Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Communication challenges in end-of-life decisions

Publication Date: 18.09.2020
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20351

Christoph Beckerab, Katharina Beckb, Alessia Vincentb, Sabina Hunzikerb

a Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

b Medical Communication and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland


With the progress in healthcare over recent decades and a growing life expectancy, discussions and decisions regarding end-of-life issues have become increasingly important. Especially in intensive care and emergency medicine there is a growing need of decision making for optimised end-of-life care. Prolonging life and preventing death is considered to be the highest principle of healthcare professionals; however, in some cases alleviation of suffering is a more appropriate goal. This article discusses communication challenges in end-of-life decision making and outlines strategies from an area of growing interest and research.

Keywords: end-of-life, medical futility, advance care planning, breaking bad news


With the progress in healthcare over recent decades and a growing life expectancy, discussions and decisions regarding end-of-life (EOL) issues have become increasingly important. Especially in intensive care and emergency medicine there is a growing need of decision making for optimised EOL care [1].

Prolonging life and preventing death is considered to be the highest principle of healthcare professionals, however, in some cases alleviation of suffering is a more appropriate goal.

This article discusses communication challenges in EOL decision making and outlines strategies from an area of growing interest and research.

Discussion of end-of-life aspects with patients – with good communication skills

To assess patients’ goals of care and establish a corresponding treatment, discussions with patients or their caregivers are essential. Still, in many patients with palliative diseases (e.g., metastatic cancer or neurodegenerative disorders), in which the relief of suffering is the primary goal of care, EOL discussions do not occur [2, 3]. The reasons for this are manifold. First, communication in the EOL setting is often perceived as a challenge as physicians frequently have to talk about conditions for which prognoses or outcome are uncertain [4]. Difficulties may arise if patients’ understanding of the disease is unrealistic or confidence in treatment is too optimistic [5, 6].

Another barrier which hampers EOL discussions is the physician’s concern about a negative impact on patients’ or caregivers’ emotional well-being, such as giving up hope [7]. However, studies have shown that addressing patients’ preferences and goals of care in EOL discussions are associated with greater satisfaction with communication and decision making [2]. Also, talking about prognosis and death is not necessarily perceived as stressful [2, 8]. A lack of communication skills constitutes a barrier for EOL conversations, with many physicians feeling unprepared or inexperienced [9, 10]. Communication training for physicians is often inadequate or simply not available [11, 12].

Especially in intensive care unit (ICU) or emergency settings, EOL discussions are often in conflict with busy daily routine and time constraints, impeding the chance to discuss patients’ values and needs [1316]. A recent study from Basel found that treating physicians significantly altered patient choices regarding their preferred care in the case of a cardiac arrest, raising the question of patient autonomy [17].

Breaking bad news (BBN) to a patient or patient’s relatives represents an important but challenging task for physicians. It may change a patient’s life and view of their future, as bad news in EOL situations is most often the disclosure of incurable diseases, palliative treatment or the fact that patients may not return to their life at home but require advanced care.

To convey the bad news, healthcare professionals should make arrangements such as choosing an appropriate room or the avoidance of interruptions. Research has shown that patients prefer to receive bad news in person with enough time for questions [18]. The request for the optimal amount of information however may vary by age, health literacy or among different cultures. Hence, it is important for BBN discussions to ascertain patients’ individual preferences. Proficient delivery with the help of specific communication strategies such as BAD can reduce patients’ or relatives’ burden. BAD is an acronym, standing for “Break bad news”, “Acknowledge the reaction” and “Discuss the near future”. Developed in the area of oncology research alongside SPIKES (Setting up the interview, Assessing the patient’s perception, Obtaining the patient’s invitation, Giving knowledge and information to the patient, Addressing the patient’s emotions with empathic responses, Strategy and summary) [19], BAD is regarded as one of the most established communication strategies for BBN today. Table 1 illustrates the different steps of the BAD strategy.

Table 1

BAD and NURSE communication strategies for the disclosure of bad news.

