Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Prions, prionoid complexes and amyloids: the bad, the good and something in between

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2017.14424
Publication Date: 18.04.2017
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14424

Hafner-Bratkovič Ivaab

a Department of Synthetic Biology and Immunology, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia

b EN-FIST Centre of Excellence, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Summary

Prions are infectious agents causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in humans and animals. These protein-based particles template conformational changes in a host-encoded prion protein to an insoluble self-like conformation. Prions are also present in yeast, where they support protein-based epigenetic inheritance. There is emerging evidence that prion-like (prionoid) particles can support a variety of pathological and beneficial functions. The recent data on the prionoid spread of other pathological amyloids are discussed in light of differences between prions and prion-like aggregates. On the other hand, prion-like action has also been found to support important functions such as memory, and amyloids were shown to have a variety of physiological roles from storage to scaffolding in simple organisms and in humans. Higher-order protein complexes play important roles in signalling. Many death-fold domains can polymerise upon nucleation to enhance sensitivity and induce a robust response. Although these polymers are structurally different from amyloids, some of them are characterised by prionoid activities, such as intercellular spread. The initial activation of these complexes is vital for organismal health, whereas prolonged activation leading to unresolved inflammation underlies autoinflammatory and other diseases. Prionoid complexes play important roles far beyond prion diseases and neurodegeneration.

Keywords: prion, amyloid, prion-like, prionoid, functional amyloid, inflammasome, signalosome, ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD), MAVS, nucleated polymerisation

Abbreviations

AIM2: cytosolic DNA sensor absent in melanoma 2

ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

ASC: apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD

CARD: caspase activation and recruitment domain

CJD: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

CPEB: cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein

Csg: curli-specific genes

DAMP: danger-associated molecular pattern

Hsp: heat shock protein

MAVS: mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein

MDA-5: melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5

NAIP: nucleotide-binding domain-containing inhibitor of apoptosis protein

NBD: nucleotide binding domain

NLR: nucleotide-binding domain- and leucine-rich repeat domain-containing receptor

NLRC4: NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 4

PAMP: pathogen-associated molecular pattern

PLD: prion-like domain

PrP: prion protein

PrPc: cellular prion protein

PrPSc: prion protein scrapie

PYD: pyrin domain

RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible gene I

RIP: receptor-interacting protein kinase

TSE: transmissible spongiform encephalopathy

For glossary: see appendix

Introduction

Organisms and cells depend on the correct folding of proteins into their native structure. Some proteins can adopt alternative, non-native conformations, which can obstruct normal cell function. Pathological conditions that arise from protein misfolding into insoluble amyloid deposits are called amyloidoses [1]. In vivo amyloids are characterised as extracellular fibrillary deposits and show green birefringence upon Congo red binding [2]. Although there are fewer than 25 proteins and peptides that form pathological amyloid in vivo [3], many proteins and peptides can form amyloid fibrils under appropriate conditions in vitro [4]. Isolated amyloid fibrils are monitored by transmission electron microscopy (fig. 1A) and have a cross-β-sheet core, which displays a characteristic diffraction pattern [8]. Amyloid fibrils are also characterised by a predominantly β-sheet secondary structure and bind specific dyes (fig. 1A). Enormous effort has been put into determining the atomistic details of the cross-β spine, which was challenging even for short amyloid-forming peptides [3, 913]. An amyloid spine is composed of in-register parallel or antiparallel β-sheets (fig. 1B), stabilised by hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, making amyloid assembly static and irreversible [14]. Amyloid formation follows typical sigmoidal growth kinetics, which is a characteristic of nucleated self-assembly reactions [15, 16] (fig. 1C). The microscopic events defining amyloid fibrillisation are primary nucleation, elongation (growth of (proto)fibrils by the addition of monomers), and the formation of new nuclei, which can occur through the fragmentation of existing polymers or through monomer-dependent secondary nucleation [15] (fig. 1D). In fact, these processes are already present in the lag phase [16], which can be shortened by the addition of preformed amyloid seeds (fig. 1C).

fullscreen
Figure 1
Characteristics of amyloid structure and polymerisation. (A) Amyloid fibrils (fibrils prepared from recombinant prion protein are shown, bar represents 500 nm) can be identified by transmission electron microscopy. Amyloids also have a characteristic X-ray diffraction pattern, bind amyloid-selective dyes and have a high content of β-sheet secondary structure, as determined by circular dichroism (CD) or Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). (B) Examples of amyloid structure (Aβ(1-42), fibril structure (PDB: 2MXU [5],), and HET-s (218-289) structure (PDB: 2KJ3 [6],) determined by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Structural images were generated by use of UCSF Chimera [7]. (C) The kinetics of amyloid formation follow a typical sigmoidal curve (blue). The addition of preformed seeds shortens the lag phase (red curve). (D) A schematic representation of amyloid fibril formation. Misfolded proteins form a nucleus, which is able to capture and transform monomers. In the process of elongation, intermediate structures such as oligomers and protofibrils are formed, which further grow to mature fibrils. Mature fibrils are either spontaneously or enzymatically disintegrated, providing further perpetuation of amyloid formation.

In the past, amyloids had a fairly poor reputation in connection with neurodegenerative diseases and systemic amyloidoses. A special place among amyloids is reserved for prions, which are protein-based infectious particles, either causing prion diseases or being connected to epigenetic inheritance in unicellular organisms. Several amyloids were shown to have a prion-like (prionoid) phenotype, and to spread among cells and seed aggregates when injected into animals, but transmissibility was not demonstrated. However, knowledge on functional amyloids is also emerging. In recent years, many prionoid amyloid and non-amyloid assemblies were observed to be important for vital processes throughout the tree of life. In this review, prions and disease-related amyloids will briefly be summarised in order to introduce the concept of prions and amyloids, with focus on nonpathological prionoid assemblies and amyloids (table 1). I will conclude by introducing the higher-order protein assemblies that are vital for signalling and innate immune responses. It seems likely that protein aggregation represents an ancient mechanism primarily facilitating beneficial functions, which only rarely leads to pathological conditions.

Table 1

A summary of reviewed prions, prionoids and functional amyloids. Note that the review only focuses on the functions of aggregated forms, and some proteins have functions related to their monomeric form. A limited number of references is listed, thus the reader should refer to the text for more information.

  ProteinType; functionReferences
HarmfulNeurodegenerationPrPScPrion; the causative agent of prion disease; prion strains and species barrier; transmissibility[17, 18]
Amyloid βPrionoid; the hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease; cell-to-cell and in vivo spread upon inoculation documented; indications for the presence of the species barrier and strains[1927]
TauPrionoid; tau deposits are the hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease and other taupathies; cell-to-cell and in vivo spread upon inoculation documented; indications for the presence of the species barrier and strains[2831]
α-synucleinPrionoid; α-synuclein deposits are the hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease, Lewy-body dementia, etc.; cell-to-cell and in vivo spread upon inoculation documented; indications for the presence of the species barrier and strains[3236]
Systemic amyloidosisAmyloid APrionoid; serum amyloid A is the hallmark of systemic amyloidosis; potential transmission through ingestion[3739]
BeneficialMemoryCPEBPrionoid; mediates the persistence of memory in Aplysia; acts as prion when heterologously expressed in yeast[4042]
Orb2Prionoid; mediates the maintenance of long-term courtship memory in Drosophila[43, 44]
CPEB3Prionoid; involved in the persistence of hippocampal-based explicit memory in mice; acts as prion when heterologously expressed in yeast[4547]
LuminidependensPrionoid; prion-like domain acts as prion when heterologously expressed in yeast[48]
Structure/storageCurli (CsgA and CsgB)Functional amyloid; Escherichia coli biofilm formation[4955]
TasAFunctional amyloid; Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation[5660]
Silkmoth chorionFunctional amyloid; eggshell formation[61, 62]
Spider silkFunctional amyloid; spider silk formation[6365]
Peptide hormonesFunctional amyloid; storage of peptide hormones in high concentration in membrane-enclosed secretory granules; functional peptide monomers are released in extracellular environment[66]
XveloFunctional amyloid; forms Balbiani bodies in dormant oocytes from Xenopus laevis[67]
DNA replication controlRepAFunctional amyloid oligomer; prevents plasmid replication by handcuffing[6871]
CatalyticPmel17Binding of highly reactive melanogenic precursors and accelerated synthesis of melanin[72]
“In between”Non-Mendelian inheritanceYeast prionsPrions; usually loss-of-function phenotypes, transmitted through mating, cell division or cytoduction; strains widely reported[7378]
SignallingMAVSNon-amyloid helical polymer; acts as prion in yeast; crucial for defence against RNA viruses; linked to autoinflammatory syndromes[79, 80] [8083]
NLRC4Non-amyloid wheel-like structure; crucial in innate immune response against intracellular bacteria; linked to autoinflammatory syndromes[8486]
ASCNon-amyloid helical polymer; acts as prion in yeast; prionoid transfer among cells demonstrated; crucial in the innate immune response; linked to autoinflammatory syndromes[79, 8789]
RIP1/RIP3 necroptosomeFunctional amyloid; drives necroptosis in virus infected cells[90]

Prions and disease-related amyloids

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), or prion diseases, are infectious neurological disorders that affect humans and animals [91, 92]. Prion diseases can have sporadic, transmissible (less than 1%), or genetic occurrence (5–15%) [93]. The latter type arises from mutations in the PRNP gene that encodes the full-length prion protein (PrP), whose recently discovered physiological role is to promote myelin homeostasis by stimulating G protein-coupled receptor Adgrg6 [94]. The transmissibility of prion diseases is well documented. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, affected more than 280 000 cattle. In addition, there is a wealth of evidence that the ingestion of contaminated beef triggered a variant form of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans (more than 200 patients, predominantly in the UK) [93]. There are also almost 500 cases of iatrogenic CJD, in which prion disease was acquired through medical procedures, such as dura mater grafting or treatment with growth hormone extracted from pituitary glands [95]. Carleton Gajdusek earned a Nobel Prize for his investigations of kuru [96], a prion disease that was transmitted through ritualistic cannibalism among the Fore people in Papua New Guinea.

