Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at rest for the diagnosis, screening and management of pulmonary hypertension

Publication Date: 07.06.2021
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w20486

Nicolas Bruggera, Mona Lichtblaub, Micha T. Maederc, Hajo Müllerd, Cyril Pellatone, Patrick Yerlyf

a Cardiology Department, Bern University Hospital (Inselspital), Bern, Switzerland

b Pulmonology Department, Zurich University Hospital (USZ), Zurich, Switzerland

c Cardiology Department, Kantonspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland

d Cardiology Department, Geneva University hospital (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland

e Cardiology Department, Neuchâtel hospital network, site de Pourtalès, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

f Cardiology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland


Doppler echocardiography is widely used in everyday clinical practice for the detection of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in symptomatic patients and in populations particularly at risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It allows accurate estimation of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure but may lack precision in particular situations. In addition, echocardiography can help to distinguish between pre- and post-capillary PH and is a very good tool to evaluate right ventricular systolic function, which is of great prognostic interest in PAH. This article reviews the current knowledge about methodologic aspects of assessing pulmonary pressure and PH origin by echo, including a discussion about abnormal thresholds. It also details advanced techniques like right ventricular strain imaging and new concepts like right ventricle – pulmonary artery coupling evaluation that have become “matured” enough to be definitely brought to routine evaluation.


A4C: apical four-chamber view

CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

CW: continuous wave Doppler

FAC: fractional area change

HIV: human immunodeficiency virus

IVS: interventricular septum

LA: left atrium

LV: left ventricle

LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction

mPAP: mean PA pressure

MPI: myocardial performance index

NTproBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

PA: pulmonary artery

PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension

PAWP: PA wedge pressure

PH: pulmonary hypertension

PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance

PW: pulsed wave Doppler

RA: right atrium

RAA: RA area

RAP: right atrial pressure

RV: right ventricle

RVGLS: right ventricle global longitudinal strain

RVF-A4C: RV-focused four-chamber view

RVEDA: right ventricular end-diastolic area

RVESA: right ventricular end-systolic area

RVESRI: RV end-systolic remodelling index

sPAP: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure

TA: tricuspid annulus

TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

TDI: tissue Doppler imaging

TTE: transthoracic echocardiography

TRV: tricuspid regurgitation velocity


Despite advances in other techniques, resting two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains key in the diagnosis, screening and follow-up of pulmonary hypertension (PH) [1]. Whereas TTE was used at first to estimate PH probability, it can also be used to determine the possible cause of PH and to evaluate right ventricular (RV) morphology and function. Nevertheless, in recent years, the reliability of TTE to estimate pulmonary pressure has been challenged [24] and recent algorithms proposing serial noninvasive risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) dismissed TTE [5, 6]. On the other hand, advanced techniques such as right ventricular strain assessment by speckle tracking imaging and new concepts like indirect right ventricle – pulmonary artery (PA) coupling evaluation improved the ability of TTE to predict outcome and to further understand the intimate relationship between the heart and pulmonary circulation.

With this review, the goal of the Swiss Society of Pulmonary Hypertension is to provide an update on current strengths and limitations of 2-D TTE in PH for sonographers and to encourage the implementation of convincing new findings in everyday practice. This review is also an attempt to gather sonographers from different PH expert centres of the country in order to define a consensus on TTE realisation. The authors hope that enhanced TTE standardisation will help PH physicians to get all the information they need to manage their patients at the highest quality level.

Echocardiography to assess pulmonary hypertension probability

TTE should be performed in all patients with suspected PH or unexplained dyspnoea, and in those at high risk of PAH with the aim of assessing PH probability [1]. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) can be assessed in 80–90% of cases and PH (sPAP >36 mm Hg) can be detected with 80–85% sensitivity-specificity by experienced sonographers [7]. In practice, sPAP is usually measured by applying the simplified Bernoulli equation to peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) measured with continuous wave Doppler (CW), where sPAP = 4·(TRV)2 + right atrial pressure (RAP) (fig. 1). Importantly, RAP is not measured but estimated from inferior vena cava diameter and inspiratory collapse [8]. TRV must be obtained from multiple views (parasternal long and short axis, apical four-chambers view), finally taking into account the maximum value obtained from the best quality TR jet envelope [9]. If peak TRV is hard to define, agitated saline can be injected to improve definition, but with the risk of overestimation due to contrast artefacts. Of note, TRV is not the only technique to estimate PAP by echo and alternatives based on pulmonary acceleration time and pulmonary regurgitation have been described; however, all have limitations [10].

Figure 1

A. Incomplete continuous wave (CW) Doppler spectral wave envelope leading to peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) underestimation (3.69 m/s). B. same patient after correct adjustment of CW Doppler in TR jet with correct TRV estimation (4.15 m/s). C. Inadequate CW gain with “fringes” and peak TRV overestimation (pink cross: 5.62 m/s); correct peak TRV estimation in modal frequency (4.69 m/s). D and E. Inferior vena cava (IVC) size during expiration and “sniff” in the same patient. SPAP = systolic pulmonary arterial pressure

Because of worries about overdiagnosis of PH, European guidelines conservatively set the maximum upper limit of normal peak TRV at 2.8 m/s, corresponding to an RV/RA pressure gradient of 31.3 mm Hg and to sPAP of 36.3 mm Hg if 5 mm Hg RAP is assumed [1]. On the other hand, the “classification” task force of the 2018 World Symposium on PH considered that the definition of PH should be strictly set according to epidemiological evidence and hence that the threshold for invasively measured abnormal mPAP should be reduced from 25 mm Hg (current guideline definition) to 21 mm Hg [11]. On the basis of epidemiological data for TTE, the upper limit of normal TRV can be considered to be 2.55 m/s, according to a recent meta-analysis pooling authors’ original data with 16 published studies [12]. According to the Bernoulli formula and assuming 5 mm Hg for RAP, a normal sPAP value would then not exceed 31 mm Hg, which is very near to the 29.6 mm Hg found by right heart catheterisation in healthy people [13]. Harmonising TTE thresholds for PH detection with the new invasive PH definition will be a task for the next European guidelines.

Despite adequate predictive values for PH detection, TTE may still lack precision for sPAP estimation [24, 7, 14], suggesting that it is reliable for disease screening, but that sPAP estimates can be falsely high or low under particular conditions. Importantly, TTE is accurate, meaning that there is no systematic bias for under- or overestimation [3, 4], although underestimation is probably more frequent [2, 3]. In everyday practice, imprecision should lessen if echocardiographers are aware of the pitfalls linked to sPAP evaluation [14]. Furthermore, obvious imprecision should be adequately recorded on TTE reports. The commonest causes of sPAP underestimation are incomplete spectral wave envelopes (fig. 1) and substantial angulation between CW and TR jet direction (maximum acceptable angle = 30°) [7]. Both pitfalls can often be resolved by a multiplane approach to TRV, including atypical views [9]. A less frequent reason for underestimation is severe TR, which rapidly abolishes the RV/RA pressure gradient and is typically recognisable by a dense triangular early peaking jet [7]. Furthermore, severe TR implies a non-stenotic orifice, where the simplified Bernouli equation does not apply. Common causes of sPAP overestimation are mistaking a TV closure artefact for the TR jet and incorrect assignment of a peak TRV out of the modal frequency (the frequency at which most red blood cells are moving, represented by the dense part of CW signal) in the case of maximum velocity boundary artefacts (“fringes”; fig. 1). This pitfall is avoided by carefully decreasing Doppler gain to improve the signal-to-noise ratio [7, 14]. Finally, RAP estimation according to inferior vena cava size and collapsibility is a major source of imprecision and very weakly correlates with invasive measurement [2, 3]. Very elevated RAPs are systematically underestimated with a TTE algorithm considering 15 mm Hg as the maximum achievable value, and up to 50% of overestimated sPAP can be attributed to RAP overestimation [2]. Consequently, current European PH guidelines removed RAP from their algorithm of PH probability estimation and concentrated only on TRV [1].

In order to improve the positive predictive value of TTE and given the possibility of missing PH if TRV-based sPAP is underestimated, guidelines recommend looking for indirect signs of PH in the case of normal or moderately elevated TRV [1]. Indirect signs are detailed and illustrated in figure 2 and must be looked for at the levels of the ventricles, PA, inferior vena cava and RA. In all situations except low PH probability, patients should be referred to PH expert centres for further investigations including right heart catheterisation unless they present evident heart or lung disease (suggesting group 2 or 3 PH) compatible with TTE findings (fig. 3) [1, 15].