Break bad news
Do I have all the necessary information? (e.g., medical results, circumstances in which the patient was brought to hospital)
What kind of information does the patient already have (e.g., already informed about diagnoses? Does the patient know the purpose of the conversation?)
Announcement of bad news with a “warning shot” (e.g., "I am afraid, I do not have good news for you…” or “I am sorry, but I have to inform you…”)
KISS – “Keep it short and simple”, concise wording of news (e.g., “we have found malignant cells in your biopsy, which means that you have cancer”; “your father has died”)
Acknowledge the reaction
Wait (at least three seconds; maintain eye contact)
Address patient’s emotions (NURSE, see below)
Avoid premature reassurance (e.g., “everything is going to be okay”)
Respond to patient’s questions
Discuss the near future
Give information that the patient requires now
What are the concrete next steps?
Amend bad news with good news (if possible)
Make follow-up appointment
Naming (e.g., “this must come as a shock…”, “I have the impression that…”)
Understanding (e.g., "this is absolutely understandable…", "I have no idea, how sad this must be for you")
Respecting (e.g., “I admire that you are so active despite your illness”)
Supporting (e.g., “Do you need any information/help?”, "here is my phone number, in case you have further questions”)
Exploring (e.g., “I wonder what you are thinking about...”, “would you like to tell me what you are thinking about…?”)

The BAD strategy, as well as SPIKES, focusses on patients’ emotions evoked by the bad news. To address these emotions, physicians may use patient-centred communication techniques summarised in the acronym NURSE (naming, understanding, respecting, supporting and exploring). During BBN, naming and/or mirroring patients’ emotions as well as understanding statements are especially helpful tools to show compassion towards the patient (table 1). Research has shown that in BBN conversations emotional opportunities are often missed [20]. However, addressing emotions may improve patients’ or relatives’ long-term adjustment to the bad news and its consequences.

Although sometimes done with good intentions, physicians should avoid premature reassurances (e.g., “It is not that bad…”, “Everything is going to be fine”) [21, 22]. First, if patients’ emotions are not addressed adequately, premature reassurance may be perceived by patients as not respecting their worries and fears. Also, the prognosis of a patient’s disease is sometimes difficult to predict and, thus, “premature reassurance” can be perceived as misleading information in the event of deterioration.

At the end of a BBN conversation, physicians should inform the patient or relative about the next steps. Often, it is advisable to make a follow-up appointment to discuss more detailed treatment plans, as patients’ capacity to absorb information is limited after the disclosure of bad news.

Over past decades, the use of intensive care at the end of life has increased steadily. Especially in the case of EOL decisions, such as withdrawal of therapy, relatives experience a high amount of psychological stress, which can affect their well-being. Studies report that up to two third of relatives of patients dying in the ICU show psychological sequelae such as depression, anxiety, complicated grief or post-traumatic stress disorder [2327].

A study by Lautrette et al. has shown that proactive communication can reduce the risk of developing depression or symptoms of a post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of ICU patients [28]. The study used a structured communication strategy summarised by the mnemonic VALUE (table 2). This strategy recommends to value and appreciate statements of family members, acknowledge their emotions, as well as to listen and ask questions to understand who the patient was as a person. These steps help the physician to adopt an empathic attitude and to build rapport with the family members during an EOL discussion. Eliciting questions enables physicians to engage family members in the discussion, help them to voice concerns and clear up misconceptions.

Table 2

The VALUE communication strategy.

Value and appreciate family statements
Acknowledge family emotions
Listen to the family and ask questions
Understand patient as a person
Elicit family questions

Adapted from Curtis [29, 30]

The VALUE communication strategy led to EOL conversations in which caregivers had more opportunities to voice concerns and emotions. Also, caregivers were more likely to agree to realistic goals of care, experienced less decisional conflict and, most importantly, experienced less psychological burden.