TSEs have all the characteristics of infectious diseases, such as transmissibility, species barriers and the presence of strains, yet the infectious particle was long unidentified. In the 1960s, Griffith proposed a theory that the infectious agent of scrapie (prion disease in sheep) is, in fact, a protein [97]. To isolate scrapie’s infectious agent, the infectivity of brain homogenates was rigorously characterised by the Nobel laureate Stanley Prusiner, who coined the term “prion” to describe infectious agents causing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies as “a small proteinaceous infectious particle that is resistant to inactivation by most procedures that modify nucleic acids” [17]. The laborious work to prove the protein-only hypothesis, however, had only started, and it took almost 30 years for the hypothesis proposing that a protein can be the causative agent of a transmissible disease to be widely accepted. The protein-only hypothesis proposes that the main component of the infectious agent causing TSE is an aberrant conformation of prion protein, PrPSc. PrPSc differs from normal PrPc in the secondary structure, as it is enriched in β-sheets and forms insoluble amyloid aggregates (or oligomers). PrP-deficient mice are resistant to infection [98], demonstrating that host-encoded PrP is exploited as a substrate during a pathological process in which PrPSc imposes conformational changes to a self-like conformation on the PrPc [92, 99].

The structure of PrPSc and the mechanism of PrPc pathological conversion remain elusive, despite many efforts [100]. Many animal models for studying prion disease have been established, in which prion characteristics, such as strains and species barriers, are stably reproduced. Prion strains possibly arise from various architectures of PrPSc [101]. Although the transmissibility of prions has been long established, the final proof for the protein-only hypothesis was much delayed. Legname et al. were the first to show that bacterial misfolded prion protein can induce neurological disease in transgenic mice overexpressing a truncated version of prion protein [102, 103]. Recombinant amyloid fibrils can also induce prion diseases in wild-type animals, although at low efficiency [104]. A technique called protein misfolding cyclic amplification brought a new boost to prion research, as it enabled the amplification of literary undetectable prion seeds using PrPc or recombinant prion protein as a substrate [105107]. This technique enabled the preparation of recombinant bacterially expressed misfolded protease-resistant prion protein that caused transmissible disease in wild-type mice [18]. The first study used RNA isolated from mouse liver as a cofactor, which was replaced later by totally synthetic components, and finally a de novo recombinant prion was produced in a novel facility, never exposed to native prions [108]. We can all appreciate the enormous efforts needed to provide evidence that prion diseases are transmitted through proteinaceous infectious particles. The reader is encouraged to learn more about the history of prion investigations in other reviews [9193].

Are other amyloidoses also transmissible?

The deposition of β-sheet-rich amyloid aggregates is a common hallmark of many amyloidoses. Among these diseases, neurodegenerative diseases are the most prevalent. Above, I briefly introduced the development of the protein-only hypothesis and its verification. The legitimate question arising is whether amyloids in diseases other than TSEs are also prions. There are many features that are shared among prions and prionoid proteins (for reviews, see [109112]): amyloid polymerisation and seeding in vitro (fig. 1C) was demonstrated for α-synuclein, amyloid β (Aβ), tau and some other proteins connected to neurodegenerative diseases. Cell-to-cell transmission is also well documented for amyloid or oligomeric forms of those proteins. The most fascinating feature, although not unexpected, is the in vivo seeding and spreading of aggregates upon intracerebral inoculation. Aβ plaques, but not neurofibrillary tangles, were induced in primates inoculated with homogenates of Alzheimer patients’ brains [1921]. The prion-like behaviour of exogenous aggregates of Aβ [2225] or tau [2830] was also demonstrated after the inoculation of transgenic mice with recombinant in vitro prepared amyloid fibrils. Transgenic and wild-type mice also supported the prion-like spread and seeding of brain or recombinant α-synuclein aggregates [3235]. The information regarding in vivo seeding and the spreading of recombinant amyloids from proteins connected to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is scarce, present only for superoxide dismutase-1 protein [113], but due to emerging developments in the field of ALS, new studies on the transmission of protein aggregates are expected soon (for a review, see [114]).

Prion diseases are characterised by the existence of prion strains and species barriers. Similarly, there are indications for the existence of a variety of Aβ aggregates that manifest in differences in seeded aggregation [25] and neurotoxicity [115]. Inoculation of brain homogenates from different genetic Alzheimer’s disease cases into a mouse model results in distinguishable forms of pathology [26]. Different synthetic Aβ preparations induce distinct changes in the mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [27]. There is also some evidence for the existence of tau [31] and α-synuclein [36] strains, and evidence for ALS-related strains (reviewed in [110]) is emerging.

Whereas prionoid spread and seeding have been observed in animal models, and the evidence for strains and species barrier is emerging for non-TSE neurodegeneration-related amyloid proteins, rigorous evidence for natural donor/host transmission resulting in characteristic diseases is missing. There are, however, some indications for possible infectivity. Two recently published studies reported the presence of Aβ pathology (grey matter or vascular) in 50% of studied growth hormone-originated iatrogenic CJD cases [116] or in 71% of dura mater transplant-originated iatrogenic CJD [117]. On the other hand, the presence of Aβ pathology in sporadic CJD cases was very low, demonstrating that Aβ pathology does not usually co-exist with TSEs. The age of iatrogenic CJD patients was also unusually low for Aβ deposition, and genetic factors predisposing individuals to Aβ pathology-related diseases were excluded. Further analyses of larger numbers of cases are nevertheless needed to draw conclusive assumptions on potential iatrogenically derived Aβ pathology. Interestingly, more evidence for the potential transmission of systemic amyloidosis is already present. Amyloid A seeds were transmitted to mice orally [37] and via the ingestion of foie gras [38], or through the ingestion of the faeces of affected cheetahs [39], suggesting that infectivity leads to a high incidence of AA amyloidosis in captive populations.

Evidence of the experimental transmission of protein aggregates on the cellular and organismal levels is emerging. The major obstacle to recognising other amyloidoses as potentially transmissible is the lack of evidence for natural transmission, despite the fact that non-prion amyloidoses are much more common than prion diseases. Although there are some indications for potential iatrogenic or natural amyloid infection, further studies will estimate whether there is a real threat, or whether prions are unique in their capability to transmit diseases in natural environments.

Yeast prions

For mammalian prions, the term defines proteinaceous infectious agents that transfer infectivity through the promotion of conformational changes in the host-encoded substrate to a self-like pathological conformation. In 1994, Wickner proposed that a similar mechanism might also exist in yeast, where a specific epigenetic inheritance was observed [73]. Prion forms of yeast prion proteins are self-perpetuating amyloid oligomers/aggregates, which are transmitted through mating, cytoduction or cell division. Protein-only infection was also demonstrated by adding amyloid fibrils to prion-free cells. Today, more than 10 different yeast prions are known. Several of them have multiple strains/variants, depend on the fractionation by the heat shock protein Hsp104, and at least some yeast prions are harmful (for a review, see [118, 119]). In most characterised yeast prions, a specific region is the determinant of prion activity. This region is characterised by an enrichment in asparagine or glutamine [120122] and has a low propensity for any particular secondary structure, as determined by various computational algorithms. This domain can exist as a soluble monomer or an ordered aggregate and is probably unnecessary for the normal function of associated domains [123].

Yeast prions are usually recognised via the loss-of-function phenotype, which is dominant and transmitted through mating or to progeny [7476]. The loss of function is achieved through prion-induced conformational changes and the aggregation of particular yeast proteins. One of the most investigated yeast prions is [PSI+], which is the prion form of translational termination factor Sup35. The presence of [PSI+] causes the recruitment and loss of function of Sup35, so translational termination is less efficient at nonsense codons. Because of the premature stop codon in the ade1-14 genes (adenine biosynthesis pathway), non-prion [PSI-] cells are not able to grow without supplemented adenine, and accumulate a red intermediate when grown on complex growth medium. The presence of [PSI+] induces the loss of function of Sup35, causing premature stop codons to be read through; such cells are able to grow without supplemented adenine and are white on complex growth medium (reviewed in [118]). Such tests are also used in Sup35 complementation assays, in which heterologous prion-like domains (PLDs) are placed instead of the Sup35 prion domain [124]. Such assays are particularly important for the screening and identification of new prion-like proteins and also enable different prion strains to be distinguished, for example via different colours of colonies on complex growth medium, where the level of inherently different ratios of prion/non-prion Sup35 results in different shades of pink. Interestingly, the mating of cells propagating different prion variants results in the domination of the more aggregated variant [77, 78].

It is fascinating that yeast prions survived selective pressure for so long, suggesting that they may prove beneficial in certain situations or environmental niches [125]. Whereas most newly identified prion-like proteins are tested for their prion-like activity in yeast, Sup35 or its prion domain also have prionoid behaviour when overexpressed in mammalian cells [126, 127], demonstrating the conservation of this phenomenon throughout kingdoms and evolution.

The prions to remember

How memories are formed and how they are retained for a lifetime, particularly since they are facilitated at a molecular level by relatively short-lived molecules, has been a very challenging problem to address. Studies of the sea slug Aplysia lead by Nobel laureate Eric Kandel and Kausik Si demonstrated that cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein (CPEB) mediates the persistence of memory [40, 41]. CPEB is an RNA-binding protein, and similar proteins can act as translational repressors or activators of target mRNAs [128]. CPEB is upregulated by serotonin and provides the continuous local protein synthesis at activated synapses [129], which is facilitated by CPEB in non-native conformation. CPEB has a glutamine/asparagine-enriched prion-like domain, similar to yeast prions. In yeast, heterologously expressed CPEB exists in two distinct conformations, of which the multimeric form is capable of self-perpetuation and prionoid transmission [41]. Later it was shown that in naïve synapses, CPEB is monomeric. Synaptic activation triggers the conversion of CPEB to a self-sustaining oligomeric state, which marks activated synapses and enables the prolonged translation of target messenger RNAs at affected synapses [42]. CPEB overexpression is controlled by serotonin, inducing the downregulation of miR-22, which has multiple binding sites on CPEB messenger RNA [130].

From Aplysia studies, we now understand that the prion-like self-perpetuation of CPEB marks activated synapses to store long-term memories. It seems that the controlled expression of CPEB and possible other mechanisms enable only the marking and maintenance of triggered synapses; how this is achieved on a molecular level remains to be solved.

More knowledge on how neurones switch on the programme for the persistence of memory and how memory is stabilised has been gained from studies on another model organism, the fruit fly. Orb2 is a Drosophila homologue of CPEB, critical for the maintenance of the long-term courtship memory through a prion-like mechanism [43, 44]. Before the memory is formed, an isoform Orb2B is abundant in neurones, but isoform Orb2A is very unstable, although the isoform Orb2A was shown to be critical for the persistence of memory. Orb2A can be stabilised by the protein Tob (transducer of Erb2). The stability of this complex is regulated by phosphorylation by LIM kinase and dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A. The activation of LIM kinase and protein phosphatase 2A can be regulated in a synapse-specific manner, restricting Orb2 multimerisation to activated synapses [131].