Figure 2

Indirect signs of pulmonary hypertension at the levels of the ventricles, pulmonary valve / pulmonary artery and inferior vena cava / right atrium. Adapted from Galiè 2016 [1].

Figure 3

Evaluation of the echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension and further management in a 4 steps approach. For management, consider if the patient has risk factors (RF) or associated conditions for pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Adapted from Galiè 2016 [1]. Other TTE signs are considered if ≥2 indices from ≥2 classes are present.

* Low peak TRV = ≤2.8 m/s according to guidelines and ≤2.55 m/s according to epidemiological data (cf text). ** Intermediate peak TRV = 2.8–3.4 m/s according to guidelines; lower limit >2.55 m/s according to epidemiological data (cf text). *** High peak TRV = >3.4 m/s according to guidelines.

Echocardiography to evaluate the cause of pulmonary hypertension

Although right heart catheterisation is required to definitely differentiate precapillary (pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤15 mm Hg) from postcapillary (PAWP >15 mm Hg) PH, TTE can fairly well predict the likelihood of both conditions [1619]. This task can be challenging or sometimes impossible, particularly in patients with combined pre- and postcapillary PH, which shares features of both disorders [20, 21]. The general approach is to systematically look at parameters favouring either pre- or postcapillary PH and to develop a working diagnosis based on the predominant echo findings and the global clinical context. Referring patients to PH expert centres for right heart catheterisation and further investigations will finally be required only in unclear situations, when PAH or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is suspected or in the case of severe PH or RV dysfunction (fig. 3) [1, 15].

Table 1 gives an overview of clinical and TTE arguments favouring each condition. If left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is clearly impaired or if there is severe aortic or mitral valve disease, postcapillary PH is very likely. Of note, heart failure and severe left-sided valvular heart disease can sometimes present without PH or alternatively with combined pre- and postcapillary PH. If LVEF is preserved or mildly reduced with no significant valve disease, attention must be paid to markers of elevated left-sided filling pressures. In this context, the ratio of the peak early mitral inflow velocity to peak early mitral annular velocity (E/e′) is important. Even though E/e′ was found to be only mildly correlated to LV end-diastolic pressure and PAWP in patients with preserved LVEF [22], elevated E/e′ turned out to be a useful marker of a postcapillary disorder in PH [17, 18]. Given that e′ at the septal annulus may be influenced by right ventricular dysfunction, only e′ measured at the lateral annulus should be used to calculate E/e′. The measurement of left atrial (LA) size (LA anteroposterior diameter in parasternal long axis view, LA area in apical four-chamber view or preferably biplane LA volume index) is also important as it mirrors PAWP and LV filling pressure. LA dilatation is therefore a strong argument in favour of postcapillary PH. In addition, comparing the size of the left and right atria (RA) can give a feeling of the predominant problem, i.e., postcapillary PH if LA > RA and vice versa.

Table 1

Clinical features and non-invasive findings favouring precapillary or postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH).

 Pre-capillary PHPost-capillary PH
Clinical features  
Atrial fibrillation*NoYes
Coronary artery diseaseNoYes
Chest X-rayNo pulmonary congestionPulmonary congestion
ECGRV hypertrophy/strainLV hypertrophy/strain
LV+LA area <RV+RA areaYesNo
Apex-forming RVYesNo
RV end-diastolic area*
LV mass*
LV eccentricity index (degree of LV “D-shape”)~1.0
LA area (apical for chamber view)*
LA anteroposterior diameter (parasternal long axis view)<3.2 cm>4.2 cm
Mitral regurgitationNo/littleLittle to severe
Peak TRV / VTI RVOTNormal/↓
Mid-systolic notch in pulmonary artery PW Doppler signal or acceleration time <80 msYesNo
IVC diameter >20 mm without inspiratory collapse (≤50%)YesNo

E/e′ = ratio of the peak early transmitral velocity to the peak early mitral annular velocity (ideally assessed at the lateral annulus); IVC = inferior vena cava; LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; PW = pulsed wave; RA = right atrium; RV = right ventricle; TRV = tricuspid regurgitation velocity; VTI RVOT = velocity time integral in the right ventricular outflow tract * Parameters included in the score by Berthelot et al. [19], † by D’Alto et al. [18] and ‡ by Opotowsky et al. [17].

Given that no single parameter can differentiate pre- from postcapillary PH, several echo scores combining the most important parameters have been developed [1719]. Table 1 shows the components of the three most important scores. Overall, the best predictors of precapillary PH include a small LA [17, 19], a dilated RV [18, 19], a clear septal D-shape [18], a notch in the pulsed wave Doppler (PW) signal of the pulmonary artery or a short acceleration time (<80 ms) [17]. The areas under the curves for these scores to predict precapillary PH range from 0.76 [18] to 0.93 [19]. Although these scores are not perfect and cannot replace right heart catheterisation in general, they can identify patients with clear postcapillary PH who will not require invasive assessment. For example, a patient with E/e′ >10, LA diameter >4.2 cm and no notch in the PA PW signal is very unlikely to have precapillary PH [17].

Finally, TTE is also useful in identifying congenital heart disease. Shunts must be suspected in cases of high pulmonary blood flow (PW Doppler), but may remain anatomically hidden as in the case of sinus venosus atrial septal defects or anomalous pulmonary venous return. Transoesophageal echo or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is warranted to define anatomical structures in such situations [1, 15].

Echocardiography to assess right ventricular remodelling

With its thin wall and relatively nonmuscular structure, the RV is branched to the low resistance pulmonary vascular tree and faces low afterload in physiological conditions. With PH, hydraulic load increases and forces the RV to adapt itself in order to maintain stroke volume and cardiac output, or, in other words, to remain “coupled” to the pulmonary circulation. At first, RV contractility increases by a factor of 4 to 5 by the mean of increased sympathetic tone, hypertrophy and changes in muscle properties. This process is usually insufficient in severe PH and further stroke volume preservation can only be attempted through the Franck-Starling mechanism with an increase in RV end-diastolic volume [2325]. To some extent, this adjustment is unavoidable in idiopathic PAH [26] and is considered maladaptive because RV dilation inevitably increases wall tension, which results in turn in increased oxygen demand, increased wall stiffness and increased ventricular interaction leading to further decreased cardiac output and eventually death [23]. As a clinical correlate, RV end-diastolic volume assessed by CMR is a very strong predictor of mortality in idiopathic PAH [27]. Unfortunately, RV 3-D geometry is too complex to allow volume modelling by simple geometrical assumptions on 2-D echo, but surrogates overcome this issue.

Assessment of right ventricular dimensions

On TTE, the RV appears to be wrapped around the left ventricle (LV) like a crescent in parasternal short axis view and appears with a triangular cavity from apical four-chamber view (A4C). RV cavity area can be measured from this view at end-diastole and serve as a substitute for RV volume (table 2) (RV end-diastolic area = RVEDA). RVEDA reference values vary according to gender, ethnicity and body surface area, and are higher in athletes than in sedentary subjects [28]. In PH, RVEDA is closely related to RV pump function [29] and responds to therapy in PAH and CTEPH [30]. On the other hand, well-defined RVEDA prognostic values are lacking in PH and RVEDA is mildly reproducible [31, 32]. Indeed, RV pronounced trabeculations and retrosternal location challenge echocardiographic evaluation and RV size may significantly fluctuate according to small plane variations in A4C [8]. Nevertheless, interobserver variability seemed to refine with time [33], possibly thanks to improved echocardiographic guidelines regarding RV imaging [8]. Typically, the RV-focused A4C (RVF-A4C) used to assess RVEDA differs from standard A4C view. It is obtained by moving the transducer more laterally in order to visualise the maximum basal RV width as well as the RV apex, which avoids RV foreshortening and usually brings the LV apex at the top of the scanning sector [8]. Of importance, the issue of RVEDA variability according to scanning plane can be attenuated by expressing RV dimensions in relation to LV metrics. Goda et al. recently showed that RV to LV end-diastolic area ratio ≥0.93 predicted lower survival in PAH and added incremental value to age, gender and functional class in risk prediction [33]. Although imperfect, RVEDA and RV to LV EDA ratio remain the proper ways to assess RV remodelling by 2-D TTE, the option of measuring RV diameter or RV to LV diameter ratio being poorly validated (table 2).

Table 2

Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular size and systolic function (see text for references).

