Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Viewpoint

Vol. 148 No. 0304 (2018)

Availability and accessibility of perinatal data for the Robson classification of caesarean sections in Switzerland

  • Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin
  • Thomas H. Hess
  • Rebekka Erdin
  • Elke Prentl
  • Jessica Pehlke-Milde
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14578
Cite this as:
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14578
Published
16.01.2018

References

  1. EUROPERISTAT. European Perinatal Health Report, Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in 2010. 2013. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR2010_w_disclaimer.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  2. Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004
  3. Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2016;123(5):745–53. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13592
  4. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6
  5. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al.; WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819–29. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7
  6. Radin RG, Mikkelsen EM, Rothman KJ, Hatch EE, Sorensen HT, Riis AH, et al. Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability. Epidemiology. 2016;27(6):889–93. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000553
  7. Stokholm J, Thorsen J, Chawes BL, Schjørring S, Krogfelt KA, Bønnelykke K, et al. Cesarean section changes neonatal gut colonization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(3):881–889.e2. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.028
  8. Sevelsted A, Stokholm J, Bønnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e92–8. doi:.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0596
  9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schweizer Frauenkliniken. Erfassungsbogen ASF-Statistik. http://www.sevisa.ch/files/2714/8230/7839/Bogen_D.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  10. Hess TH. Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten und Voraussetzungen von der Statistik zum Qualitätssicherungsinstrument am Beispiel der ASF-Statistik der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. 2008. https://www.ksw.ch/Portaldata/1/Resources/FRA/Dokumente/Masterarbeit_ASF-Statistik_Dr._med._Th._Hess.pdf. (Updated June 2017).
  11. Mueller M, Kolly L, Bauman M, Imboden S, Surbek D. Analysis of caesarean section rates over time in a single Swiss centre using a ten-group classification system. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13921. doi:.https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.13921

Most read articles by the same author(s)