There is substantial evidence that similar mechanisms are employed for long-term memory persistence in mammals. A mouse orthologue CPEB3 was demonstrated to be “a key mediator of the consolidation and persistence of hippocampal-based explicit memory” [45]. Although there are several mammalian CPEB homologues, CPEB3 contains a prion-like domain and exhibits prion-like behaviour in yeast; it forms amyloid and detergent-resistant oligomers and is transmitted to the progeny [46]. Fioritti and colleagues [45] show that CPEB3 is a translational regulator that acts as a repressor in the basal state. Upon stimulation of the hippocampal neurones, CPEB3 is de-SUMOylated (SUMO: small ubiquitin-like modifier), which allows it to switch to an oligomeric state, acting as a regulator of translation in response to learning-related activity [47]. In contrast to invertebrate orthologues, CPEB3 aggregates are not long-lived, but the aggregation is increased upon restimulation of animals [45]. Interestingly, while Kandel’s group studied CPEB3 conditional knockout mice, transgenic mice completely lacking CPEB3 have an improved spatial memory compared with controls [132], suggesting that there are unknown mechanisms that could compensate for the total lack of CPEB3.

Unlike mammalian prions and amyloids connected to neurodegenerative diseases, Aplysia CPEB, Drosophila Orb2, and murine CPEB3 self-perpetuating multimeric forms do not kill cells, but instead harbour important biological functions and may serve as a persistent form of information, which is later discussed also in the context of prionoid assemblies mediating signalling.

Plant prion-like proteins revealed by a bioinformatics screen

As described above, prion-like proteins mediate molecular memories in sea slugs, fruit flies, and mice. Although many prions have been found in yeast, no prion has yet been identified in plants. Plants also form epigenetically founded memories when exposed to stressors such as cold, drought and pathogens [133].

The whole proteome of Arabidopsis was screened with an algorithm detecting prion-like domains [134], revealing almost 500 proteins with PLDs [48]. Half of all proteins involved in the autonomous flowering pathway contain PLDs. These prion-like domains were expressed in yeast to determine whether they can form prion phenotypes. Three domains formed prion-like sodium dodecyl sulphate-resistant oligomers, with the prion-like domain of the luminidependens protein providing a faithful phenotypic switch, and could propagate a spectrum of prion strains, which were maintained through generations. These prions were not dependent on Hsp104, but rather on other heat shock proteins such as Hsp70 and Hsp90. Whether luminidependens exhibits prionoid properties in Arabidopsis and whether this is involved in flowering decisions remains to be elucidated.

Functional amyloids from biofilm formation to securing genetic material

In the previous section, nonpathological amyloids involved in memory demonstrated that prionoid activity can be of vital importance. Amyloids can also perform a variety of functions, from scaffolding and storage to replication control. Such amyloids have been observed in bacteria as well as in humans, demonstrating that amyloid fold is beneficial in certain circumstances.

Microbial amyloids paved the way to recognition of functional amyloid

One of the first pieces of evidence for functional amyloids came from bacteria. In the last decade, microbial amyloids were shown to function in biofilm formation, changing the properties of microbial surfaces and contributing to interaction with host tissue and immune system evasion [135]. Functional microbial amyloids have been found in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, and are reviewed elsewhere [135, 136]. To demonstrate the major differences between functional and pathological amyloid, two examples of extracellular microbial amyloid will be presented here.

Chapman et al. [49] demonstrated that curli pili, which are present on the surface of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, have characteristics of amyloid. In contrast to pathological amyloids, the assembly of curli is not the result of protein misfolding, but rather the orchestrated effort of products encoded on two divergently transcribed operons (seven curli-specific genes, Csgs). The main components of curli amyloid are CsgA and CsgB. CsgA, which is secreted as unstructured protein [50], interacts with cell-surface-associated CsgB to form amyloid [51]. CsgD regulates the expression of csgBAC operon; CsgG makes pores in the outer membrane. This process is facilitated by CsgC. CsgA and CsgB are translocated from the periplasm to the extracellular milieu through CsgG pores [52]. CsgF helps to expose CsgB to the surface and CsgE facilitates the access of CsgA to CsgG pores. Both CsgF and CsgE seem to have chaperone-like functions in the curli assembly [53, 54]. Interestingly, CsgA orthologues from different bacterial species can cross-seed in in vitro fibrillation assay, suggesting that these heterogeneous curli fibres might participate in biofilms produced by various species co-existing in nature [55].

Another well-defined example of a bacterial amyloid is TasA in Bacillus subtilis. TasA has been shown to be involved in biofilm formation [56]. As in the case of E. coli curli amyloids, the formation of B. subtilis biofilm is tightly regulated. Proteins needed for the formation of B. subtilis amyloids are encoded in one operon containing three genes [57]. TasA forms amyloid fibres that are tethered to the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall by TapA [58]. TapA also promotes TasA polymerisation and must be produced by the same cell for extracellular amyloids to be formed. The third protein encoded in the operon is SipW, a signal peptidase cleaving TasA and TapA into mature forms [59]. Additional regulation comes outside this operon. SinR represses the expression of tasA when biofilm formation is not favourable [60].

Another phenomenon connected to functional amyloids involves RepA. RepA (plasmid-encoded initiator protein) is a plasmid-encoded protein responsible for triggering and controlling the plasmid replication of Pseudomonas pPS10. The RepA-WH1 domain fibrillises in vitro, which is accelerated by specific DNA [68] and can be transmitted from mother to daughter cells [69, 70]. RepA controls and inhibits plasmid replication via the mechanism called handcuffing. The replication origins of two DNA molecules are handcuffed via a bridge of RepA amyloid oligomers, which has been detected by the use of amyloid-specific antibodies [71]. The prevention of plasmid over-replication by amyloid RepA represents a novel function in which amyloid complexes are involved and is vital for cells.

The heterologous expression of proteins in bacteria frequently leads to the formation of inclusion bodies that also have the characteristics of amyloid [137], from which it is possible to extract functional proteins; they are not only regarded as products of a safety mechanism avoiding toxicity, but also as potential drug-release systems [138].

Spider silk and silkmoth chorion

Silkmoth chorion is the major component of eggshell and its properties protect the oocyte and developing embryo from the environment. It is composed of low molecular weight proteins, which are able to form amyloid [61]. During amyloid formation, chorion peptides first form nuclei of a liquid crystalline nature, which collapse to form amyloid fibrils. On the molecular level, chorion peptides transform from a left-handed parallel β-helix to an antiparallel β-pleated sheet [62]. Amyloid-like nanofibrils have also been found in the gland of the spider Nephila edulis [63]. Spider silk proteins have been characterised in vitro [64, 65], which opened a perspective field of research and the design of recombinant spider silk [139142] in addition to other amyloid-based materials [143].

Pmel17 amyloid within melanosomes accelerates the covalent polymerisation of reactive small molecules into melanin

The study by Fowler et al. [72] was the first to demonstrate functional amyloid formation in mammals. Pmel17 is trafficked to early melanosomes as a transmembrane protein. Within this compartment, the nonaggregating full-length protein is proteolytically processed, releasing an amyloid-prone fragment Mα, which rapidly polymerises into fibres confined within the melanosome. Mα fibres bind highly reactive melanogenic precursors, accelerate their polymerisation into melanin and inhibit the diffusion of these cytotoxic intermediates across the melanosome membrane. In addition to facilitating melanin biogenesis, Mα fibres also prevent cytotoxicity, which is associated with melanogenic precursors. Fowler and co-workers demonstrated that Mα fibres are amyloid in nature and that melanin synthesis can be facilitated by recombinant Mα fragment amyloids. They also suggested an important difference between functional and pathological amyloid. Recombinant Mα fibrillates at least four orders of magnitude faster than Aβ or α-synuclein in identical conditions [72], suggesting that Mα fibrillisation bypasses the formation of toxic intermediates [144, 145]. Mutant gelsolin is similarly proteolytically cleaved during secretion, leading to the slow deposition of extracellular gelsolin amyloid and gelsolin amyloid disease. Pmel17 amyloid is thus formed quickly to avoid more toxic oligomeric species and confined to a membrane-enclosed container, preventing cell damage that could be caused by mature amyloid.

Peptide hormones stored in amyloid conformation

Hormone-producing cells can store peptide hormones for an extended period of time in membrane-enclosed secretory granules. Maji et al. [66] tested 42 peptide hormones and demonstrated that almost three quarters formed amyloids upon in vitro incubation with glucosaminoglycans. Adrenocorticotrophic hormones, which are derived from the same prohormone and secreted together, formed amyloid only when incubated together and lacked the ability to cross-seed the other partner, suggesting that they formed mixed fibrils [66]. Co-aggregation was also demonstrated for ghrelin and obestatin. This study also showed that functional peptide monomers are released from amyloid aggregates, demonstrating that in this case amyloid formation is not an irreversible process. Although some of the peptides exhibited moderate neurotoxicity in the amyloid state, the authors argue that toxicity could be substantially lower in cells where amyloids are enclosed by membrane. They also demonstrated amyloid-specific staining and characteristics of isolated secretory granules of a mouse pituitary tumour neuroendocrine cell line and from rat pituitary tissue. This study introduced a different view of functional amyloid, showing that cells can pack hormones in high concentration in the form of amyloid fold and wrap amyloid aggregates with membrane to protect against cytotoxicity. Upon the appropriate trigger, these granules are released from cells and functional monomers are released from amyloid.

Balbiani bodies are protected by the amyloid network of Xvelo

The Balbiani body is a non-membrane-surrounded compartment consisting of mitochondria, RNA, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, present in early oocytes. It specifies the germline identity by forming germ plasm in frogs and fish, but its function in mammals is not known [146]. Buckyball protein is the main organiser of zebrafish Balbiani bodies, as the loss of the functional buckyball led to the absence of Balbiani bodies and disrupted oocyte polarity [147, 148]. Recently, Boke et al. [67] isolated Balbiani bodies from Xenopus laevis and analysed their content with quantitative mass spectrometry. They showed that the buckyball orthologue named Xvelo is highly enriched in Balbiani bodies. Balbiani bodies were very stable upon isolation and resisted high ionic strength and temperature disintegration. Moreover, they stained with an amyloid-specific dye, thioflavin T. Xvelo is driven to Balbiani bodies by its N-terminal prion-like domain and makes a structural matrix in which organelles are incorporated. Recombinant Xvelo forms microscale amyloid-like networks in vitro. Boke et al. tested several proteins that have prion-like domains and RNA-binding domains, but only Xvelo and the buckyball targeted Balbiani bodies. The prion-like domains of these two proteins could be exchanged while retaining Balbiani body targeting, further demonstrating the specificity and homology of these two proteins. Full-length Xvelo could form networks and cluster mitochondria in egg extracts, demonstrating the sufficiency of Xvelo for Balbiani body-like assembly. Xvelo did not co-aggregate with other proteins with prion-like domains. Balbiani bodies are present in premature oocytes, whereas they either disappear or disperse into germ plasm in mature oocytes, suggesting that the amyloid network protects RNA and organelles, but can be disintegrated when appropriate. Although for now only buckyball and Xvelo have been demonstrated to be the main structural organisers of Balbiani bodies, they indicate that the amyloid network of a specific natively disordered protein with a prion-like domain could be an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for the protection of germline components in dormant cells.