ParameterAssessment / techniqueAdvantagesLimitationsAbnormality thresholdsPrognostic value in PH
RV dimensions
RV basal diameterRV focused 4-ch view at end-diastole
Distance from lateral endocardial border to IVS right border parallel to TA plane
Max transversal dimension of the basal one third
Easy and fast
Assessed from univoqual anatomical reference (unlike mid-diameter)
Not indexed to BSA and gender
Not validated as a prognostic factor in PH
Dependent on probe rotation. May be underestimated.
>41 mmUnknown
RV end-diastolic areaRV focused 4-ch view
Manual tracing of RV endocardial border from lateral TA to apex back to medial TA along IVS at end-diastole and end-systole.
Relatively easy and fast
No geometrical assumptions needed
Normal values well established
Correlated to RV pump function
Sensitive marker to reverse remodelling on therapy
Mildly reproducible
Incomplete visualisation of RV cavity with severe enlargement
Suboptimal endocardial definition (trabeculations to be included in the cavity)
Sensitive to minor plane variations (attenuated if RVEDA related to LVEDA)
May under- or overestimate RV size
Men >24 cm2
Women >20 cm2
RVEDA indexed for BSA
Men >12.5 cm2/m2
Women >11.5 cm2/m2
Normal right/left ventricle ratio <0.66
RVEDA prognostic values poorly defined
RV end-systolic remodelling indexRV focused 4-ch view
ratio of end-systolic RV free wall length to end-systolic septal height.
free wall length from lateral TA RV insertion of IVS. Septal height as a straight line from septal TA to RV insertion on IVS
Less dependent on image acquisition
Corrects for apical foreshortening
Improved Intra-/interobserver variability
No need for endocardial border definition
Derived from a single centre observation, not validated by others
Incomplete visualisation of RV free wall in the case of severe enlargement
RVESRI <1.35: adapted
RVESRI 1.35–1.7: adverse remodelling
RVESRI >1.7: severe remodelling
RVESRI >1.35
Direct indices of RV systolic function
RV FACRV focused 4-ch view
Manual tracing of RV endocardial border from lateral TA to apex and back to medial TA along IVS at end-diastole and end-systole.
Incudes longitudinal and radial systolic function (global RV systolic function)
Well correlated to RVEF
Not angle-dependent
Same limitations as RVEDA
Does not consider outflow
<35%Threshold values for prognosis poorly defined
TAPSERV-modified 4-ch view. Cursor aligned on TA displacement axis
Quick and easy
Highly reproducible
Not indexed to BSA and gender
Angle dependent
Load dependent
Sensitive to passive translational motions
Transversal shortening and outflow tract not accounted
Normal: >21 mm
Mild/moderate/severe dysfunction:
18–20/16–17/≤15 mm
Conflicting data
≤15 mm
S′ wave
RV-modified 4-ch view. Cursor aligned on TA displacement axis
S′ velocity on lateral TA or basal RV free wall
Quick and easy
Highly reproducible
Less dependent on image quality than TAPSE
Similar to TAPSE<9.5–10 cm/sNo specific data in PH
Tissue Doppler on TA in RV-focused 4-ch view
End of a′ to onset of e′(= a′–e′) waves interval and onset to end of S′ wave (= S′)
MPI = [(a′-e′) − S′] / S′
Single beat acquisitionNot a “pure” systolic function index
Unreliable in elevated RA pressure
Highly load dependent
Normal: <0.38
Upper reference limit
RV MPI by PW DopplerConventional RV inflow and outflow Doppler
End of A to onset of E waves interval on inflow (=A–E); onset to end of S wave on outflow (=S)
MPI = [(A–E) − S] / S
 Requires 2 different heartbeats with possibly different cycle lengths
Unreliable in atrial fibrillation
Other limitations similar to RV-MPI by PW-TDI
Normal: <0.28
Upper reference limit: <0.43
RV longitudinal free wall strainRV-focused 4-ch view
Sector depth and size adjusted to visualise RV apex and obtain frame rate >50–60 Hz
Region of interest defined from lateral TA to RV apex (exclude RA and pericardium)
Angle independent
Translational motion independent.
Radial function not considered
outflow tract not considered
Load dependent
Software originally created for left ventricle
Inter-vendor variability.
Limited by image quality
Normal <−25%
Associated with low RVEF from <−20%
Worse prognosis: <−20%
Worst prognosis: <−15%
RV dyssynchronySame technique as for RVLSFreewall
Standard deviation of time to peak strain across 4 (basal + mid IVS and free wall) segments
Similar to RVLSFreewallSimilar to RVLSFreewallDyssynchrony = RV-SD4 <18–19 msRV-SD4 >23 ms
Indirect indices of RV systolic function
Pericardial effusionMeasurement in diastole where PEF appears the biggestEasy and fastNot sensitive for RV dysfunction
Not specific of RV dysfunction
No effusion normally visualised<1 cm intermediate outcome
>1 cm poor outcome
Right atrial areaRV-focused 4-ch view
Planimetry by endocardial border tracing at end-systole; exclude area between leaflets and annulus; exclude right appendage
Relatively easy and fast
No geometrical assumptions needed
Indirect measure of RV function
Accounts for dimension change in a single plane
Interobserver variability not well reported
Men: 15.8–16.6 cm2
Women: 14.7–15.7 cm2
Worse prognosis: >18 cm2
Worst prognosis: >27 cm2
Eccentricity indexParasternal short axis view
Papillary muscle level
End of systole (es) and/or end of diastole (ed)
LV diameter 1 parallel to IVS (LVD1) and LV diameter 2 perpendicular to LVD1 (LVD2)
ReproducibleRelatively cumbersome
Inaccurate if measured in oblique sections
Not independently associated with outcome in most studies
Normal value ~1EIed>1.56 and EIes>1.81 whatever RV function
Worst outcome with EIed>1.7 if TAPSE <15 mm
Tricuspid regurgitationMultiple views
Severe TR: vena contracta >7 mm, PISA radius >9 mm (Nyquist limit 28 cm/s) and systolic hepatic vein flow reversal
ReproducibleModerate to severe TR associated with later stages of RV dilatation/dysfunctionMild TR usual with PH, does not affect prognosisModerate to severe TR

4-ch = four-chamber; BSA = body surface area; FAC = fractional area change; IVS = intraventricular septum; LV = left ventricular; LVEDA = left ventricular end-diastolic ratio; MPI = myocardial performance index; PISA = proximal isovelocity surface area; PEF = pericardial effusion; EI = eccentricity index; PH = pulmonary hypertension; PW-TDI = pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging; RA = right atrial; = right ventricular; RVEDA = right ventricular end-diastolic area; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; RVESRI = right ventricular end-diastolic remodelling index; RVLSfreewall = right ventricular longitudinal free wall strain; RV-SD4 = standard deviation of the times to peak systolic strain for the four mid-basal right ventricular; segment; TA = tricuspid annulus; TAPSE = tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TR = tricuspid regurgitation

Alternatively, Amsallem et al. proposed an index of RV end-systolic dimension seemingly less influenced by image acquisition with low intra-/interobserver variability. Their RV end-systolic remodelling index (RVESRI) is derived by dividing RV free wall longitudinal length by septal height taken in RVF-A4C, which partially corrects for apical foreshortening and integrates both dimensional and functional aspects of RV adaptation to PH. In a collective of 228 PAH patients, baseline RVESRI was strongly and independently associated with death, transplantation or hospitalisation and was incremental to the REVEAL score to predict outcome (table 2) [34].

Echocardiography to assess right ventricular systolic function: direct indices

After size and volume, RV dysfunction is the most powerful predictor of death in PH [35], making RV systolic function assessment another essential aspect of TTE in PH. Systolic function can be regarded as the interplay between intrinsic factors such as contractility and heart rate, extrinsic factors such as preload and afterload, and inter-ventricular interaction [36]. Mechanistically, it results in RV emptying by three mechanisms: radial displacement of the free wall towards the interventricular septum (IVS), IVS bulging into the cavity, and shortening of the long axis with descent of the tricuspid annulus (TA) towards the apex. Practically, RV function is often first assessed qualitatively by visual evaluation, but quantitative measurements should always be preferred when possible.