In conclusion, with a growing need of EOL care, communication with dying patients or their relatives will become increasingly important as a core competence for all caregivers. Today, most people die in hospitals even though the majority of patients would prefer to spend their final days at home [31]. This highlights the need for training in communication skills in EOL settings to help explore and respect patients’ preferences in these crucial situations and to make medically meaningful but also patient-centred decisions.

Advance care planning

Patient autonomy and participation in EOL decision-making are valued as high quality of care [32]. Therefore, the awareness of patients’ preferences regarding future medical treatments should be a central element of care for patients, especially in patients with advanced illness. A timely initiation of advance care planning (ACP) gives patients the opportunity to receive their preferred care early on [33]. General practitioners are often in the unique position of having a long-term relationship with their patients and relatives, which constitute a good basis for the early start of ACP [34]. Still, the occurrence of ACP in the general practice setting remains low [35, 36].

If a patient’s preference is unknown or a patient is not able to express his or her treatment preference, the patient’s next of kin often act as surrogate decision-makers, potentially increasing their emotional burden.

Advanced directives (AD), as a set of instructions, may convey a patient’s wishes to family members and/or healthcare professionals [37]. ADs may also designate a patient’s next of kin as surrogate decision-makers in case the patient is incapacitated. Recent surveys showed that about 28% of the Swiss population above 55 years of age had completed an AD [3, 38]. However, many advanced directives only focus on specific intensive care treatments such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation or intubation, and do not properly address other components of care. Also, ADs often do not provide enough clarity about the goals of care, limiting their usability in clinical settings [39, 40]. ACP was originally developed to overcome such shortcomings by allowing patients to state preferences of care and to document potential treatment plans pre-emptively [33, 41].

Literature has shown that ACP not only improves care towards the end of life, but also reduces stress and depression in surviving relatives and helps physicians make end-of-life decisions in accordance with patients’ preferences [33]. Over past years, different treatment plans have emerged, such as Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POLST), Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOLST) or Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT), which combine discussions about resuscitation with other goals of emergency care [42, 43].

To facilitate such ACP discussions, physicians may use decision aids. Decision aids are tools that illustrate medical information and provide a better understanding for lay people. Patients with a low health literacy and difficulties in processing medical information especially benefit from these interventions, enabling them to participate in the decision-making regarding their own care. Recent research has shown that decision aids increase patient knowledge and reduce patients’ decisional conflicts, as patients show higher clarity about which goals of care are the most important to them [44, 45]. For example, videos explaining the nature and outcome of cardiac arrests have been used to increase patient knowledge and were associated with patients preferences towards less invasive treatments in the event of clinical deterioration [46]. A variety of other examples of decision aids are listed in the decision aid inventory of the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Table 3 presents a selection of decision aids targeting end-of-life decisions.

Table 3

Collection of decision aids for end-of-life decisions.