Prionoid complexes spread (to) signalling and immunity

Prion-like complexes are not rare in processes necessary for normal cell or organism function, such as signalling [149]. Many signalling molecules are modular, where at least one of the domains belongs to the death fold. The death-fold domains are the death domain, death-effector domain, caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD) and pyrin domain (PYD) [150]. This fold is composed of a six-helix bundle and has the tendency to form homotypic interactions and filament-like structures in vitro and in vivo. Those filaments are rich in α-helical secondary structure and do not express amyloid characteristics, yet they have some characteristics of prionoid behaviour. Cai et al. [79] tested domains belonging to different classes of the death fold for their ability to compensate for the yeast prion Sup35NM domain in the white/red screening assay, and showed that several were able to cluster the Sup35 translation termination domain to cause a loss of function. They extensively characterised the prion-like behaviour of the CARD domain of mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein (MAVSCARD) and PYD domain of apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASCPYD), which are described in detail below.

MAVS aggregates promote antiviral signalling

Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs, e.g., RIG-I and MDA5) detect very low amounts of viral RNA molecules to induce a robust antiviral signalling [151]. RIG-I, upon sensing viral RNA, oligomerises with the N-terminal domain, which is composed of tandem CARDs (2CARD). Oligomerised RIG-I recruits protein MAVS via CARD-CARD interaction. Activated MAVS signals to kinases, which activate the transcription factors, nuclear factor-κB and interferon regulatory factor 3 to induce antiviral defence.

Before activation with RIG-I-like receptors, there are multiple interactions between adjacent domains to keep MAVS in the dormant conformation [152]. Viral RNA induces RIG-I 2CARDs to form short filaments [153] or to form a tetramer upon covalent and noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin [151, 154]. RIG-I2CARD tetramer has a helical geometry, where the second CARD of 2CARD continues the helical turn made by the first CARD [154]. The MAVSCARD domains extend the filament formation nucleated by the helical tetramer of RIG-I2CARD [155] (fig. 2A). Upon activation, MAVS (which is tethered to the mitochondrial membrane), forms large rod-like aggregates at the mitochondrial surface [8083] (fig. 2A). Aggregated MAVS is, in fact, the active signalling complex. Mutations that abrogate filament formation also inactivate signalling activity in cells [83, 153, 154]. In vitro, prepared MAVS fibrils are able to induce endogenous MAVS polymerisation in cells, demonstrating their prionoid activity [80]. The MAVSCARD domain has been shown to have the prionoid phenotype in yeast [79].

fullscreen
Figure 2
Innate immunity signalling platforms with a prionoid character. (A) The schematic representation of the assembly of RIG-I-nucleated MAVS filament (left), AIM2-nucleated ASC filament (middle), and NAIP-nucleated NLRC4 oligomer (right). In each case, nucleators are first activated by respective PAMP binding. The scheme of NLRC4 is based on the NLRC4 oligomer structure (PDB: 3JBL [85]). (B) The structure of ASCPYD filament as determined by electron microscopy (PDB: 3J63 [87]) reveals a hollow three-start helical assembly. (C) Upon activation of nucleators, ASC is recruited to perinuclear region to form ASC specks (immunofluorescence-labelled endogenous ASC specks are shown in green and nuclei are depicted in blue, bar represents 10 μm). Upon activation of PYD-containing receptors such as NLRP3 or AIM2, ASC specks are formed by the polymerisation of ASCPYD domains and crosslinking of ASCPYD filaments by ASCCARD domains [156]. Structural images were generated by use of UCSF Chimera [7].
AIM2 = cytosolic DNA sensor absent in melanoma 2; ASC = apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; CARD = caspase activation and recruitment domain; MAVS = mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein; NAIP = nucleotide-binding domain-containing inhibitor of apoptosis protein; NLRC4 = NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 4; PAMP = pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PYD = pyrin domain; RIG-I = retinoic acid-inducible gene I

There are indications that melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) uses oligomer or filament formation slightly different from RIG-I to nucleate MAVS filaments, the mechanisms of which are currently under investigation [157159]. MDA5 gain-of-function mutations are linked to autoinflammatory syndromes [160, 161]. As with other aggregates with substantial chemical stability, there is always a question of the resolution of such complexes and, in this case, antiviral signalling silencing. A recent study reported that MAVS aggregates are tagged for elimination with mitochondrial resident E3 ligase membrane associated ring-CH-type finger 5 (MARCH5), which transfers ubiquitin chains to specific residues of MAVS and labels them for proteasome-mediated degradation [162].

NLRC4 upon activation with NAIP recruits more NLRC4 molecules to support maximal multiplication of the input signal

The nucleotide binding domain- (NBD) and leucine rich repeat domain-containing proteins (NLRs) are a family of cytosolic proteins. Upon sensing either pathogen-associated (PAMPs) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), some of these cytosolic receptors form caspase-activating platforms called inflammasomes. The major function of the canonical inflammasomes is the activation of procaspase-1, which induces pro-interleukin-1β and pro-interleukin-18 cytokine maturation and cleaves gasdermin D [163, 164]. The N-terminal part of gasdermin D forms pores in the membranes [165168], thus inducing pyroptosis, a specific type of inflammatory cell death.

NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 4 (NLRC4) contains a CARD domain that is able to recruit procaspase-1 via its CARD domain directly. NLRC4 responds to cytosolic flagellin and to proteins of the type 3 secretion system (reviewed in [169, 170]). In the absence of triggers, the NLRC4 molecule is present in autoinhibited form, stabilised via multiple interactions between its domains and adenosine diphosphate [171]. In fact, NLRC4 is not the real sensor of PAMPs, which are detected by a family of NBD-domain-containing inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (NAIPs). NLRC4 activation is initiated by respective NAIPs recognising bacterial ligands [172] and structural rearrangement exposing the NAIP nucleating surface. Activated NAIP binds to the NLRC4 receptor surface, which is already exposed in the inactive form. The binding of NAIP to NLRC4 induces structural rearrangement of NLRC4, exposing the nucleating surface of NLRC4, which is capable of recruiting additional NLRC4 molecules, consequently forming wheel-like [84, 85] or spiral [86] structures, in which NAIP is present only at the start (fig. 2A). It is possible that NAIP-induced NLRC4 prion-like oligomerisation into 10- to 12-oligomeric wheel-like structures provides a seed for the oligomerisation of procaspase-1 via the CARD domain, which has also been shown to form filaments in vitro [85, 173]. NLRC4CARD is also able to recruit ASCCARD and induce ASCPYD filament formation [156, 174]. Mutations in NLRC4 cause autoinflammatory syndromes [175, 176].

As in the case of MAVS polymerisation, NLRC4 oligomerisation enables the detection of small amounts of PAMPs present and the amplification of the signal to induce a strong inflammatory response.

ASC specks continue to promote inflammation upon secretion

NLRC4 is not the only NLR that forms inflammasomes. NLRP3, the NLR family protein containing a pyrin domain 3, is able to sense a plethora of DAMPs from adenosine triphosphate [177] and monosodium urate crystals [178] to Aβ aggregates [179] and prion protein fibrils [180]. NLRP3 and other pyrin domain-containing receptors, such as cytosolic DNA sensor absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) [181], recruit adaptor ASC via PYD-PYD interaction, and ASC further uses its CARD domain to catch pro-caspase-1 (fig. 2A). ASCPYD has been identified as a prion domain in the yeast assay [79] and formed filaments in vitro and in mammalian cells upon overexpression [87]. ASC prion-like aggregation has been initiated by the addition of respective receptors NLRP3 and AIM2, which serve as nuclei from which the ASCPYD filament grows [87] (fig. 2A). ASCCARD domains are clustered and initiate the formation of pro-caspase-1CARD short filaments growing out of ASCPYD filament in a star-like pattern in vitro [87]. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of human [87] and mouse [167] ASCPYD filament has been determined, revealing a three-start helical filament (fig. 2B). As in the case of MAVSCARD filament, in the ASC filament the secondary structure is also retained and filaments do not bind amyloid-specific dyes. Mutations that inhibit filament formation also abrogate inflammasome signalling [87]. Upon activation in vivo, ASC is recruited to the perinuclear region into a structure called a speck [182] (fig. 2C). Interestingly, ASC specks also appear upon activation of NLRC4, where NLRC4-mediated pyroptosis is ASC independent [183185], but interleukin-1β maturation is strongly enhanced in the presence of ASC [156, 183]. Yeast-based assay [79], extensive mutagenesis [156] and the use of the ASCCARD-specific single domain antibody fragment [174] have revealed that CARD domains of ASC enable the crosslinking of ASCPYD filaments into ASC specks (fig. 2C), which is necessary for the caspase-1 maturation of cytokines. Yeast and in vitro studies have demonstrated the prion-like characteristics of ASC, but, even more importantly, ASC specks are released from cells and are active in the extracellular space. Released ASC aggregates re-enter phagocytes and are able to induce NLRP3 activation as classical particulate triggers via phagocytosis and lysosomal destabilisation [186], but they are also able to seed and recruit endogenous ASC molecules in the absence of upstream receptors [88, 89]. Moreover, extracellular ASC specks have been found in both mouse models and patients with cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndromes, demonstrating that prionoid behaviour supports overstimulation and the progression of pathology [88, 89]. ASC specks have been found in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with traumatic brain injury [187]. Whereas a neutralising antibody against ASC reduced inflammation in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury [188], anti-ASC antibody opsonised ASC specks, increased engulfment and boosted the proinflammatory response in crystal-induced peritonitis [89], which opens new strategies for intervention with such protein-based particles, for example via neutralising antibodies lacking an Fc region, such as single-domain antibody fragments [174].

RIP1/RIP3 necroptosome is an amyloid-signalling complex

Some viral infections induce programmed necrosis (necroptosis). Li et al. showed that receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIP-1, RIP-3) interact through their RIP homotypic interaction motifs (RHIMs) and form amyloid fibrils in vitro [90]. RIP-1/RIP-3 fibrils are extensively characterised by the binding of amyloid-selective dyes, circular dichroism spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Although isolated RIP-1 or RIP-3 form fibrils, they are irregular and short and the formation is slow. On the other hand, preformed seeds accelerate RIP-1 fibrillation, and selected mutations in either of the complex partners decrease fibril formation. Upon necroptosis induction in cells, RIP-1 and RIP-3 are clustered into punctate-like structures, which are stained with thioflavin T. No thioflavin T labelling has been observed in untreated cells. Mutations that inhibit fibril formation also abolish punctate complexing and kinase activation. Li et al. demonstrated that RIP-1 and RIP-3 form a functional cross-β amyloid signalling complex, which by proximity-induced activation mediates necroptosis [90].