Two-dimensional surrogates of right ventricular ejection fraction

Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessed with CMR is an aggregate of longitudinal and radial components of RV emptying and is a strong outcome predictor in PAH [37]. However, it again refers to volume variations not assessable by 2-D echo. Instead, TTE can measure the percent change in RV area between end-diastole and end-systole RV fractional area change [FAC]), which is also an integration of longitudinal and radial shortenings (table 2, fig. 4). It is important to consider indices accounting for both RV radial and longitudinal shortening in PH because both components appear to be differently affected by afterload [38]. Indeed, CMR-based RVFAC is closely linked to RVEF whatever the PVR, whereas longitudinal function variables such as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) become weakly correlated to RVEF at high PVR [38, 39]. This finding may reflect a plateauing (“floor effect”) of longitudinal shortening after an initial parallel decline in both planes, further loss of systolic function being essentially generated by further leftward IVS bowing. Consequently, relying only on longitudinal shortening variables may create a false perception of stability in patients with severe PH and low but constant measurements, whereas consideration of changes in more integrative variables such as RVFAC may better reflect clinical evolution in these patients [40].

Figure 4

76-year-old male with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Normal TAPSE, S′ velocity and FAC with abnormal MPI and right ventricular free-wall strain. FAC = fractional area change; TAPSE = tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; S′ = TA tissue Doppler velocity; MPI = Tei index; TCO = tricuspid valve closure to opening time; ET = ejection time.

When measured by echo, RVFAC correlates fairly well with RVEF on CMR (R = 0.71–0.8) [38, 4143] and consistently predicts outcome in different PAH populations [4446], including after adjustment for numerous other TTE and haemodynamic variables [46]. In everyday practice, RVFAC is, however, limited by low accuracy and reproducibility in the case of suboptimal endocardial definition and remains inconvenient because of poorly defined prognostic values.

Longitudinal displacement parameters

Owing to predominantly deep longitudinal fibres, long axis shortening plays a significant role in RV emptying [47]. An easy and quick way to assess longitudinal function is to measure TAPSE, which considers RV base displacement towards the apex during systole. TAPSE is assessed by M-mode on an RV-modified apical 4-chamber view focused to align the cursor parallel to lateral TA excursion (table 2, fig. 4) [8]. As already mentioned, TAPSE is variably correlated with RVEF depending on PH severity but also because an angle is sometimes inevitable between the M-mode reference point located outside the heart and TA excursion axis [41, 48]. Moreover, this angle can change during systole because of a “rocking” leftward displacement of the apex. As an LV contribution to RV emptying, this translational motion is independent from RV free wall contraction, but it can still account for an important part of TAPSE [49].

In precapillary PH, TAPSE <18 mm was associated with lower stroke volume, dilated right atrium and reduced survival [32], whereas TAPSE ≤15 mm was associated with a nearly 3-fold rise of mortality or emergent lung transplantation in PAH [45]. However, TAPSE seems to lose predictive power in populations with severe PH and a dilated RV, where a “floor effect” can appear in addition to paradoxical improvement due to afterload decrease on worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR), like for any other load-dependent variable [46, 50].

Another means to quantify longitudinal function is to measure lateral TA systolic excursion velocity (S′) by pulsed wave tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI). As opposed to TAPSE, S′ can still be acquired on images of suboptimal quality. As both indices highly correlate (R >0.9), they basically convey similar information (table 2, fig. 4) [36].

Analysis of time intervals

RV myocardial performance index (MPI), or Tei index, globally reflects RV systolic and diastolic performance. It is defined as the sum of isovolumic contraction and relaxation times divided by ejection time [51], higher values indicating poorer function. RV-MPI can be assessed by conventional PW-Doppler from two different views (ejection time at the pulmonary valve from the short axis view and isovolumic intervals derived from tricuspid flow in in any view), and hence from two heartbeats with possibly different cycle lengths. Alternatively, RVMPI can be acquired by PW-TDI on the lateral TA during a single beat to circumvent this issue (table 2, fig. 4). Correlation between both techniques is surprisingly modest and normal values differ from one method to the other [8]. Although several factors such as pseudo-normalisation with increasing RAP (reduction of isovolumic relaxation time) [52] and dependence on loading conditions [53] significantly limit RV-MPI, this variable was consistently associated with outcome in PAH and mixed PAH/CTEPH populations, including after adjustment for numerous other TTE and haemodynamic variables [46, 51, 54].

Right ventricular deformation imaging (strain)

Strain refers to the magnitude of myocardial deformation occurring in a given segment during systole and is calculated as the percent change of length separating two points during movement [(end-systole − end-diastole) / end-diastole lengths × 100]. Global strain is the average of all segments and negative values represent shortening. Strain is nowadays assessed by speckle tracking imaging, using an algorithm tracking constant pattern of black and white spots, i.e., speckles produced by ultrasound in the acoustically inhomogeneous myocardium within a user-defined region of interest. Speckles are tracked in any direction, making strain an angle-independent variable, with the additional strength of being mainly dependent on local shortening and less influenced by external traction due to displacement of neighbouring segments [55].

At the RV level, global longitudinal strain is assessed on RVF-A4C with 85–95% feasibility [50, 56] and low intra/interobserver variability [57], and can include (RVGLSTotal) or exclude the IVS (RVGLSFreewall). Image acquisition must be optimised in order to obtain a frame rate ≥50–60 Hz, avoid reverberation and visualise the RV apex throughout the complete cardiac cycle [8]. Reference points and regions of interest should be defined with care, the inclusion of atrial wall or pericardium in the region of interest producing falsely low strain (table 2, fig. 4).

Unfortunately, consensus about the best algorithm for strain analysis is lacking, and software show a low inter-vendor agreement [55]. Consequently, longitudinal patient follow-up should be performed with similar equipment and software for comparison. Nevertheless, both RVGLSTotal and RVGLSFreewall correlate better with CMR-derived RVEF than conventional indices (R = −0.77 to −0.86) [43, 58, 59]. A recent meta-analysis proposed −27% ± 2% as normal range for RVGLSFreewall [60] with detection thresholds for abnormal RVEF at −20% [61]. Focardi et al. reported sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 93% for RVGLSFreewall ≥−17% to predict RVEF <45% [43].

In the largest prospective study conducted so far (406 precapillary PH and 169 non-PH subjects), RVGLSFreewall was the only direct RV function index to predict mortality after adjustment for functional class, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and 6-minute walking distance [56]. Others found similar results and two recent meta-analyses reported a pooled unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88–4.77) for mortality using binary RVGLSFreewall cut-off values in precapillary PH (76% PAH) [62], and a HR of 2.96 (95% CI 2.0–4.38) for all-cause mortality with a 22% relative reduction of RVGLSFreewall [63].

Beside global strain, speckle tracking imaging can assess RV dyssynchrony. In PH, electrophysiological remodelling creates zones of slow conduction and prolonged action potential in the RV with delayed peak myocardial shortening resulting in regional contraction inhomogeneity and finally in intraventricular dyssynchrony [64]. With speckle tracking imaging, dyssynchrony is assessed by measuring standard deviations (SDs) of time to peak strain across a chosen number of segments (models with four and six segments including the IVS). In PAH, RV dyssynchrony (RV-SD4 >18–19 ms) is frequent and affects haemodynamics, RVEF, functional class and functional capacity [65, 66]. With a 23-ms cut-off, RV-SD4 predicts 1-year event-free survival with negative and positive predictive values of 95% and 57% (table 2) [67].

Echocardiography to assess right ventricular systolic function: indirect indices

Right atrial size

RA size and pericardial effusion (PEF) are the only two TTE variables recommended for risk stratification in the current European Respiratory Society (ERS) / European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on PH [1]. Although international guidelines on TTE advocate volume assessment for RA size quantification [8], orthogonal views of the RA cannot be obtained for biplane calculation and minor axes of the RA may not be equal, particularly in the event of RA dilatation. As far as PH is concerned, RA size should be alternatively quantified by single plane assessment of its area (RAA) on A4C (table 2, fig. 2). Indeed, RAA correlates with RV function in PH patients and larger RAA has been associated with lower cardiac index reserve at exercise in PAH patients [29]. Of note, normal RAA values differ between men and women, and rise with high endurance training [68]. In addition, RA may also dilate because of TR and atrial fibrillation, and the reproducibility of RAA measurement is not well defined.

In PAH, RAA has been consistently reported as a strong prognostic factor, also after adjustment for relevant clinical, biological, haemodynamic and usual TTE variables [6972]. However, it has not been adjusted for modern robust direct RV function variables such as RVGLSFreewall.