TitleAuthor/developerYearHealth condition / topicTypeContentLanguageLink
A Decision Aid to Prepare Patients and Their Families For Shared Decision-Making About Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)Jennifer Kryworuchko2012Cardiopulmonary resuscitationVideoVideo explaining cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its prognosisEnglish
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a decision aid for patients and their familiesChris Frank2009Cardiopulmonary resuscitationWritten materialGiving information about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation / life support and its outcome
giving information regarding advanced directives
Advance Care Planning: Should I Receive CPR
and Life Support?
Healthwise2016Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
End of life issues
Written materialGiving information about cardiopulmonary resuscitation / life support and its outcome
giving information regarding DNR orders
Autopsy: Should I have an autopsy done on my loved one?Healthwise2016Autopsy of next of kin after deathWritten materialGiving information about autopsy (indications and considerations)English
Understanding the Options: Planning care for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit.Jennifer Kryworuchko2015Life prolonging / palliative careWritten materialInformation/considerations about life prolonging / palliative care; scaling questions to determine patient's preferences and goals of careEnglish
Advance Care Planning: Should I stop treatment that prolongs my life?Healthwise2016Life prolonging / palliative careWritten materialGiving information about life prolonging and palliative care, considerationsEnglish
Advance Care Planning: Should I have artificial
hydration and nutrition
Healthwise2016Artificial Hydration and NutritionWritten materialGiving information regarding hydration/ nutrition
explaining advantages and disadvantages of artificial hydration/nutrition
Advance Care Planning: Should I stop kidney dialysis?Healthwise2016Chronic kidney failure / DialysisWritten materialGiving information about dialysis, explaining advantages/disadvantages of stopping dialysisEnglish
Kidney Failure: Should I Start Dialysis?Healthwise2016Chronic kidney failure / dialysisWritten materialGiving information about chronic kidney failure and dialysisEnglish
Breathing with a Ventilator: Stop or Stay On?EBSCO Health2019Patients dependent on a ventilatorWritten materialInformation about staying or removing from a ventilator (advantages and risks)English
When you need extra care, should you receive it at home or in a facility?Mary Ann Murray2010Patients dependent on careWritten materialInformation about care at home vs. in a facility; scaling questions to determine patient's preferencesEnglish
Prepare for your careThe Regents of the University of California2020Advance directiveWebsiteInteractive website offering information regarding end-of-life decision makingEnglish 
Entscheidungshilfe Herz-Lungen-WiederbelebungAdvance care planning medizinisch begleitet ®2017Cardiopulmonary resuscitationWritten materialInformation about cardiac arrest / cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cates plot illustrating risk of death / hypoxic encephalopathyGerman
DNR = do-not-resuscitate

Medical futility

As a result of a considerable increase in medical interventions available to patients over past decades, physicians regularly encounter situations in which a treatment is considered medically futile for a specific patient. A recent study on patients in the ICU found that more than 10% of patients received treatment perceived as futile by their treating clinicians [47]. In the context of EOL care, medical futility often refers to interventions that might prolong life, but in which the chance of a benefit for the patient is extremely small and by far outweighed by the potential risks, harms and suffering [4749]. Such situations are challenging for clinicians and the clinical team, who know the potential burden and distress resulting from a futile intervention for patients and relatives [50, 51]. Several factors contribute to the difficulty in decision making in such situations. First, although physicians may agree to the overall concept of medical futility, this concept is difficult to apply in clinical practice, as the clinical course of the illness and the outcome of interventions are sometimes difficult to foresee [5254]. This is particularly true for EOL care. Second, judgment of futility is often based on a clinical impression [50]. This incorporates objective medical data from the patient history and subjective data from patient’s currently perceived and future expected quality of life, as well as potential benefits and harm associated with the treatment [5557]. Interpretation of these different variables may contribute to the ambiguity regarding futility for an individual patient [53, 54]. Disclosing that a specific treatment is considered futile and that EOL should be adapted accordingly can be challenging [56]. Even though patients and physicians may agree on the overall treatment goals, an overestimation of the chance of positive outcomes due to misconceptions and lack of knowledge on the patients’ side contributes to difficulties in reaching consensus on a specific treatment.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrests is one of the treatments in which medical futility is important to consider [58]. CPR was originally developed to resuscitate healthy patients who suffered from a sudden cardiac arrest. Nowadays, however, CPR is commonly offered to all patients as an intervention, regardless of the underlying reason for the cardiac arrest. Prognosis of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is poor, with a survival rate of less than 20% [59]. Further, many ÌHCA survivors are dependent on long-term care or suffer from permanent brain injury after CPR [60]. For about two decades, the Pre-arrest Morbidity (PAM) index [61] and Prognosis after Resuscitation (PAR) score [62] were the most commonly used clinical risk scores to evaluate prognosis after CPR for IHCA. Although these scores did show sufficient validity in several studies [58, 61, 63], optimal cut-off values differed depending on clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the respective patient population [64]. Recently, the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score has been developed and validated in large samples of patients [6569]. Also, a modified version has been proposed: The Prediction of Outcome for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (PIHCA) score [70]. These scores incorporate clinical conditions that are associated with poor outcome such as metastatic cancer, advanced renal failure or sepsis. The authors developed a multivariate prediction model based on a meta-analysis including patients who suffered from an in-hospital cardiac arrest and calculated cut-off scores suggesting the chance of neurologically intact survival, such as “very low” (0.9% of patients have a good neurological outcome), “low” (1.7%), “average” (9.4%) and “above average” (27.5%) (the GO-FAR score can be accessed under For patients with a very low and low chance of functional survival CPR attempts may be considered futile [48].