Of the signalling platforms described, only RIP1/RIP3 present with characteristics of amyloids; others are nucleated polymers of molecules that conserve their death fold, but nevertheless exhibit some prionoid characteristics, as discussed below. In fact, there are more examples of such signalling platforms, also called supramolecular organising centres [189], such as CARMA1/Bcl10/MALT1 [190]. These signalling platforms are assembled via nucleated polymerisation, where the nucleator induces the polymerisation of another protein. The major function of the supramolecular organising centres is to amplify a signal that reaches a certain threshold to maximum, which enables an efficient immune response and pathogen clearance [189]. Some of these signalosomes destine the cell to die, which is effective in the case of intracellular pathogens and promotes further induction of the immune system. In humans, these pathways are controlled on transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels to avoid unwanted activation [191]. Mutations in the nucleator proteins, such as NLRP3, NLRC4 or MDA5, cause autoinflammatory syndromes [160, 161, 175, 176, 192]. The fact that functional ASC specks are released from activated cells and induce further signalling in nascent cells, which is a prionoid behaviour, opens questions on how these complexes are disassembled or inactivated when infection has been cleared out. An efficient innate immune response is needed to fight against pathogens, but can exacerbate underlying disease when it responds to DAMPs or when inflammation is perpetuated in a prionoid way.

Conclusion

Higher-order protein assemblies, either with pathological functions or supporting vital functions, are being discovered in a wide variety of organisms from unicellular organisms, such as bacteria and yeast, to humans. The aim of this review was to give an overview of this versatile group of proteins, which expose their either detrimental or beneficial functions through monomer polymerisation/aggregation (table 1). First, the hard work leading to the recognition of mammalian prions as infectious agents was presented. Other disease-related amyloids resemble prions in their self-templating propagation, cell-to-cell transmissibility, possible existence of species barrier and strains. The difference between prions and disease-related prionoids is that conclusive evidence of transmission in non-prion amyloidoses has not been presented so far. Amyloids, in addition to being the hallmark of various neurodegenerative diseases, have important structural, storage, information transfer and protective functions (table 1), which is not surprising if one takes the stability of amyloid structures into account. Even pathological amyloid fibrils, which are not the most toxic or infectious protein species [144], have a damage control function by sequestering more toxic oligomers. There are, however, some obvious differences between pathological and functional amyloid assembly. Functional amyloid formation is highly controlled and usually depends on the presence of more than one protein in the same cell/location. The formation of pathological amyloids is very slow compared with the nucleated fibrillisation of functional amyloids. The fibrillisation of some functional amyloids can be reversible. Examples are peptide hormone granules and Balbiani bodies that can be dismembered when dissolution is needed. When hormone granules are secreted from cells functional peptide hormones are released [66]. This shows amyloid folds in a completely new light, as an ancient fold able to supporting various tasks, which can only occasionally form as a result of pathological protein misfolding.

In the present review we also focused on polymers based on death-fold domains (table 1). Death-fold signalosomes, such as MAVS and ASC filaments, are structurally very different from amyloid prions, as they are composed of filaments of polymerised death-fold domains [87, 155]. At first glance, it is like comparing apples and oranges. Specific segments of the death-fold domain adapt upon polymerisation, yet this is far from the prion protein conformational change from an α-helical to a predominantly β-sheet secondary structure. In contrast to loss-of-function yeast prions, signalosomes are gain-of-function polymers, as they signal to enzymes, which are activated by proximity-driven oligomerisation [149]. The loss of ability to polymerise correlates with the loss of signalling activity [83, 87, 153, 154]. However, oligomerisation-prone death-fold domains can replace prion domains in yeast screening. Additionally, signal-induced oligomerisation is initiated by a nucleator (e.g., RIG-I-like receptor, NLRP3, NAIP/NLRC4) and upon nucleus formation proceeds very fast. This is similar to functional amyloid formation. The major characteristic of death-fold signalosomes placing them into the prionoid group is the ability to transfer and initiate filament formation in the recipient cells [80, 88, 89]. Signalosomes are vital for normal innate immune response and efficient defence against pathogens, but they also perpetuate inflammation in autoinflammatory syndromes and in common diseases where innate immunity is activated through recognition of danger-associated molecular patterns. Prion-like or prionoid protein behaviour has been observed in a variety of situations, both vital and detrimental, and seems to serve as a way of information transfer beyond a disease-causing role.

Acknowledgment

The author is grateful to Dr. Tomaž Bratkovič for critically reading the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

This work was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (J3-5503, P4-0176 and J3-6791). No other potential conflicts of interest were declared.

Correspondence

Iva Hafner Bratkovič, PhD, Department of Synthetic Biology and Immunology, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, iva.hafner[at]ki.si

References

1 Chiti F, Dobson CM. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75(1):333–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.123901 PubMed

2 Sipe JD, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, Ikeda S, Merlini G, Saraiva MJ, et al.; Nomenclature Committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2012 recommendations from the Nomenclature Committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2012;19(4):167–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2012.734345 PubMed

3 Eisenberg D, Jucker M. The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases. Cell. 2012;148(6):1188–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.022 PubMed

4 Chiti F, Webster P, Taddei N, Clark A, Stefani M, Ramponi G, et al.Designing conditions for in vitro formation of amyloid protofilaments and fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(7):3590–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3590 PubMed

5 Xiao Y, Ma B, McElheny D, Parthasarathy S, Long F, Hoshi M, et al.Aβ(1-42) fibril structure illuminates self-recognition and replication of amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(6):499–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2991 PubMed

6 Van Melckebeke H, Wasmer C, Lange A, Ab E, Loquet A, Böckmann A, et al.Atomic-resolution three-dimensional structure of HET-s(218-289) amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(39):13765–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja104213j PubMed

7 Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al.UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1605–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084 PubMed

8 Sunde M, Serpell LC, Bartlam M, Fraser PE, Pepys MB, Blake CC. Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol. 1997;273(3):729–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1348 PubMed

9 Benzinger TL, Gregory DM, Burkoth TS, Miller-Auer H, Lynn DG, Botto RE, et al.Propagating structure of Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid(10-35) is parallel beta-sheet with residues in exact register. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(23):13407–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13407 PubMed

10 Tycko R. Solid-state NMR studies of amyloid fibril structure. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2011;62(1):279–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103539 PubMed

11 Makin OS, Atkins E, Sikorski P, Johansson J, Serpell LC. Molecular basis for amyloid fibril formation and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(2):315–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406847102 PubMed

12 Nelson R, Sawaya MR, Balbirnie M, Madsen AO, Riekel C, Grothe R, et al.Structure of the cross-beta spine of amyloid-like fibrils. Nature. 2005;435(7043):773–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03680 PubMed

13 Sawaya MR, Sambashivan S, Nelson R, Ivanova MI, Sievers SA, Apostol MI, et al.Atomic structures of amyloid cross-beta spines reveal varied steric zippers. Nature. 2007;447(7143):453–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05695 PubMed

14 Wu H, Fuxreiter M. The Structure and Dynamics of Higher-Order Assemblies: Amyloids, Signalosomes, and Granules. Cell. 2016;165(5):1055–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.004 PubMed

15 Knowles TP, Waudby CA, Devlin GL, Cohen SI, Aguzzi A, Vendruscolo M, et al.An analytical solution to the kinetics of breakable filament assembly. Science. 2009;326(5959):1533–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1178250 PubMed

16 Arosio P, Knowles TP, Linse S. On the lag phase in amyloid fibril formation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17(12):7606–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CP05563B PubMed

17 Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216(4542):136–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6801762 PubMed

18 Wang F, Wang X, Yuan CG, Ma J. Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science. 2010;327(5969):1132–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183748 PubMed

19 Baker HF, Ridley RM, Duchen LW, Crow TJ, Bruton CJ. Experimental induction of beta-amyloid plaques and cerebral angiopathy in primates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;695(1):228–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb23057.x PubMed

20 Baker HF, Ridley RM, Duchen LW, Crow TJ, Bruton CJ. Induction of beta (A4)-amyloid in primates by injection of Alzheimer’s disease brain homogenate. Comparison with transmission of spongiform encephalopathy. Mol Neurobiol. 1994;8(1):25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02778005 PubMed

21 Baker HF, Ridley RM, Wells GA. Experimental transmission of BSE and scrapie to the common marmoset. Vet Rec. 1993;132(16):403–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.132.16.403 PubMed

22 Eisele YS, Bolmont T, Heikenwalder M, Langer F, Jacobson LH, Yan ZX, et al.Induction of cerebral beta-amyloidosis: intracerebral versus systemic Abeta inoculation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(31):12926–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903200106 PubMed

23 Eisele YS, Obermüller U, Heilbronner G, Baumann F, Kaeser SA, Wolburg H, et al.Peripherally applied Abeta-containing inoculates induce cerebral beta-amyloidosis. Science. 2010;330(6006):980–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194516 PubMed

24 Langer F, Eisele YS, Fritschi SK, Staufenbiel M, Walker LC, Jucker M. Soluble Aβ seeds are potent inducers of cerebral β-amyloid deposition. J Neurosci. 2011;31(41):14488–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3088-11.2011 PubMed

25 Meyer-Luehmann M, Coomaraswamy J, Bolmont T, Kaeser S, Schaefer C, Kilger E, et al.Exogenous induction of cerebral beta-amyloidogenesis is governed by agent and host. Science. 2006;313(5794):1781–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1131864 PubMed

26 Watts JC, Condello C, Stöhr J, Oehler A, Lee J, DeArmond SJ, et al.Serial propagation of distinct strains of Aβ prions from Alzheimer’s disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(28):10323–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408900111 PubMed

27 Stöhr J, Condello C, Watts JC, Bloch L, Oehler A, Nick M, et al.Distinct synthetic Aβ prion strains producing different amyloid deposits in bigenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(28):10329–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408968111 PubMed

28 Iba M, Guo JL, McBride JD, Zhang B, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Synthetic tau fibrils mediate transmission of neurofibrillary tangles in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s-like tauopathy. J Neurosci. 2013;33(3):1024–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2642-12.2013 PubMed

29 Clavaguera F, Bolmont T, Crowther RA, Abramowski D, Frank S, Probst A, et al.Transmission and spreading of tauopathy in transgenic mouse brain. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(7):909–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1901 PubMed

30 Peeraer E, Bottelbergs A, Van Kolen K, Stancu IC, Vasconcelos B, Mahieu M, et al.Intracerebral injection of preformed synthetic tau fibrils initiates widespread tauopathy and neuronal loss in the brains of tau transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;73:83–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.032 PubMed