Tricuspid regurgitation

In PH, tricuspid regurgitation occurs as a consequence of RV remodelling, with tricuspid annular dilation, valve tenting and normal leaflets. Whereas virtually all newly diagnosed PAH patients display TR, severe regurgitation is rare (<20%) and reflects late-stage RV maladaptation [73] with poor outcome in PAH [46, 73].

Pericardial effusion

Pericardial effusion is common (20–50%) on initial imaging in PAH [26] and its volume correlates with RA pressure and size, RV size and function, and TR severity [74, 75]. Physiologically, it is caused by increased central venous pressure, which impairs both venous and lymphatic drainage of the heart, with swollen lymphatic subepicardial pre-collectors suffusing in the pericardial space [76]. Of note, pericardial effusion is not specific to RV dysfunction and may also reflect serositis in connective tissue disease-associated PAH [36, 74]. the presence and severity of pericardial effusion nevertheless remain correlated with poor outcome in PAH after adjustment for PAH aetiology and right atrial pressure [74, 77].

Left ventricular eccentricity index

As the IVS and the pericardium are shared by both ventricles, events occurring on one side influence the contralateral one, a phenomenon called right-left ventricular interaction [78, 79].

With a flat configuration in the unloaded human heart [80], the IVS displays a concave shape during systole in physiological conditions because of a positive left to right trans-septal pressure gradient. With PH, systolic interventricular gradient decreases, increasing in turn the IVS curvature (flattening) in a linear relationship [81]. During early diastole, interference occurs in PH through persisting RV free wall shortening, while IVS and LV free wall already relax. This results in a transient inverted trans-septal pressure gradient and in a rapid leftward septal motion (“early diastolic bounce”), with possible short reverse septal curvature in severe PH [8284]. RV and LV pressures may finally equalise at end-diastole if RV dilatation is significant enough to induce pericardial constraint [78, 82]. Importantly, IVS mediated ventricular interactions reduce LV size, impair LV filling and may deeply reduce stroke volume in PAH [83, 85].

IVS flattening can be qualitatively assessed or quantified by measuring LV eccentricity index (EI) in parasternal short axis view (table 2, fig. 2). Systolic EI correlates with PVR and with RV function indices, and both end-systolic and end-diastolic EI predict outcome in PAH in univariate analysis. However, the association of EI with outcome may disappear after adjustment for clinical, haemodynamic and TTE variables such RV dyssynchrony [45, 46, 67, 69].

Overall, standard TTE assessment of the right heart should include several complementary indices of RV remodelling and systolic function, providing a cluster of direct and indirect evidence of RV adaptation or maladaptation to PH. Key variables exploring longitudinal function (TAPSE, S′, RVGLSFreewall, and RV dyssynchrony), global motion (RVFAC, MPI), ventricular interaction, right atrium, pericardium and tricuspid valve should be assessed, highlighting the strengths and limitation of each of them according to the particular clinical situation.

Evaluation of right ventricle-pulmonary arterial coupling

Right ventricle-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling refers to the concept of RV contractility adaptation to the afterload conditions provided by pulmonary arteries. The only validated way to assess RV-PA coupling is the invasive generation of pressure-volume loops with conductance catheters at different preloads in order to determine RV end-systolic elastance (Ees = slope of the line joining the end-systolic pressure values acquired at different preloads) as a load-free determinant of contractility, and arterial elastance (Ea = end-systolic pressure / stroke volume), as an index aggregating both resistive and pulsatile components of afterload. RV-PA coupling can then be determined as the Ees/Ea ratio, with normal values between 1.5 and 2.0 [86].

In PH, RV volume increases when Ees/Ea is ≤0.8 [87] and RV-PA coupling was shown to be a main determinant of outcome [88]. As pressure-volume curves cannot be constructed with TTE, surrogates have been explored, such TAPSE for Ees and sPAP for Ea. Although the assumptions that both terms hold for contractility and afterload, respectively, are far from perfect, TAPSE/sPAP was shown to correlate independently with Ees/Ea, and values <0.31 mm/mm Hg identified Ees/Ea <0.805 with good sensitivity and specificity [89]. Furthermore, trials showed a strong association between TAPSE/sPAP and outcomes in PH on left heart disease and PAH populations [8991]. Of importance, TAPSE/sPAP appeared to be a stronger event predictor than RV systolic function variables such as TAPSE, RAA, S′ and MPI taken per se. Also, TAPSE/sPAP showed a clear pattern of distribution across the total PA compliance versus PVR curve, meaning that populations with a high TAPSE/sPAP value have high TAC and low PVR, and conversely. Of course, the above-described limitations of TAPSE taken in isolation remain true when associated with sPAP. Consequently, authors attempted to replace it by RVLSglobal and RVLSFreewaal and found RVLS/sPAP to be superior than TAPSE/sPAP to predict 1-year mortality in PH associated with chronic stable heart failure [92]. Like that of other experts in the field, the authors’ opinion is that TTE-evaluated RV-PA coupling allows a better understanding of RV adaptation to afterload and that TAPSE/sPAP is a “ready to use surrogate of RV to afterload coupling at the bedside” and should be routinely reported by sonographers [93].

Echocardiography for the follow-up of pulmonary hypertension

As PAH and other forms of precapillary PH such as CTEPH are progressive diseases and because response to therapies and interventions are not predictable on an individual basis, periodic risk stratification is of utmost importance in patients’ care [94]. For this purpose, current ESC/ERS guidelines recommend the use of multidimensional variables including TTE parameters (RAA and pericardial effusion) besides other modifiable factors [1]. This approach has been retrospectively validated in the Swedish PAH registry [95], but further analyses of the German and French registries did not consider TTE for risk assessment, mainly because echo variables were not captured in these databases [5, 6]. Nevertheless, PAH and CTEPH outcomes remain closely related to changes in RV size and function on therapy [27, 37], which can be typically assessed by TTE.

Once medical therapy for PAH is established, sPAP does not change significantly enough to be reliably detected by TTE, but RV systolic function variables and size of the right cavities usually improve [37, 44]. As most RV-related TTE indices are afterload dependent, their changes reflect both treatment-induced afterload decrease and systolic function improvement. However, the proportion of RV function variation attributed to PVR change is quite small and RV function may still deteriorate in spite of decreased PVR in some patients, reflecting progressive RV failure and eventually poor outcome [37, 96].

Reverse remodelling of the right cavities (size reduction) on PH therapy affects both RA and RV. Because RA size is related to RV function [29], RA reverse remodelling is thought to reflect decreased RV filling pressure and volume overload, and hence improved RV systolic function. In patients on riociguat for PAH or CTEPH for 12 months, Marra et al. found that 31% of patients could recover normal RA size and Sano et al. showed that mid-term RA reverse remodelling (RAA decrease ≥15%) predicted long-term survival in PAH [30, 97]. At RV level, treatment-induced remodelling can be monitored by following RVEDA and RVESA. In their study, Sano et al. reported larger mid-term RVEDA and RVESA increases in patients with eventual events and excellent outcome in patients with reverse remodelling (RVEDA or RVESA decrease ≥15%) [97]. More recently, Badagliaca et al. showed that a score including RVEDA, LVEI and RAA reduction after 1 year of treatment independently predicted outcome in idiopathic PAH and improved prognostic models based on clinical and haemodynamic factors [96].

Following RVESRI change at 1 year also appeared to reflect RV adaptation vs maladaptation in PAH. Although a minority of patients (24%) had significantly changed RVESRI (>10%) on therapy, those with improvement had a good outcome and those with deterioration a poor prognosis. Of importance, RVESRI change seemed incremental to the REVEAL score for risk prediction [34].

Follow up of TTE indices of RV function on therapy is also of interest in PAH. For example, complete recovery of TAPSE (≥2 cm) at 1 year is an independent predictor of 3-year survival [98], and improvement of RVGLSFreewall by ≥5% after 6 months independently predicts 4-year survival after adjustment for age, PAH cause and functional class [99].

Finally, following up pericardial effusion is also important in PAH because the emergence of a new pericardial effusion was recently found to be predictive of bad prognosis in two single centre studies [100, 101], whereas resolution pericardial effusion conferred a prognosis similar to no pericardial effusion at all and pericardial effusion persistence an even worse one than new pericardial effusion [101].

Echocardiographic screening for populations at high risk for PH

Several populations are at high risk of developing PH, including patients with connective tissue disease (scleroderma and scleroderma spectrum), congenital heart disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), porto-pulmonary hypertension and relatives of patients with heritable PAH . Recommendations for screening modalities were reported at the 6th World Symposium for PH [15] and are endorsed by the Swiss Society for Pulmonary Hypertension. Most of them include TTE and are summarised hereafter.