Both scores show promising predictive values regarding implementation in clinical practice.

Especially in cases of uncertainty, these clinical risk scores may be a useful additional tool for physicians to assess medical futility, foster decision making in EOL, and to facilitate conversations with patients and their next of kin. This could further support patients and their next of kin in making informed EOL decisions aligned with their personal values and treatment goals.


With an aging society, decision making and adequate communication in EOL decisions are becoming increasingly important. Incorporating individuals’ needs and preferences is crucial. Although there are potential barriers to conducting EOL discussions, it is worth taking the time and effort to optimise EOL conversations. Proactive communication can not only ease patients’ and relatives’ psychological burden but can also prevent them from developing long-term mental health issues.

Disclosure statement

No financial support and no other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


Header image: © Navee Sangvitoon |


Christoph Becker, MD, Emergency Department and Medical Communication and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, christoph.becker[at]


1 Etkind SN, Bone AE, Gomes B, Lovell N, Evans CJ, Higginson IJ, et al.How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):102. doi:. PubMed

2 You JJ, Dodek P, Lamontagne F, Downar J, Sinuff T, Jiang X, et al.; ACCEPT Study Team and the Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET). What really matters in end-of-life discussions? Perspectives of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families. CMAJ. 2014;186(18):E679–87. doi:. PubMed

3 Becker C, Künzli N, Perrig S, Beck K, Vincent A, Widmer M, et al.Code status discussions in medical inpatients: results of a survey of patients and physicians. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20194. PubMed

4 Krawczyk M, Gallagher R. Communicating prognostic uncertainty in potential end-of-life contexts: experiences of family members. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15(1):59. doi:. PubMed

5 Jones GK, Brewer KL, Garrison HG. Public expectations of survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(1):48–53. doi:. PubMed

6 Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D, et al.Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1709–14. doi:. PubMed

7 Hancock K, Clayton JM, Parker SM, Wal der S, Butow PN, Carrick S, et al.Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2007;21(6):507–17. doi:. PubMed

8 Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Wolfe P, Emanuel LL. Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: is it stressful? Is it helpful?Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(18):1999–2004. doi:. PubMed

9 Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al.; The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(S1, Suppl):S187–93. doi:. PubMed

10 Tulsky JA, Fischer GS, Rose MR, Arnold RM. Opening the black box: how do physicians communicate about advance directives?Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(6):441–9. doi:. PubMed

11 Walczak A, Butow PN, Bu S, Clayton JM. A systematic review of evidence for end-of-life communication interventions: Who do they target, how are they structured and do they work?Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(1):3–16. Published online September 26, 2015. doi:. PubMed

12 Cegala DJ, Lenzmeier Broz S. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1004–16. doi:. PubMed

13 Visser M, Deliens L, Houttekier D. Physician-related barriers to communication and patient- and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):604. doi:. PubMed

14 Knauft E, Nielsen EL, Engelberg RA, Patrick DL, Curtis JR. Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD. Chest. 2005;127(6):2188–96. doi:. PubMed

15 Momen NC, Barclay SI. Addressing ‘the elephant on the table’: barriers to end of life care conversations in heart failure - a literature review and narrative synthesis. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011;5(4):312–6. doi:. PubMed

16 Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(11):1877–82. doi:. PubMed

17 Siegrist V, Eken C, Nickel CH, Mata R, Hertwig R, Bingisser R. End-of-life decisions in emergency patients: prevalence, outcome and physician effect. QJM. 2018;111(8):549–54. doi:. PubMed

18 Figg WD, Smith EK, Price DK, English BC, Thurman PW, Steinberg SM, et al.Disclosing a diagnosis of cancer: where and how does it occur?J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(22):3630–5. doi:. PubMed