31 Sanders DW, Kaufman SK, DeVos SL, Sharma AM, Mirbaha H, Li A, et al.Distinct tau prion strains propagate in cells and mice and define different tauopathies. Neuron. 2014;82(6):1271–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.047 PubMed

32 Luk KC, Kehm VM, Zhang B, O’Brien P, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Intracerebral inoculation of pathological α-synuclein initiates a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative α-synucleinopathy in mice. J Exp Med. 2012;209(5):975–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20112457 PubMed

33 Masuda-Suzukake M, Nonaka T, Hosokawa M, Oikawa T, Arai T, Akiyama H, et al.Prion-like spreading of pathological α-synuclein in brain. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 4):1128–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt037 PubMed

34 Sacino AN, Brooks M, McGarvey NH, McKinney AB, Thomas MA, Levites Y, et al.Induction of CNS α-synuclein pathology by fibrillar and non-amyloidogenic recombinant α-synuclein. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1(1):38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2051-5960-1-38 PubMed

35 Jones DR, Delenclos M, Baine AT, DeTure M, Murray ME, Dickson DW, et al.Transmission of Soluble and Insoluble α-Synuclein to Mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2015;74(12):1158–69. PubMed

36 Prusiner SB, Woerman AL, Mordes DA, Watts JC, Rampersaud R, Berry DB, et al.Evidence for α-synuclein prions causing multiple system atrophy in humans with parkinsonism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):E5308–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514475112 PubMed

37 Lundmark K, Westermark GT, Nyström S, Murphy CL, Solomon A, Westermark P. Transmissibility of systemic amyloidosis by a prion-like mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(10):6979–84. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092205999 PubMed

38 Solomon A, Richey T, Murphy CL, Weiss DT, Wall JS, Westermark GT, et al.Amyloidogenic potential of foie gras. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(26):10998–1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700848104 PubMed

39 Zhang B, Une Y, Fu X, Yan J, Ge F, Yao J, et al.Fecal transmission of AA amyloidosis in the cheetah contributes to high incidence of disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(20):7263–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800367105 PubMed

40 Si K, Giustetto M, Etkin A, Hsu R, Janisiewicz AM, Miniaci MC, et al.A neuronal isoform of CPEB regulates local protein synthesis and stabilizes synapse-specific long-term facilitation in aplysia. Cell. 2003;115(7):893–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01021-3 PubMed

41 Si K, Lindquist S, Kandel ER. A neuronal isoform of the aplysia CPEB has prion-like properties. Cell. 2003;115(7):879–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01020-1 PubMed

42 Si K, Choi YB, White-Grindley E, Majumdar A, Kandel ER. Aplysia CPEB can form prion-like multimers in sensory neurons that contribute to long-term facilitation. Cell. 2010;140(3):421–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.008 PubMed

43 Keleman K, Krüttner S, Alenius M, Dickson BJ. Function of the Drosophila CPEB protein Orb2 in long-term courtship memory. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(12):1587–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1996 PubMed

44 Majumdar A, Cesario WC, White-Grindley E, Jiang H, Ren F, Khan MR, et al.Critical role of amyloid-like oligomers of Drosophila Orb2 in the persistence of memory. Cell. 2012;148(3):515–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.004 PubMed

45 Fioriti L, Myers C, Huang YY, Li X, Stephan JS, Trifilieff P, et al.The Persistence of Hippocampal-Based Memory Requires Protein Synthesis Mediated by the Prion-like Protein CPEB3. Neuron. 2015;86(6):1433–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.021 PubMed

46 Stephan JS, Fioriti L, Lamba N, Colnaghi L, Karl K, Derkatch IL, et al.The CPEB3 Protein Is a Functional Prion that Interacts with the Actin Cytoskeleton. Cell Reports. 2015;11(11):1772–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.060 PubMed

47 Drisaldi B, Colnaghi L, Fioriti L, Rao N, Myers C, Snyder AM, et al.SUMOylation Is an Inhibitory Constraint that Regulates the Prion-like Aggregation and Activity of CPEB3. Cell Reports. 2015;11(11):1694–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.061 PubMed

48 Chakrabortee S, Kayatekin C, Newby GA, Mendillo ML, Lancaster A, Lindquist S. Luminidependens (LD) is an Arabidopsis protein with prion behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(21):6065–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604478113 PubMed

49 Chapman MR, Robinson LS, Pinkner JS, Roth R, Heuser J, Hammar M, et al.Role of Escherichia coli curli operons in directing amyloid fiber formation. Science. 2002;295(5556):851–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1067484 PubMed

50 Barnhart MM, Chapman MR. Curli biogenesis and function. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60(1):131–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106 PubMed

51 Hammer ND, Schmidt JC, Chapman MR. The curli nucleator protein, CsgB, contains an amyloidogenic domain that directs CsgA polymerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(30):12494–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703310104 PubMed

52 Robinson LS, Ashman EM, Hultgren SJ, Chapman MR. Secretion of curli fibre subunits is mediated by the outer membrane-localized CsgG protein. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(3):870–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04997.x PubMed

53 Nenninger AA, Robinson LS, Hultgren SJ. Localized and efficient curli nucleation requires the chaperone-like amyloid assembly protein CsgF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(3):900–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812143106 PubMed

54 Nenninger AA, Robinson LS, Hammer ND, Epstein EA, Badtke MP, Hultgren SJ, et al.CsgE is a curli secretion specificity factor that prevents amyloid fibre aggregation. Mol Microbiol. 2011;81(2):486–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07706.x PubMed

55 Zhou Y, Smith D, Leong BJ, Brännström K, Almqvist F, Chapman MR. Promiscuous cross-seeding between bacterial amyloids promotes interspecies biofilms. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(42):35092–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.383737 PubMed

56 Branda SS, Chu F, Kearns DB, Losick R, Kolter R. A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(4):1229–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05020.x PubMed

57 Romero D, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(5):2230–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910560107 PubMed

58 Romero D, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Kolter R. An accessory protein required for anchoring and assembly of amyloid fibres in B. subtilis biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2011;80(5):1155–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07653.x PubMed

59 Stöver AG, Driks A. Secretion, localization, and antibacterial activity of TasA, a Bacillus subtilis spore-associated protein. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(5):1664–72. PubMed

60 Kearns DB, Chu F, Branda SS, Kolter R, Losick R. A master regulator for biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55(3):739–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04440.x PubMed

61 Iconomidou VA, Vriend G, Hamodrakas SJ. Amyloids protect the silkmoth oocyte and embryo. FEBS Lett. 2000;479(3):141–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01888-3 PubMed

62 Hamodrakas SJ, Hoenger A, Iconomidou VA. Amyloid fibrillogenesis of silkmoth chorion protein peptide-analogues via a liquid-crystalline intermediate phase. J Struct Biol. 2004;145(3):226–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.004 PubMed

63 Kenney JM, Knight D, Wise MJ, Vollrath F. Amyloidogenic nature of spider silk. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269(16):4159–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03112.x PubMed

64 Knight DP, Knight MM, Vollrath F. Beta transition and stress-induced phase separation in the spinning of spider dragline silk. Int J Biol Macromol. 2000;27(3):205–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(00)00124-0 PubMed

65 Vollrath F, Knight DP. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature. 2001;410(6828):541–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35069000 PubMed

66 Maji SK, Perrin MH, Sawaya MR, Jessberger S, Vadodaria K, Rissman RA, et al.Functional amyloids as natural storage of peptide hormones in pituitary secretory granules. Science. 2009;325(5938):328–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1173155 PubMed

67 Boke E, Ruer M, Wühr M, Coughlin M, Lemaitre R, Gygi SP, et al.Amyloid-like Self-Assembly of a Cellular Compartment. Cell. 2016;166(3):637–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.051 PubMed

68 Giraldo R. Defined DNA sequences promote the assembly of a bacterial protein into distinct amyloid nanostructures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(44):17388–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702006104 PubMed

69 Fernández-Tresguerres ME, de la Espina SM, Gasset-Rosa F, Giraldo R. A DNA-promoted amyloid proteinopathy in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77(6):1456–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07299.x PubMed

70 Gasset-Rosa F, Coquel AS, Moreno-Del Álamo M, Chen P, Song X, Serrano AM, et al.Direct assessment in bacteria of prionoid propagation and phenotype selection by Hsp70 chaperone. Mol Microbiol. 2014;91(6):1070–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12518 PubMed

71 Molina-García L, Gasset-Rosa F, Moreno-Del Álamo M, Fernández-Tresguerres ME, Moreno-Díaz de la Espina S, Lurz R, et al.Functional amyloids as inhibitors of plasmid DNA replication. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25425 PubMed

72 Fowler DM, Koulov AV, Alory-Jost C, Marks MS, Balch WE, Kelly JW. Functional amyloid formation within mammalian tissue. PLoS Biol. 2005;4(1):e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040006 PubMed

73 Wickner RB. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1994;264(5158):566–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7909170 PubMed

74 Patino MM, Liu JJ, Glover JR, Lindquist S. Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science. 1996;273(5275):622–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5275.622 PubMed

75 Paushkin SV, Kushnirov VV, Smirnov VN, Ter-Avanesyan MD. In vitro propagation of the prion-like state of yeast Sup35 protein. Science. 1997;277(5324):381–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.381 PubMed

76 Sparrer HE, Santoso A, Szoka FC, Weissman JS. Evidence for the prion hypothesis: induction of the yeast [PSI+] factor by in vitro- converted Sup35 protein. Science. 2000;289(5479):595–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5479.595 PubMed

77 Bradley ME, Edskes HK, Hong JY, Wickner RB, Liebman SW. Interactions among prions and prion “strains” in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(Suppl 4):16392–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152330699 PubMed

78 Tanaka M, Collins SR, Toyama BH, Weissman JS. The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes. Nature. 2006;442(7102):585–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04922 PubMed

79 Cai X, Chen J, Xu H, Liu S, Jiang QX, Halfmann R, et al.Prion-like polymerization underlies signal transduction in antiviral immune defense and inflammasome activation. Cell. 2014;156(6):1207–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.063 PubMed

80 Hou F, Sun L, Zheng H, Skaug B, Jiang QX, Chen ZJ. MAVS forms functional prion-like aggregates to activate and propagate antiviral innate immune response. Cell. 2011;146(3):448–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.041 PubMed

81 Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK, Chen ZJ. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell. 2005;122(5):669–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012 PubMed

82 Tang ED, Wang CY. MAVS self-association mediates antiviral innate immune signaling. J Virol. 2009;83(8):3420–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02623-08 PubMed