Most data regarding screening for PAH in connective tissues diseases are based on patients with scleroderma [102], where the prevalence of PAH is ~10–12% (19% in patients with DLCO <60%). Screening is meaningful in scleroderma because PAH is one of the leading causes of death and outcome may improve with early PAH-specific therapy [103]. Multiple algorithms can be proposed: annual TTE [1], conditional TTE (DETECT algorithm [104]), and pulmonary function tests (FVC/DLCO ratio) associated with NTproBNP. If any of the tests is positive, right heart catheterisation should be undertaken.

In congenital heart disease, PH is present by definition in patients with Eisenmenger Syndrome. In other cases, such as persistent open systemic-to-pulmonary shunt or after defect correction, PH screening should be part of the regular follow-up TTE. Postoperative PAH screening is recommended after 3–6 months and then annually in patients with increased PVR at baseline [15].

In HIV, PH screening is recommended only in patients with risk factors such as female sex, intravenous drug or cocaine use, chronic hepatitis C infection, origin from high-prevalence countries, known Nef (negative regulatory factor) or Tat (transactivator of transcription) proteins and in US African-American patients [15].

PH screening with TTE is recommended for all patients with portal hypertension (0.5–5% prevalence) and in all patients before liver transplantation (prevalence ~10%). However, given the high incidence of hyperkinetic PH with liver disease, right heart catheterisation should be performed only if TRV is >3.4 m/s or if RA or RV enlargement is found [15].

Genetic screening in the French registry found PAH-associated mutations in 16.9% patients with sporadic PAH and in 89% of patients with a family history (heritable PAH) [105]. The risk of developing PAH being 14% for male and 42% for female mutation carriers [106], annual TTE and genetic counselling are recommended for all asymptomatic mutation carriers [15].

Finally, patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) have an increased risk of developing PH (TTE prevalence 4.23%). In most cases, PH is related to high-output heart failure, but PAH is possible and associated with poor survival [107]. TTE screening is recommended in all patients with HHT or family history of HHT with symptoms, heart failure or hepatic arteriovenous malformations [15].


Although right heart catheterisation remains unconditionally mandatory for a definite PH diagnosis, TTE can reliably detect abnormal haemodynamics and sPAP can be estimated with acceptable precision given adequate TRV envelope and experienced sonographers. SPAP, TRV and RAP should be reported separately and commented on if necessary. In addition, TTE can discriminate fairly well between pre- and postcapillary PH in many situations, avoiding unnecessary right heart catheterisation.

Although the main weakness of 2-D TTE remains its inability to explore the complex 3-D RV morphology, the assessment of modern direct and indirect indices of RV remodelling and systolic function enable a comprehensive view of RV adaptation to PH, helping clinicians to estimate the outcome of their patients and their response to therapy. In the future, 3-D echo may circumvent this limitation. Currently, 3-D echo is not widely available and cannot be considered as part of a routine examination of the RV because it needs expensive matrix-array transducers, dedicated software for post-processing and specific learning to avoid pitfalls such sternal shadowing or incomplete RV volume acquisition. In experienced hands, however, it demonstrates good agreement with CMR, which is the gold standard regarding RV and RA volumes as well as RVEF in PH patients [108]. Asthe advantages of 3-D echo will probably appear more and more evident with time, the authors guess that it will soon be part of the complex pathways of PH diagnosis and follow-up.


Dr Patrick Yerly, MD, Service de Cardiologie, Centre hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, patrick.yerly[at]


1 Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(1):67–119. doi:. PubMed

2 Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion HC, Girgis REAccuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(7):615–21. doi:. PubMed

3 Rich JD, Shah SJ, Swamy RS, Kamp A, Rich S. Inaccuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension: implications for clinical practice. Chest. 2011;139(5):988–93. doi:. PubMed

4 D’Alto M, Romeo E, Argiento P, D’Andrea A, Vanderpool R, Correra AAccuracy and precision of echocardiography versus right heart catheterization for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):4058–62. doi:. PubMed

5 Boucly A, Weatherald J, Savale L, Jaïs X, Cottin V, Prevot GRisk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(2):1700889. doi:. PubMed

6 Hoeper MM, Kramer T, Pan Z, Eichstaedt CA, Spiesshoefer J, Benjamin NMortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(2):1700740. doi:. PubMed

7 Greiner S, Jud A, Aurich M, Hess A, Hilbel T, Hardt SReliability of noninvasive assessment of systolic pulmonary artery pressure by Doppler echocardiography compared to right heart catheterization: analysis in a large patient population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(4):e001103. doi:. PubMed

8 Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande LRecommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–71. doi:. PubMed

9 Schneider M, Pistritto AM, Gerges C, Gerges M, Binder C, Lang IMulti-view approach for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension using transthoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34(5):695–700. PubMed

10 D’Alto M, Bossone E, Opotowsky AR, Ghio S, Rudski LG, Naeije R. Strengths and weaknesses of echocardiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2018;263:177–83. doi:. PubMed

11 Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, Denton CP, Gatzoulis MA, Krowka MHaemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801913. doi:. PubMed

12 Marra AM, Naeije R, Ferrara F, Vriz O, Stanziola AA, D’Alto MReference Ranges and Determinants of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity in Healthy Adults Assessed by Two-Dimensional Doppler-Echocardiography. Respiration. 2018;96(5):425–33. doi:. PubMed

13 Kovacs G, Berghold A, Scheidl S, Olschewski H. Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(4):888–94. doi:. PubMed

14 Amsallem M, Sternbach JM, Adigopula S, Kobayashi Y, Vu TA, Zamanian RAddressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(2):93–102. doi:. PubMed

15 Frost A, Badesch D, Gibbs JSR, Gopalan D, Khanna D, Manes ADiagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801904. doi:. PubMed

16 Maeder MT, Schoch OD, Kleiner R, Joerg L, Weilenmann D, Swiss Society For Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulmonary hypertension associated with left-sided heart disease. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14395. PubMed

17 Opotowsky AR, Ojeda J, Rogers F, Prasanna V, Clair M, Moko LA simple echocardiographic prediction rule for hemodynamics in pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(6):765–75. doi:. PubMed

18 D’Alto M, Romeo E, Argiento P, Pavelescu A, Mélot C, D’Andrea AEchocardiographic prediction of pre- versus postcapillary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):108–15. doi:. PubMed

19 Berthelot E, Montani D, Algalarrondo V, Dreyfuss C, Rifai R, Benmalek AA Clinical and Echocardiographic Score to Identify Pulmonary Hypertension Due to HFpEF. J Card Fail. 2017;23(1):29–35. doi:. PubMed

20 Naeije R, Gerges M, Vachiery JL, Caravita S, Gerges C, Lang IM. Hemodynamic Phenotyping of Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(9):10. doi:. PubMed

21 Rosenkranz S, Gibbs JS, Wachter R, De Marco T, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Vachiéry JL. Left ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(12):942–54. doi:. PubMed

22 Nauta JF, Hummel YM, van der Meer P, Lam CSP, Voors AA, van Melle JP. Correlation with invasive left ventricular filling pressures and prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic diastolic parameters used in the 2016 ESC heart failure guidelines and in the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations: a systematic review in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(9):1303–11. doi:. PubMed

23 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Westerhof BE, Westerhof N. The Relationship Between the Right Ventricle and its Load in Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(2):236–43. doi:. PubMed

24 Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Haddad F, Chin KM, Forfia PR, Kawut SM, Lumens JRight heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25, Suppl):D22–33. doi:. PubMed

25 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Chin KM, Haddad F, Hassoun PM, Hemnes AR, Hopkins SRPathophysiology of the right ventricle and of the pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension: an update. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801900. doi:. PubMed

26 Bossone E, Duong-Wagner TH, Paciocco G, Oral H, Ricciardi M, Bach DSEchocardiographic features of primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(8):655–62. doi:. PubMed

27 van Wolferen SA, Marcus JT, Boonstra A, Marques KM, Bronzwaer JG, Spreeuwenberg MDPrognostic value of right ventricular mass, volume, and function in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(10):1250–7. doi:. PubMed

28 Grünig E, Biskupek J, D’Andrea A, Ehlken N, Egenlauf B, Weidenhammer JReference ranges for and determinants of right ventricular area in healthy adults by two-dimensional echocardiography. Respiration. 2015;89(4):284–93. doi:. PubMed