19 Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302–11. doi:. PubMed

20 Pollak KI, Arnold RM, Jeffreys AS, Alexander SC, Olsen MK, Abernethy AP, et al.Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(36):5748–52. doi:. PubMed

21 Razavi D, Merckaert I, Marchal S, Libert Y, Conradt S, Boniver J, et al.How to optimize physicians’ communication skills in cancer care: results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(16):3141–9. doi:. PubMed

22 Giroldi E, Veldhuijzen W, Leijten C, Welter D, van der Weijden T, Muris J, et al.‘No need to worry’: an exploration of general practitioners’ reassuring strategies. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):133. doi:. PubMed

23 Metzger K, Gamp M, Tondorf T, Hochstrasser S, Becker C, Luescher T, et al.Depression and anxiety in relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Results of a prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2019;51:57–63. doi:. PubMed

24 Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P, et al.; French FAMIREA Group. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(10):1893–7. doi:. PubMed

25 Kentish-Barnes N, Chaize M, Seegers V, Legriel S, Cariou A, Jaber S, et al.Complicated grief after death of a relative in the intensive care unit. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(5):1341–52. doi:. PubMed

26 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, et al.; FAMIREA Study Group. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(9):987–94. doi:. PubMed

27 Zimmerli M, Tisljar K, Balestra GM, Langewitz W, Marsch S, Hunziker S. Prevalence and risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder in relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):801–8. doi:. PubMed

28 Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al.A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–78. doi:. PubMed

29 Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Rubenfeld GD. The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2, Suppl):N26–33. doi:. PubMed

30 Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(8):844–9. doi:. PubMed

31 Sykes N. End of life issues. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(8):1157–62. doi:. PubMed

32 Gauthier DM, Swigart VA. The contextual nature of decision making near the end of life: hospice patients’ perspectives. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20(2):121–8. doi:. PubMed

33 Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340(mar23 1):c1345. doi:. PubMed

34 Michiels E, Deschepper R, Van Der Kelen G, Bernheim JL, Mortier F, Vander Stichele R, et al.The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin. Palliat Med. 2007;21(5):409–15. doi:. PubMed

35 Ramsaroop SD, Reid MC, Adelman RD. Completing an advance directive in the primary care setting: what do we need for success?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):277–83. doi:. PubMed

36 Tung EE, North F. Advance care planning in the primary care setting: a comparison of attending staff and resident barriers. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26(6):456–63. doi:. PubMed

37 Emanuel LL. Advance directives. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59(1):187–98. doi:. PubMed

38 Vilpert S, Borrat-Besson C, Maurer J, Borasio GD. Awareness, approval and completion of advance directives in older adults in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14642. doi:. PubMed

39 Holley JL, Hines SC, Glover JJ, Babrow AS, Badzek LA, Moss AH. Failure of advance care planning to elicit patients’ preferences for withdrawal from dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33(4):688–93. doi:. PubMed

40 Teno JM, Licks S, Lynn J, Wenger N, Connors AF, Phillips RS, et al.; Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(4):508–12. doi:. PubMed

41 Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2014;28(8):1000–25. doi:. PubMed

42 Fromme EK, Zive D, Schmidt TA, Olszewski E, Tolle SW. POLST Registry do-not-resuscitate orders and other patient treatment preferences. JAMA. 2012;307(1):34–5. doi:. PubMed

43 Field RA, Fritz Z, Baker A, Grove A, Perkins GD. Systematic review of interventions to improve appropriate use and outcomes associated with do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions. Resuscitation. 2014;85(11):1418–31. doi:. PubMed

44 Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al.Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431. doi:. PubMed

45 Butler M, Ratner E, McCreedy E, Shippee N, Kane RL. Decision aids for advance care planning: an overview of the state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(6):408–18. doi:. PubMed

46 Becker C, Lecheler L, Hochstrasser S, Metzger KA, Widmer M, Thommen EB, et al.Association of Communication Interventions to Discuss Code Status With Patient Decisions for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e195033. doi:. PubMed