83 Xu H, He X, Zheng H, Huang LJ, Hou F, Yu Z, et al.Structural basis for the prion-like MAVS filaments in antiviral innate immunity. eLife. 2014;3:e01489. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01489 PubMed

84 Hu Z, Zhou Q, Zhang C, Fan S, Cheng W, Zhao Y, et al.Structural and biochemical basis for induced self-propagation of NLRC4. Science. 2015;350(6259):399–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac5489 PubMed

85 Zhang L, Chen S, Ruan J, Wu J, Tong AB, Yin Q, et al.Cryo-EM structure of the activated NAIP2-NLRC4 inflammasome reveals nucleated polymerization. Science. 2015;350(6259):404–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac5789 PubMed

86 Diebolder CA, Halff EF, Koster AJ, Huizinga EG, Koning RI. Cryoelectron Tomography of the NAIP5/NLRC4 Inflammasome: Implications for NLR Activation. Structure. 2015;23(12):2349–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.10.001 PubMed

87 Lu A, Magupalli VG, Ruan J, Yin Q, Atianand MK, Vos MR, et al.Unified polymerization mechanism for the assembly of ASC-dependent inflammasomes. Cell. 2014;156(6):1193–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.008 PubMed

88 Baroja-Mazo A, Martín-Sánchez F, Gomez AI, Martínez CM, Amores-Iniesta J, Compan V, et al.The NLRP3 inflammasome is released as a particulate danger signal that amplifies the inflammatory response. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(8):738–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2919 PubMed

89 Franklin BS, Bossaller L, De Nardo D, Ratter JM, Stutz A, Engels G, et al.The adaptor ASC has extracellular and ‘prionoid’ activities that propagate inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(8):727–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2913 PubMed

90 Li J, McQuade T, Siemer AB, Napetschnig J, Moriwaki K, Hsiao YS, et al.The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell. 2012;150(2):339–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.019 PubMed

91 Aguzzi A, Polymenidou M. Mammalian prion biology: one century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2004;116(2):313–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01031-6 PubMed

92 Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(23):13363–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 PubMed

93 Aguzzi A, Calella AM. Prions: protein aggregation and infectious diseases. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(4):1105–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2009 PubMed

94 Küffer A, Lakkaraju AK, Mogha A, Petersen SC, Airich K, Doucerain C, et al.The prion protein is an agonistic ligand of the G protein-coupled receptor Adgrg6. Nature. 2016;536(7617):464–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19312 PubMed

95 Brown P, Brandel JP, Sato T, Nakamura Y, MacKenzie J, Will RG, et al.Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, final assessment. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(6):901–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1806.120116 PubMed

96 Gajdusek DC, Gibbs CJ, Alpers M. Experimental transmission of a Kuru-like syndrome to chimpanzees. Nature. 1966;209(5025):794–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/209794a0 PubMed

97 Griffith JS. Self-replication and scrapie. Nature. 1967;215(5105):1043–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/2151043a0 PubMed

98 Büeler H, Aguzzi A, Sailer A, Greiner RA, Autenried P, Aguet M, et al.Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell. 1993;73(7):1339–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90360-3 PubMed

99 Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24(1):519–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519 PubMed

100 Eraña H, Castilla J. The architecture of prions: how understanding would provide new therapeutic insights. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14354. PubMed

101 Caughey B, Raymond GJ, Bessen RA. Strain-dependent differences in beta-sheet conformations of abnormal prion protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(48):32230–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.48.32230 PubMed

102 Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HO, Riesner D, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, et al.Synthetic mammalian prions. Science. 2004;305(5684):673–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1100195 PubMed

103 Colby DW, Giles K, Legname G, Wille H, Baskakov IV, DeArmond SJ, et al.Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(48):20417–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910350106 PubMed

104 Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Bocharova O, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, et al.Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(2):177–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x PubMed

105 Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature. 2001;411(6839):810–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35081095 PubMed

106 Castilla J, Saá P, Hetz C, Soto C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell. 2005;121(2):195–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.011 PubMed

107 Atarashi R, Moore RA, Sim VL, Hughson AG, Dorward DW, Onwubiko HA, et al.Ultrasensitive detection of scrapie prion protein using seeded conversion of recombinant prion protein. Nat Methods. 2007;4(8):645–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1066 PubMed

108 Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Wang F, Wang X, Xu Y, Yang H, et al.De novo generation of infectious prions with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. FASEB J. 2013;27(12):4768–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.13-233965 PubMed

109 Guo JL, Lee VM. Cell-to-cell transmission of pathogenic proteins in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2014;20(2):130–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.3457 PubMed

110 Eraña H, Venegas V, Moreno J, Castilla J. Prion-like disorders and Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies: An overview of the mechanistic features that are shared by the various disease-related misfolded proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;S0006-291X(16)31430-9. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.166 PubMed

111 Ashe KH, Aguzzi A. Prions, prionoids and pathogenic proteins in Alzheimer disease. Prion. 2013;7(1):55–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/pri.23061 PubMed

112 Aguzzi A, Rajendran L. The transcellular spread of cytosolic amyloids, prions, and prionoids. Neuron. 2009;64(6):783–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.016 PubMed

113 Chia R, Tattum MH, Jones S, Collinge J, Fisher EM, Jackson GS. Superoxide dismutase 1 and tgSOD1 mouse spinal cord seed fibrils, suggesting a propagative cell death mechanism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010627 PubMed

114 Laferriere F, Polymenidou M. Advances and challenges in understanding the multifaceted pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14054. PubMed

115 Nussbaum JM, Schilling S, Cynis H, Silva A, Swanson E, Wangsanut T, et al.Prion-like behaviour and tau-dependent cytotoxicity of pyroglutamylated amyloid-β. Nature. 2012;485(7400):651–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11060 PubMed

116 Jaunmuktane Z, Mead S, Ellis M, Wadsworth JD, Nicoll AJ, Kenny J, et al.Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-β pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nature. 2015;525(7568):247–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15369 PubMed

117 Frontzek K, Lutz MI, Aguzzi A, Kovacs GG, Budka H. Amyloid-β pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy are frequent in iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after dural grafting. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14287. PubMed

118 Liebman SW, Chernoff YO. Prions in yeast. Genetics. 2012;191(4):1041–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.137760 PubMed

119 Wickner RB. Yeast and Fungal Prions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(9):a023531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a023531 PubMed

120 Masison DC, Wickner RB. Prion-inducing domain of yeast Ure2p and protease resistance of Ure2p in prion-containing cells. Science. 1995;270(5233):93–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5233.93 PubMed

121 Michelitsch MD, Weissman JS. A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(22):11910–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.22.11910 PubMed

122 Sondheimer N, Lindquist S. Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol Cell. 2000;5(1):163–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80412-8 PubMed

123 Tuite MF. Yeast prions and their prion-forming domain. Cell. 2000;100(3):289–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80663-7 PubMed

124 Alberti S, Halfmann R, King O, Kapila A, Lindquist S. A systematic survey identifies prions and illuminates sequence features of prionogenic proteins. Cell. 2009;137(1):146–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.044 PubMed

125 Wickner RB, Kelly AC. Prions are affected by evolution at two levels. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(6):1131–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2109-6 PubMed

126 Krammer C, Kryndushkin D, Suhre MH, Kremmer E, Hofmann A, Pfeifer A, et al.The yeast Sup35NM domain propagates as a prion in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(2):462–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811571106 PubMed

127 Hofmann JP, Denner P, Nussbaum-Krammer C, Kuhn PH, Suhre MH, Scheibel T, et al.Cell-to-cell propagation of infectious cytosolic protein aggregates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(15):5951–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217321110 PubMed

128 de Moor CH, Richter JD. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements mediate masking and unmasking of cyclin B1 mRNA. EMBO J. 1999;18(8):2294–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.8.2294 PubMed

129 Miniaci MC, Kim JH, Puthanveettil SV, Si K, Zhu H, Kandel ER, et al.Sustained CPEB-dependent local protein synthesis is required to stabilize synaptic growth for persistence of long-term facilitation in Aplysia. Neuron. 2008;59(6):1024–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.036 PubMed

130 Fiumara F, Rajasethupathy P, Antonov I, Kosmidis S, Sossin WS, Kandel ER. MicroRNA-22 Gates Long-Term Heterosynaptic Plasticity in Aplysia through Presynaptic Regulation of CPEB and Downstream Targets. Cell Reports. 2015;11(12):1866–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.034 PubMed

131 White-Grindley E, Li L, Mohammad Khan R, Ren F, Saraf A, Florens L, et al.Contribution of Orb2A stability in regulated amyloid-like oligomerization of Drosophila Orb2. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(2):e1001786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001786 PubMed

132 Chao HW, Tsai LY, Lu YL, Lin PY, Huang WH, Chou HJ, et al.Deletion of CPEB3 enhances hippocampus-dependent memory via increasing expressions of PSD95 and NMDA receptors. J Neurosci. 2013;33(43):17008–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3043-13.2013 PubMed

133 Kinoshita T, Seki M. Epigenetic memory for stress response and adaptation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(11):1859–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu125 PubMed

134 Lancaster AK, Nutter-Upham A, Lindquist S, King OD. PLAAC: a web and command-line application to identify proteins with prion-like amino acid composition. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(17):2501–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu310 PubMed

135 Blanco LP, Evans ML, Smith DR, Badtke MP, Chapman MR. Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20(2):66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.005 PubMed

136 Romero D, Kolter R. Functional amyloids in bacteria. Int Microbiol. 2014;17(2):65–73. PubMed

137 Carrió M, González-Montalbán N, Vera A, Villaverde A, Ventura S. Amyloid-like properties of bacterial inclusion bodies. J Mol Biol. 2005;347(5):1025–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.030 PubMed

138 Villaverde A. Bacterial inclusion bodies: an emerging platform for drug delivery and cell therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2012;7(9):1277–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.100 PubMed

139 Slotta U, Hess S, Spiess K, Stromer T, Serpell L, Scheibel T. Spider silk and amyloid fibrils: a structural comparison. Macromol Biosci. 2007;7(2):183–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600201 PubMed

140 Monks JN, Yan B, Hawkins N, Vollrath F, Wang Z. Spider Silk: Mother Nature’s Bio-Superlens. Nano Lett. 2016;16(9):5842–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02641 PubMed

141 Rising A, Johansson J. Toward spinning artificial spider silk. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(5):309–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1789 PubMed

142 Tokareva O, Jacobsen M, Buehler M, Wong J, Kaplan DL. Structure-function-property-design interplay in biopolymers: spider silk. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(4):1612–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.020 PubMed

143 Knowles TP, Mezzenga R. Amyloid Fibrils as Building Blocks for Natural and Artificial Functional Materials. Adv Mater. 2016;28(31):6546–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201505961 PubMed

