Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Original article

Vol. 151 No. 2930 (2021)

The role of the Swiss list of occupational diseases in the protection of workers’ health

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2021.20538
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w20538
Published
28.07.2021

Summary

Occupational disease lists (ODLs) are essential legal mechanisms for recognising pathologies related to exposure to occupational hazards. In 2017, Switzerland revised its ODL and solicited stakeholders to review the ODL proposal. This revision represented an important and rare event, and was an opportunity to assess the legal status and role of Swiss ODL. In this research, we examined the structure and content of this revised Swiss list, by comparing it to other official recommendations and ODLs, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the European Commission (EC). In addition, we assessed the effectiveness of the Swiss ODL from the occupational and public health perspectives, in considering the process of reporting and recognition of occupational diseases as a measure for protecting the health of workers.

Although the Swiss ODL appears to be in accordance with the ILO and EC recommendations, its role as a legal mechanism of workers’ protection is not optimal. Its effectiveness is limited by the conditions for recognising a disease as occupational, which are determined by Swiss federal law and are stricter than in other countries. The overall burden of occupational diseases has a significant economic, social and moral impact on working populations, their families and society as a whole. As such, more transparency with respect to the ODL revision and conditions for recognising occupational disease and to the data on recognised and reported cases, along with continuous education of physicians are required to enhance the effectiveness of the Swiss system of recognition and reporting of occupational diseases and protection of Swiss workers.