47 Huynh TN, Kleerup EC, Wiley JF, Savitsky TD, Guse D, Garber BJ, et al.The frequency and cost of treatment perceived to be futile in critical care. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1887–94. doi:. PubMed

48 Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(12):949–54. doi:. PubMed

49 Barjaktarevic I, Bobe L, Klapholz A, Dinan W. Multiple Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Attempts in a Community Hospital: Evaluation of the Futility Assessment. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32(5):504–9. doi:. PubMed

50 Perkins GD, Griffiths F, Slowther AM, George R, Fritz Z, Satherley P, et al. Do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions: an evidence synthesis. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016.

51 Truog RD, White DB. Futile treatments in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1894–5. doi:. PubMed

52 Simon JR, Kraus C, Rosenberg M, Wang DH, Clayborne EP, Derse AR. “Futile Care”-An Emergency Medicine Approach: Ethical and Legal Considerations. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(5):707–13. doi:. PubMed

53 Curtis JR, Park DR, Krone MR, Pearlman RA. Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA. 1995;273(2):124–8. doi:. PubMed

54 Truog RD, Brett AS, Frader J. The problem with futility. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(23):1560–4. doi:. PubMed

55 Saltbaek L, Michelsen HM, Nelausen KM, Gut R, Nielsen DL. Old age and poor prognosis increase the likelihood of disagreement between cancer patients and their oncologists on the indication for resuscitation attempt. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(12):3363–70. doi:. PubMed

56 Osinski A, Vreugdenhil G, de Koning J, van der Hoeven JG. Do-not-resuscitate orders in cancer patients: a review of literature. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(2):677–85. doi:. PubMed

57 Reisfield GM, Wallace SK, Munsell MF, Webb FJ, Alvarez ER, Wilson GR. Survival in cancer patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2006;71(2):152–60. doi:. PubMed

58 Ebell MH, Afonso AM. Pre-arrest predictors of failure to survive after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2011;28(5):505–15. doi:. PubMed

59 Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, Li Y, Krumholz HM, Chan PS; American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1912–20. doi:. PubMed

60 Young GB. Clinical practice. Neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(6):605–11. doi:. PubMed

61 George AL, Folk BP, Crecelius PL, Campbell WB. Pre-arrest morbidity and other correlates of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Am J Med. 1989;87(1):28–34. doi:. PubMed

62 Ebell MH. Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(5):551–8. PubMed

63 Bowker L, Stewart K. Predicting unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of three morbidity scores. Resuscitation. 1999;40(2):89–95. doi:. PubMed

64 O’Keeffe S, Ebell MH. Prediction of failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of two predictive instruments. Resuscitation. 1994;28(1):21–5. doi:. PubMed

65 Piscator E, Göransson K, Bruchfeld S, Hammar U, El Gharbi S, Ebell M, et al.Predicting neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest-external validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation score. Resuscitation. 2018;128:63–9. doi:. PubMed

66 Ebell MH, Jang W, Shen Y, Geocadin RG; Get With the Guidelines–Resuscitation Investigators. Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1872–8. doi:. PubMed

67 Thai TN, Ebell MH. Prospective validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score for in-hospital cardiac arrest prognosis. Resuscitation. 2019;140:2–8. doi:. PubMed

68 Rubins JB, Kinzie SD, Rubins DM. Predicting Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Retrospective US Validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation Score. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2530–5. doi:. PubMed

69 Ohlsson MA, Kennedy LM, Ebell MH, Juhlin T, Melander O. Validation of the good outcome following attempted resuscitation score on in-hospital cardiac arrest in southern Sweden. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:294–7. doi:. PubMed

70 Piscator E, Göransson K, Forsberg S, Bottai M, Ebell M, Herlitz J, et al.Prearrest prediction of favourable neurological survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: The Prediction of outcome for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (PIHCA) score. Resuscitation. 2019;143:92–9. doi:. PubMed

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!