29 Fischer L, Benjamin N, Blank N, Egenlauf B, Fischer C, Harutyunova SRight heart size and function significantly correlate in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension - a cross-sectional study. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):216. doi:. PubMed

30 Marra AM, Halank M, Benjamin N, Bossone E, Cittadini A, Eichstaedt CARight ventricular size and function under riociguat in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (the RIVER study). Respir Res. 2018;19(1):258. doi:. PubMed

31 Ghio S, Recusani F, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Laudisa ML, Campana CPrognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(7):837–42. doi:. PubMed

32 Forfia PR, Fisher MR, Mathai SC, Housten-Harris T, Hemnes AR, Borlaug BATricuspid annular displacement predicts survival in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(9):1034–41. doi:. PubMed

33 Goda A, Ryo K, Delgado-Montero A, Tayal B, Handa R, Simon MAThe Prognostic Utility of a Simplified Biventricular Echocardiographic Index of Cardiac Remodeling in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(6):554–60. doi:. PubMed

34 Amsallem M, Sweatt AJ, Aymami MC, Kuznetsova T, Selej M, Lu HRight Heart End-Systolic Remodeling Index Strongly Predicts Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Comparison With Validated Models. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(6):e005771. doi:. PubMed

35 Benza RL, Miller DP, Gomberg-Maitland M, Frantz RP, Foreman AJ, Coffey CSPredicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation. 2010;122(2):164–72. doi:. PubMed

36 Forfia PR, Vachiéry JL. Echocardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(6, Suppl):S16–S24. doi:. PubMed

37 van de Veerdonk MC, Kind T, Marcus JT, Mauritz GJ, Heymans MW, Bogaard HJProgressive right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension responding to therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):2511–9. doi:. PubMed

38 Hoette S, Creuzé N, Günther S, Montani D, Savale L, Jaïs XRV Fractional Area Change and TAPSE as Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Pulmonary Hypertension: A CMR Study. Lung. 2018;196(2):157–64. doi:. PubMed

39 Kind T, Mauritz GJ, Marcus JT, van de Veerdonk M, Westerhof N, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Right ventricular ejection fraction is better reflected by transverse rather than longitudinal wall motion in pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12(1):35. doi:. PubMed

40 Mauritz GJ, Kind T, Marcus JT, Bogaard HJ, van de Veerdonk M, Postmus PEProgressive changes in right ventricular geometric shortening and long-term survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2012;141(4):935–43. doi:. PubMed

41 Anavekar NS, Gerson D, Skali H, Kwong RY, Yucel EK, Solomon SD. Two-dimensional assessment of right ventricular function: an echocardiographic-MRI correlative study. Echocardiography. 2007;24(5):452–6. doi:. PubMed

42 Leong DP, Grover S, Molaee P, Chakrabarty A, Shirazi M, Cheng YHNonvolumetric echocardiographic indices of right ventricular systolic function: validation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and relationship with functional capacity. Echocardiography. 2012;29(4):455–63. doi:. PubMed

43 Focardi M, Cameli M, Carbone SF, Massoni A, De Vito R, Lisi MTraditional and innovative echocardiographic parameters for the analysis of right ventricular performance in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):47–52. doi:. PubMed

44 Galiè N, Hinderliter AL, Torbicki A, Fourme T, Simonneau G, Pulido TEffects of the oral endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan on echocardiographic and doppler measures in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(8):1380–6. doi:. PubMed

45 Ghio S, Klersy C, Magrini G, D’Armini AM, Scelsi L, Raineri CPrognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2010;140(3):272–8. doi:. PubMed

46 Grapsa J, Pereira Nunes MC, Tan TC, Cabrita IZ, Coulter T, Smith BCEchocardiographic and Hemodynamic Predictors of Survival in Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension: Seven-Year Follow-Up. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(6):e002107. doi:. PubMed

47 Brown SB, Raina A, Katz D, Szerlip M, Wiegers SE, Forfia PR. Longitudinal shortening accounts for the majority of right ventricular contraction and improves after pulmonary vasodilator therapy in normal subjects and patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2011;140(1):27–33. doi:. PubMed

48 Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1984;107(3):526–31. doi:. PubMed

49 Giusca S, Dambrauskaite V, Scheurwegs C, D’hooge J, Claus P, Herbots LDeformation imaging describes right ventricular function better than longitudinal displacement of the tricuspid ring. Heart. 2010;96(4):281–8. doi:. PubMed

50 van Kessel M, Seaton D, Chan J, Yamada A, Kermeen F, Hamilton-Craig CPrognostic value of right ventricular free wall strain in pulmonary hypertension patients with pseudo-normalized tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion values. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32(6):905–12. doi:. PubMed

51 Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, McGoon MD, Tajik AJDoppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):838–47. doi:. PubMed

52 Yoshifuku S, Otsuji Y, Takasaki K, Yuge K, Kisanuki A, Toyonaga KPseudonormalized Doppler total ejection isovolume (Tei) index in patients with right ventricular acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(5):527–31. doi:. PubMed

53 Cheung MM, Smallhorn JF, Redington AN, Vogel M. The effects of changes in loading conditions and modulation of inotropic state on the myocardial performance index: comparison with conductance catheter measurements. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(24):2238–42. doi:. PubMed

54 Yeo TC, Dujardin KS, Tei C, Mahoney DW, McGoon MD, Seward JB. Value of a Doppler-derived index combining systolic and diastolic time intervals in predicting outcome in primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(9):1157–61. doi:. PubMed

55 Voigt JU, Cvijic M. 2- and 3-Dimensional Myocardial Strain in Cardiac Health and Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(9):1849–63. doi:. PubMed

56 Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM, Frantz RP, Pellikka PA, Oh JKOutcome prediction by quantitative right ventricular function assessment in 575 subjects evaluated for pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(5):711–21. doi:. PubMed

57 Park JH, Park MM, Farha S, Sharp J, Lundgrin E, Comhair SImpaired Global Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Predicts Long-Term Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015;23(2):91–9. doi:. PubMed

58 Vizzardi E, Bonadei I, Sciatti E, Pezzali N, Farina D, D’Aloia AQuantitative analysis of right ventricular (RV) function with echocardiography in chronic heart failure with no or mild RV dysfunction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(2):247–55. doi:. PubMed

59 Park JH, Negishi K, Kwon DH, Popovic ZB, Grimm RA, Marwick TH. Validation of global longitudinal strain and strain rate as reliable markers of right ventricular dysfunction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and outcome. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;22(3):113–20. doi:. PubMed

60 Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM, Frantz RP, Pellikka PA, Oh JKReference values for right ventricular strain in patients without cardiopulmonary disease: a prospective evaluation and meta-analysis. Echocardiography. 2015;32(5):787–96. doi:. PubMed

61 Longobardo L, Suma V, Jain R, Carerj S, Zito C, Zwicke DLRole of Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Strain in the Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Function and Comparison with Conventional Parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(10):937–946.e6. doi:. PubMed

62 Shukla M, Park JH, Thomas JD, Delgado V, Bax JJ, Kane GCPrognostic Value of Right Ventricular Strain Using Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(8):1069–78. doi:. PubMed

63 Hulshof HG, Eijsvogels TMH, Kleinnibbelink G, van Dijk AP, George KP, Oxborough DLPrognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(4):475–84. doi:. PubMed

64 Hardziyenka M, Campian ME, Bouma BJ, Linnenbank AC, de Bruin-Bon HA, Kloek JJRight-to-left ventricular diastolic delay in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is associated with activation delay and action potential prolongation in right ventricle. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(5):555–61. doi:. PubMed

65 Badagliacca R, Poscia R, Pezzuto B, Nocioni M, Mezzapesa M, Francone MRight ventricular remodeling in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: adaptive versus maladaptive morphology. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(3):395–403. doi:. PubMed

66 Badagliacca R, Papa S, Valli G, Pezzuto B, Poscia R, Reali MRight ventricular dyssynchrony and exercise capacity in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(6):1601419. doi:. PubMed

67 Badagliacca R, Reali M, Poscia R, Pezzuto B, Papa S, Mezzapesa MRight Intraventricular Dyssynchrony in Idiopathic, Heritable, and Anorexigen-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Clinical Impact and Reversibility. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(6):642–52. doi:. PubMed