144 Silveira JR, Raymond GJ, Hughson AG, Race RE, Sim VL, Hayes SF, et al.The most infectious prion protein particles. Nature. 2005;437(7056):257–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03989 PubMed

145 Caughey B, Lansbury PT. Protofibrils, pores, fibrils, and neurodegeneration: separating the responsible protein aggregates from the innocent bystanders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26(1):267–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081142 PubMed

146 Richardson BE, Lehmann R. Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(1):37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2815 PubMed

147 Dosch R, Wagner DS, Mintzer KA, Runke G, Wiemelt AP, Mullins MC. Maternal control of vertebrate development before the midblastula transition: mutants from the zebrafish I. Dev Cell. 2004;6(6):771–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.002 PubMed

148 Marlow FL, Mullins MC. Bucky ball functions in Balbiani body assembly and animal-vegetal polarity in the oocyte and follicle cell layer in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008;321(1):40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.557 PubMed

149 Wu H. Higher-order assemblies in a new paradigm of signal transduction. Cell. 2013;153(2):287–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.013 PubMed

150 Ferrao R, Wu H. Helical assembly in the death domain (DD) superfamily. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012;22(2):241–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2012.02.006 PubMed

151 Zeng W, Sun L, Jiang X, Chen X, Hou F, Adhikari A, et al.Reconstitution of the RIG-I pathway reveals a signaling role of unanchored polyubiquitin chains in innate immunity. Cell. 2010;141(2):315–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.029 PubMed

152 Shi Y, Yuan B, Qi N, Zhu W, Su J, Li X, et al.An autoinhibitory mechanism modulates MAVS activity in antiviral innate immune response. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8811 PubMed

153 Peisley A, Wu B, Yao H, Walz T, Hur S. RIG-I forms signaling-competent filaments in an ATP-dependent, ubiquitin-independent manner. Mol Cell. 2013;51(5):573–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.024 PubMed

154 Peisley A, Wu B, Xu H, Chen ZJ, Hur S. Structural basis for ubiquitin-mediated antiviral signal activation by RIG-I. Nature. 2014;509(7498):110–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13140 PubMed

155 Wu B, Peisley A, Tetrault D, Li Z, Egelman EH, Magor KE, et al.Molecular imprinting as a signal-activation mechanism of the viral RNA sensor RIG-I. Mol Cell. 2014;55(4):511–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.010 PubMed

156 Dick MS, Sborgi L, Rühl S, Hiller S, Broz P. ASC filament formation serves as a signal amplification mechanism for inflammasomes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11929 PubMed

157 Wu B, Peisley A, Richards C, Yao H, Zeng X, Lin C, et al.Structural basis for dsRNA recognition, filament formation, and antiviral signal activation by MDA5. Cell. 2013;152(1-2):276–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.048 PubMed

158 Gack MU, Shin YC, Joo CH, Urano T, Liang C, Sun L, et al.TRIM25 RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for RIG-I-mediated antiviral activity. Nature. 2007;446(7138):916–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05732 PubMed

159 Wu B, Hur S. How RIG-I like receptors activate MAVS. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;12:91–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2015.04.004 PubMed

160 Rutsch F, MacDougall M, Lu C, Buers I, Mamaeva O, Nitschke Y, et al.A specific IFIH1 gain-of-function mutation causes Singleton-Merten syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(2):275–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.014 PubMed

161 Rice GI, del Toro Duany Y, Jenkinson EM, Forte GM, Anderson BH, Ariaudo G, et al.Gain-of-function mutations in IFIH1 cause a spectrum of human disease phenotypes associated with upregulated type I interferon signaling. Nat Genet. 2014;46(5):503–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2933 PubMed

162 Yoo YS, Park YY, Kim JH, Cho H, Kim SH, Lee HS, et al.The mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase MARCH5 resolves MAVS aggregates during antiviral signalling. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8910 PubMed

163 Kayagaki N, Stowe IB, Lee BL, O’Rourke K, Anderson K, Warming S, et al.Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature. 2015;526(7575):666–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15541 PubMed

164 Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, et al.Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526(7575):660–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature15514 PubMed

165 Ding J, Wang K, Liu W, She Y, Sun Q, Shi J, et al.Pore-forming activity and structural autoinhibition of the gasdermin family. Nature. 2016;535(7610):111–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18590 PubMed

166 Liu X, Zhang Z, Ruan J, Pan Y, Magupalli VG, Wu H, et al.Inflammasome-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature. 2016;535(7610):153–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18629 PubMed

167 Sborgi L, Rühl S, Mulvihill E, Pipercevic J, Heilig R, Stahlberg H, et al.GSDMD membrane pore formation constitutes the mechanism of pyroptotic cell death. EMBO J. 2016;35(16):1766–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201694696 PubMed

168 Aglietti RA, Estevez A, Gupta A, Ramirez MG, Liu PS, Kayagaki N, et al.GsdmD p30 elicited by caspase-11 during pyroptosis forms pores in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(28):7858–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607769113 PubMed

169 Vance RE. The NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasomes. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;32:84–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2015.01.010 PubMed

170 Zhao Y, Shao F. The NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome in innate immune detection of bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Immunol Rev. 2015;265(1):85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12293 PubMed

171 Hu Z, Yan C, Liu P, Huang Z, Ma R, Zhang C, et al.Crystal structure of NLRC4 reveals its autoinhibition mechanism. Science. 2013;341(6142):172–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1236381 PubMed

172 Tenthorey JL, Kofoed EM, Daugherty MD, Malik HS, Vance RE. Molecular basis for specific recognition of bacterial ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasomes. Mol Cell. 2014;54(1):17–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.018 PubMed

173 Lu A, Li Y, Schmidt FI, Yin Q, Chen S, Fu TM, et al.Molecular basis of caspase-1 polymerization and its inhibition by a new capping mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(5):416–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3199 PubMed

174 Schmidt FI, Lu A, Chen JW, Ruan J, Tang C, Wu H, et al.A single domain antibody fragment that recognizes the adaptor ASC defines the role of ASC domains in inflammasome assembly. J Exp Med. 2016;213(5):771–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20151790 PubMed

175 Canna SW, de Jesus AA, Gouni S, Brooks SR, Marrero B, Liu Y, et al.An activating NLRC4 inflammasome mutation causes autoinflammation with recurrent macrophage activation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1140–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.3089 PubMed

176 Romberg N, Al Moussawi K, Nelson-Williams C, Stiegler AL, Loring E, Choi M, et al.Mutation of NLRC4 causes a syndrome of enterocolitis and autoinflammation. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1135–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.3066 PubMed

177 Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O’Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, et al.Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440(7081):228–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04515 PubMed

178 Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04516 PubMed

179 Halle A, Hornung V, Petzold GC, Stewart CR, Monks BG, Reinheckel T, et al.The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-beta. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):857–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1636 PubMed

180 Hafner-Bratkovič I, Benčina M, Fitzgerald KA, Golenbock D, Jerala R. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophage cell lines by prion protein fibrils as the source of IL-1β and neuronal toxicity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(24):4215–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1140-0 PubMed

181 Hornung V, Ablasser A, Charrel-Dennis M, Bauernfeind F, Horvath G, Caffrey DR, et al.AIM2 recognizes cytosolic dsDNA and forms a caspase-1-activating inflammasome with ASC. Nature. 2009;458(7237):514–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07725 PubMed

182 Fernandes-Alnemri T, Wu J, Yu JW, Datta P, Miller B, Jankowski W, et al.The pyroptosome: a supramolecular assembly of ASC dimers mediating inflammatory cell death via caspase-1 activation. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14(9):1590–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402194 PubMed

183 Broz P, von Moltke J, Jones JW, Vance RE, Monack DM. Differential requirement for Caspase-1 autoproteolysis in pathogen-induced cell death and cytokine processing. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(6):471–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.11.007 PubMed

184 Case CL, Shin S, Roy CR. Asc and Ipaf Inflammasomes direct distinct pathways for caspase-1 activation in response to Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun. 2009;77(5):1981–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01382-08 PubMed

185 Mariathasan S, Newton K, Monack DM, Vucic D, French DM, Lee WP, et al.Differential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf. Nature. 2004;430(6996):213–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02664 PubMed

186 Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad EO, Kono H, Rock KL, et al.Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):847–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1631 PubMed

187 Adamczak S, Dale G, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Bullock MR, Dietrich WD, Keane RW. Inflammasome proteins in cerebrospinal fluid of brain-injured patients as biomarkers of functional outcome. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(6):1119–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.JNS12815 PubMed

188 de Rivero Vaccari JP, Lotocki G, Alonso OF, Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD, Keane RW. Therapeutic neutralization of the NLRP1 inflammasome reduces the innate immune response and improves histopathology after traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29(7):1251–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2009.46 PubMed

189 Kagan JC, Magupalli VG, Wu H. SMOCs: supramolecular organizing centres that control innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(12):821–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri3757 PubMed

190 Qiao Q, Yang C, Zheng C, Fontán L, David L, Yu X, et al.Structural architecture of the CARMA1/Bcl10/MALT1 signalosome: nucleation-induced filamentous assembly. Mol Cell. 2013;51(6):766–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.032 PubMed

191 Yang J, Liu Z, Xiao TS. Post-translational regulation of inflammasomes. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(1):65–79. [Epub ahead of print 2016 Jun 27] http://www.nature.com/cmi/journal/v14/n1/full/cmi201629a.html PubMed

192 Agostini L, Martinon F, Burns K, McDermott MF, Hawkins PN, Tschopp J. NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity. 2004;20(3):319–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00046-9 PubMed

Appendix: Glossary

     Term     Definition
     ASC     Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD domain is adaptor protein, containing pyrin and CARD domain. It forms inflammasomes downstream of activated NLRs.
     Inflammasome(s)     Cytosolic multiprotein complexes for activation of inflammatory caspases.
     MAVS     Mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein is an adaptor protein, which upon binding to viral RNA-activated RLRs polymerizes, activates cytosolic kinases, which in turn activate transcription factors to induce antiviral signaling.
     NLRs     Nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat domain-containing receptors are cytosolic pattern recognition receptors of pathogen-associated molecular patterns and danger-associated molecular patterns. Some of the members of this family of proteins form inflammasomes.
     Prion     Proteinaceous infectious particle lacking coding nucleic acids, the causative agent of prion diseases.
     Prionoid     Prion-like protein, a protein with a prion-like propagation (and cell-to-cell transmission)
     PrPc     Cellular prion protein, the normal version of prion protein
     PrPSc     Abnormal isoform of prion protein resulting from conformational transition of the cellular prion protein.
     RLRs     Rig-I-like receptors are cytosolic pattern recognition receptors detecting viral RNA.

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!

close