References

  1. Kim EA, Kang SK. Historical review of the List of Occupational Diseases recommended by the International Labour organization (ILO). Ann Occup Environ Med. 2013;25(1):14–24. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-4374-25-14
  2. ILO. P155 - Protocol of 2002 to the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981, Art. 1b.
  3. ILO. R121 - Employment Injury Benefits Recommendation, 1964 (No. 121), Art.6 (1).
  4. ILO. Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases. Geneva; 2009.
  5. ILO. C018 - Workmen's Compensation (Occupational Diseases) Convention 1925 (No. 18).
  6. ILO. R194 - List of Occupational Diseases Recommendation, 2002 (No. 194), Art. 2.
  7. EC. Treaty establishing the European Community - Title VIII: Social policy, Education, Vocational training and Youth - Chapter 1: Social Provisions - Article 118. OJ C 224. 1957:P. 0046.
  8. EC. Commission Recommendation to Member States concerning the adoption of a European List of occupational diseases. OJ 80. 1962: pp. 2188–98.
  9. EC. Commission Recommendation of 19 September 2003 concerning the European schedule of occupational diseases OJ L 238. 2003: pp. 28–34.
  10. ILO. R194 - List of Occupational Diseases Recommendation, 2002 (No. 194).
  11. Driscoll T, Wagstaffe M, Pierce N. Developing a List of Compensable Occupational Diseases: Principles and Issues. The Open Occupational Health and Safety Journal. 2011.
  12. SUVA. Statistique des accidents LAA 2020. Lucerne: SUVA; 2020. Report No.: 2386.f – 2020.
  13. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases [press release]. Geneva; 2015.
  14. SUVA. Statistique des accidents LAA 2008–2012. Dix-neuvième période quinquennale d’observation de la Suva et cinquième période quinquennale d’observation de tous les assureurs LAA. Lucerne: SUVA; 2014. Report No.: 1946/19.f.
  15. Laubli T. Les couts de la santé générés par de fortes contraintes au travail. Analyse des données de l’enquête européenne sur les conditions de travail et la santé des travailleurs suisses. Executive Summary. Bern, Switzerland: Secrétariat d’Etat à l’économie SECO; 2014.
  16. Guseva Canu I, François M, Graczyk H, Vernez D. Healthy worker, healthy citizen: the place of occupational health within public health research in Switzerland. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(1):111–20. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01245-w
  17. Cooper ID. What is a “mapping study?”. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(1):76–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013
  18. ILO. Employment Injury Benefits Convention, 1964 [Schedule I amended in 1980] (No. 121).
  19. Conseil fédéral. Ordonnance sur l’assurance-accidents (OLAA), du 20 décembre 1982 (État le 1er avril 2018) (RS 832.202). Portail du gouvernement suisse1982 [updated 2018 April 1]. Available from: https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19820361/index.html.
  20. EC. Information notices on occupational diseases a guide to diagnosis. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (European Commission); 2009.
  21. Driscoll T, Jacklyn G, Orchard J, Passmore E, Vos T, Freedman G, et al. The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):975–81. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204631
  22. GBD 2016 Occupational Risk Factors Collaborators. Global and regional burden of disease and injury in 2016 arising from occupational exposures: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(3):133–41. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-106008
  23. Danuser B. Comment soigner la santé au travail? REISO Revue d'information sociale. Published online 2014 June 23. https://www.reiso.org/articles/themes/travail/277-comment-soigner-la-sante-au-travail
  24. Chouanière D, Praz-Christinaz S-M, Danuser B. Mieux connaître la médecine du travail. Rev Med Suisse. 2009.
  25. Conseil fédéral. Modification de l’annexe 1 de l’ordonnance sur l’assurance-accidents (OLAA). Adaptation de la liste des maladies professionnelles figurant à l’annexe 1 OLAA aux dernières connaissances scientifiques et techniques sur les substances nocives et les effets mécaniques pour la santé. Portail du Gouvernement suisse. Procédures de consultation terminées. RS 832.202:1.
  26. Guillemin M. Santé au travail: le déni des politiques publiques. REISO Revue d'information sociale. Published online 2018 August 16. https://www.reiso.org/document/3326.
  27. EUROGIP. Enquête sur la sous-déclaration des maladies professionnelles en Europe. Paris: EUROGIP; 2002.
  28. EUROGIP. Reporting of occupational diseases: issues and good practices in five European countries. Paris: EUROGIP; 2015.
  29. Baur X, Woitowitz HJ, Budnik LT, Egilman D, Oliver C, Frank A, et al. Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer: The Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution. Critical need for revision of the 2014 update. Am J Ind Med. 2017;60(5):411–21. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22709
  30. Groupe de coordination des statistiques de l’assurance-accidents LAA (CSAA). Statistique des accidents LAA 2019. Lucerne: SUVA; 2019.
  31. EUROGIP. Les maladies professionnelles en Europe – Statistiques 1990-2006 et actualité juridique. Paris: EUROGIP; 2009.
  32. Probst I. La dimension de genre dans la reconnaissance des TMS comme maladies professionnelles [The gender dimension in the recognition of MSDs as occupational diseases]. Pistes. 2009;11(11-2):2. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.2395
  33. Probst I, Salerno S. Biais de genre dans la reconnaissance des maladies professionnelles: l’exemple des troubles musculosquelettiques (TMS) en Italie et en Suisse [Gender Bias in the Recognition of Occupational Diseases: The Case of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Italy and Switzerland]. Pistes. 2016;18(18-2):2. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.4889
  34. EUROGIP. Musculoskeletal disorders: What recognition as occupational diseases? A study on 10 European countries. Paris: EUROGIP; 2016.
  35. Marant Micallef C, Shield KD, Baldi I, Charbotel B, Fervers B, Gilg Soit Ilg A, et al. Occupational exposures and cancer: a review of agents and relative risk estimates. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(8):604–14. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104858
  36. Marant Micallef C, Shield KD, Vignat J, Baldi I, Charbotel B, Fervers B, et al. Cancers in France in 2015 attributable to occupational exposures. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019;222(1):22–9. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.015
  37. Bovio N, Richardson DB, Guseva Canu I. Sex-specific risks and trends in lung cancer mortality across occupations and economic activities in Switzerland (1990-2014). Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(8):540–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-106356
  38. EUROGIP. Incidence and detection of occupational cancers in nine European countries. Paris: EUROGIP; 2018.
  39. Tossavainen A. Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer: the Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23(4):311–6. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.226
  40. Jost M, Stöhr S, Pletscher C, Rast H. Maladies professionnelles causées par l’amiante. Factsheet SUVA Division médicale. 2013:1–22.
  41. Wolff H, Vehmas T, Oksa P, Rantanen J, Vainio H. Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer, the Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution 2014: recommendations. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(1):5–15. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3462
  42. Collegium Ramazzini. Collegium Ramazzini response to ‘Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer, the Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution 2014: recommendations’. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(1):91–4. doi:.https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3535
  43. Carder M, Bensefa-Colas L, Mattioli S, Noone P, Stikova E, Valenty M, et al. A review of occupational disease surveillance systems in Modernet countries. Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65(8):615–25. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv081
  44. EU-OSHA. Methodologies to identify work-related diseases: Review of sentinel and alert approaches. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2017.
  45. Curti S, Sauni R, Spreeuwers D, De Schryver A, Valenty M, Rivière S, et al. Interventions to increase the reporting of occupational diseases by physicians: a Cochrane systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(5):353–4. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103209
  46. Spreeuwers D, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ. Evaluation of occupational disease surveillance in six EU countries. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60(7):509–16. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq133
  47. Spreeuwers D, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, de Wilde NS, Braam I, Willemse Y, et al. Sentinel surveillance of occupational diseases: a quality improvement project. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(11):834–42. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20608
  48. van der Molen HF, Kuijer PP, Smits PB, Schop A, Moeijes F, Spreeuwers D, et al. Annual incidence of occupational diseases in economic sectors in The Netherlands. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(7):519–21. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2011-100326
  49. Spreeuwers D, de Boer AG, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ. Characteristics of national registries for occupational diseases: international development and validation of an audit tool (ODIT). BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):194. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-194
  50. OECD. Health Data Governance: Privacy, Monitoring and Research. Paris: OECD; 2015.
  51. Kauppinen T. Finnish occupational exposure databases. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):154–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1080/104732201460253
  52. EU-OSHA. Alert and sentinel approaches for the identification of work-related diseases in the EU. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2018.
  53. ILO. Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention 187 (2006).
  54. Graczyk H, Hopf NB, Mediouni Z, Guseva-Canu I, Sanvido O, Schmid K, et al. Occupational exposure to plant protection products and health effects in Switzerland: what do we know and what do we need to do? Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14610. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14610
  55. Bovio N, Vienneau D, Canu IG. Inventory of occupational, industrial and population cohorts in Switzerland. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(Suppl 1):A29.1. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.77
  56. Kass DE, Thier AL, Leighton J, Cone JE, Jeffery NL. Developing a comprehensive pesticide health effects tracking system for an urban setting: New York City’s approach. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(14):1419–23. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7149
  57. Chiarini B. Projet de sensibilisation des médecins à la santé au travail. Faculté de biologie et de médecine Université de Lausanne UNIL - Bugnon Rue du Bugnon 21 - bureau 4111 CH-1015. Lausanne SUISSE: Université de Lausanne; 2012.
  58. Smits PB, de Boer AG, Kuijer PP, Braam I, Spreeuwers D, Lenderink AF, et al. The effectiveness of an educational programme on occupational disease reporting. Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58(5):373–5. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn061

Most read articles by the same author(s)