68 Grünig E, Henn P, D’Andrea A, Claussen M, Ehlken N, Maier FReference values for and determinants of right atrial area in healthy adults by 2-dimensional echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(1):117–24. doi:. PubMed

69 Raymond RJ, Hinderliter AL, Willis PW, Ralph D, Caldwell EJ, Williams WEchocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(7):1214–9. doi:. PubMed

70 Bustamante-Labarta M, Perrone S, De La Fuente RL, Stutzbach P, De La Hoz RP, Torino ARight atrial size and tricuspid regurgitation severity predict mortality or transplantation in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(10):1160–4. doi:. PubMed

71 Austin C, Alassas K, Burger C, Safford R, Pagan R, Duello KEchocardiographic assessment of estimated right atrial pressure and size predicts mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2015;147(1):198–208. doi:. PubMed

72 Stepnowska E, Lewicka E, Dąbrowska-Kugacka A, Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L, Zagożdżon P, Kamiński RPredictors of poor outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A single center study. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0193245. doi:. PubMed

73 Chen L, Larsen CM, Le RJ, Connolly HM, Pislaru SV, Murphy JGThe prognostic significance of tricuspid valve regurgitation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(4):1572–80. doi:. PubMed

74 Fenstad ER, Le RJ, Sinak LJ, Maradit-Kremers H, Ammash NM, Ayalew AMPericardial effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension: characteristics, prognosis, and role of drainage. Chest. 2013;144(5):1530–8. doi:. PubMed

75 Batal O, Dardari Z, Costabile C, Gorcsan J, Arena VC, Mathier MA. Prognostic Value of Pericardial Effusion on Serial Echocardiograms in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Echocardiography. 2015;32(10):1471–6. doi:. PubMed

76 Stewart RH, Rohn DA, Allen SJ, Laine GA. Basic determinants of epicardial transudation. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(3 Pt 2):H1408–14. PubMed

77 Eysmann SB, Palevsky HI, Reichek N, Hackney K, Douglas PS. Two-dimensional and Doppler-echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization correlates of survival in primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 1989;80(2):353–60. doi:. PubMed

78 Naeije R, Badagliacca R. The overloaded right heart and ventricular interdependence. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113(12):1474–85. doi:. PubMed

79 Friedberg MK. Imaging right-left ventricular interactions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(5):755–71. doi:. PubMed

80 Lima JA, Guzman PA, Yin FC, Brawley RK, Humphrey L, Traill TASeptal geometry in the unloaded living human heart. Circulation. 1986;74(3):463–8. doi:. PubMed

81 Dellegrottaglie S, Sanz J, Poon M, Viles-Gonzalez JF, Sulica R, Goyenechea MPulmonary hypertension: accuracy of detection with left ventricular septal-to-free wall curvature ratio measured at cardiac MR. Radiology. 2007;243(1):63–9. doi:. PubMed

82 Roeleveld RJ, Marcus JT, Faes TJ, Gan TJ, Boonstra A, Postmus PEInterventricular septal configuration at mr imaging and pulmonary arterial pressure in pulmonary hypertension. Radiology. 2005;234(3):710–7. doi:. PubMed

83 Marcus JT, Gan CT, Zwanenburg JJ, Boonstra A, Allaart CP, Götte MJInterventricular mechanical asynchrony in pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-to-right delay in peak shortening is related to right ventricular overload and left ventricular underfilling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(7):750–7. doi:. PubMed

84 Palau-Caballero G, Walmsley J, Van Empel V, Lumens J, Delhaas T. Why septal motion is a marker of right ventricular failure in pulmonary arterial hypertension: mechanistic analysis using a computer model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;312(4):H691–700. doi:. PubMed

85 Gan CT, Lankhaar JW, Marcus JT, Westerhof N, Marques KM, Bronzwaer JGImpaired left ventricular filling due to right-to-left ventricular interaction in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290(4):H1528–33. doi:. PubMed

86 Tello K, Seeger W, Naeije R, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani H, Richter MRight heart failure in pulmonary hypertension: Diagnosis and new perspectives on vascular and direct right ventricular treatment. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(1):90–107. doi:. PubMed

87 Tello K, Dalmer A, Axmann J, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani HA, Naeije RReserve of right ventricular-arterial coupling in the setting of chronic overload. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(1):e005512. doi:. PubMed

88 Vanderpool RR, Pinsky MR, Naeije R, Deible C, Kosaraju V, Bunner CRV-pulmonary arterial coupling predicts outcome in patients referred for pulmonary hypertension. Heart. 2015;101(1):37–43. doi:. PubMed

89 Tello K, Wan J, Dalmer A, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani HA, Naeije RValidation of the Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion/Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure Ratio for the Assessment of Right Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(9):e009047. doi:. PubMed

90 Guazzi M, Naeije R, Arena R, Corrà U, Ghio S, Forfia PEchocardiography of right ventriculoarterial coupling combined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing to predict outcome in heart failure. Chest. 2015;148(1):226–34. doi:. PubMed

91 Tello K, Axmann J, Ghofrani HA, Naeije R, Narcin N, Rieth ARelevance of the TAPSE/PASP ratio in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2018;266:229–35. doi:. PubMed

92 Iacoviello M, Monitillo F, Citarelli G, Leone M, Grande D, Antoncecchi VRight ventriculo-arterial coupling assessed by two-dimensional strain: A new parameter of right ventricular function independently associated with prognosis in chronic heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2017;241:318–21. doi:. PubMed

93 Guazzi M. Use of TAPSE/PASP ratio in pulmonary arterial hypertension: An easy shortcut in a congested road. Int J Cardiol. 2018;266:242–4. doi:. PubMed

94 Galiè N, Channick RN, Frantz RP, Grünig E, Jing ZC, Moiseeva ORisk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801889. doi:. PubMed

95 Kylhammar D, Kjellström B, Hjalmarsson C, Jansson K, Nisell M, Söderberg SA comprehensive risk stratification at early follow-up determines prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(47):4175–81. doi:. PubMed

96 Badagliacca R, Poscia R, Pezzuto B, Papa S, Reali M, Pesce FPrognostic relevance of right heart reverse remodeling in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(2):195–205. doi:.

97 Sano H, Tanaka H, Motoji Y, Fukuda Y, Sawa T, Mochizuki YRight ventricular function and right-heart echocardiographic response to therapy predict long-term outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(4):529–36. doi:. PubMed

98 Mazurek JA, Vaidya A, Mathai SC, Roberts JD, Forfia PR. Follow-up tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion predicts survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2017;7(2):361–71. doi:. PubMed

99 Hardegree EL, Sachdev A, Villarraga HR, Frantz RP, McGoon MD, Kushwaha SSRole of serial quantitative assessment of right ventricular function by strain in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(1):143–8. doi:. PubMed

100 Shimony A, Fox BD, Langleben D, Rudski LG. Incidence and significance of pericardial effusion in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(6):678–82. doi:. PubMed

101 Batal O, Dardari Z, Costabile C, Gorcsan J, Arena VC, Mathier MA. Prognostic Value of Pericardial Effusion on Serial Echocardiograms in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Echocardiography. 2015;32(10):1471–6. doi:. PubMed

102 Young A, Nagaraja V, Basilious M, Habib M, Townsend W, Gladue HUpdate of screening and diagnostic modalities for connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(6):1059–67. doi:. PubMed

103 Humbert M, Yaici A, de Groote P, Montani D, Sitbon O, Launay DScreening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: clinical characteristics at diagnosis and long-term survival. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(11):3522–30. doi:. PubMed

104 Coghlan JG, Denton CP, Grünig E, Bonderman D, Distler O, Khanna D, DETECT study group. Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1340–9. doi:. PubMed

105 Girerd B, Montani D, Jaïs X, Eyries M, Yaici A, Sztrymf BGenetic counselling in a national referral centre for pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):541–52. doi:. PubMed

106 Larkin EK, Newman JH, Austin ED, Hemnes AR, Wheeler L, Robbins IMLongitudinal analysis casts doubt on the presence of genetic anticipation in heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(9):892–6. doi:. PubMed

107 Revuz S, Decullier E, Ginon I, Lamblin N, Hatron PY, Kaminsky PPulmonary hypertension subtypes associated with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: Haemodynamic profiles and survival probability. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0184227. doi:. PubMed

108 Grapsa J, Gibbs JS, Dawson D, Watson G, Patni R, Athanasiou TMorphologic and functional remodeling of the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension by real time three dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(6):906–13. doi:. PubMed

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!