed apart from the regular operating budget for teaching of the faculty. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Correspondence

Correspondence: Bernard Cerutti, PhD MPH, Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of medicine, 1 Rue Michel Servet, CH 1211 Geneva, Switzerland, bernard.cerutti[at]unige.ch

References

  1 Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. Transforming primary care: from past practice to the practice of the future. Health Aff. 2010;29:779–84.

  2 Lambert T, Goldacre M. Trends in doctors’ early career choices for general practice in the UK: longitudinal questionnaire surveys. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61:e397–403.

  3 Fujisawa R, Lafortune GJ. The Remuneration of General Practitioners and Specialists in 14 OECD Countries: What are the Factors Influencing Variations across Countries? Paris, France: OECD Publications Service, OECD Health Working Papers 41, 2008.

  4 Jeffe DB, Whelan AJ, Andriole DA. Primary care specialty choices of United States medical graduates, 1997–2006. Acad Med. 2010;85:947–58.

  5 Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Stamm M, Marty F, Dreiding P, Zoller M, Buddeberg: Primary care in Switzerland – no longer attractive for young physicians? Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136:416–24.

  6 Gaspoz JM. How about primary care medicine? [Article in French]. Rev Med Suisse. 2011;7:1321–4.

  7 Kuikka L, Nevalainen MK, Sjöberg L, et al. The perceptions of a GP’s work among fifth-year medical students in Helsinki, Finland. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30:121–6.

  8 Kiolbassa K, Miksch A, Hermann K, et al. Becoming a general practitioner – which factors have most impact on career choice of medical students? BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:25.

  9 Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students 1996–2003. Acad Med. 2005;80:791–6.

10 Lambert EM, Holmboe ES. The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. medical students, 1990–2003. Acad Med. 2005;80:797–802.

11 Probst A, Natanzon I, Szecsenyi J, Joos S. Family Doctors Seen through the Eyes of Specialists: A Qualitative Study. Int J Family Med. 2013;729473.

12 Natanzon I, Ose D, Szecsenyi J, Campbell S, Roos M, Joos S. Does GPs’ self-perception of their professional role correspond to their social self-image? – a qualitative study from Germany. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:10.

13 Vilpert S. Primary care physicians: situation in Switzerland and international comparison [in French]. Bern, Swiss health Observatory, 2005.

14 Morley CP, Roseamelia C, Smith JA, Villarreal AL. Decline of medical student idealism in the first and second year of medical school: a survey of pre-clinical medical students at one institution. Med Educ Online. 2013;18:21194.

15 Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376:1923–58.

16 Scott I, Gowans M, Wright B, Brenneis F, Banner S, Boone J. Determinants of choosing a career in family medicine. CMAJ. 2011;183:E1–8.

17 Primary Care and General Medicine Masterplan Information Sheet [in French]. Federal Office of Public Helath, 2013. Available at: http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/berufe/13932/13933/14198 (accessed on 23 September 2014).

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!

close